OBAMA DRONES STRIKE FIRST LIBYAN CIVILIAN TARGETS -- While Political World Obsesses on Birther Story

-
-
- PoliticalAmazon
- added this
Here I was afraid the Obama birth-certificate drama would interfere with us watching Obama and opposing the evil he is doing, including this LIBYAN CIVILIAN MASSACRE BY U.S. DRONES THAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SNAP OUT OF IT, PEOPLE!
Obama's Big Reveal of his birth certificate--the equivalent of a Circus side-show Hoochie dancer's blow-off finale, where she rips off her tear-away panties in the final Big Reveal--has done its job. It has distracted us from:
OBAMA'S AUTHORIZED SLAUGHTER OF LIBYAN CIVILIANS BY DRONE ATTACKS ON HOME COMPOUNDS.
The stripper's Big-Finale Blow-Off Reveal is just like the Obama Big-Finale Birth Certificate Blow-Off Reveal we were treated to by Obama today. It's his Final Orgasmic Act of the agonizingly-years-long birth-certificate tease. Obama, with a snap of his wrist, revealed all...and the slobbering masses fell for it.
And it has done its job...It has kept political junkies focused on the crack-cocaine of political issues: a freaking BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
Was it as good for you as it was for the military-industrial complex?
Was it as good for you as it was for Robert Gates, Sec. of Defense, ex-VP and presidential-level lobbyist for two administrations for Raytheon (which has heavily invested in new-technology drones, which go for $4,500,000 each).
How about the innocent Libyan civilians, in housing compounds, already slaughtered by U.S. drones? Was it as good for you as it was for them?
WAKE UP, PEOPLE! WE ARE SLAUGHTERING LIBYAN CIVILIANS!
The birther stories are so seductive, addictive and irresistible. That's because we react, on cue, en masse, like the herd of sheeple we are, to unite behind (or against) someone we perceive is suffering from what may be a racially-motivated, but extremely stupid, attack.
We don't have to think. We know the insults and arguments to post. It's a thoughtless rush, like a hit off of a crack-pipe.
And this Ultimate Birther Story of All Birther Stories--Obama's Big Blow-Off Birth-Certificate Reveal--is more successful than any of the prior birther successes. It had to be, because it had to distract us from something truly heinous:
OBAMA'S SUCCESSFUL AUTHORIZATION OF THE DRONE MASSACRE OF LIBYAN CIVILIANS, AND THE DRASTIC ESCALATION OF OUR PARTICIPATION IN THE LIBYAN CIVIIL WAR.
Any birther story can distract and soothe the political masses, as it has since the first time it raised its ugly bipartisan head. Like an adrenaline smoothie, it wraps us in its warm, seductive embrace....and all other political issues seem to fade into the background.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, WAKE UP, PEOPLE!
While everyone is flailing around in the birther-vs-Obama Circus Big-Top orgasmic, political-crack-addict distraction, the U.S. IS LAUNCHING DRONES AGAINST CIVILIANS IN LIBYA, with several successful "hits"--i.e., slaughtered innocent civilians--already.
Why haven't we been watching Obama like a mother elephant on steroids, protecting her babies from a pack of starving lions read to take us down to another bloody slaughter, this time in Libya?
After all, five days ago Obama AUTHORIZED THE USE OF OUR DRONES AGAINST CIVILIANS IN LIBYA.
Did you get the "U.S. DRONES SLAUGHTERING CIVILIANS IN LIBYA" part?
Honestly, do you think Obama would have done his birth-certificate Big Reveal Blow-Off finale if it wasn't for a damned good (i.e., corporate-profitable) reason? After all, he can only do it once, so it had better pay off, and pay off good.
The "birther" distraction has become Obama's greatest tool which, predictably, will do two things:
1. Distract both the left and right from whatever blood-dripping slight-of-hand Obama needs to pull.
2. Unite the ever-freaking-gullible liberal/Democrat/progressive base behind him?
As soon as I saw the "birth certificate reveal" article, I KNEW Obam had done something heinous. Obama would not have revealed his birth certificate unless it was to distract us from something REALLY, REALLY evil he didn't want our focus on...until it was too late to stop it.
