Community | May 10, 2011 | 621 comments

OBL's son says U.S. broke international law 'IF' his father is dead

source: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/05/osama-bin-ladens-son-full-text.html

Image
PoliticalAmazon
Wel, well, WELL! Things are certainly getting interesting now.

OBL's fourth son, apparently acting as a spokesperson for the family, is calling for evidence that OBL was actually killed.

He is also calling any such death as illegal, and questions why Sadam got a trial but his father, OBL, did not.

It looks like it's gonna be "put-up-or-shut-up time" real soon.
----------------------------------

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/05/osama-bin-ladens-son-full-tex...

Osama bin Laden's son says U.S. broke international law 'if' his father is dead

May 10, 2011 | 12:35 pm

Osama bin Laden's son Omar says he always disagreed with his father about violence, and is now disagreeing with the violence purportedly used against his father.
In a statement written by the Bin Laden family but signed only by Omar, 30, the United States is accused of breaking international law by killing the un armed terrorist leader without a trial. That is, they said, if the mission was indeed successful.

Omar bin Laden began the statement (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/world/asia/binladen-statement.html?_r=3&re...) by saying that he and the family do not believe that the Al Qaeda leader is dead and, like the so-called deathers in this country, want to see photographs and/or video evidence as proof.

"We are not convinced on the available evidence in the absence of dead body, photographs, and video evidence that our natural father is dead," Omar bin Laden wrote in a statement that was released to the New York Times. "Therefore, with this press statement, we seek such conclusive evidence to believe the stories published in relation to 2 May 2011 operation Geronimo as declared by the President of United States Barrack Hussein Obama in his speech that he authorized the said operation and killing of OBL and later confirmed his death."

If his father were "executed," Omar said, he wonders why people such as Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic were given a chance in front of a judge while his father "was not arrested and tried in a court of law."

In the statement, Omar bin Laden identified himself as "the fourth-born son of our father," and said he "always disagreed with our father regarding any violence and always sent messages to our father, that he must change his ways and that no civilians should be attacked under any circumstances."

When it was announced earlier this month that the elder Bin Laden was dead, U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. maintained that the mission was indeed legal.

"Let me make something very clear," Holder said. "The operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful. He was the head of Al Qaeda, an organization that conducted the attacks of September the 11th [2001]. He admitted his involvement."

-----------------
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics
  2. tags:
    Obama,  Osama bin Laden,  Osama,  son,  1 more
  3.     
    |

621 comments // OBL's son says U.S. broke international law 'IF' his father is dead

  • jamjaminyourmouth
    • 0
      jamjaminyourmouth  

    • Plain and simple what America did was barbaric! As far as being a country all about freedom and fair trials we failed at that point. I just dont see why we couldn't of kept him in prison for the rest of his life ?

    • 1 year ago
  • crystalman
    • -1
      crystalman  
    • jamjaminyourmouth:

      I suppose in your wimpy world defeating the Nazis and Japanese was unethical...so not nice killing all those people. Don't you understand what kind of world we are living in? It is bloody, violent and very scary.

    • 1 year ago
  • jamjaminyourmouth
    • 0
      jamjaminyourmouth  
    • crystalman:

      Oh i understand the full extent of what kind of world we live in but i can say you are sure you know what country you are in. America isn't all your building it up to be. My main point is " JUST CAUSE THEY DID IT; DOSE NOT MAKE IT RIGHT OR OK" . read some books and learn your history.

    • 1 year ago
  • Nephwrack
    • +1
      Nephwrack  

    • "If his father were "executed," Omar said, he wonders why people such as Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic were given a chance in front of a judge while his father "was not arrested and tried in a court of law." "

      simple. they didn't want him to talk.

    • 1 year ago
  • crystalman
  • Nephwrack
  • mrtraffic
    • +1
      mrtraffic  

    • "IF HIS FATHER IS DEAD" Way to feed the trolls there junior. It says not to do that in the Koran. Look it up its somewhere in the back

    • 1 year ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • mrtraffic
  • crystalman
  • Mulers
  • VanessafromDC
  • zhafar
    • -4
      zhafar  

    • They should have got a back-hoe and buried him with a pigs carcass on national television at Guantonimo. Omar bin Laden needs to be bitch slapped!

