How dare you. Faux called me and told me , personally, that there is no human being Left of Olbermann.

The richest man always wins, until money doesn't matter anymore. Thats why the super rich must be wary of how much they abuse the people.

well said.

Thank you

LMAO!!!!! Keith always did the "AARRGH!!!" when he talked about Murdoch on Countdown!

LOL! :)

LOL.

Loved your post, SIBob! :) +^d!

Thank you.

You're welcome. :)

You need to see a video Murdoch admitting this...?

Accusations seem to be enough for conservatives... gotta fight fire with fire I guess.

Don't just vote me down. Do it or admit your cowardice.

Edit: I'm sorry, I was wrong to post this.

p.s. I didn't vote you down.

20th? Really? Prove it. I've posted one comment on one article to you outside of that thread and sent 2 private messages in response to the one you sent me, so if you're going to lie outrageously, say 50k or something.
BTW it isn't an attack, it's fact.
You claimed to know what it was that caused certain women to be raped while others weren't: Their clothing; and when I asked for your help in deciding on whether or not I was rape bait, you chickened out.
You claimed I couldn't counter any of your arguments and said I was trying to guilt you into submission when I clearly did counter all of your arguments (while generously requiring you to counter only one of mine: why not give an equal amount of advice to men?) and you already said you didn't give a damn about me, so why should I expect you to feel bad over the fact that I was raped? That doesn't even make sense!
Then you proceeded to congratulate people who insisted I was an attention whore when it should be obvious that this issue is serious enough to take drastic measures: Most women would fight to their deaths rather than be raped, so really, what's so drastic about a few pics?
You think you were respectful? Go back to that thread and count how many of your responses to me were removed compared to the number of my responses to you that were removed. Notice anything?
We've covered all this ground months ago and I'm just sick and tired of the dance you and people like you do to avoid facing up to the facts: MEN ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR RAPE. Then I'm insulted/attacked/belittled/dismissed for insisting you tell them what THEY can do to prevent rape as though the fact that I'm a rape survivor makes my opinion irrelevant.
This isn't desperation, it's dedication and I'm dedicated to you Vix. You could be so much more than what you are now and it hurts me to see you waste your potential.

You consistently dodge every opportunity to make a real statement by insulting my mental stability and you wonder why I am not more pleasant.

OK. I am truly sorry for accusing you of voting me down and if there is any way I can make up for any damage I may have caused by posting that comment without any proof that it was indeed you who voted on it, feel free to come here and make your demands:

http://current.com/news/93232212_sluts-dont-cause-rape-rapists-do-why-slutwalks-...

I will meet them to the best of my ability.

And for whoever it was who did vote me down, I am sorry. I wasn't thinking. The news of one TV station being removed from the network of a foreign country is, by far, more important then defending the trillions of women, dead and alive, who were blamed for their own rape on the basis that they were dressed like/were literally sluts.

Again, I am sorry. If I haven't blocked you feel free to send me a private message telling me how I can make it up to you. If you are blocked follow the instructions I gave to Vixxen, and I promise, I'll do my best.

EFFECTIVE SIGN. bravo !!!

Classic liberal response, deflection rather than an answer. Based on your response I'll assume you mean Current is just as bad a Fox which means Current Lies!

Murdoch isn't afraid of a guy with ridiculously low ratings headed for an obscure network. If anything it's payback for Olbermann's shots at Fox.

I don't think it's a liberal thing (not that I'd call Vix something as nice as that).

Fuck no. Suck my kneecaps.

Hey, why are you still voting me down? Wouldn't it be much more satisfying to cuss me out? I might finally learn my lesson then.

Warren-Merrill you are being squirrlly and picking at your own nuts. Don't chew when your head is up where it is right now . And get your head out of there.

Your post would be a great insult if you were a 5th grader. But since you're not it's a typical liberal turning to vulgarities and insults due to the inability to intelligently atticulate your thoughts. Then again, I imagine you're finding it difficult to be articulate without intelligent thoughts.

"Isn't it amazing that a supposed media giant like Murdoch would do something so extreme to stifle free speech?"

BUt that's what Republic Syndicate and their Masters do "Bestest"

That's right, Milieu.

Perhaps Murdoch's conglomerate isn't as robust as we assume it is, and he needs some viagratization of his conglomerate.

Very nicely stated, PA! +^d!

Maybe not, but what it does show is that Murdoch is a very petty man which most ultra rich right wing assholes are. But Murdoch doesn't have to protect his integrity anymore, that horse has left the barn years ago and we all know he's a dick already. He does what the Kochs, Devos, Bradleys and all the other corporate tyrants do, squash freedom.

That's laughable. Why would anyone be afraid of a pundit with low ratings on MSNBC moving to an obscure network?

