Giant Wolf Epidemic: Huge Packs Of Giant Canadian Gray Wolves Are Terrifying Idaho Residents

This is obviously photoshopped. There is no way a man of his stature could carry an animal that big. Stupid people who believe it. Stupid hunters. It's a shame that man feels so threatened by an animal that they have to kill it. Stop the senseless murder and learn to stay out of the wild animals path. They were there first. Not us.

Human Beings are by far and away the most efficient and effective destroyers of their own habitat, environment and ecosystem that nature, in her infinite wisdom, has ever seen fit to produce (I have positively no doubt whatsoever that she does now, and will for the rest of her life, deeply and profoundly regrets that decision).

Those individual human beings that were fully capable of coexisting symbiotically with the Earth’s natural ecology have, for the most part, long since been systematically exterminated down to the very last man, woman and child, and their societies’ cultures and civilizations annihilated from the face of the planet, never to be seen nor heard from again in known recorded history.

Human beings destroy the natural ecology of the Earth’s ecosystems far more effectively, and more efficiently, than anything else, terrestrial or otherwise, in the multi-billion-year history of life on Planet Earth. Our race regularly predictably, and routinely annihilates entire species that we have not yet discovered, much less classified, and more often than not do not even know exist at all.

The exponential proportions of Human mass-procreation rival the equivalent of a highly infectious and easily multi-vector transmittable pandemic plague.

The process of Descent with Modification through Natural Selection, known in shorthand as Evolution, has produced a nearly hairless bipedal terrestrial primate with a relatively large brain for its body size, but with relatively very poor olfactory and auditory senses as well as visual acuity when compared to other mammalian species. The ape’s heavy dense bones do not permit flight and greatly hinder its swimming capabilities, and it’s mostly hairless and thin (easily punctured) skin and fleshy musculature make it vulnerable susceptible to the elements in harsh environments, necessitating its constant construction of artificial housing structures to live in.

And so what makes human beings so special?

We’ve only been on this earth for less than two million years.
There are other species all around us that have been around here for tens, and even hundred of millions of years.
There are countless innumerable species in the world that single-handedly outnumber human beings tens of thousand, or even millions to one.
There are numerous species with lager brains than we have.
Many species have by far an away better immune systems than we have.
Many have better lung capacity, hardier digestive systems, and much more efficient and effective food and energy processing.
Just about every warm-blooded species on earth has better senses than we have, by thousands of orders of magnitude.
And there are numerous species in this world tat are one hell of a lot tougher, stronger, faster, and harder to kill.

So by what possible logic could one consider humans to possibly be anywhere near even remotely approaching being the “dominant” species on this Planet Earth?

what if thats just a small man? :3

"...And the Lord Said: 'Go Forth and Be Fruitful and Multiply and Replenish the Earth and Subdue It. and Have Dominion Over the Fish of the Sea, the Fowl of the Air, and Every Living thing that Moves'..."
"...And the Lord Said: 'Behold, I Give Unto Thee the Power to Reason and to Think and to Imagine..."
-Bereshit [Book of Genesis], Pentateuch, Sefer Torah Shebichtav'al Peh [Books of Moses], Old Testament, Judeo-Christian Bible

This IS a photoshopped picture. Saw one right next to a postcard of a jackalope and a truck sized bull trout in Gupta's Stinker Station on Cole Road. Try not to waste too much time on the "story"!

Quick! Send in Sarah Palin to hunt them from atop a helicopter!

This is bogus.

voted down

Couldn't find a legitimate site that carried the story:

Did find this though. >>1st and 3rd paragraphs especially note.

Aerial hunting of the Arctic Wolf has now been legalized in Alaska in hopes that shooting the wolves will increase the population of caribou for hunters to kill. It usually takes the wolves a long time to die in agony. The wolf co-exists in a symbiotic relationship with other animals, and kills its prey quickly and mercifully for food, which weeds out the old and sick animals. Hunters kill the biggest, best, and healthiest animals for a stuffed trophy.

According to all leading wolf biologists, wolves are terrified of humans, probably because wolves have been persecuted for so long. There has NEVER been a single person killed by a healthy wolf in the lower 48 states and even attacks are extremely rare. Wolves are very curious, but they avoid people at all costs. Even wolves in captivity shy away from people, and will not make eye contact. Unlike other predators, wolves make their presence known, communicate readily with other pack members, and signal that humans are to be avoided. The best way to prevent being attacked if you are confronted by a wolf is to NOT run away. Stand tall, act dominant and yell. NEVER hit a wolf or provoke a wolf. It's a form of suicide. Rabid wolves will attack people, but attacks from healthy ones are fabrications or extreme exaggerations. Sometimes wolves try to take the sleeping bags of campers, but are not interested in people. Wolves are large carnivores, not demons, and should be treated with the same respect due any potentially dangerous wild animal.