    • 1 year ago
  • mrtraffic
  • Dusty_King
    • +2
      Dusty_King  

    • Very interesting comments. Bin Laden is responsible for killing 3,000 innocent people in our country. I'm not going to apologize for going into Afghanistan, how it was handled is a different story, but when comes down to brass tax.
      I'm not going to shed 1 damn tear over Bin Laden or his fucking 1,000 bastard children from one of his 5 wives. He's dead, too bad boy, you're not going to get any fucking sympathy from me. Nor will I talk smack about Obama, he did what he said he was going to do and we all voted for him. End of story.

      Do you guys really think we should weep over that SOB Bin Laden and now have crocodile tears for that murderer? Bin Laden kid can kiss my ass. I am so disgusted with this "news" story. This is worthy of the Enquirer.

    • 1 year ago
  • tlbuffin
  • jennilamb007
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • Mulers
  • VanessafromDC
  • theknopfknows
    • -9
      theknopfknows  
    • Image

    • OMAR THE TENT MAKER DIDN´T LIKE HIS FATHER BUT GOT MILLIONS ANYWAYS. SO THE MONEY RAN OUT
      GOLDEN GOOSE GOT COOKED HAWAIIAN STYLE, LUAU BEN LADEN,
      COST A LOT OF MONEY TO GET THIS DANGEROUS SICK UNARMED OLD MAN, FORMER CIA EMPLOYEE for 23 YEARS HA HA.
      SACRIFICE FOR THE NATIONAL IDENTITY AND PRIDE!
      AFTER 911 THE MUSLIMS DANCED IN THE STREET,
      and so USA is not any better at dancing over a sick old corpse.
      A TRILLION DOLLARS divided by 310 million AMERICAN people good old tax money.
      Would you take him alive if I gave you back the MONEY and LIVES?
      WOULD YOU?
      FREE MANNING YOU USA IDIOTS!

    • 1 year ago
  • darkmerkaba
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +5
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • darkmerkaba:

      You might want to brush up on your WWII history because there is a world of difference between Hitler and ANYBODY, including OBL.

      I think Hitler is in a class of his own. His only competitors, really, are Pol Pot and Joseph Stalin.

    • 1 year ago
  • darkmerkaba
    • -1
      darkmerkaba  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      Hitler swore to kill all Jews, OBL swore to kill all Americans/Westerners/any non-Muslim.
      Hitler took the Jews to mass killing camps, OBL brought the mass killings to the anyone who wasn't Muslim.
      Hitler was the head of a group of people desiring global domination and killed men women and children who stood in their way. OBL was the head of an organization of people desiring global domination and killed men women and children.

      The only difference between the two is that Hitler killed himself before we could get to him. or....is Hitler still alive because i havent seen any DNA evidence, dead pictures released, or (and i read this on a current site) POV video of him getting shot.

      Maybe you should brush up on your WWII history.

    • 1 year ago
  • ArchDruid
  • samthesixth
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • Mulers
  • Mulers
  • tlbuffin
  • ArchDruid
  • ArchDruid
  • Mulers
  • Mulers
  • Mulers
  • tlbuffin
  • Mulers
    • 0
      Mulers  
    • tlbuffin:

      but what about the details and those that didnt vote for obama, OBLs son maybe. whats ur opinion of americas aiding the 911 atack and are u saying that Ronald Reagan is worse than hitler then it still begs the question why is hitler exibit A

    • 1 year ago
  • tlbuffin
  • Mulers
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  

    • well we did break international law.but it isnt like that was the realm in wich bin laden was functioning.it would have been nice if he had.a whole lot less complicated and all.but that wasnt his standard

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • freecrack:

      OBL has never been indicted on crimes related to 9/11. The messages Bush Jr and then Obama claimed were from OBL--it's never been proven they were from OBL, and there is a whole lot of indications they weren't.

