Both parties abandon the jobless
source: http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/25/frum.jobless/index.html?hpt=T2
-
-
- rustyred
- added this
One afternoon on my way to the subway, I paused in front of one of these signs in the window of a restaurant that catered to students. I stood maybe 10 seconds, maybe 12. The manager bolted out, put his hand on my shoulder: "Hey -- you want a job?"
That's what a strong economic recovery looks like.
Technically speaking, the U.S. economy is recovering right now. GDP growth has been positive since the summer of 2009. Employment is growing. If you like, you can say the recession is over.
But don't say it too loud. With 13.5 million people out of work -- 6.1 million out of work for 27 weeks or more -- the odds are high that one of them may hear and take offense.
Isn't it weird that...neither of the two great U.S. political parties is offering a plan to do anything about the job situation?
--David Frum
Globalization crushing middle class? Ryan: 'No more gimmicks' Ryan budget plan fair? Stockman: Ryan plan 'whiffs entirely'
RELATED TOPICS
Economic Recovery
Recessions and Depressions
U.S. Federal Reserve
U.S. Republican Party
The recovery is weak, and job creation is slow. Everybody knows that. But here's something that we don't know, or anyway don't think about enough: Isn't it weird that in this dismal economic situation, neither of the two great U.S. political parties is offering a plan to do anything about the job situation?
This is a democracy, right? The parties compete for power by offering solutions to problems that people care about, isn't that the theory? Yet here is the thing that people care about the very, very most -- and from the two parties there is ... what?
The Republicans have coalesced around U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan's budget plan.
That plan has four main elements:
-- It would impose large cuts in Medicaid for the poor right away.
-- It would impose very large cuts on other domestic spending programs.
-- It would cut the top rate of federal income tax from the current 36% to 25%, while pledging to close unspecified loopholes.
-- Starting 10 years from now, it would reduce Medicare benefits for people now younger than 55 by potentially more than half.
Ryan's plans are bold. And they made bold promises. According to a Heritage Foundation study commissioned by Ryan, the plan would reduce unemployment to 6.4% next year, 4.0% in 2015 and 2.8% by 2021. (The rate of 2.8% was last seen during the Korean War, when millions of young men were conscripted into the armed forces.)
Alas, the Heritage projections were derided by other economists and eventually quietly withdrawn by Heritage itself.
Well, we all sometimes get our math wrong. But here's the strange thing: the invalidation of Heritage's job predictions has had no impact whatsoever on Republican advocacy of the Ryan plan.
Suppose I presented you with a plan to land an astronaut on Mars. You check my numbers and discover a mistake: my trajectory will instead send the astronaut hurtling into outer space. If I answer, "Well let's use that trajectory anyway," wouldn't you conclude that I was less than totally committed to the Mars mission? That perhaps I had some other goal in mind instead?
But at least Republicans have a goal in mind.
What about the Democrats? From the party of the president, we hear no job message at all. The president instituted his job program in 2009: His big stimulus plan, backed by the Federal Reserve's active monetary creation. Last year, the president offered a supplementary measure. He agreed to Republican renewal of the Bush tax cuts of 2001 plus a partial remission of Social Security payroll taxes.
Obviously, the results of those policies has been underwhelming, to put it mildly. On Sunday, The New York Times reported that the latest round of Fed easing -- $600 billion of direct money creation -- has not produced substantial results, in the opinion of most economists.
Plan A and Plan B have failed.
So what's the administration's Plan C? It seems to be wait and hope. The waiting will be long. At current trends, it will be years before all the involuntarily unemployed return to work. And hope is never a plan.
The administration does however have a political plan: Blast the Ryan plan. Since the Ryan plan is highly politically vulnerable, the blasting will likely hurt the GOP and help President Obama. The blasting will not, however, do much for the unemployed. But then we've all sort of given up on them, haven't we?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/25/frum.jobless/index.html?hpt=T2
-
- tags:
- Jobs, Unemployment, jobless, job creation, 1 more
-
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
I live in Boston now and the job market is totally fucked up. Employers only interview currently employed applicants with the exact or more job experience and required degree (4 year business degree needed to be a secretary and 2 year criminal justice degree for a security guard).
