THE PEOPLE WIN IN CALIF! State lawmakers' pay stops if they don't pass a budget by June 16!
source: http://latimes.com/news/local/la-me-legislature-pay-20110603,0,3349292.story
-
-
- PoliticalAmazon
- added this
Our state legislature is notorious for its month-long budget standoffs and, while social service programs come to a stop, contractors go unpaid, and people lose their jobs, the legislators continue to get paid, just like clockwork.
Well, the people of California passed a measure where, if the budget isn't passed by June 16, the legislators' paychecks stop.
Our state controller, John Chiang, is enforcing it, too.
LOLOLOLOL! TAKE THAT, you assholes.
With all the bad news about the government increasing its control over the citizens, isn't it GREAT to hear about the citizens successfully fighting back?
-----------------------
latimes.com/news/local/la-me-legislature-pay-20110603,0,3349292.story
latimes.com
CALIFORNIA LAWMAKERS WILL LOSE PAY IF BUDGET ISN'T PASSED BY JUNE 15, STATE CONTROLLER SAYS.
John Chiang, California's chief accountant, says he will invoke the provisions of a new law requiring him to dock legislators' pay unless they approve a balanced spending plan on time.
By Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times
June 3, 2011
Reporting from Sacramento -- California lawmakers will start losing their pay in two weeks if they don't complete a balanced budget, state Controller John Chiang announced Thursday.
Chiang, the state's chief accountant, said a ballot measure passed in November requires him to dock legislators' pay unless they approve a balanced spending plan by the June 15 deadline specified in the California Constitution.
His interpretation of the measure differs from that of lawyers in the state Senate, who recently said that a budget bill lawmakers passed in March — which left the state with a nearly $11-billion shortfall — met the conditions to keep salaries flowing. But Chiang issues the checks.
"In passing Proposition 25 last November, voters clearly stated they expect their representatives to make the difficult decisions needed to resolve any budget shortfalls by the mandatory deadline, or be penalized," Chiang said in a statement. "I will enforce the voters' demand."
Legislative leaders expressed support for the controller's decision, despite earlier hedging and statements from their staff that lawmakers were entitled to collect their pay regardless of whether any further action was taken on the budget.
"The controller's decision resolves any questions about the Legislature's obligations under Proposition 25," Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said in a statement. "I support the controller's conclusion."
Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez (D-Los Angeles) said in a statement: "I do not believe we should even be talking about loopholes or ways to get around that provision, because our focus needs to be on doing our job and passing a balanced budget."
The controller's announcement comes amid legislative gridlock on a spending plan....
------------------------------------------------
[FULL ARTICLE AT URL, ABOVE]
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, US Politics
-
- tags:
- California, CA, pay, Salary, 3 more
-
-
Mark701
-
Funny, though not unheard of. When the Catholic cardinals took years to pick a pope, one king got fed up. He removed the roof of the compound where the cardinals were meeting as motivation for them to come to a quick decision. When that didn't work, he cut off their food and water. They selected a pope shortly thereafter, and "Conclave" was born.
Moral of the story: Nothing gets done until you inconvenience someone at the top.
- 12 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
Slingingstones
-
A friend sent me this in an email...wishful thinking?
Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States."
- 12 months ago
-
Slingingstones
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Slingingstones:
!!!! I wished I could have ^+ 'ed this post about 10 times!!
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Slingingstones
-
PoliticalAmazon:
Tnx PA...what brought that issue up was the disparity between 20 yr. mil vets only getting 1/2 pay for retirement, whereas senators and reps get full pay retirement after serving one (1) term....not to mention their health benefits.
Cheers,
- 12 months ago
-
Slingingstones
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
Epic pwnage.
- 12 months ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
CalgarC
-
F...T...W...
- 12 months ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
freehit
-
I know one isn't supposed to make broad sweeping generalizations BUT do any of you know of ANY lawmaker who would be hurt by loosing their OFFICIAL paychecks for a period of time? From what I've seen, you have to be RICH to run. There must be at least a few somewhere in this country that is in the same boat financialy as the majority of the people posting here. At least I hope that someone financialy forked like myself would conceivably have a shot at becoming a legislator with the odds less than a billion to one. (Not that someone LOOKING like me woud be even thought capable of being qualified or holding an intelligent thought in this day and age in the USA, maybe 230 years ago, not today.) End of this particular rant, fustration vented.