      OBL has been "killed" about 5 or 6 times by now. At this point, he's made fools of two presidents: Bush, whose attention span was so short he soon got distracted by moonbeams or whatever...and Obama, who claims he REALLY DID kill OBL, but destroyed or sequestered all evidence that could have been tested by independent forensic specialists to prove it was OBL the Seals got (along with the other civilians in the compound).

    • 1 year ago
  • darkmerkaba
  • Mulers
  • Mulers
  • freecrack
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      chances are.bin laden had absolutely nothing to do with 9-11.chances are the first reaction from bin laden was the most accurate, when he stated he didnt do it, but praised those who did.

      but at the end of the day, bin ladens recognized list of crimes reads like clarence bodigers rap sheet in robocop.if anyone deserved to die, it was obl.so fuck the pretense.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -5
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image

    • I've found the "War Is a Crime" website to be a good source in the past. The following is part of an article on their website.

      -------------------------

      http://warisacrime.org/content/lies-damn-lies-and-bin-ladens-death

      Lies, Damn Lies, and Bin Laden's Death
      Submitted by Stephen Lendman on Tue, 2011-05-03 08:41

      .....Separating Fact from Fiction

      Post-9/11, bin Laden became "Enemy Number One," the nation's top "security threat." In fact, if he hadn't existed, he'd have been invented for political advantage.

      In March 1985, after Ronald Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 166 to arm Afghan Mujahideen fighters, Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) recruited bin Laden to fight Soviet Afghan forces as a CIA asset. He likely remained one until his death, while simultaneously called "Enemy Number One," using him advantageously both ways.

      David Ray Griffin wrote seminal books on 9/11, including "The New Pearl Harbor," "The 9/11 Commission Report," "9/11 and American Empire," "9/11 Contradictions," "Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7," and "Osama Bin Laden: Dead of Alive?"

      It was also the title of his October 9, 2009 Global Research article, covering two types of evidence:

      (1) Objective evidence that he's dead:

      After December 13, 2001, his regularly intercepted messages stopped.

      On December 26, 2001, according to "a leading Pakistani newspaper" story, a prominent Taliban official said he attended his funeral.

      Bin Laden, in fact, was very ill with kidney disease. In September 2001, CBS News anchor Dan Rather reported that he was admitted to a Rawalpindi, Pakistan hospital on September 10, 2001, and France's Le Figaro said:

      "Dubai....was the backdrop of a secret meeting between Osama bin Laden and the local CIA agent in July (2001). A partner of the administration of the American Hospital....claims that (bin Laden) stayed (there) between the 4th and 14th of July (and) received visits from many members of his family as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. (During the same period), the local CIA agent, known to many in Dubai, was seen taking (the hospital's) main elevator (to) bin Laden's room."

      Why not if he was a valued asset.

      In July 2002, "CNN reported that (his) bodyguards had been captured in February of that year, adding: 'Sources believe that if the bodyguards were captured away from bin Laden, it is likely the most wanted man in the world is dead."

      Finally, despite Washington offering a $25 million reward for information leading to his capture or killing, no one came forward.

      (2) Testimonial evidence of his death:

      In 2002, influential "people in a position to know" that he died included:

      -- Pakistan President Musharraf;

      -- FBI counterterrorism head Dale Watson;

      -- Oliver North saying, "I'm certain that Osama is dead....and so are all the other guys I stay in touch with;"

      -- Afghanistan President Karzai;

      -- Israeli intelligence saying supposed bin Laden messages were fake; and

      -- Pakistan's ISI "confirm(ing) the death of....Osama bin Laden (and) attribut(ing) the reasons behind Washington's hiding (the truth) to the desire of (America's hawks) to use the issue of al Qaeda and international terrorism to invade Iraq."

      Other evidence includes former CIA case officer Robert Baer telling National Public Radio (NPR): "Of course he's dead."

      Then in March 2009, "former Foreign Service officer Angelo Codevilla published an essay in the American Spectator entitled 'Osama bin Elvis,' " saying:

      "Seven years after (bin Laden's) last verifiable appearance among the living, there is more evidence of Elvis's presence among us than for his."

