Image
OrchidBlack
Interesting piece by Leo Hickman…

Watching from afar how the environmental debate plays out in the US can be perplexing for many onlookers. Arguably, nowhere is the so-called "culture war" between left and right so heavily fought.

What is often not fully absorbed by onlookers, though, is the underlying role that religious doctrine – or "pulpit power" - plays in the environmental debate in the US. On the one hand, you have the "Creation Care" movement which is prevalent in some quarters of the Christian Church. On the other, particularly among evangelicals, you often see a vitriolic reaction aimed towards environmentalism.

Just last month, a survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors found that 41% strongly disagreed with the statement: "I believe global warming is real and manmade." The survey also found that 52% of the pastors address the issue of the environment with their churches once a year or less, with evangelical pastors speaking less often on the environment than mainline pastors.

When, in 2007, I interviewed the Bishop of London in the midst of his "fast" from flying, I asked him about this issue. He was scornful of evangelicals who "justify and sanctify irresponsible, anti-social behaviour" though a very literal interpretation of the Old Testament's "mythological language".

Much of this debate seems to centre on the interpretation of one of the most contentious verses in the Bible – the so-called Dominion Mandate, or Genesis 1:28:

And God blessed them [Adam and Eve], and God said unto them, be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the Earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the Earth.

An organisation in the US called the Cornwall Alliance has intentionally and prominently positioned itself at the very heart of this debate. It describes itself as "a coalition of clergy, theologians, religious leaders, scientists, academics, and policy experts committed to bringing a balanced Biblical view of stewardship to the critical issues of environment and development". Its board of advisors features many religious leaders and thinkers, but includes scientists such as the climate sceptic Dr Roy Spencer. Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, its spokesman, is a prominent media figure in the US, appearing on shows such as Fox News' Glenn Beck, where he dispenses his harsh criticism of environmentalism.

Continued at The Guardian...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Green,   Culture,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Religion Global Warming Opinion Environmentalism 3 more
  3.     
    |

40 comments // U.S. Evangelicals and Environmentalism

  • August_K
    • 0
      August_K  
    • A snippet from the wonk room/think progress article link Orchid Black posted below.

      "CFACT and the Cornwall Alliance, according to disclosures filed with the Washington State Secretary of State’s office, share a common fundraising firm, ClearWord Communications Group. ClearWord has helped raise millions of dollars not only for CFACT and Cornwall,
      but also for infamous polluter front groups like FreedomWorks,

    • 1 year ago
  • August_K
    • 0
      August_K  
    • So what else is new?
      The billionaires of the world have been manipulating groups of people who can't think for themselves for decades and now the plan is to use their church leaders to tell them what to believe AND tell them how to vote too.

      If these profit hungry environment polluting fat cats want to involve churches in what's actually business AND politics.....perhaps we need to change those laws regarding the tax exempt status of the houses of worship who accept money to push political agendas?

      One only needs to read the below recent headline and a few lines of text to see that this is just more of the same BS.

      Tea Party Jesus: Koch's Americans For Prosperity Sidles Up to Religious Right for 2012 Campaign

      "David Koch's key operative, Tim Phillips, is moving to merge the religious right with the Tea Party movement -- just in time for the presidential race.
      But there’s something more at work here than just good coalition politics. Movement strategists, such as Reed and Phillips, want to fully co-opt or merge the Religious Right, its organizing infrastructure, and its activists into the Tea Party wing of the GOP.

      So conservative Christian voters are being told that a radically limited federal government is God’s idea, and that right-wing economic policies are mandated by the Bible."

      http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/150622/tea_party_jesus%3A_koch%27s_americans_fo...

    • 1 year ago
  • sidpomy
    • +3
      sidpomy  
    • If we can rape the heartland of America to the point where the land literally turns to dust and becomes completely unusable for years (Dustbowl) then we can do the same to the entire Earth. What's possible on a moderate scale is surely possible on a larger scale, especially with modern industrial equipment.

