Community | April 21, 2011 | 33 comments

ARMY GENERAL: "WE RUSHED INTO [LIBYA] WITHOUT A PLAN...NOW WE'RE GOING IN CIRCLES"

Image
PoliticalAmazon
Accordign to this LATimes article, President Obama's obsession with rushing into a Libyan War was based on "faulty" assumptions, was initiated without a plan, leaving the Libyan rebels, NATO allies, and the U.S. military "going in circles."

Obama pushed ahead with his Libyan War, despite the fact that it was "not popular at the Pentagon." Even Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates and "top uniformed officers" have shown sparse interest in getting involved in Libya at the same time we are trying to hold our national head above water in Afghanistan.

The air-strikes campaign failed to shove Kadafi off his throne and, indeed, has been unable to even stop Kadafi's forces from bombing civilians and taking back the towns the Libyan rebels, NATO and the U.S. spent so many resources capturing.

The rebels remained poorly trained, poorly motivated, disorganized, easily distracted, and angry that NATO/U.S. aren't doing more to fight their war for them.

It seems that Obama, once again, by his insistance on getting the U.S. and NATO involved in

This disaster leaves us with some questions:

1. Why was/is Obama so obsessed with starting a Libyan War?
2. What is it he is lying about to--or withholding information from--the American people this time?
3. Will Obama's Libyan War end up as an Afghanistanian Quagmire--one where we cannot win but cannot leave, either?
3. What the hell do we do now?

--------------------------------

[BEGIN QUOTE] "We rushed into this without a plan," said David Barno, a retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. "Now we're out in the middle, going in circles." ...
....Privately, U.S. officials concede that some of their assumptions before they intervened in the Libyan conflict may have been faulty. Among them was the notion that air power alone would degrade Kadafi's military to the point where he would be forced to halt his attacks, and that the U.S. could leave the airstrikes primarily to warplanes from Britain, France and other European countries......
...His decision to intervene in Libya was not popular at the Pentagon, where Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and top uniformed officers have shown little interest in taking a major role in the conflict while they are fighting the war in Afghanistan. Obama managed to overcome his advisors' objections by promising to keep the U.S. role limited....If the alliance's most powerful member isn't willing to escalate, few other members will be eager to do so.[END QUOTE]

-------------------------------------------------

latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-fg-libya-assess-20110419,0,4991088.story

LOS ANGELES TIMES (latimes.com)

NEWS ANALYSIS

WITH U.S. IN SUPPORT ROLE, NATO'S LIBYA MISSION IS 'GOING IN CIRCLES'
Kadafi's forces have been able to intensify their
counteroffensive while NATO members don't appear
willing to escalate their intervention.

By David S. Cloud and Ned Parker, Los Angeles Times
(Cloud reporting from Washington and Parker from Benghazi, Libya.)

7:24 PM PDT, April 18, 2011

A month ago in Libya, troops loyal to Moammar Kadafi were advancing on opposition-held areas, tens of thousands of civilians feared for their lives, and rebel forces appeared in disarray with little prospect of driving Kadafi from power.

After four weeks and hundreds of airstrikes by the U.S. and its NATO allies, in many ways little has changed.

Kadafi's tanks and artillery no longer threaten the de facto rebel capital of Benghazi in eastern Libya, and Kadafi's combat aircraft and helicopter gunships are grounded. But the disorganized rebel forces are still outmatched and outnumbered by Libyan army units, which, along with their leader, show no sign of giving up.

Rather, Kadafi has intensified his counteroffensive in recent days. Human rights groups accused Kadafi's military of using cluster bombs and truck-mounted Grad rockets to bombard residential areas of Misurata, the only city in western Libya still in rebel hands.

"We rushed into this without a plan," said David Barno, a retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. "Now we're out in the middle, going in circles."

The failure of the international air campaign to force Kadafi's ouster, or even to stop his military from shelling civilians and recapturing rebel-held towns, poses a growing quandary for President Obama and other NATO leaders: What now?

Privately, U.S. officials concede that some of their assumptions before they intervened in the Libyan conflict may have been faulty. Among them was the notion that air power alone would degrade Kadafi's military to the point where he would be forced to halt his attacks, and that the U.S. could leave the airstrikes primarily to warplanes from Britain, France and other European countries.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron, who led the charge within NATO to launch the air campaign in Libya, argued last week that the alliance needed to step up its attacks to fulfill the United Nations mandate to protect civilians. But winning agreement to escalate the intervention could further divide the already badly split alliance.