The Obama Birther Distractor Tool--Obama's always-convenient and predictable way to distract both the Left and the Right by engaging the nutball birthers in dialogue about his birth certificate, while always playing the victim role--is extremely valuable. It distracts both sides at the same time into emotionally-laden, mindless, well-rehearsed-by-now diatribes each other.
The birther issue is crack to political junkies who haunt internet message boards. So intoxicating, so seductive, so mindless, so impossible to resist.
Meanwhile--what is going on that he, and the right, don't want us to focus on.
COULD IT BE THE HAMBURGER-LIKE REMAINS OF INNOCENT LIBYAN CIVILIANS SLAUGHTERED BY THE OBAMA-AUTHORIZED DRONES?
WAKE UP, PEOPLE!!!
And, guess what? Robert Gates, our Sec. of Defense and Raytheon-drone whore, is telling us we will be in Libya for YEARS now.
Obama, the Democrats and GOPers have just launched a HUGE escalation of our war efforts in Libya. Since Obama authorized the use of drones against Libyan civilians five days ago, there has been so little in the way of American protest against it.
Nope. We are far too busy with our birther crack-pipe, and letting tools like President Obama and Orily Taitz yank us around by the short-hairs over an issue as stupid as a birth certificate.
Now, one more time. Why do you think Obama released his birth certificate today? Five days after he authorized the use of drones to attack civilians in Libya, when the news of it was starting to spread, despite the birther crack-smoke-filled ethers of the internet?
Jesus fucking christ, I think I'm going to cry.
==============================
http://compliancecampaign.wordpress.com/2011/04/24/nato-hits-civilian-targets-in...
NATO forces hit civilian areas in Libya, commence drone attacks
The UN Security Council resolution purportedly authorizing U.S./NATO operations in Libya was further undermined yesterday when NATO airstrikes reportedly hit civilian targets in Tripoli and other cities.
As France 24 reports today,
NATO planes staged raids on civil and military sites in the Libyan capital Tripoli and other cities, JANA news agency said, without confirming the number of people killed and wounded. Earlier air raids conducted by the Western alliance struck near a compound in Tripoli where Kadhafi resides.
“A military source said civil and military sites were targeted by the colonialist aggressor,” said JANA, specifying that the strikes had also covered Al-Khums, Gharian, El Assa and Sirte, the birthplace of strongman Moamer Kadhafi.
Three new explosions rocked the Libyan capital in the late evening as NATO warplanes overflew Tripoli, AFP journalists said, after several earlier blasts in the city centre and outlying quarters.
The Chinese news agency Xinhau adds that civilian infrastructure was among NATO’s targets:.....
===============
http://abcnews.go.com/International/pentagon-confirms-predator-drone-strike-liby...
Pentagon Confirms First Predator Drone Strike in Libya
April 23, 2011
........"The real work of that will have to be done by the Libyans themselves. But we can provide them with some cover from the air. And I think the kind of training that some of the allies are going to do and some of the assistance they're providing will help them. But this is likely to take a while," Robert Gates said.
===========
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Politics, US Politics
-
- tags:
- Obama, Libya, drones, birth certificate, 3 more
-
-
CitizenHill
-
When, oh when will the "progressive" leftists come to grips with the fact that they are supporting a POTUS with no respect for citizens constitutional rights and rule of law?
- 1 year ago
-
CitizenHill
-
-
ROSERITA
-
I'm crying with you.. How about Petraus taking over the CIA?? WTF!! where is the media coverage of that? Panetta to the Pentagon? why? tell us why!!!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
ROSERITA
-
-
coolplanet
-
Two months ago all us liberal types were supporting the protestors in Libya.
Then when Gadaffi started killing and threatened to kill hundreds of thousands of Libyan protesters, and the UN intervenes with military action, liberals freak out.
The left is way too utopian!
We think that the good witch Glinda will wave her magic wand and Dorothy will click her ruby slippers and peace will come.
Grow some balls hippies! - 1 year ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
lightningthunderfox
-
even if this is a lie (ziggy),
the intention of the article is good ( Stickin it to the MAN). no matter how you look at it there is something going on with our military.
