Obama Administration punishes reporter for using multimedia
source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/bronstein/detail?entry_id=87978
-
-
- FreetobeyoUandme7
- added this
White House officials have banished one of the best political reporters in the country from the approved pool of journalists covering presidential visits to the Bay Area for using now-standard multimedia tools to gather the news.
The Chronicle's Carla Marinucci - who, like many contemporary reporters, has a phone with video capabilities on her at all times - pulled out a small video camera last week and shot some protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser at the St. Regis Hotel.
She was part of a "print pool" - a limited number of journalists at an event who represent their bigger hoard colleagues - which White House press officials still refer to quaintly as "pen and pad" reporting.
But that's a pretty Flintstones concept of journalism for an administration that presents itself as the Jetsons. Video is every bit a part of any journalist's tool kit these days as a functioning pen that doesn't leak through your pocket.
In fact, Carla and her reporting colleague, Joe Garofoli, founded something called "Shaky Hand Productions" - the semi-pro, sometimes vertiginous use of a Flip or phone camera by Hearst reporters to catch more impromptu or urgent moments during last year's California gubernatorial race that might otherwise be missed by TV.
The name has become its own brand; often politicians even ask if anyone from Shaky Hand will show at their event. For Carla, Joe and reporters at other Hearst newsrooms where Shaky Hand has taken hold, this was an appropriate dive into use of other media by traditional journalists catering to audiences who expect their news delivered in all modes and manners.
That's the world we live in and the President of the United States claims to be one of its biggest advocates.
Just the day before Carla's Stone Age infraction, Mr. Obama was at Facebook seated next to its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, and may as well have been wearing an "I'm With Mark" t-shirt for all the mutual admiration going back and forth.
"The main reason we wanted to do this is," Obama said of his appearance, "first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media. And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you've got citizens who are informed, who are engaged."
Informed, in other words, through social and other digital media where videos of news are posted.
The President and his staffers deftly used social media like Twitter and Facebook in his election campaign and continue to extol the virtues and value. Except, apparently, when it comes to the press.
So what's up with the White House? We can't say because neither Press Secretary Jay Carney nor anyone from his staff would speak on the record.
Other sources confirmed that Carla was vanquished, including Chronicle editor Ward Bushee, who said he was "informed that Carla was removed as a pool reporter." Which shouldn't be a secret in any case because it's a fact that affects the newsgathering of our largest regional paper (and sfgate)and how local citizens get their information.
What's worse: more than a few journalists familiar with this story are aware of some implied threats from the White House of additional and wider punishment if Carla's spanking became public. Really? That's a heavy hand usually reserved for places other than the land of the free.
But bravery is a challenge, in particular for White House correspondents, most of whom are seasoned and capable journalists. They live a little bit in a gilded cage where they have access to the most powerful man in the world but must obey the rules whether they make sense or not.
CBS News reporter, Mark Knoller, has publicly protested the limited press access to Obama fundraisers, calling the policy "inconsistent." "It's no way to do business," wrote Politico's Julie Mason, "especially [for] a candidate who prides himself on transparency."
A 2009 blog by the White House Director of New Media states that "President Obama is committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history."
Not last week.
Mason referred to the San Francisco St. Regis protest as "a highly newsworthy event" where "reporters had to rely on written pool reports..."
Except, thanks to Carla's quick action with her camera, they didn't.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/bronstein/detail?entry_id=87978
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, US Politics, Elections 2012
-
- tags:
- Obama, Protest, Freedom of the Press
-
-
Warren_Merrill
-
A few weeks ago a reporter was locked in a closet during a certain period of a Biden fundraiser. Transparency was a fun campaign word in 2008. Now the Obama administration doesn't think it's such a good idea.
- 1 year ago
-
Warren_Merrill
-
-
August_K
-
The rest of the article on sfgate states that the reporter broke some rules.
"but must obey the rules whether they make sense or not."
- 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
Tuppy54
-
I will not be voting again for this fraud who stomps on freedom of the press to control his corporate manufactured image. Time to write in an actual progressive like Kucinich or Grayson.
- 1 year ago
-
Tuppy54
-
-
samthesixth
-
Hypocrisy at its finest.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
Leen61
-
Ah yes, Mr. Transparency Award's communications people don't want anything that might be construed as negative publicity hitting the airwaves. Nothing different than any other pol out there. They want their message controlled and that is the same as the right wing/MSM. George Allen found out first hand what not being able to control your message does to your political future. Granted, compared to the Bush administration it still sheds more light on reality than the prior presidential example. But it still leaves much to be desired. We get it, not everyone will agree with what you're doing and will voice it. Why not let that reality play out to the public and then do something to correct what is displeasing the people. Sounds simple enough.
- 1 year ago
-
Leen61
-
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
What ever happened to freedom of the press?
- 1 year ago
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
-
Schnookums
-
FreetobeyoUandme7:
It's been effectively gone for a long long time. People are just now noticing because they have something to compare it to on a nationwide level. 15 years ago it would have been almost unheard of for someone to be reading a San Francisco Chronicle article (or watching Democracy Now online) in Maine, or Alabama, or North Dakota. Now people do it everyday. Compare that to whatever your local media is, and for many it becomes obvious what's been missing.
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
Schnookums
-
-
FreetobeyoUandme7:
By the way, I can't get this out of my head every time I see you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_26FOHoaC78
My Aunt helped produce this in the 1970's, and I spent time on some of the sets. What I learned that summer truly formed who I am today.......
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
Schnookums:
Interesting. I don't recall ever seeing this.
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM