Community | May 27, 2011 | 90 comments

Gays in the Military...Troops May Fear Sharing Beliefs

Image
congoboy
SAN DIEGO -- Military chaplains are concerned troops could be punished for expressing objections to homosexuality once the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is lifted.

Leaders of 21 religious groups that provide chaplains to the U.S. military on Monday sent a letter to the chiefs of chaplains of the Navy, Army and Air Force. They want Congress or the Pentagon to guarantee troops won't be punished if they openly discuss their objections to homosexuality.

"This is already an assault and a challenge on individual conscience and some Soldiers may think it's forcing them to abandon their religious beliefs or being marginalized for holding to those beliefs," said Douglas E. Lee, a retired Army brigadier general and chaplain, whose signature was the first on the letter.

Chaplains who preach at base chapels that homosexuality is a sin will still be entitled to express their beliefs during worship after the military's adopts its new policy allowing openly gay troops, according to training materials given to Marines.

But the organizations say it is not enough to state that service members and chaplains remain free to exercise their faith in chapel services. http://www.military.com/news/article/chaplains-troops-may-fearing-beliefs-on-gay...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Culture,   current cult,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Gays In The Military Dont Ask Dont Tell
  3.     
    |

90 comments // Gays in the Military...Troops May Fear Sharing Beliefs

  • Warren_Merrill
    • -1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • There's no way to guarantee what happens off base even though military personnel are always accountible for their actions. There's no guarantee a gay doesn't take a bullet in the back from friendly fire. It doesn't matter if the behavior is wrong. There's very little protection from it. There are rules. Then there's reality.

    • 12 months ago
  • Persecuted
  • congoboy
    • -2
      congoboy  
    • Warren_Merrill:

      i dont understand why "openly gay" is so important. what does this label signify, wearing pink ribbons, standing on a soap box in the middle of a barracks proclaiming your preferences, bitch talk with your fellow troops or playing broadway show tunes on your boom box? i dont get it. there is a level of professionalism expected from all troops and discussing ones sexuality publicly isnt exactly what i would call professional conduct. cant a guy serve without making a big deal as to who he prefers to sleep with? that being said a man should be able to serve without harassment. keeping your lifestyle private and not in your face seems reasonable to me. same thing goes for civilian life too.

    • 12 months ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +1
      Varex_Sythe  
    • congoboy:

      You're confusing openly gay with flamboyantly gay.

      An openly gay person is someone who does not hide the fact that they are gay. A flamboyantly gay person is someone who goes out of their way to make sure that every single person within their immediate vicinity is well aware that they are gay.

      Think of it another way, an openly strait person does not go around telling everyone that they like having sex with people of the opposite gender every chance they get while also wearing obnoxiously bold clothes that make a statement about their sexual orientation. However, they also don't hide it from people. If someone asks them then they will tell them that they are strait. If someone assumes that they might be gay and invites them along for an "adventure" that they are not comfortable with then they will say something along the lines of, "no thanks, I'm strait."

      It is the same damn thing for openly gay people. Most of them are not flamboyant. They dress the same as you, I, or anyone else, and they act the same as you, I, or anyone else (with the exception of their sexual preference).

      As for, "Can't a guy serve without making a big deal as to who he prefers to sleep with?" The answer is no. However, the answer does not just apply to homosexuals who serve, it applies to strait guys as well. Most strait men in the military brag, boast, share the kind of woman that they like to sleep with. If a homosexual has to put up with a heterosexual describing their ideal sexual partner in great detail, then the heterosexual has to put up with the homosexual doing the same.

    • 12 months ago
  • Persecuted
  • Persecuted
    • +1
      Persecuted  
    • i guess these guys are a little uncomfortable... about as uncomfortable as the people who have come out as being gay in the first place... we are totally fine with allowing gays to be uncomfortable... let these homophobes squirm and when they are out in the field and a gay dude saves their lives, then they wont be so uncomfortable

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
  • kennymotown
    • +3
      kennymotown  
    • Here is a list to live by!

      1. Take care of planet Earth
      2. Greed, is bad
      3. Take care of your fellow Humans
      4. Homosexuals are your fellow Humans (Get over it)
      5 Do not worship Jesus or other false Idols such as Mohamed
      6. Worship Science as it is your true Savior
      7. Make Jobs available to everyone that can work
      8. Make your Government work for the Citizens of whatever Country you live in
      9. Heal the Sick
      10. Comfort those that are dying

    • 12 months ago
  • samthesixth
    • +4
      samthesixth  
    • kennymotown:

      1. Love your neighbor as yourself
      2. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
      3. Always tip at least 20%
      4. Act locally, first
      5. Give to those who ask of you
      6. Do something for your community or someone in it
      7. Reduce, reuse, recycle
      8. Teach
      9. Love your dog or pet.
      10. Question yourself

    • 12 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • congoboy
    • +1
      congoboy  
    • kennymotown:

      wow kenny except for the religion bashing your list is pretty liveable. are you christophobic or something? you have a right to your agnostic or atheistic feelings but people of faith also have their right to worship as they please.. now i can also see the insanity and hypocrisy of some religious practices but that doesnt make all people of all faiths the enemy. but your mention of mohammed in such an unsavory light is what gets people killed in some circles

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • congoboy:

      Those people really need to be brought into the 21st century, all around the world in various religions they talk about how their Gods came down from the sky's it's very easy to assume they confused Aliens with the only word they could come up with GODS!

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
  • kennymotown
  • congoboy
  • kennymotown
  • congoboy
  • samthesixth
  • kennymotown
  • Stever_B
  • congoboy
  • maxjunk
    • +3
      maxjunk  
    • So what? Even if this were true, which it's not, why should we allow people to spread hatred and lies against homosexuality?

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • maxjunk:

      what do you find so unbelievable in this story? there is nothing in it in reference to either lies or hatred. disagreeing with anothers lifestyle choice does not automatically equate to hate. ive met a few gays who are really down on breeders and lesbians who unjustifiably hate all men. so we find plenty of hate speech in the gay community as well

    • 12 months ago
  • sharin
    • +3
      sharin  
    • a typical article from congo "boy"
      maturity and intellect of a 9 year old, echoing everything he hears from fox "news" - nothing but lines, smears and misinformation

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -2
      congoboy  
    • sharin:

      yes it may be typical of me exposing stories that the leftylibs prefer not to notice or address. reality's a bitch when you look beyond your own narrow minded liberal rhetoric. this is an important story, as important to those of faith as openly gay troops in the military is to homosexuals. can you tell me what in this story is lies, smears and misinformation? i'm not even sure it ran on fox and just because you disagree with conservative principles doesnt mean fox lies. it seems your beloved dan rather had an honesty problem and after some 40 years of lying to the american public was finally caught and booted off the air. just because youre spirtually bankrupt doesnt mean the the entire country is. most of us on the right have moved on to a level of toleration to lifestyles and concepts we may disagree with you leftylibs could take a lesson from us.

    • 12 months ago
  • remanns
  • congoboy
    • -6
      congoboy  
    • remanns:

      homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle, simple as that and most americans agree. gays should be able to serve without fear of harassment but to expect acceptance from all their comrades is asking too much. most americans tolerate the gay lifestyle while fewer accept it. it is the right of everyone to have their beliefs, both gay and straight. like it or not religion runs deep and most of the worlds cultures and religions see marriage between a man and a woman as sacred.

    • 12 months ago
  • Stever_B
    • +5
      Stever_B  
    • congoboy:

      It's so nice to be told over and over and over and over that my lifestyle is abnormal by such authorities in the matter.

      If you got your head out of your ass long enough to check any other news sources besides Fox News, Newsmax and military.com, you'd know that no, MOST Americans do not agree with your "opinion" on the matter.

      Gay people generally don't interfere in your ability to live the life you want to, why do you and your ilk insist on not giving gays the same respect and acceptance?? Because you think your bible tells you to? Because it makes you feel icky? Because it's easier to be an asshole than to be a human? Sorry, none of those are good enough reasons.