- 1 year ago
-
lightningthunderfox
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
lightningthunderfox:
No problem for you that it's not true, party on.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
This thread is a hoax
It's a lie and she's admitted itSee the exchange with the first poster at the bottom quoted in this post.
She confabulated 2 stories neither of which claim any civilian was harmed by a drone in Lybia. The drone hit a rocket launcher.
Excerpts:
LIBYAN CIVILIAN MASSACRE BY U.S. DRONES THAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
OBAMA'S AUTHORIZED SLAUGHTER OF LIBYAN CIVILIANS BY DRONE ATTACKS ON HOME COMPOUNDS.
WAKE UP, PEOPLE! WE ARE SLAUGHTERING LIBYAN CIVILIANS!
OBAMA'S SUCCESSFUL AUTHORIZATION OF THE DRONE MASSACRE OF LIBYAN CIVILIANS,
Meanwhile--what is going on that he, and the right, don't want us to focus on.
COULD IT BE THE HAMBURGER-LIKE REMAINS OF INNOCENT LIBYAN CIVILIANS SLAUGHTERED BY THE OBAMA-AUTHORIZED DRONES?
After all, five days ago Obama AUTHORIZED THE USE OF OUR DRONES AGAINST CIVILIANS IN LIBYA.
Did you get the "U.S. DRONES SLAUGHTERING CIVILIANS IN LIBYA" part?
3 hours ago
GENERALNATTY --> @PoliticalamazonUmm where does it say that the drone hit civilians? , it says that it took out a rocket launcher that was used to attack civilians.
"A U.S. Air Force Predator drone took out a rocket launcher used to attack civilians in the battle between Qadhafi forces and civilians in Misrata, Libya, NATO said today."
Response 2 hours ago
PoliticalAmazon
@GENERALNATTY:Sorry--thought the Gates and civilian info was in the same article. My bad.
=======================================================
These are all made up lies in this story.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
PA... you've entered the Trump zone!
Welcome to waste-of-time writing and giving a public show of self-indulgent, careless of others sensibilities, with your display of mental masturbation.
Kinda gross lady...
(I'm being waaay kind calling you a lady on the image you posted with this story) - 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
totally_dilapidated: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
David_H:
The thread is a lie check it before you attack
No Civilians were harmed by "the" drone.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
David_H:
"You managed to make your point without a personal swipe at the poster"
Pity you could not do the same.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
David_H:
.
I expressed my opinion on someone who defaces the image of the President of The United States. You want to support that? You want the degradation of our elected leader to be ok?
There is civil discourse in words and image. This image is not a part of civil discourse. I am saying so.And... oh... btw... David/PA. You will have to change your syntax. I told you before, if you're going to be multi-personalities, you need to change up your writing style.
- 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
David_H:
You have excellent command of the English language.That is a fact I don't think you will dispute.
"You managed to make your point"
I'll clarify it for anyone that doesn't understand. However I think you do.
You could have said:
You made your point without etc. I just don't understand etc.I would have responded. Thank you David, I have been an anti war activist for 40+ years.
"Managed" changes the meaning of the sentence.The first time you responded to one of my comments, I will not go into. That was a different type of affront, but you were hot under the collar at many others. I replied with no vitriol. I did not take it personally.
The second time you replied to one of my comments, you took a similar tack to this last one. I ignored it. First one is on me. I'm a patient sort of fellow.
You may not remember the comment. To paraphrase you:
That is a valid point of view, I think. Thank you for offering it.Something like that but the meaning was all in "I think".
Since you just did it again, I though it wise to draw your attention to it.
If you have an ax to grind with me, let's air it out.I don't know you.
I first became aware of you, in the thread I mention above, the night you came through and were "venting" by commenting on personal attacks being made against Political Amazon.If we have a history that I don't know about, here or elsewhere, please let me know.
I prefer not to launch into personal attacks, but like you I tend to respond in kind. I would not call it a failing, perhaps an understandable reaction to aggression.