      Griffin also explained fake messages and videos, saying today's advanced technology can fool experts, but not all of them.

      For years, bin Laden tapes surfaced at strategically-timed moments. Consider one on Friday, September 7, 2007 ahead the sixth 9/11 anniversary. Hector Factor's Neal Krawetz, a digital image forensics expert, said it was full of low quality visual and audio splices, a likely fake.

      Striking also was bin Laden's beard that was gray in recent images. In this one, it was black. In addition, he was dressed in a white hat and shirt, as well as a yellow sweater, the same attire as on an October 29, 2004 video. Moreover, the background, lighting, desk and camera angle were identical.

      Krawetz noted that "if you overlay the 2007 and 2004 videos, bin Laden's face is the same (unaged)." Only his beard was darker, and the picture contrast was adjusted. Most important are the edits showing obvious splices, at least six video ones in all. Even more audio ones were used that appeared to be words and phrases spliced together, making Krawetz suspect a vocal imitator was used.

      A Final Comment

      Clear evidence showed bin Laden died years ago, likely in December 2001. However, reporting it was concealed to pursue America's "war on terror."

      As a result, "Enemy Number One" was used to stoke fear as pretext for imperial wars on Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, perhaps others now planned, and numerous proxy ones in Somalia, Yemen, Bahrain, Palestine, Central Africa, Colombia, and elsewhere.

      Griffin wrote his bin Laden book, hoping to shorten America's wars. He also wished to expose "fake bin Laden tapes (used as) one part of an extensive propaganda operation....furthering the militarization of America and its foreign policy" while popular needs go begging.

      Obama's latest lie left America's imperial agenda unchanged. In fact, his announcement likely bolsters public support for what's clearly become unpopular, saying:

      "(T)hink back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11," urging people to show it again despite how militarism harms their security, well-being and futures by draining funds badly needed for domestic needs.

      Instead, expect increasing amounts used for corporate handouts and wars, Obama as uncaring about human needs as extremist Republicans. He's also an inveterate liar.

    • 1 year ago
  • theknopfknows
    • +2
      theknopfknows  
    • Image

    • WHAT IS THE BIG FUSS! 10 years a trillion dollars, 6000 USA TROOPS DEAD more injured a million Iraqi-Afghanistan-Pakistan, people dead, JUST TO GET! ONE OLD SICK MAN, UNARMED GOOOD JOB AMERICA REAL SMART:

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • theknopfknows
    • -5
      theknopfknows  
    • Image
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      GERONAMO DIED AFTER 27 YEARS IN AMERICAN INDIAN CONCENTRATION CAMP:
      AND OBAMA OR MILITARY NAMED BEN LADEN CODE NAME GERONAMO, INDIAN ABUSE IS CONSTANT OBAMA BLACK VISUAL EFFECT BUT KANSAS WHITE ON THE INSIDE OREO COOKIE. but he is crackers!

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • +4
      ninetyseven  

    • Wow- so many comments on this subject...at the end of the day...dont we all just want a little peace and quiet ?
      No fear of bombs....no threats to our family...no political diversity..anyone think of any way to get everyone to stop fighting ?
      How about tolerence of all beliefs and peoples ?
      Maybe helping one another peacefully ?
      awww i think thats a dream that may never come to pass.
      (off topic but maybe a pause is necessary sometimes)

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -3
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • ninetyseven:

      I think YOU want people to stop discussing this subject. Why is that?

      I also think anyone who actually believes there are no threats to us from terrorists is either crazy, delusional, or lying.

      Of course, the "terrorists" we really have to fear are the ones in our government, who use fear and terror to keep us complacent while they crush our constitutional rights.