The U.S. military moved into a support role early this month, and Obama has given no indication that he will send U.S. warplanes into combat missions again, let alone reconsider his promise not to use ground troops in Libya.

His decision to intervene in Libya was not popular at the Pentagon, where Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and top uniformed officers have shown little interest in taking a major role in the conflict while they are fighting the war in Afghanistan. Obama managed to overcome his advisors' objections by promising to keep the U.S. role limited.

If the alliance's most powerful member isn't willing to escalate, few other members will be eager to do so.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   US Politics
  2. tags:
    Obama Libya NATO circles 1 more
  3.     
    |

33 comments // ARMY GENERAL: "WE RUSHED INTO [LIBYA] WITHOUT A PLAN...NOW WE'RE GOING IN CIRCLES"

  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • Can anybody say Iraq, AFG and Libya. Knew you could. At least in Iraq there was some military victory for all the effort. In Libya, we got nothing. Talk about even worse leadership.

    • 1 year ago
  • coxian_armada
  • Schnookums
  • irie_ojo
  • Persecuted
    • +2
      Persecuted  
    • nonsense... there was a plan for libya long before barack obama took office... the plan to keep the war machine fed... there doesnt have to be a purpose, or a plan on the ground... there only has to be bombs and gunfire, destroyed cities and schools... and contracts for the biggest defense companies... the rich are getting richer... one death at a time... i hope they are saved an extra nice place in hell

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • Prijedor
  • Nick19
    • 0
      Nick19  
    • These are college students who got some buddies and some guns and went out in a pickup truck. They're a very disorganized bunch and they're slowly getting equipment from Western nations that may improve the combat situation for these rebels.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • Nick19:

      The problem is this: if a country provides weapons to people who do not have military leaders, who are undisciplined, and clueless about much of what has to do with fighting in a war, including handling guns...that country bears the responsibility for what happens as a result of giving weapons to people who do not have the skills to safely use them.

      I've read about three different occasions where the rebels won a major battle and then took an entire day or day and a half off to feast and party afterwards, abandoning checkpoints, etc.

      When Kadafi routed them back to eastern Libya, the rebels driving the large trucks upon which weaponry was mounted just turned around and drove like a bat out of hell, taking the guns--the main defense the rebels had to protect the groups in the rear who were also evacuating--with them.

      Luis Sinco, who won a Pulitzer for his photography for the Marlboro Marine Pulitzer-winning series of articles about Blake Miller (http://www.mediastorm.com/publication/the-marlboro-marine), was in Libya until conditions led the LATimes to call home its photographers.

      He wrote a series of blog entries. I will post a couple of them after this post.

      The two entries, below, are the two parts of the article (published in November 2007) that accompanied the Marlboro Man photo at the top of this post.

      Part 1 LATimes "Marlboro Man" Article: http://articles.latimes.com/print/2007/nov/11/nation/na-marlboro11

      Part 2 LATimes Article: "Marlboro Man" http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-marlboro12nov12,1,631640,fu...

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Nick19:

      Nick, the rah-rah stories we are being fed about Libya are not true. The army is untrained, undisciplined, and dangerous in its stupidity, as this blog entry from Luis shows.

      The military leaders are unprofessional, and unable or unwilling to conduct training and field exercises for their soldiers. It is an out-of-control situation, and adding weapons to it would be a freaking disaster.

      The conditions in Libya with the rebels puts everyone, including our pilots, support staff, journalists, and others, in extreme danger.

      THIS is why Obama, and the Defense Department, is (they say) dead-set against giving the rebel army weapons.

      ---------------------------------------------------

      http://framework.latimes.com/2011/04/01/a-close-call-near-the-front-line-in-liby.../0

      "A CLOSE CALL NEAR THE FRONT LINE IN LIBYA"

      By: Luis Sinco, LATimes
      Posted On: 6:43 p.m. | April 1, 2011

      With my Libya assignment ending in two days, I had a very close call Friday, April Fools’ Day, near Port Brega.

      I was sitting in the back of a car as a Times reporter, a driver and I pushed further toward the scene of the fighting. I heard a loud thump behind us, and a shock wave enveloped the vehicle, catching us all totally by surprise. I looked out the left rear passenger window and saw a plume of smoke and dirt very nearby. A rocket out of nowhere, with absolutely no warning.