I abhor sophistry, (modern meaning) but like you, I understand it's application. Evidenced on your part, by how quickly you disambiguated your comment to totally "dilapidated", linguistically exonerated yourself, and called him or her "dilapidated". All in one sentence Then you refer to your wit, and stinging commentary as a failing, further reaching for one more potential slider to zing through undetected.
It's the strongest suit I have seen (metaphor) you don David. You are a practiced and skilled verbal warrior. Don't deny your nature. It's a declaration of either weakness, or arrogance. Both a portent of doom in martial arenas, be they real, imagined, physical, or otherwise. That being said, I congratulate you on your skill. I give credit where it is due.
So, is this a mere case of unintentional composition of a couple of sentences, on your part? or do we have a personal problem?
In case it crosses your mind, I'm about as thin skinned as a tank, that is not the third possibility.
I am not your enemy yet, that is now up to you. I would prefer that not to be the case.
I am simply stating the way I have perceived your manner of communication.What say you?
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
totally_dilapidated: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
David_H:
Fair enough.
I thank you, and will look forward to better discourse with you. - 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
David_H:
Thanks again.
Have a great night.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
David_H:
Excuse me?
You see text as far more unsettling than imagery? Well, that's for you, but for others? Your narrow opinion is not understanding others or the difference between text and image.Point of fact, the caves at Lascaux show image predates text. Paintings are the most sought after endeavor of humankind. No other endeavor of man approaches the value of painting, not architecture, music, literature, sculpture. Some paintings become so valuable, they are priceless. No amount of money on earth can buy them. So, I claim the image is far more radically offensive than text. And, according to history and the prevailing understanding of imagery worldwide today, my opinion has more weight than yours in this matter.
Under Community Guidelines:
Creating multiple accounts:
Gaming the system or getting around a suspension or ban by creating a new account is not acceptable.I did not read it is a violation to suggest someone has multiple profiles. Since you are accusing me of violating some rule, then I will gather the data evidence from the postings on Current with the ID's David_H and PoliticalAmazon and draw comparison conclusions to support my theory.
- 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
totally_dilapidated: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
David_H:
Please flag me so I can have a discussion with Regina.
- 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
totally_dilapidated: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
totally_dilapidated
-
David_H:
Cronies?
I have no cronies.
But I do perceive a crone here... - 1 year ago
-
totally_dilapidated
-
-
harleyblueswoman
-
IT'S CALLED WAR FOR A REASON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Has there ever been one that civiilians haven't got the worse end of the deal???????? Get a freaking grip on reality!!!!!!!! No one wants innocent people to die but it happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Should we just let Gaddaffi kill everyone? Guess that would be ok!!! I mean what do we do....damned if we do and damned if we don't!!! and TRUMP is the douchbag you can thank for all the Birther bullcrap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get off my President's back and let him do his freaking job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You make it sound like President Obama loaded the drones and did it himself.....gee let's see where are those civilians at?
NATO< NATO< NATO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are all in it together!!!!
Do you want his job? Do you think it is easy trying to do all he has to do? especially after the Mess that BUSH left this country in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do you really think that he likes that bullshit that TRUMP has been doing when he has more important things to dwell on?????? Do you think He enjoys hearing that the civilians got killed? Besides.....is there a difference between civilian deaths and people in the military deaths???????????? DEATH!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not good for anyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!And I would appreciate it if you would not use my Saviors's name in vain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
harleyblueswoman
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
harleyblueswoman: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
harleyblueswoman
-
David_H:
http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm
You sir are totally clueless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
harleyblueswoman
-
-
VoyagerFilms
-
PoliticalAmazon - you are clearly on the wrong site. I think you are looking for the "Idiots-R-Us" site. Please exit with your rubbish now.
- 1 year ago
-
VoyagerFilms
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
LIBYAN CIVILIAN MASSACRE BY U.S. DRONES THAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
This story is a confabulation. It's a bald faced lie.
Read this exchange at the beginning.
GENERALNATTYUmm where does it say that the drone hit civilians? , it says that it took out a rocket launcher that was used to attack civilians.