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • +3
      ninetyseven  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      HaHa You think wrong...threats are every where...and yES fear the government.they can follow your cell phone .i wont slam you ...have your opinion....
      Please everyone keep talking about this subject.....you will make at least one person happy :+)

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
  • samthesixth
  • David_H
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • WagonMaster
    • +3
      WagonMaster  

    • I don't think it's going to be "put -up- or- shut-up time" " real soon" real soon There's no point to it. If some necrophile wants to morbidly see photos of gross dead people, they can get hold of some old copies of TRUE DETECTIVE magazine. Bin Laden's death is over and done with. Basically so is the story. Besides didn't someone violate at least some International Laws on 9/11? And who really gives a crap if a mass murderer is....murdered?

    • 1 year ago
  • Binary_Star
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Binary_Star:

      1. There is no proof OBL was connected to 9/11.

      2. OBL has never been indicted on 9/11 charges because, according to the FBI and the grand jury, there was no hard evidence to support such charges.

      3. There is no proof that OBL was actually killed. Obama made sure of that.

      4. However, there is plenty of proof Obama illegally sent our forces into Pakistan to "take out OBL," and in the process killed at least four residents of a residential compound, in a residential neighborhood.

      Therefore, to answer the burning question "Who is the terrorist now?," that would be President Obama.

      I wonder if OBL's family will try to get him investigated by the Hague?

    • 1 year ago
  • ZiggyStrange
  • ZiggyStrange
  • David_H
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +3
      ZiggyStrange  
    • David_H:

      We communicate in writing.
      Something is either accurate or it isn't.
      I'm not seeking to distance the President from anything.
      You, and others are trying to blame him for what happens every time there is an event of that nature. Information comes out in pieces, and always inaccurate at first.

      I will ask you the same question I asked PA.

      What was it Obama lied about regarding this operation?

      He said he was going to do it during his campaign, he had the opportunity, he did it.
      End of story. I'm glad he did.

      Anyone that expected an instant flawless detailed account from the W.H. related to a military operation is either in a fog, or hopelessly challenged.

      This is why the typical reaction to anything that provides an opportunity, is blame Obama. Ignorance, insanity, and propaganda. Like the article you were defending PA over, where she was lying and you knew it. Remember we were murdering civilians with drones in Libya? That's O.K. with you apparently. No problem with lies when they fit your agenda.

      Then you call me disingenuous for stating the obvious, which is a fact?

      Who is being disingenuous David? Seems to me it's you, again.

    • 1 year ago
  • David_H
  • ZiggyStrange
  • David_H
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +2
      ZiggyStrange  
    • David_H:

      See you never. I hope. But I don't believe you.

      Your ego will not allow you to not respond, it's a character thing.

      To use a metaphor in the form of a quote from a Scott I admire.

      "The back of your head's a treat"

    • 1 year ago
  • darkmerkaba
    • +1
      darkmerkaba  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      Ummm, we didnt illegally send forces into Pakistan. The deal with Pakistan was we couldnt enter their country UNLESS we have evidence that OBL is there. then all deals are off. they agreed YEARS ago. and guess what, he was there, we went in and killed him then threw his shit body over a ship in the ocean.
      NO. Laws. Broken.

    • 1 year ago
  • VanessafromDC
  • VanessafromDC
  • David_H
  • VanessafromDC
    • 0
      VanessafromDC  
    • David_H:

      Thanks for your opinion.......He ordered the bombing in NY & you sound like he should have walked.......Am I missing something here??? Are you one of those that feels he is a victim now......SCREW YOU!!!

    • 1 year ago
  • David_H
  • VanessafromDC
  • musicjohnny
    • -2
      musicjohnny  

    • OK, here's the thing: we're at war. We're not going to put every enemy soldier on trial are we? To those who say "but we put the nazi leader on trial after the war" well, yes we did....AFTER the war. We're in the middle of a war. If we have the opportunity to advance in that war by taking out an enemy leader....we do it. If he'd come out and surrendered, of course he would have been put on trial, but that's not what happened.