      “I told you we should not go on!” the driver screamed, spinning the car around and weaving frantically through a crowd of vehicles and rebels gathered on the road. “I told you!”

      He was absolutely right. It’s April 1 and, before the blast, two very strange things happened.

      At about 3 p.m., I was standing on a rocky knoll when a single shot rang out. Up the road, rebel fighters crowded around a parked car, talking excitedly. A comrade trying to clear a jammed assault rifle had accidentally shot himself.

      I ran to the scene and saw his limp body sprawled awkwardly on the ground. He wasn’t moving and his eyes had rolled up into his head as several men rushed him to a nearby ambulance. I knew I was photographing a dead man.

      I’ve had this nagging feeling that something like this was going to happen sometime. A few days ago, a magazine reporter standing near me was nearly shot in the face by a rebel who was also trying to free a jammed weapon. The rebel army is untrained and undisciplined — and I’m surprised more people haven’t been accidentally maimed or killed.

      Before this thought could sink in, a convoy of three SUVs rolled up the road. Riding in the lead vehicle was Gen. Abdul Fatah Younis, the nominal leader of the rebel army. The troops greeted him like a rock star, thrusting their arms through the open window, hoping to shake the general’s hand.

      I have gone to the front lines almost every day over the last five weeks, and I have never seen Younis anywhere near the fighting. However, I had seen him early on in an office in Benghazi, sitting behind a very large desk, surrounded by would-be soldiers smoking cigarettes and watching television.

      Port Brega, Port Brega, Port Brega. The name has been drilled into my head over the last 39 days. To most people in Los Angeles, it’s a speck on the map that they will never see.

      The car rode very roughly as we drove away from the scene of the blast. We got out and saw that a piece of shrapnel had punctured a large hole in the right rear tire’s sidewall. But there wasn’t time to change it. We had to get away and drove the next five miles on shredded rubber and the rim.

      The odds stack up against you the longer you stay. I truly believe that — and Libya has to be the most dangerous place I’ve ever been.

      I haven’t been back to this part of the world since my last trip to Iraq almost seven years ago. But for some reason, I talked myself into it. I thought this assignment would be about demonstrations for democracy, a little rock throwing, some tear gas and maybe an occasional gunshot or two. Wouldn’t you know it; a war went and broke out on me.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Nick19:

      Nick, here is a "blog" article by a journalist named Bryan Chan. Luis Sinco is the photographer on this story.

      It describes the retreat of the rebels from advancing Kadafi forces. The last few paragraphs are the most poignant, but the entire article is compelling reading because this is how it really was, from those who were there.:

      "You could almost see this coming. Three weeks ago, these men were butchers, bakers, laborers, teachers and clerks. They possessed no military expertise or rudimentary skills with weapons. They simply got caught up in the revolutionary fervor against a hated and ruthless dictator.
      "There was no training, no strategy and no grand plan. Every so-called colonel I’ve met in Benghazi sits behind a large desk surrounded by would-be soldiers smoking and watching television.
      "After a week of killing and dying the front moved about 100 miles to Bin Jawwad and back again to Port Brega where it all started. This is the reality, and the dream of an easy march to Tripoli has all but died."

      --------------------

      "REBELS RETREAT FROM PRO-KADAFI FORCES IN LIBYA

      By: Bryan Chan
      Posted On: 4:31 p.m. | March 10, 2011

      Times photographers Luis Sinco and Rick Loomis are in Libya covering the conflict. Loomis is with a government-sponsored tour in the capital, Tripoli. Sinco is working in rebel-held territory in eastern Libya and filed this report after witnessing their retreat farther east:

      Few things look so forlorn as an army in retreat.

      After a week of fierce fighting against forces loyal to Libyan dictator Moammar Kadafi, the ragtag rebel army beat a hasty retreat Thursday from the oil town of Ras Lanuf, leaving the future of breakaway eastern Libya in doubt.

      It was not a pretty sight. Undisciplined and untrained rebel volunteers scuffled with each other, some urging their comrades to stand and fight. But most realized the futility of continuing to take on Kadafi’s better armed and trained military for now.
      Along the only route out of Ras Lanuf, battle-weary rebels boarded pickup trucks for the long ride to the rear. Many immediately fell asleep as they trekked out of the desert. Some wept along the roadside. Some tried to put on a brave face, weakly flashing the now familiar victory sign as they pulled out.