      The global tragedy of the commons, as it were, is one of mankind's greatest follies. And what fuels this shortsightedness that we can't consume infinite resources forever? Two things in my opinion: religion - the enemy of human reason, and the blind pursuit of profit - the enemy of human morals.

    • 1 year ago
  • warman1138
    • +1
      warman1138  
    • Many times in the past, civilizations have collapsed due to, or helped along by enviormental degragation. Makes you wonder, why exactly, Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden of edan. Was it just the apple?

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
  • cherry5000
  • OrchidBlack
  • bike10
  • KB723
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • About a decade ago, religious right (called "evangelicals" and "fundamentalists" now) leaders started calling for their followers to conduct their life in a sustainable way. They were speaking specifically towards the environment and the role humans play in the environment, but certainly "sustainability" could be applied to all parts of one's life.

    • 1 year ago
  • TheAmbivalante
    • +3
      TheAmbivalante  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      That's nice. Seriously. It is. It's heartening to see that some are waking up.

      Unfortunately, there are still plenty of well-placed, high-profile evangelicals that are actively fighting against any attempts to institutionalize environmentally-friendly limitations. And they are, much more often than not, constituents of the GOP who, in turn, suck on any energy lobbyist cock within reach.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • TheAmbivalante:

      TC, I mentioned g the apparent change in heart of a few religious-right leaders only in passing, as a kind of historical perspective of the RR and environmentalism.

      We witnessed the birth of political-religion co-dependency when Ronald Reagan first bent knee to the religious right. In exchange for their votes to make him president, he created a monster of leviathan proportion. Part of that quid-pro-quo deal was Reagan's allowing the RR a seat at the policy-setting banquet table, and they've used it like a cudgel ever since.

      As the years progressed, the GOP and the RR became more and more co-dependent, to the point that, now, the GOP would be hardpressed to win a presidential election without the nearly-majority backing of its RR faction.

      That cudgel of co-dependency can be wielded both ways, and the GOP political influence the RR so eagerly and ruthlessly took advantage of, struck back. After waiting long enough so that the hook was set, the GOP began demanding its own tribute. One of those demands was support of their anti-environment policies.

      The one RR leader I specifically remember taking the hesitant pro-environment stance was Jerry Falwell, who was aging quickly and had increasing serious medical problems.

      This revision of values is not unusual as people age. Hell, if we brain cancer and impending death could make Leeatwater*** question, at his deathbed, his entire professional life of cruel and ruthless political campaign tactics, there might be hope for redemption, at least on a small scale, of Jerry Falwell.

      ------

      ***Although Atwater is the most famous for his "deathbed apology" about his tactics in the campaign between GHWBush and Michael Dukakis, there are two others that provide more introflection.

      "In 1988, fighting Dukakis, I said that I 'would strip the bark off the little bastard' and 'make Willie Horton his running mate.' I am sorry for both statements: the first for its naked cruelty, the second because it makes me sound racist, which I am not. Mostly I am sorry for the way I thought of other people. Like a good general, I had treated everyone who wasn't with me as against me."
      --"I'm Still Lee Atwater" (John Brady, 12/1/1996)

      "Long before I was struck with cancer, I felt something stirring in American societyIt was a sense among the people of the country -- Republicans and Democrats alike -- that something was missing from their lives, something crucial. I was trying to position the Republican Party to take advantage of it. But I wasn't exactly sure what 'it' was. My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood."
      --"I'm Still Lee Atwater" (John Brady, 12/1/1996)

      "My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. The '80s were about acquiring — acquiring wealth, power, prestige. I know. I acquired more wealth, power, and prestige than most. But you can acquire all you want and still feel empty. What power wouldn't I trade for a little more time with my family? What price wouldn't I pay for an evening with friends? It took a deadly illness to put me eye to eye with that truth, but it is a truth that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn on my dime. I don't know who will lead us through the '90s, but they must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of American society, this tumor of the soul."
      --Life Magazine, February 1991

    • 1 year ago
  • OrchidBlack
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • http://www.cornwallalliance.org/

      "fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over every living thing."