    • 1 year ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -3
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • musicjohnny:

      which war are you speaking of? because if you mean the one against pakistan, i didnt know it existed. if you mean the so called war on terror, that is nothing but a catchphrase. there isnt a war on al queda. they arent a nation. we treat them as criminals, so it at best a police action. now as a police action, this country doesnt have a policy that its ok to bring someone in dead or alive. so it wasnt that either. it was us killing someone we considered a danger. nothing more nothing less. if you can sleep at night with the idea that the corporate overlords that run the planet are given your consent to kill anyone they consider dangerous, more power to you.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -3
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • musicjohnny:

      1. Illogical comparison. The differences between "every enemy soldier" and "a Nazi leader" OBL are vast. Therefore, the same rules and policies applied to one do not apply to the other.

      2. Which "war" are we in the middle of? If you could provide the reference for the date war was declared, that would help.

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • +5
      ninetyseven  

    • Please excuse the ranting,,, all here at Current.
      Feels better now that some of the sceeve i feel for bin rotten is out of me.

      :+)

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • ninetyseven:

      You let the propaganda about OBL get to you like that?

      If so, you better lay in about 12 cases of Maalox because propaganda about mythical threats has turned out to be Obama's go-to remedy for any problem he is having in his presidency.

      He's a lot like GWBush that way.

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • +3
      ninetyseven  

    • the United States is accused of breaking international law by killing the un armed terrorist leader without a trial. That is, they said, if the mission was indeed successful.

      haha thats funny ...breaking international law....
      What the F@#$ do we care about breaking ANY law for killing that God awful scum..
      praize allah.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • +5
      congoboy  
    • ninetyseven:

      i wonder if any international laws were broken when u.s. airliners were commandeered by islamo-fascists who slashed the throats of innocent flight attendants and then flew said aircraft into several buildings murdering 3000 more?

    • 1 year ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -3
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • ninetyseven:

      there are those that feel for saying what you did it would be justifiable to kill you. they feel the law is on their side, and it would be just. so who gets to decide the ultimate arbiter of justice? who makes the rules, the moral judgements, whatever?

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • -1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • ninetyseven:

      No, the mission was an abject failure because Obama broke international law.

      Indeed, Obama has continued GWBush's steady march towards achieving OBL's goal for America... to force our country into bankruptcy, to make us less than the beacon of good we (mostly) were before 9/11, and make us more like the terrorists we fear.

      When Obama launched his Operation Manly-Man:Pakistan, he showed the world we are no better than OBL, and that we certainly are not the great country we were before 9/11.

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
  • congoboy
  • ninetyseven
    • -3
      ninetyseven  
    • Itsbatman_Durr:

      there are those that feel..."being prepared "is a deterent to anyone who might want to kill you.
      Who are those that feel they may want to kill me for what i said...this is America....Freedom of speech ? do You.. or .any friends..want to kill me ?

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -1
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • ninetyseven:

      you said: "What the F@#$ do we care about breaking ANY law for killing that God awful scum..
      praize allah."

      my point in answer to that is that you are very cavalier about saying its ok to kill someone you feel is a god awful scum. So by that logic it must be ok for others to kill you if they feel you are god awful scum.

    • 1 year ago
  • David_H
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -3
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • David_H:

      i hear ya! i for one am tired of nationalism, patriotism, and borders. its a false, man made construct designed to separate and control us. just because i fell from a womb somewhere doesnt mean i have to agree with the policies of that lands overlords, nor should it mean i need to dance when they yank the strings. we are one race, all members of humankind, and we need to treat all as equals and interact as such within our biosphere

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • 0
      ninetyseven  
    • David_H:

      Thanks for the comment and now here is some information for you.

      "citizens should report suspicious activity to their local law enforcement authorities. The “If You See Something, Say SomethingTM” campaign across the United States encourages all citizens to be vigilant for indicators of potential terrorist activity, and to follow NTAS Alerts for information about threats in specific places or for individuals exhibiting certain types of suspicious activity."
      Taken from Homeland Security Web Site.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • VanessafromDC
  • VanessafromDC
  • ninetyseven
    • -2
      ninetyseven  

    • "Let me make something very clear," Holder said. "The operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful. He was the head of Al Qaeda, an organization that conducted the attacks of September the 11th [2001]. He admitted his involvement."

      Thank you Mr Holder

    • 1 year ago
12345
1 - 100 of 621
more from Community:
from the community

top videos