      A steady stream of ambulances brought the dead and wounded to hospitals in Port Brega and Ajdabaya. One fighter told me that some of the casualties were left behind. The earlier high morale had evaporated, and many were in a surly mood.
      Unlike a week ago, when they triumphantly moved the front line to Bin Jawwad with little resistance, few uttered the words “sura, sura” or “picture, picture.” None posed proudly beside their antiquated antiaircraft artillery, and instead insisted on no photographs. One rebel brusquely pushed me aside when I raised my camera.

      The only time they wanted me to take a picture was when an ambulance pulled to a stop and the side door slid open to reveal an older man with a brushy beard and the top of his head blown off. A pair of rebels pushed me to the front of a gawking crowd. The dead man was a bloody mess and I declined to photograph him. As I walked away, the rebels stared with disbelief, their eyes imploring what was wrong with me.
      Back in Port Brega, I saw two dead fighters wrapped in thick blankets in a truck bed. A rebel bent down to kiss one of the men’s hands. Several then gently lifted the bodies from the vehicle, placed them on stretchers and carried them into a morgue.
      Inside, hospital personnel removed the men’s shoes, socks and belts. They emptied their pockets of identification, cigarettes and money before tying together their thumbs and big toes and sliding them into refrigerated chambers.

      Outside, a large gathering pressed against the hospital gates, shouting “God is great!” A young man sat near the entrance and shed tears for his brother, who was gravely wounded. The ground was littered with cigarette butts, empty water bottles, crushed tuna cans and shell casings. The air was silent of celebratory gunfire.

      You could almost see this coming. Three weeks ago, these men were butchers, bakers, laborers, teachers and clerks. They possessed no military expertise or rudimentary skills with weapons. They simply got caught up in the revolutionary fervor against a hated and ruthless dictator.

      There was no training, no strategy and no grand plan. Every so-called colonel I’ve met in Benghazi sits behind a large desk surrounded by would-be soldiers smoking and watching television.

      After a week of killing and dying the front moved about 100 miles to Bin Jawwad and back again to Port Brega where it all started. This is the reality, and the dream of an easy march to Tripoli has all but died.

      --------------------------------

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • Nick19:

      Photo Caption (Luis Sinco, LATimes Photographer): "A caricature of Moammar Kadafi peers from a wall in Benghazi, where many appeared oblivious to the threat of government forces bearing east, having been reassured by the opposition council that everything is OK."

      ---------------------------------

      Nick, here is the most chilling blog entry from Luis...it is when the rebels turn on the journalists and photographers.

      The photo with this post is one of the ones Luis surreptitiously took, with his camera just hanging around his neck.

      -----------------------------------

      http://framework.latimes.com/2011/03/13/rebels-in-libya-no-longer-welcome-journa...
      Rebels in Libya no longer welcome journalists as tide turns against them

      Posted On: 10:08 p.m. | March 13, 2011

      By Luis Sinco, Los Angeles Times

      I literally shot from the hip at the front lines Sunday. I had no other choice and did not raise the camera to my eye as retreating rebels abruptly turned their wrath on members of the Western media covering the nearly month-long Libyan uprising.
      Amid the chaos and panic at the gates of Ajdabiya, rebel fighters immediately singled me out — telling me in no uncertain terms that I should leave.

      An irate middle-aged man pushed me back, yelling at me in Arabic while gesturing menacingly with a Kalashnikov held close tightly to his chest. According to my interpreter, he laid the blame for a quick succession of rebel battlefield defeats on photographers and reporters, who had compromised their positions and revealed their lack of weaponry with pictures and words.

      His red and bleary eyes bulging, he looked as if he hadn’t slept in days. He wore a kaffiyeh scarf tightly wrapped around his head, and his tone was all business. I backed off and shot surreptitiously with a camera hanging from my neck.

      I waited a few minutes and again tried to get better access. Again I was told no. As I walked away, a man shouted from the crowd: “Go home! You are no longer needed here!”

      It was a complete about-turn after three weeks of being warmly welcomed as a friend and ally in the fight against Moammar Kadafi. Deep down, I knew the honeymoon wouldn’t last. It was just too good to be true. In the rebels’ opinion, their recent losses had nothing to do with poor training, a lack of strategy, weak leadership and overall incompetence. People often blame the messenger for bad news.