- 1 year ago
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
-
ReMarker
-
Frum and other Republican operatives try every conceivable way to make the Dems. seem as bad as Repubs. so dummies turn against good government as well as bad government.
Non-dummies know there is a necessity in society for government, good government being the most desired.
If Republican operatives are successful at convincing dummies ALL government is bad then Republicans, the masters of snake oil selling, can continue ripping off society.
We all may be some dumb but we all are not plum dumb. You can't cure stupid.
- 1 year ago
-
ReMarker
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
ReMarker:
hear hear.
Title of this piece is bullshit. Democrats bring bill after bill on economic development and financial reform. The Republicans having majority ignore all Democratic offerings in the House.
How everyone seems blind to the facts of the matter is... weird. It's nakedly out there for everyone to see. Me thinks the Democrats are so bad at messaging, it's killing them and they don't see their own death. In that, I see weird too...
- 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
Saladin
-
"One afternoon on my way to the subway, I paused in front of one of these signs in the window of a restaurant that catered to students. I stood maybe 10 seconds, maybe 12. The manager bolted out, put his hand on my shoulder: "Hey -- you want a job?"
This happened to me once recently.
Then I woke up.
- 1 year ago
-
Saladin
-
-
harleyblueswoman
-
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70§iontree=5,70
Here is The Progressive plan.....the one we need!!!!!!!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
harleyblueswoman
-
-
harleyblueswoman
-
-
The Leadership Americans Deserve
- 1 year ago
-
harleyblueswoman
-
-
derk
-
David Frum's opinion is worth about 1/10 of a Canadian nickel ... and he would know, since he is Canadian.
- 1 year ago
-
derk
-
-
GREENRAGE
-
My questions: were the millions of unemployed voters active last November? Were there any polls by [major] media outlets identifying anything other than who was/not for the Tea Party Movement, a Republican or Democratic supporter? There has been little or no mention how as a minority in the Senate, Republicans used the filibusterer in record amounts thus causing monumental problems for the very American people they were supposed to be protecting. While there is finger pointing and factual evidence for both Democrats and Republicans; no solutions by individuals or parties have lessened the problem of unemployment. Any discussion of jobs or their creation is always overshadowed by "the debt ceiling" or "holding Americans hostage" etc. With no real solutions in mind, would it be fair to say Americans as a whole or in part have chosen to be spectators rather than participants in solving crisis' rather than producing solutions? Whether unionized or not, whether retired with a pension or not, a college graduate or not; jobs for millions of unemployed/underemployed workers are the issue. Corporate "uncertainty" hasn't closed GE, name a major bank, holding company or stock market, nor reduced CEO salaries of AIG, Fannie Mae or Freddi Mac. I have noticed "certainty" in rising corporate profits and frustration levels of unemployed/underemployed American citizens. Is it too late to ask all influential parties to consider not exporting jobs abroad? Is it too late to ask multinational American corporations to consider America their 1st priority?
- 1 year ago
-
GREENRAGE
-
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
We are abandoning the jobless. We vote for Tea Party candidates, we buy exports from China, we allow our schools to degrade, we vote against tax breaks for SMALL businesses, we provide welfare for large corporations to pour money overseas. Don't blame the politicians, we put them there and they truly represent us.
- 1 year ago
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
-
Steamed_N_More
-
Who abandoned the jobless? The captains of industry is who. The GDP is up. CEO pay is up. The economic ship is leaking and the captains and crew have their lifeboat guarded and prepared to leave with their "booty" before any passengers know what perils they face. (Not all the crew is included on the lifeboat boarding list either!)
- 1 year ago
-
Steamed_N_More
-
-
samthesixth
-
Corporatist hypocrites.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
Leen61
-
I'm no fan of David Frum, but I have to agree that both parties have abandoned the jobless. Obama has allowed the Reps to hijack his stimulus bill and it's gone down hill from there with his compromising. Obama has totally deferred to the Reps tax cut and corporate welfare agenda.