"A U.S. Air Force Predator drone took out a rocket launcher used to attack civilians in the battle between Qadhafi forces and civilians in Misrata, Libya, NATO said today."
===========================================================
Political Amazon's response
Sorry--thought the Gates and civilian info was in the same article. My bad.==========================================================
I challenge you to show us where it is there is a Civilian Massacre by U.S. Drones going on right now in Libya.
You are a liar and you are insulting every person on this thread to do nothing more than feed your irrational hatred of Obama.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
stupidamericanz
-
ZiggyStrange:
what about pakistan many killed by drones
- 1 year ago
-
stupidamericanz
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
stupidamericanz:
That has no relevance to this thread. Please try to stay on topic.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
stupidamericanz
-
His supporters no care about human life they care more about Obama look good and if you attack his drones you racist.
- 1 year ago
-
stupidamericanz
-
-
Leen61
-
We are quietly getting embroiled in our third war. Fourth if you include Pakistan. Does the humanitarian part officially end when we start killing the people we are supposed to be saving?
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
KB723
-
Leen61:
Happens Every Time Leen.... =(
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
Leen61
-
KB723:
Sad but true. I'm tired of war. :(
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
KB723
-
Leen61:
Yeah, it would be nice not to have such disruption in an already Mad World.... I wish it would end myself... =( But if it did, I always hope the Swedish Bikini Team might drop by and bring Beer, Really Good Beer.... Know what I mean??? =)
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
Leen61
-
KB723:
KB, sorry this isn't one of my major fantasies....know what I mean?
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
KB723
-
Leen61:
I just think that is something to throw in as levity... "Perspective".... =)
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
Leen61
-
KB723:
OK KB. :)
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
KB723
-
Leen61:
Coool... =)
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
Leen61: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
Leen61
-
David_H:
That's true, David. When you hear the words humanitarian mission, chances are it's a bunch of BS. When that humanitarian mission involves fighter jets and drones.
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
Leen61: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
Leen61
-
David_H:
It makes me sad too, David. I have no idea what the hell is wrong with us. :(
I'm well David and I hope you are too. :) - 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
http://tinyurl.com/3fcchey
NATO forces hit civilian areas in Libya, commence drone attacksThe UN Security Council resolution purportedly authorizing U.S./NATO operations in Libya was further undermined yesterday when NATO airstrikes reportedly hit civilian targets in Tripoli and other cities.
As France 24 reports today,
NATO planes staged raids on civil and military sites in the Libyan capital Tripoli and other cities, JANA news agency said, without confirming the number of people killed and wounded. Earlier air raids conducted by the Western alliance struck near a compound in Tripoli where Kadhafi resides.
“A military source said civil and military sites were targeted by the colonialist aggressor,” said JANA, specifying that the strikes had also covered Al-Khums, Gharian, El Assa and Sirte, the birthplace of strongman Moamer Kadhafi.
Three new explosions rocked the Libyan capital in the late evening as NATO warplanes overflew Tripoli, AFP journalists said, after several earlier blasts in the city centre and outlying quarters.
The Chinese news agency Xinhau adds that civilian infrastructure was among NATO’s targets:
NATO warplanes bombed several military and civilian targets in Tripoli, resulting in casualties Saturday night.
Three loud explosions were heard near the Women’s Military Academy in downtown Tripoli after NATO fighter jets flew over the capital, a Xinhua correspondent said.
The NATO airstrike also targeted cities of al-Khums and Sirte, destroying water-supply and sewage systems as well as private cars, the state-run JANA news agency quoted the Libyan military as saying.
Even before the new reports of NATO hitting civilian targets, the military alliance was coming under criticism from the Libyan opposition — which NATO is ostensibly supporting — for not doing enough to protect civilians from pro-Gaddafi forces.
Last week, NATO reportedly halted operations in defense of civilians in the city of Ajdabiya, due to inclement weather conditions that inhibited their military capabilities. Libyan rebel spokesman Shamsiddin Abdulmolah, however, pointed out to CNN that the loyalists who were bombing the city “have no problem with the weather conditions there.”