      On the road back to Benghazi, I saw two carloads of Africans prostrate on the ground. One rebel waved a pistol over the terrified men’s heads and questioned them in Arabic. I jumped out of the car to take pictures but three men immediately ran in my direction, raised their weapons and told me to get lost. It’s just too hard to win an argument against loaded guns.

      Back in Benghazi, dusk settled as I arrived at the courthouse square to gauge the public mood and get some pictures. I met a man I had befriended over the last two weeks, and he was stunned to hear that Kadafi’s forces were bearing down. All this time, the revolutionary government has been sticking to their delusional message that everything is OK — and the people buy it completely. In an environment like this, it’s almost impossible to work.

      I returned to my hotel and caught the tail end of a news conference with the head of rebel military forces, Gen. Abdul Fatah Younis, who used to be the interior minister in Kadafi’s regime. Recent battlefield setbacks did not force a retreat or constitute defeat, he said. Rather, they are part of a brilliant strategy to lure loyalist forces into a trap. Yes, maybe. But that’s just not the way it looks.

      Times reporters David Zucchino, Jeffrey Fleishman and I plan to stay in Benghazi one more day. And if Kadafi continues his unimpeded march, we will be quickly pulling out.

      ------------------------

    • 1 year ago
  • mrtraffic
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • mrtraffic:

      Yes, you are wrong.

      When CIA have been in Libya for quite awhile now, intel sufficient to conduct the operation should have been available, and if it wasn't available, then we should not have gone in until we had enough information to do it right.

      Hell, we shouldn't have gone in there, anyway. It is the biggest damned spider trap--it makes Vietnam look like an easy-breezy-in-and-out deal.

    • 1 year ago
  • mrtraffic
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • mrtraffic
  • bla_bla_bla
    • +3
      bla_bla_bla  
    • As Obama said the Lybia situation is a "Terd Sandwich". Many prominent Republicans urged we needed to take action too, that is of course until Obama did it, then they spun a 180. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

    • 1 year ago
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • I thought he drug his feet actually . It was my hope we could prevent a civilian massacre . The rebels invited us . Begged us . After that i was unhappy with the dirty bombs , which i thought were illegal ... I still think we did right . If he was a really clever president he might have helped them with intel and training better . Remember he is still beholden to his corporate overlords , like all presidents will be , after "citizens united" .

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • Angeliron
    • 0
      Angeliron  
    • I think our best first step is to recognize that we are ALL a bunch of fucking maroons! Just save yourself the trouble, yes, you in the back of the class, admit this Truth, and you will be amazed at what becomes of the realization!

    • 1 year ago
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +1
      ZiggyStrange  
    • Image
    • http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/04/going-circles-libya

      Spin Spin Spin. Voted down.

      Read how responsible sources reported this.

      The LA Times reports on how things are going in Libya:

      "We rushed into this without a plan," said David Barno, a retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. "Now we're out in the middle, going in circles."

      The failure of the international air campaign to force Kadafi's ouster, or even to stop his military from shelling civilians and recapturing rebel-held towns, poses a growing quandary for President Obama and other NATO leaders: What now?
      ---------------------------------------------------------

      Well, this, apparently:

      A joint British-French military team of advisers is to be sent to Benghazi in a move that is likely to lead to accusations of mission creep....The UK-French team will advise the rebels on intelligence-gathering, logistics, and communications. In an indication of the serious nature of the move, the team will be run by a joint force headquarters, the Guardian has learned.

      ....William Hague, the foreign secretary, said in a statement that the team "will enable the UK to build on the work already being undertaken to support and advise the NTC [National Transitional Council] on how to better protect civilians". He added: "In particular they will advise the NTC on how to improve their military organisational structures, communications and logistics, including how best to distribute humanitarian aid and deliver medical assistance."

      Hague said the British section of the team will consist of "experienced British military officers".

      Bud these are advisors, not trainers, no rebels are being armed, no boots are on the ground, etc. etc. Move on, nothing to see here, folks.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      1. *I* didn't say anything about "boots on the ground." However, since you did, there have already been "boots on the ground" and there are Marines who are being kept technically with their boots off the ground, by keeping them on ships offshore---and that is a pathetically stupid and dishonest maneuver, to keep Obama technically not lying.