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
mitekillem
-
A Civil, Civil War. An idea occurred to me that one way out of debt is to fake our own death. We can do this easily by dividing the nation, and renaming ourselves, and becoming separate countries. Because...then who do you send the bill too?
Also, nobody has to fight or get bloody. I mean sure, we could if we wanted to make a show of it, but I'm sure that Ultra conservatives will have no quarrel about being in a separate country from Liberals.
If we can just agree on territory lines, etc, then we can amicably split.Conservatives can enjoy their country of zero taxes for the rich, will have a 2 class society, and will re-institute slavery as a cheap source of labor, to prevent "outsourcing jobs". Also their health care will resemble the health care available to Americans of the 1700s. -Their primary export will be guns, soldiers, slaves, and oil.
Liberals will invest in education, will have an even tax across the board so that each will pay what they can. Education and Healthcare will be a universal benefit. They will produce more scientists, and thus will have better technology.
Since few corporations are willing to pay such high employee costs, there will be few private sector jobs. Most jobs will be in banks, health care, government, technology, and small businesses.
Because of the fail-safes placed in the government to protect against corruption (which led to the split in the first place), government officials are subject to more restraints, and laws are only passed once they pass the house, congress, and popular vote. If the popular vote fail, the law is dead, and goes back to the drawing board. Any money that goes unaccounted for sends a red-flag, and gets immediate investigation and prosecution.
Unlike conservatives who want to keep their lower-class docile and stupid, liberals know that all things are connected, and the strength of the nation is shown by it's weakest link. They have the benefit of having a long history, and a good education. ...so there's little room for BS.Conservatives will be free to enjoy the paradise in which they are trying to create.
Liberals will most likely develop a utopia [so long as the legislate with common sense, and not try to legislate 'crazy' or 'stupidity'.] - 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
artemis6
-
mitekillem:
How i wish that would work . You know they would try to use the army against us . Like in the other countries , like Libya ... Egypt and so on . I see no other way though . start anew and be self sufficient as possible with solar and wind ....
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
riverratt50
-
mitekillem:
"[so long as the legislate with common sense, and not try to legislate 'crazy' or 'stupidity'.]
"
That's the BIG question right there, Most think, w/ power come's stupidity and crazy. - 1 year ago
-
riverratt50
-
-
mitekillem
-
riverratt50:
Not exactly my intent. Basically Liberals have a tendency to legislate too much. For example, the shooting in Arizona of Rep. Giffords. I remember shortly after they wanted to push through some soft of gun control law that would have effected everyone just so they could prevent crazy people from getting guns. -However, You Can't Legislate Crazy.
It's ridiculous to make laws to try to keep crazy from happening.
A certain percentage of the population is just messed up in the head, and Legislators need to deal with that. -There's no point in sacrificing the freedoms of everyone, just to try and stop a handful. - 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
Milieu
-
"Obviously, the results of those policies has been underwhelming, to put it mildly. On Sunday, The New York Times reported that the latest round of Fed easing -- $600 billion of direct money creation -- has not produced substantial results, in the opinion of most economists."
Geez, let me think this over............the speech writer for Mad King George III pointing out that the Dems and Obama haven't gotten anything "Right" after Mad King destroys the budget............. Hhmmmmm
And the Republic Syndicate's members have blocked, defeated, destroyed and patently lied about anything being done to Actually help the Not Rich.
Then the Maroon has the gall to say, "Well, at least we got a plan."
Add GN and the Kochtopus into the mix and you've got GREED and greed and Hate running the show."Norquist favors dramatically reducing the size of the government.[14] He has been noted for his widely quoted quip: "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Norquist
Frum is the David Duke of Republic Syndicate. Oh, so pleasant, respectable, seemingly rational, but, presenting the Syndicate's line.
- 1 year ago
-
Milieu
-
-
Schnookums
-
When Reagan nearly tripled the National Debt from ~$900billion to ~$2.7trillion, the nation bought it. Nobody is going to let Obama take the National Debt from $11.8trillion to $35.4trillion in eight years, so that door for job recovery is closed. All of the other doors open to short paths to nowhere. As my Grandmother used to say......"we're in a dilly of a pickle".
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