      It's time to accept that the world is NEVER going to be exactly like you want it to be.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • Stever_B:

      http://instance.so

      whether people agree or not is irrelevant. you know the gay lifestyle can be viewed many ways. some see it as bad, some see it as good, some empathetic, and others dont care either way. but no matter whether it is accepted or not, tolerated or bashed human kind as is with all animals was created or evolved as a species of two separate identifiable types, a man and a woman. now you can mix it up any way you like even throw in a farm animal or two depending on your preferences. but the reality is that a man and a woman procreating is what is normal and sex between members of the same sex or with animals is not meaning abnormal. now i can like you, be your best buddy and accept or tolerate your lifestyle choice but that doesnt change what is normal and abnormal. now there is plenty of abnormal in the straight world as well, incest for instance. so the label is not just befitting those who practice homosexuality. i have known gays who ive had respect for but like anyone else respect shouldnt be expected as its something one earns. acceptance? one can respect and tolerate but acceptance is a lot to expect from folks who disagree with a lifestyle. my world is pretty much how i want it to be, but we can always use more money right? ive kinda givin up on the rest of the world. having expectations of others especially our politicians is too much of a downer. dont worry, be happy:)

    • 12 months ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +7
      littlwarrior  
    • Well lets put it this way, if you were at work and made a homophobic comment would they probably not fire you? This is just using religion to make hate speech ok.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • littlwarrior:

      these men of religious faith have a right to their beliefs, and as long as they dont harass their fellow troops there should be no problem. there is nothing in this story about hate speech. just because ones personal beliefs whether religious or otherwise disagrees with someone elses lifestyle doesnt necessarily make them hateful.

    • 12 months ago
  • oppressed1
    • -11
      oppressed1  
    • Lol our commander told us we can't call each other faggots anymore because it could offend someone. The military is being bitchified by liberals.

    • 12 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +3
      Varex_Sythe  
    • oppressed1:

      Yeah man, I totally understand. You use to be able to call a black man a N****r without any consequences, now you can't call a homosexual a f****t, soon you won't be able to call an strong willed and independent woman a c*nt. The hell is happening to this world where our military forces have to actually respect people who are different?

      F.Y.I. you are a jackass. I hope the military gives you a reality check if it doesn't chew you up and spit you out boy.

    • 12 months ago
  • samthesixth
  • Warren_Merrill
    • -1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • samthesixth:

      There's a double standard. Liberals are worthy of respect. Conservatives are open targets to be called every filthy name in the book. It's exceptible because liberals hate them. Then the liberals whine at the rhetoric from the right. It's why I find must liberals to be hypocrites. People on this site should wake up. You may not like my politics but what I just wrote is how a lot of people who don't have your politics view you.

      I find a lot of people on this site to be hate filled, vulgar and full of insults. But I don't hate any of you. Hate is such a waste of energy. Energy is for productivity. I don't judge my friends by their politics. I judge them by how they interact with and treat people regardless of their politics.

    • 12 months ago
  • gump
    • +1
      gump  
    • Warren_Merrill:

      Well its hard not to hate your guys when they keep acting out what it actually means to be every filthy name in the book . They keep in our faces telling us to suffer and die like cockroaches or bacteria so they can have more bucks, more power and more air to breathe when we stop breathing . Your guys keep shouting that they want our place in the the sun and everything else every human has , and shouting that they wont share after they steal everything. I believe that when people tell me what they are I should believe them. No one has to be a liberal to see who is a hypeocrit . And who is likely getting paid to throw thier own stinky poop around in this community every day. I see you whine all the time. If you are real you are sad . And if you are just after the devils dollars you are doubly sad . What do you do to celabrate the rest of the humans on earth ? Who corralled you into the small place you are jammed into.?????