      This is the crux of their propaganda, and it is blatant BS. True Christians know the importance of stewardship to the planet and working with nature, not subduing it. That is oil company talk because that is all they know and do. These are not the worlds of anyone who truly cherishes and respects all this Earth gives us. And to me this looks like just another satellite of the fossil fuel lobby. If you look at the members of their board of "advisors", one of them is Roy Spencer who is tied to both the Heartland Institute and the George C. Marshall Institute, two skeptic organizations tied to oil company money. I am sure there are more.

    • 1 year ago
  • Wicks934
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • JanforGore:

      I agree, Jan, that some Christian groups (dominionists especially) have used the Bible to justify just about every atrocity you can think of, and rape-and-pillage of the earth is just one of them.

      But I do have to say that the Arkansas Baptists in my family are actually reasonable. All I have to do is bring up the part of the Bible that says (very loose quote here) "Take care of the earth and God's creatures as you would want Jesus to take care of you."

      Have you ever seen chickens harvested? I'm talking about when the contractors (Foster Farms, for instance) goes out to the subcontractors (like members of my mother's family in Arkansas) to pick up the chickens, live, for transport to Foster Farms (or whatever contractor) for killing and processing.

      Well, let's just say it is not for the faint-hearted, especially a faint-hearted vegetarian.

      That's when I brought up the idea of "do you want Jesus taking care of you like you take care of the animals that have been entrusted into your care" deal.

      Most of the family are very good-hearted Christians. It's just that they were raised raising their own chickens and killing them for their own table, and it was easy to transfer over to comercially raising thousands of chickens and having them harvested. They just had not really thought about it much before. Well, they may have THOUGHT about it, but not in connection to what it says in the Bible.

      Then I have an uncle in Arkansas that has a puppy mill...there is no hope for him, and I have as little to do with him as possible.

    • 1 year ago
  • CreditFigaro
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • CreditFigaro:

      I think you are correct that religion tells us what we want to hear.

      I think religion also tells heinously corrupted individuals what the people the corrupt want to dominate want to hear.

      Then the heinously corrupted individuals can pimp religion to the people they want to dominate by telling the "serfs" what they want to hear.

      I think of the historical "Negro spirituals" (or "poor white spirituals"; they are often very similar) and regard them as singing justification for not getting what they want, or accepting horrible treatment by their "overseers," so that, in the after-life they can have that "Mansion Just Over the Hilltop," where the streets are all paved with silver and gold."

      That's a song I still remember from Bible School. Scary. Talk about unfortunate imprinting.

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
  • Wicks934
  • MDBard
    • +9
      MDBard  
    • How come I never see a story about compassionate christian coalitions feeding the poor or helping the homeless, Evangelicals get tons of money from people that need it more then them and buy mansions, one more control mechanism of the far right. Hey send me money and you'll go to heaven....but if you don't I'll send you to hell....Love ya. It's like an abusive spouse...I only hurt you because you make me. I'll be so glad when the Rapture gets here and takes all these guys off my damn planet.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +7
      littlwarrior  
    • People use religion for power, religions use politics to gain more power, it is a vicious and disgusting cycle, that has been the same since the first scoundrel met the first fool thousands of years ago.

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
    • +4
      coolplanet  
    • Fundamantalists cite the first chapter of the bible as justification for trashing the planet.
      They should consider the last chapter of the bible which states: "And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations."

    • 1 year ago
  • OrchidBlack
    • +1
      OrchidBlack  
    • ThatCrazyLibertarian:

      Did you even bother to read the entire article? There are religious organizations doing everything in their power to prevent anything and anyone trying to solve pressing environmental issues because their religious text somehow tells them that environmentalism is “evil.”