The only people supporting the extinction of wolves are the ignorant misinformed, livestock farmers, hunters, and the unethical academics and politicians who are on the payroll of the hunters and farmers. "The north woods of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan are healthier ecosystems because of the presence of wolves,” said Steve Williams, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

http://wolfanti-defamationleague.blogspot.com/

Did anyone check their passports?
If a Canadian wolf has puppies in Idaho, are they "Anchor puppies"?
Wolves could be used by Canadian cartels to smuggle in drugs.
Canadian Wolves will soon be the new choice for cheap labor. They don't require health care, they don't need raises, they can't pay taxes, they can't even own houses, nor do they require training or education, also you can pay them in food.

I say we relocate these wolves to the Mexican border. We'll deputize the wolves, and give them free rein along the border. -It will definitely make people think twice before crossing over on foot. Plus, the wolves will never go hungry.
Problem solved, crisis averted....your welcome.

It was photoshopped. But the Right will believe anything and wolves are evil.
The Bible says so.

BEWARE! You are entering a snuff shot zone. One of our number can't post enough dead wolf photos.

that midget is trying to carry his doggy

End hunting, it should be for people who have no other access to food supply. It should be for people that are not in contact with a regular source of food. Fishing needs to be cut way back before we screw up the oceans any more. Eat more vegtables and fruit. If you need to hunt something hunt easter eggs.

So killing them is the answer???? So by that logic whenever something destructive comes into a habit you should destroy it....so that means all cities in every country should be demolished and every human who lives a life without any regards to the ecosystem it inhabits should be destroyed as well. Just following your logic buddy.

Well, we knew Canada had to invade sometime- and it looks like they are doing it with werewolves!

We need some patriotic American vampires to launch a counter attack!

That looks photoshopped. Like the photos of the guy holding the giant house cat. I'm not sure I buy this story. Even if it were true, how is it possible that in just 16 years, the normal wolves that were introduced into the wild suddenly "mutate" into hulked-out Project X monsters. Sounds and smells very fishy. Or....um....wolfy.

...that's just a big cuddly puppy dog...

it's pretty pathetic that some want to kill off all of the creatures in the wild just because they think they are dangerous or pose an inconvenience to them. If you're scared of wild animals, stay out of the wild.

simple, first off, gray wolves are not an invasive species. They are very much native to North America. You want to to invasive species, talk about cattle and how much damage they do. If you are afraid to go camping because of the big bad wolf, don't go camping. Stay out of the wilderness areas.

Common sense should tell you that any wild animal can be dangerous, but it's obvious people single out the wolf because they have an agenda. They either hunt or ranch or do both. If you think gray wolves are big, you'd be scared at the size of dire wolves which were bigger than gray wolves.

Oh I'm sure.
Sounds like someone putting the case for dickless gun-nuts to go on a shooting spree.

-On the other side of the coin- Yes, it IS true that large wild packs CAN indeed be dangerous to animals and humans. Ignore this "giant" crap though, even a pack of medium sized dogs 20 strong are dangerous to anything that gets in its way, so people should exersize sensible precautions and packs should be controlled as a last resort if needed.

Damn that is cool, we need more wolfs and to expand their habitat. prosecute the bastard in the picture for killing the defenseless puppy. Your a big man now aren't you, murdering animals that basically don't have a chance against you.

It's probably the radiation from Chernobyl that mutated the big bad wolves.
I hope they eat us all!

This story stinks of propoganda. I call B.S. on this one.

When the leader of the wolf pack was contacted, he only had this to say,"Remove scenes depicting wolves from the movie "Twilight" and we will go."

I have been in these woods , and NOT seen such wolves , the ones i did see were shy of me , and i am a small person . Alone . Must've been some work to bait them , and nothing at all to be proud of .

Where is the Headline: "Homo Sapien Pandemic: Idaho Humans Terrorize Canadian Grey Wolves"?

This would be awesome if it were a movie...and if i didnt live in idaho

Its my fault I've been feeding them RAW BANKSTERS!!!!! LOL I hope they come for you in your sleep .... I particularly like the line "if you see this creatures DO NOT APPROACH!" ha hahahaha yessssssss my plan is working perfectly hahahhahahaha The end is Nigh ! RUn giant wolves in wait where IDAHo oh who gives a F***... This is going where it should stay The TRASH CAN BABY :)

no one calls them that anymore. The "native" wolf was a gray wolf aka canis lupis. That wolf was wiped out by the feds. I know you will probably deny this because it doesn't suit your agenda, but that is the fact of the matter. Irremotus was wiped out by the feds so they reintroduced the gray wolf. No one knows how much the "native" wolves weighed because no one weighed them when they were being killed off and I doubt anyone bothered or cared to. The wolves in Idaho are a lot smaller than hunters/ranchers will tell you. Wolves in Idaho are 80-110 pounds. Much smaller than the supersized wolf that some assume they are. Wolves don't kill for fun. That is another myth spread by the hunters/ranchers, the ones who despise wolves. That's called surplus killing and it happens from time to time. Wolves will come back for their prey unless the animal is disturbed by humans. Even if wolves don't eat their prey, the other animals in the ecosystem will. Wolves provide food for other animals. If you knew anything, you'd know Utah has no wolves and don't tell me to educate myself, when all you've been doing is posting misinformation. Wolves belong in the wild. If you don't like it, too bad.