And the answer to your question is: He shouldn't be, so why is he?
From: Profile of the Sociopath

# Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

# Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."

Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

to watch that small network explode,if given the chance.

I think Murdoch's reaction to Olbermann being on Current indicate he is afraid of something. It seems logical that the "something" has to do with what Olbermann does that Murdoch feels threatened by.

For Murdoch to debase himself by using his huge power as a media mogul to force one of his clients to break a contract with Current (I assume there was a contract), over one pundit's being back on the air...I think Murdoch is very much threatened by someone he perceives he cannot control.

Perhaps Murdoch was behind Obama having to be shoved off of MSNBC right before Comcast took possession, and doesn't like Obama being so persistent and tenacious that he lined up another gig with Current.

Whatever...something's not right in Murdoch's reaction.

Excellent post, Milieu! And it's all true.

PA, I think you meant Olbermann..not Obama.

Maybe that's something you should ask Murdoch?
He's obviously uncomfortable with the Gore/Olbermann alliance.

If anything it's a powerplay. Murdoch has the power to show Olbermann he can control whether or not he's seen on tv even if it's by a small audience.

It's not obscure in Italy, 1 in 3 people watch it.

Someday Current will have more viewers than YouTube's Hamster On a Piano. If Olbermann had bad ratings at MSNBC don't expect them to get better at Current. There may be some initial curiosity. But eventually his ratings will be worse than at MSNBC.

Then Murdoch has done a great "up yours" to Olbermann.

do you have a link to that interview? the only sites I've been able to find it on was pay to view sites :(

I know. Isn't it great?

wrong acsent....also the best view of terry hacher

Since you find one dominating point of view acceptable, One must ask....Would still feel that way if the only news was liberal? Would You? Honestly? Yeah, I thought not!

QUOTE FROM CRYSTALMAN: "What's all the whinging and whining?"

---------

I know. You would think Murdoch, with being rated by Forbes' as the 13th-most powerful person in the world, wouldn't show his cowardice about Olbermann-uncensored being shown on a small media outlet like Current.

HOw's the Kool-Aid?

Do you push crystal meth like the pissant republican trash bags in the Bush CIA ? You know every dispicable meth dealer I ever knew was a right wing F everybody punk that would feed his own grandmother to his dogs on a wym. Ya, republicans. Every one of them. The scourge of humanity. Thoughtless selfish dirt bags. Smell of rotting flesh and look pale as the angel of death. Close to hell with nothing left of soul to lose. But it would just be wringing and whineing to be concerned for them . There is just a differance of opinion and ideology that we should learn to live with. None of my business. I"m sure. Just as Murdock pushing his murderous poison kool aide is no body's business except his bosses who let him front for them. Who cares about various ideologies. They are just names of different things in one classification . Few people know the differance between one word or an other in America anyway. If a guy could talk them over toward the cliffs then thats just a job to do for some paper dollars. No one sould bear a grudge over it . Or hardly even notice any thing is going on. No one should notice whats in a name. Like "Crystal " man . What is a crystal man. Whats in the name. I'm asking you crystalman. What is in your name. What do you say with it . Are you saying you are a republican at heart. Are you saying you can trick your way through a pointless life that nobody should pay attention to unless you invite them. Or advertizeing. Like with a business name. Like ...crystalman ? I am watching a movie right now called THE DOMINO PEOPLE . You should watch it sometime. That is the kind of thing you are standing up for . Or laying down for as the case may be. Murdock's power that you defend is based on murder . You are defending murder . Murder begets money for these people . They have done so much murder over recent generations that they have more money available to them then they will ever need to continue thier domination of the world . Maybe you want to be on top of the world with them . But when you choose to be on thier side you just become one of thier suckers , a " shamo " , While your brain is thinking of ways to serve them they are sitting on your head with a chain around your neck . Thats not where freedom lives. You would be better off chooseing freedom right from the start rather then regreting when it is too late to effectively make that choice. But maybe thats all just ideology to you and maybe you are just going to bounce around like a ball in a pachinco till you fall for the lowest common denominator. If you push people to the cliffs for the bad guys because you are in awe of what they are doing with thier power and money remember while you do this that you will be at the edge of the cliffs yourself some day and some shamo working for your chosen bosses will be pushing you.

Love the last paragraph!!! Such a grand visual!!!

You got a vote from me... Great image !!! Laughed so hard I almost soiled my undergarments.

TMI. LOL

(just kidding)

a chalkboard instesd of a cross..lol

I am familiar with the community guidelines and I'm curious, on what basis did you flag this?
(Hint: "Because it makes me look like a stupid ass" is not a valid answer)

looks like these twisted punks are out to give you a hard time. Take my advice..just walk over them.

Good idea. I need to invest in stilettos apparently. +^'d