    • 12 months ago
  • oppressed1
  • Varex_Sythe
  • bluestranger
    • +7
      bluestranger  
    • Of course these shamans are going to worry about this terrible burden that has been put on the straight troops. That is what they are there for. Their job is to spread all of the fear, distrust, hate, and a belief in magic that they possibly can. All sects and cults like to claim the title of the "religion of peace". When one of these chaplains of a religion of peace steps up and tells the troops to object on their own time he will be doing his job. Until then they are all exposing themselves as the hypocrites that they are. They could also be exposing themselves to the wrath of the U.C.M.J. if they encourage troops of whatever faith they profess, to openly oppose or harass gay troops. In the mean time I guess they'll just have to walk it off.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -2
      congoboy  
    • bluestranger:

      they have every right to their religious beliefs and objections as do any american. as long as they dont publicly speak out or harass their fellow gay troops it should be no one elses business. sorry to hear youre so confused

    • 12 months ago
  • bluestranger
    • +2
      bluestranger  
    • congoboy:

      Openly discuss implies that they want to do it anytime anywhere. The only place that would be appropriate would be in a cultural diversity class. I see you got my point about appropriate times. The simplest solution to the problem would be to discharge troops with beliefs that prohibit them from working and fighting beside gays. Maybe I understood more than you give me credit for. Are you aware that not so long ago some christian churches claimed evidence from the bible as proof for separation of the races? On the same lines I wonder why the government is paying for a Chaplancy Corps anyway. Seems like a violation of separation of church and state. Thank you for worrying about my level of comprehension though.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • bluestranger:

      i agree that openly discussing, as in audibly projecting your religious viewpoint of homosexuality on a street corner on a military base is non productive, unprofessional, and counter productive. but the same is true for "openly gay" troops to openly discuss, as in audibly projecting their lifestyle choices on a street corner on a military base is also non productive, unprofessional, and counter productive. now both sides should be able to share or express their beliefs in private with whomever, whether religious leader or bff. theres a lot of killin goin on during war time and a lot of soul searching so my belief is that there are times that military personnel may need a religious leader to confide in or find comfort with.

    • 12 months ago
  • bluestranger
  • ThirdSection
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • ThirdSection:

      this is america and like it or not hate speech is protected under the constitution. as long as one is not advocating violence toward another person its protected. now at work or in the military harassment and hate speech should not be tolerated. but a man has a right to his religious beliefs and to practice those beliefs without fear of reprisal.

    • 12 months ago
  • unimatrix0
    • +8
      unimatrix0  
    • It is hard to feel sorry for some poor dumb bastard clinging to their ignorant religious superstitions. Bigots should be punished. Religious superstition and ignorance is never an excuse for bigotry.

      Homophobia is morally unacceptable in the military, and civil society; just as racism, sexism, and other bigotries are unacceptable.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -5
      congoboy  
    • unimatrix0:

      sexism is still widely accepted in some enlightened circles sweetie, including the military:) bigots do not deserve to be "punished" by your version of the thought police any more than gays should be. but this isnt a story about gay bashing or infringing on the rights of gays in the military. it is a story of equal rights and religious freedom. a man is free to believe what he wants contrary to your own narrow mind set as to whats acceptable. as long as a man of religion is not beating up or otherwise infringing on the rights of others he has just as much right to his opinion as you do. and thanks to our military we all do. peace

    • 12 months ago
  • dinm76
    • +5
      dinm76  
    • congoboy:

      Thats some real twisted logic you've got going there! You're defending bigots by trying to claim that there is some sort of "right" to hate. My God...just please go back to neverland!
      You're jumping though hoops trying to hold on to an idealogly you have some twisted 'need' to support.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -6
      congoboy  
    • dinm76:

      and your spin is pretty twisted as well. one can legitimately disagree with anothers lifestyle without hating or being bigoted my friend. and regardless to how perverse, a man has a right to hate as well as long as he's not infringing on the rights of others. you leftylibs always try to turn a mans opinion into hate speech when it differs from your own. you should try meditating, being more honest, and more open minded sometime, it can be quite cathartic.

    • 12 months ago
  • Stever_B
  • littlwarrior
    • +5
      littlwarrior  
    • congoboy:

      You would have a point if only why would straight troops feel compelled to share their hatred of another? What discussion could they possibly be having where homosexuality came up in such a way for this to be an appropriate discussion? Its just not something that people really should be talking about, though I'm sure that if there are soldiers genuinely concerned about the gays coming to get them at night, which there probably are such poor ignorant sods, there will be a proper place and time to express those concerns.