    • 1 year ago
  • OrchidBlack
    • +3
      OrchidBlack  
    • ThatCrazyLibertarian:

      Excerpt From the Cornwall Alliance Declaration on Global Warming:

      WHAT WE DENY
      1) We deny that Earth and its ecosystems are the fragile and unstable products of chance, and particularly that Earth’s climate system is vulnerable to dangerous alteration because of minuscule changes in atmospheric chemistry. Recent warming was neither abnormally large nor abnormally rapid. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human contribution to greenhouse gases is causing dangerous global warming.
      2) We deny that alternative, renewable fuels can, with present or near-term technology, replace fossil and nuclear fuels, either wholly or in significant part, to provide the abundant, affordable energy necessary to sustain prosperous economies or overcome poverty.
      3) We deny that carbon dioxide—essential to all plant growth—is a pollutant. Reducing greenhouse gases cannot achieve significant reductions in future global temperatures, and the costs of the policies would far exceed the benefits.
      4) We deny that such policies, which amount to a regressive tax, comply with the Biblical requirement of protecting the poor from harm and oppression.

    • 1 year ago
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • OrchidBlack
  • OrchidBlack
    • +2
      OrchidBlack  
    • ThatCrazyLibertarian:

      I posted this article because it informs readers about one of the main organizations that actively plot to thwart any efforts at addressing environmental problems. How sinister of me…

      If you are here to distract away from the focus of this piece by all means go somewhere else and “spend” or rather waste your time.

      Finally, there is no such thing as common ground with climate change and science deniers nor do I or other scientists interested in saving this planet believe that we are obligated in squandering more precious time on people who deny facts. People who deny facts should not be considered and if they are alienated in the process of trying to inform the public and save this planet… well so be it.

    • 1 year ago
  • s_peak
    • +4
      s_peak  
    • OrchidBlack:

      I really think "Global warming" is a shield for assholes who just don't want to take the time to care... or don't want to be educated... or basically... they're just plain evil. My reasoning for this is as such:

      Even if you completely forget about global warming, there are many other aspects of our destruction that are manifesting as possible methods of our own extinction... Deforestation is slowly cutting off our air supply. Plants filter and create our air. Asthma and allergies are on the rise, and has been linked to lower air quality and toxins in the air. Fish in the ocean are now mostly too toxic to eat, as most of them contain dangerous levels of mercury, pcbs and other toxins.

      Honestly, you don't have to be a scientist to understand that we play a role in our OWN survival here. Global warming doesn't even matter... it's EVERYTHING else that we're doing that's the real problem. We know that microbes live faster life cycles than us. Soil samples have been taken from all the corners of the world... and what they found was resistance to all of our antibiotics... in organisms that had never been near them before.

      We fit somewhere into this web, and it is fragile. If you don't believe global warming, that's fine. You should believe in the oceans, and clean water, and breathable air, though...

      This, to me... seems very suspiciously like it's just a government front organization to help sustain the use of fossil fuel. I mean, it says "we don't believe in renewable energy" right on there.

    • 1 year ago
  • OrchidBlack
    • +6
      OrchidBlack  
    • s_peak:

      This organization is against all aspects of environmentalism not just global warming. Also, scroll up and click on the link to ThinkProgress. The information they discovered indicates that they are indeed a front group not for the government but rather oil companies.

    • 1 year ago
  • 1947lucymaldonado
  • Arizona_Huey
  • OrchidBlack
  • tverdell
  • OrchidBlack
  • tverdell
  • remanns
  • coolplanet
    • +3
      coolplanet  
    • Fundamentalists believe that heaven and earth must pass away before Christ will return to create a new heaven and earth from one sentence in the book of Revelation.

      It should be noted that Thomas Jefferson considered Revelation "the ravings of a mad man."

    • 1 year ago
  • dreamsenvoy
  • OrchidBlack
more from Community:

top videos