Gaddafi’s forces were using Grad missiles and mortars, the spokesman said, “and sometimes we feel that NATO wants to use any excuse out there so they don’t carry out their duties.”
But NATO leaders have already made it clear that they view their mission as deposing Gaddafi, not necessarily enforcing a no-fly zone or protecting civilians which Resolution 1973 originally authorized.
Two weeks ago, President Obama and his British and French counterparts, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy, made public their objective of regime change, which was specifically not authorized by Resolution 1973. In a joint op-ed, they wrote:
So long as Gaddafi is in power, Nato and its coalition partners must maintain their operations so that civilians remain protected and the pressure on the regime builds. Then a genuine transition from dictatorship to an inclusive constitutional process can really begin, led by a new generation of leaders. For that transition to succeed, Colonel Gaddafi must go, and go for good.
They subsequently made it clear that they were stretching Resolution 1973 even further, by sending in ground forces, despite the resolution’s explicit prohibition of “a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory.”
The reports of NATO attacks on civilian infrastructure are simply the next logical step in this process of mission creep. While NATO will undoubtedly deny that it is intentionally hitting infrastructure, history shows that this is certainly within its modus operandi.
In the 1999 bombing of Serbia, for example, NATO intentionally bombed bridges, a television station and other civilian targets in an effort to weaken Slobodan Milosevic’s communication and transportation capabilities. The attacks were a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, as are the alleged bombings of water-supply and sewage systems yesterday in Libya.
More civilian deaths at the hands of the U.S. and NATO in Libya should be expected going forward, especially with the recent deployment of Predator drones in the country. These unmanned flying bombers have become notorious in Pakistan and Afghanistan for indiscriminately killing civilians.
While the Pentagon insists on the targeting precision of drones, their track record is less than impressive. As Geoff Simons, author of Drone Diplomacy, points out in a letter to the Guardian,
The evidence is overwhelming that drone usage in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere massively increases “collateral damage”. On 6 May 2002 a drone killed 10 Afghan civilians in a car convoy. On 5 January 2006 a drone targeting al-Qaida‘s Ayman al-Zawahiri blew up a house in Pakistan. He wasn’t there and eight civilians were killed. A week later a Predator ordered into action from CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, destroyed three houses in Demadola, Pakistan, killing 22 civilians, including five women and five children.
On 19 May 2009 a drone attacked homes of villagers in North Waziristan thought to be aiding insurgents, killing 14 women and children. On 2 December 2010, Conflict Monitoring Centre in Islamabad issued a report charging that the US was deliberately ignoring Pakistani civilian deaths (2,043 over five years) caused by drones. On 23 January 2011, after 13 more civilians were killed, 2,000 tribesmen in North Waziristan held a protest against drone missile strikes.
In May 2010 Philip Alston, UN special representative on extrajudicial executions, warned of a “PlayStation” mentality among drone operators in the United States. Alston, a professor of law at New York University, said that he’s “particularly concerned that the US asserts an ever-expanding entitlement to target individuals across the globe … an ill-defined licence to kill without accountability.”
The deployment of drones in Libya comes just on the heals of a drone attack in Pakistan that reportedly killed five children and four women, who were among the “militants” targeted for execution.
As the weapons are now being used in Libya, these sorts of tragedies will be expected, especially since the U.S. and NATO have already made clear that they are not bound by international law. Having already exceeded Resolution 1973 with declarations of regime change and commitment of ground forces in Libya, they now appear to be disregarding the Geneva Conventions in targeting civilian infrastructure.
The violations can only be expected to continue going forward, unless the U.S./NATO intervention is halted in its tracks.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
KB723
-
WooHooo!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
Umm where does it say that the drone hit civilians? , it says that it took out a rocket launcher that was used to attack civilians.
"A U.S. Air Force Predator drone took out a rocket launcher used to attack civilians in the battle between Qadhafi forces and civilians in Misrata, Libya, NATO said today."
- 1 year ago
-
GENERALNATTY
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
GENERALNATTY:
Sorry--thought the Gates and civilian info was in the same article. My bad.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
PoliticalAmazon:
Ok no prob bro
- 1 year ago
-
GENERALNATTY