    • 12 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
    • -2
      congoboy  
    • littlwarrior:

      the discussion between a man and his religious leader should remain confidential. this in no way advocates open and public gay bashing. if a man feels uncomfortable with some of his troop mates he should be able to privately vent somewhere

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
  • kennymotown
  • Warren_Merrill
    • 0
      Warren_Merrill  
    • unimatrix0:

      This is the kind of hate filled rhetoric I was referring to above. Because someone's belief system is different you trash and condemn them and their beliefs. There are a lot of religious people who believe gays should be allowed to live their lives freely. I was one of them. But as I've participated on this site I've slowly lost respect for gays due to their constant bashing and trashing of people with religious beliefs. It seems gays have a "my way or the highway" attitude against religion. I didn't know this until I came to this site. After you trash anyone who doesn't believe the way you do, you want peace. HA!

    • 12 months ago
  • unimatrix0
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • kennymotown:

      every homosapien is human and as humans we are all guilty of judging others. you judge me, i judge my ass hole neighbor or the fat lady eating a large all meat pizza while still remaining weight conscious by drinking a diet coke. its whether we react negatively thats important. many people do things i find disagreeable but unless a child is being harmed or an innocent weaker person is being harassed i usually keep my opinions to myself, except is a public forum like this one where we are all free to anonymously express our beliefs without fear of retribution. peace

    • 12 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +2
      letsliveinpeace  
    • Image
    • things to know: Civil unions in Illinois
      Downers Grove, IL — Civil unions unveiled next week
      On Wednesday, Illinois’ civil union law will take effect, and county clerk offices across the western suburbs will start issuing applications to same-sex couples.

      With the civil unions Illinois becomes one of about a dozen states that grant same-sex couples with all the legal priveleges and obligations enjoyed by married couples.

      Getting a civil union license is a lot like the process for a marriage license. The couple must fill out an application — show they are at least 18 and not blood-related — and appear together at the county clerk’s office to get the license and certificate. That gives the couple 60 days to have a civil union ceremony, in which the officiator will complete the license and return it.

      By law, couples must wait one day after getting the license before they can have the ceremony, so Illinois’ first civil unions won’t actually happen until Thursday. That morning, 30 couples are scheduled to have their ceremonies in Chicago’s Millennium Park with Gov. Pat Quinn and other notable figures attending.

      Behind the law
      The civil union bill passed through the General Assembly in the closing weeks of the last legislative session, and Quinn signed it into law Jan. 31.

      The law simply guarantees couples in a civil union all the rights provided to Illinois spouses; it does not lay out each one individualy. Equality Illinois, a gay rights group, counts almost 650 protections that will be ensured by a civil union. That includes hospital visitation rights, decision-making powers in medical emergencies, inheritance rights and adoption as well as parental rights.

      Besides Illinois, New Jersey allows same-sex civil unions, and Delaware and Hawaii will introduce them next year. Five states and the District of Columbia have legalized gay marriage, and another four states offer nearly all spousal rights to unmarried couples in a domestic partnership.

      On the other hand, 39 states, including Illinois, have a statute on the books defining marriage as between one and one woman.

      Illinois’ civil unions are not just for same-sex couples. They are available for heterosexual couples as well. Some have speculated that it might be a popular alternative to remarrying for senior citizens because the federal government does not recognize civil unions. For instance, a widow who enters a civil union partnership could continue to collect Social Security survivor benefits. She would forfeit them if she remarried.

      http://bit.ly/lk6bzV

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
  • jubal
  • Stever_B
  • littlwarrior
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • AJILIVIZION
    • +5
      AJILIVIZION  
    • I think its one thing for a soldier or any person to express objection to another person's sexuality and life-style, but it is another if they choose to degrade, belittle or insult those very same people. So, I say, let these soldiers share their feelings :P lol... They just have to maintain certain boundaries for confronting the homosexuals they work with, such as not physically threatening or bullying them. If a soldier does cross the line, they should have to attend courses on the subjects of anthropology, sociology, and philosophy. The lessons soldiers could take from these subjects would create a better understanding of the different avenues people take to develop their whole identity. They would walk away with a heightened sense of tolerance towards their fellow human beings. Then again, they might realize what a brain wash religion is, turning them totally against everything they once stood for, and join the Peace Corps.... :D

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • +1
      congoboy  
    • AJILIVIZION:

      agreed. sorta like most of the rest of us in civilian society. a man has a right to his religious beliefs and if unable to find acceptance, in the very least needs to adhere to tolerance.