Wolves kill other animals. That is what they are supposed to be doing and there is nothing wrong with that. Sometimes people don't want to accept the reality of nature and how brutal it can be and don't want to accept that wild animals kill other wild animals and that is perfectly natural behavior on their part. Cannot fault them for that. the "canadian" gray wolf is indeed native to the rockies. It's been documented gray wolves naturally migrating over to Idaho and other surrounding states. There is no scientific evidence what so ever that says that gray wolves in Canada were never in Idaho. Many experts from all over the world know that wolves travel amazing distances and realize that don't care about human made boundaries. These wolves were in Montana, idaho, and wy way before wolf reintroduction ever took place. The wolf opponents have a lot of misinformation they claim is true when it isn't.

Comment regarding the wolf pictured in the main post: This wolf was shot in Drayton Valley, Alberta which is near Edmonton about 3 hours North of Calgary. The wolf weighed over 230 lbs smashing the previous record of 175 lbs. Wouldn't want to run into this puppy in the woods. Apparently a bear hunter witnessed this wolf chase off a big black bear at his baiting station.

Seriously? Must've got this from fox

http://www.snopes.com/photos/hunting/graphics/idahowolf.jpg

and another monster, this one shot in the Salmon area of Idaho. I sure as hell wouldn't want this large of a predator to start overpopulating in my backyard! Say what you want, but these things can will and do kill other wildlife, livestock, pets, and eventually people...

Canadian grey wolf not native to the Rockies (http://www.standard.net/topics/opinion/2010/10/04/canadian-grey-wolf-not-native-...)

(UNEDITED)In response to the letter "Game agencies should not be in charge of wolves" the letter writer is misinformed as are most people regarding the reintroduction of wolves in Idaho and other states. The timberwolf is the original wolf that existed in the Rockies and remained in small pockets until the introduction of the much larger non-native pack animal the Canadian grey wolf which is a different sub-species. The newly introduced wolves are not on the endangered list due to their extensive numbers and range in their native Canada. I agree that wolves once roamed freely in the Rockies and should do so now. However, it is irresponsible to introduce a non-native sub species and call it the same as the original endangered sub species and cause problems for hunters and ranchers. I think wolf numbers are at higher numbers than most people think, just ask those who hunt and work in the outdoors. In 35 years of hunting in Idaho and other states I never say the wasteful destruction of animals from any predator, wolf included, that the Canadian wolf does. When you see a wolf pack eviscerate an animal for fun or corner farm animals in a pen for sport you may think differently. I think wolves should be managed the same as bear or lion, the numbers are managed and seasons set depending on numbers. Utah would do well to start a wolf management program before the situation gets out of hand as in Idaho and Montana. Please educate yourselves on the true facts about the introduction of wolves. If you like to watch wolves in a nice setting, go to the zoo. To see how they really are, actually go into the wild and see for yourself. You will watch your backtrail after that.

Todd Cook

Ogden

The wolves reintroduced are gray wolves and are the same animal as the ones that were wiped out. It's a common myth that there were "native" wolves in Idaho and surrounding states. yes, there were a small population of wolves, but these were not the wolves that were exterminated by the feds and yes, contrary to populat belief among the wolf haters, the federal government did kill off the wolves and that is why wolves were reintroduced. Valerius Geist also recently debunked the argument that the wrong wolf was reintroduced. he said any wolf reintroduced in idaho would be around the same size because of the food sources, mainly elk. There is no scientic evidence what so ever that suggests that the wolves reintroduced were different than the ones killed off. All experts/scientists recognize there is no difference between any gray wolf. They are all the same and they all kill elk, deer, etc, game animals that hunters don't want wolves killing and that is why hunters despise predators such as wolves. The deer and elk are the wolves food source. They need those animals to survive on. As for wolf sizes, the wolves in Idaho, Montana, wyoming, etc are a lot smaller than the wolf opponents will tell you, then again, most of them never even weighed a wolf, so they are just basing their beliefs on assumptions and misinformation. Here is the truth. the wolves shot by hunters back in 2009-2010 weighed anywhere from 80 to 110 pounds. One was around 120. There is a lot of misinformation and lies coming from those that despise the wolves, mainly the hunters and the ranchers. These same wolves that were reintroduced have been crossing the border to get into Idaho for decades and decades. The wolf opponents do not care what kind of wolf is in their state. they hate all wolves equally because all wolves act the same and eat the same kind of animals. As for the people claiming they were resident wolves, these people are basically assuming that they were irremotus. Everyone knows that wolves were killed off by the federal government. These "resident" wolves were dispersers that naturally migrated from Canada on their own. The wolf opponents don't like when these facts are exposed.

The newscast is misleading---those were not wolf "attacks"---that was a pack defending its territory.

The women and their dogs were trespassing on the wolf pack's territory.

In the photo---look at the head---that is not a wolf, it is a dog. Probably a very large dog and a small guy.

That picture is real, I used to camp in Canada and we saw those giant wolves. When I was young my neighbor who lived down the alley, his name was alleyopp he used to ride one to school.

KSyris says this wolf pic is fake, possibly forged by those against the conservation efforts, they'll stop an nothing! It's in their DNA...