      2. Nobody with two neurons firing at the same time can trust what is coming from the Obama administration on this. He is acting just like Bush/Cheney did in Iraq, including lying us into the war. Would you trust Bush/Cheney again? If you wouldn't, then you shouldn't trust Obama, either.

      3. Do you know anyone who was in one of America's "technically" non-wars, like Vietnam? Iraq? Afghanistan? If you were close enough to them to be someone they would confide in, you will know that our government and military leaders lied their asses off at every turn to keep funding coming to the military's efforts, and to hide the illegal activities that were going on. My ex-husband and his squad were one of the squads in Cambodia when we were not supposed to be there. He almost died because, you see, he was not "technically" in Cambodia (because it was illegal for him and his men to be there), so when he was wounded they couldn't send a helicopter to evacuate until his men half-carried, have dragged him, into Vietnam, where it was legal for them to be.

    • 1 year ago
  • Warren_Merrill
    • 0
      Warren_Merrill  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      The UK and France can train the rebels all they want. It won't make them professional soldiers. They're up against professional soldiers. It's rare a military action can be successful without going in on the ground. Battle fronts can't be established from the air. The US has two choices through NATO. Turn and run or go in on the ground.

    • 1 year ago
  • Fatalism
  • samthesixth
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • In fact, this LATimes article is being carried by publications all over the U.S., and all over the world.

      Try again with that "ad-hominem-attack" thingy.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • NPR found the article, including the "going in circles" comment, to be credible enough to have the equivalent of the "above-the-fold" placement of a print newspaper on NPR's web publication.

      -----------------

      http://topics.npr.org/article/0aw62DD06LgI7?q=Nicolas+Sarkozy

      With U.S. in support role, NATO's Libya mission 'going in circles'

      Among them was the notion that air power alone would degrade Kadafi's military to the point where he would be forced to halt his attacks, and that the U.S. could leave the airstrikes primarily to warplanes from Britain, France and other European... Full Article at Los Angeles Times...

      -------------------

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Mother Jones found the LATimes article, including the "going in circles" comment by retired Army General David Barno, to be credible enough to both report and build on:

      ---------------

      http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/04/going-circles-libya

      Going in Circles in Libya

      — By Kevin Drum
      | Tue Apr. 19, 2011 9:10 AM PDT

      The LA Times reports on how things are going in Libya:

      "We rushed into this without a plan," said David Barno, a retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. "Now we're out in the middle, going in circles."

      The failure of the international air campaign to force Kadafi's ouster, or even to stop his military from shelling civilians and recapturing rebel-held towns, poses a growing quandary for President Obama and other NATO leaders: What now?

      Well, this, apparently:

      A joint British-French military team of advisers is to be sent to Benghazi in a move that is likely to lead to accusations of mission creep....The UK-French team will advise the rebels on intelligence-gathering, logistics, and communications. In an indication of the serious nature of the move, the team will be run by a joint force headquarters, the Guardian has learned.

      ....William Hague, the foreign secretary, said in a statement that the team "will enable the UK to build on the work already being undertaken to support and advise the NTC [National Transitional Council] on how to better protect civilians". He added: "In particular they will advise the NTC on how to improve their military organisational structures, communications and logistics, including how best to distribute humanitarian aid and deliver medical assistance."

      Hague said the British section of the team will consist of "experienced British military officers".

      Bud these are advisors, not trainers, no rebels are being armed, no boots are on the ground, etc. etc. Move on, nothing to see here, folks.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Ad hominem attack. Instead of attacking a quite credible source, why don't you refute his experienced assessment, if you don't agree with it?

      "A retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and Nato forces in Afghanistan" is far more believable and capable of assessing the overall direction of action in a war than is, for instance, Obama, who got us into this clusterfuck in the first place.

    • 1 year ago
  • JustZ
    • +3
      JustZ  
    • "a retired Army general who once commanded U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan..."

      Presidents and their Joint Chiefs don't usually involve retired generals in the planning of active operations.

      Isn't this the same thing that passes for fact every day in the MSM?
      Some talking head brings a retired general to enlighten the world on "what's really going on here is... " when in fact, they have no clue because....wait for it---- they're retired down in Boca to play golf every day.

      Sorry but this is "not news"; it's one man's opinion.
      And as every operation is different, his opinion is no more relevant (much less accurate)... than anyone's.

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
more from Community:

top videos