    • 12 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +9
      letsliveinpeace  
    • Major gay-rights group backs Obama for second term

      The nation's largest gay-rights groups endorsed President Obama for reelection, praising him for historic accomplishments for the LGBT community.

      The Human Rights Campaign posted a page on its website Thursday — flagged on Twitter by Obama's campaign press secretary — offering its endorsement of the president.

      "From signature achievements like passage of the law to end 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' to administrative changes throughout government, President Obama has done more to improve the lives of LGBT people than any President in history," the group said. "The following is a compilation of many of the actions taken by the Administration on LGBT issues."

      Obama had for some time faced scrutiny over the extent of his administration's promises on gay rights but won a significant amount of praise for delivering on its promise to repeal "Don't ask, don't tell," the military's ban on openly gay and lesbian service members, late last year.

      HRC's endorsement, which comes at an especially early point in the cycle, should go some lengths to quieting criticism of Obama, who's on the record as being against same-sex marriage but has acknowledged his viewpoints are "evolving."

      Obama's would-be Republican challengers aren't seen as especially more inclined to support gay rights. Former Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman (R) signed a bill into law during his time as governor of Utah that allowed same-sex couples to enter into civil unions, though he's said he believes in "traditional" marriage.
      http://bit.ly/kZnkjQ

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -7
      congoboy  
    • letsliveinpeace:

      whoop di doo... its too bad they werent a larger voting block, because if thats the best thing he's done since taking office its gonna take more than the gay community to get him reelected. its amazing how a politicians viewpoints can change as election time grows near. peace

    • 12 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
  • congoboy
  • letsliveinpeace
  • SFirman
  • jubal
  • congoboy
  • SFirman
  • congoboy
  • floydyboy
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • Saladin
    • +10
      Saladin  
    • congoboy:

      Since when do you have the right to openly tell your squadmates you hate their very existence because of your religion?

      Seriously, just swap around some of the words in this article and maybe you'll get an idea of why I think these people can go fuck themselves.

      "Leaders of 21 religious groups that provide chaplains to the U.S. military on Monday sent a letter to the chiefs of chaplains of the Navy, Army and Air Force. They want Congress or the Pentagon to guarantee troops won't be punished if they openly discuss their objections to blacks serving in the military."

      That didn't do it for ya? Then how about this?

      "Leaders of 21 atheist groups sent a letter to the chiefs of chaplains of the Navy, Army and Air Force on Monday. They want Congress or the Pentagon to guarantee troops won't be punished if they openly discuss their objections to Christians serving in the military."

      You can be a bigoted piece of shit on your own time. When you're in a unit, you do not have the right to break cohesion because you have your panties in a bunch over some extraneous issue.

      The military is not owned by any one group of people, and these assholes better remember that.

    • 12 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -7
      congoboy  
    • Saladin:

      once again youve kinda twisted a simple civil rights story into some kind of troop bashing. these men of religious faith have a right to their beliefs as does any american. nothing here about wanting to bash or harm gays just wanting the freedom to have their beliefs without being persecuted, sorta like gays on the other end of the spectrum. i support someone who is gay to serve their country although i, as do most prefer the bill clinton endorsed version of dont ask dont tell. so if a homosexual has a right to serve openly a religious man should have the right to express his beliefs without harrassment. its a two way street my friend and this story nor do the men it represents has anything to do with harming anyone. now under democratic leadership during ww 2 blacks were treated as second class citizens in the military and for the most part kept segregated and in seperate regiments, we wont even go into the japanese. your comparisons in modern times are hostile, bigoted, irrelevent, and kinda silly really. peace

    • 12 months ago
  • Ricky84
  • unimatrix0
  • Warren_Merrill
    • -1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • Saladin:

      In any work environment with a lot of personnel, chances are there will be people you don't care for. It doesn't mean you don't have to perform your responsibilities and respect the person in public. It doesn't mean you have to embrace them in your mind.

    • 12 months ago
more from Community:

top videos