- 12 months ago
-
freehit
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
freehit:
I agree, it seems unlikely, but the lawyers in the Senate went to all the trouble to come up with a "loophole" --even when they knew the California voters, who voted for it, would be FURIOUS. Which we are. And nobody but the legislators are buying the "loophole" claim, anyway.
Understand, these budget overdue deals go MONTHS.
I wish they'd take away their perks. Now THAT would get their attention.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
ilikeike
-
freehit:
Too true freehit, btw love the beard.
- 12 months ago
-
ilikeike
-
-
Warren_Merrill
-
Politicians at all levels should lose their pay if they can't pass a budget.
- 12 months ago
-
Warren_Merrill
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Warren_Merrill:
Thank you, Warren. I think they should be paid for their work, but if they cannot get a balanced budget passed on time, and state contractors, etc. have to go unpaid, then the legislators should go unpaid, too.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Milieu
-
PoliticalAmazon:
I know it slipped past you PA, but Mr._Merrill was getting his shot in support of the Kochs and ALEC destroying the country.
- 12 months ago
-
Milieu
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Milieu:
Thanks for the FYI.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
HSouixZ
-
I'm happy for California, but I have to say it is bittersweet news, because this won't help us Floridians...If as the saying goes, that the nation follows California. We are so screwed by this asshat; Governor Rick Scott, and his budget that he has recently passed, the challenge seem insurmountable to overcome.
The idiot has made such a mess of this state's (Florida's) budget, I do believe it will take us years to recover. I love my job, but I am seriously making plans to put in a transfer to move to another state. I just can't stand to live here in this fustercluck that has become Florida.
He won't be re-elected, but I just don't feel the same about living here.
I wish the people of the Great State of California much success. I hope that their state legislature doesn't fuck them over and pass a budget that screws their citizen-constituency, like we have been butt fucked here in Florida.
- 12 months ago
-
HSouixZ
-
-
TypeMemeHere [removed]
-
HSouixZ: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
TypeMemeHere [removed]
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
HSouixZ:
HS, I'm so sorry to hear that Scott is doing such damage to Florida. I really understand your willingness to relocate when the future of Florida looks so bleak. Come to California! That would be cool!
I don't think the California State legislators would risk making the voters angry when the voters just took away their paychecks with they don't do their job.
We can just as easily take away their perks, too, and let's see how much they enjoy having to provide their own state-related transportation, pay for their own state-releated phone and utilities, etc.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
TypeMemeHere:
I KNEW the new drug-testing law had to be connected to a political crony. sonofabitch.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Incredulous
-
niceeeeeeee
and they say the nation follows California, so maybe our Federal 'representatives' could benefit from a little California leaning too....
- 12 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
Warren_Merrill
-
Incredulous:
"they say the nation follows California"
http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=890719699916&id=2a8ae8acde2b0...
- 12 months ago
-
Warren_Merrill
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Warren_Merrill:
What happens if your state legislators don't pass the budget by the deadline?
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
ilikeike
-
Warren_Merrill:
typical asshattery, ignoring henceforth
- 12 months ago
-
ilikeike
-
-
Warren_Merrill
-
ilikeike:
Typical liberal. Nothing to offer but insults.
- 12 months ago
-
Warren_Merrill
-
-
mistro
-
its all a show i guarantee that there gonna have a budget drawn up on the last day. they dont work for the people anymore they all work together to make their money..the only way were gonna get the change we want is by a revolution cause corporations already have our government by the balls.. anyone remember the banks that stole our houses then got bailouts? those are the ones im talking about..we will all need to join together and take our country back...
- 12 months ago
-
mistro
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
mistro:
Do you realize how many military and police institutions there are in America. I think there must be one on every block.
Sometimes I think the government is TRYING to get us to physically revolt because it would give them a reason to lock us up and declare martial law.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
mistro
-
PoliticalAmazon:
thats very true but imagine if everyone got sick of it and banded together all the gangs the motorcycle gangs and so many americans have guns itd get really bloody but wed be able to do something..
- 12 months ago
-
mistro
-
-
letsliveinpeace
-
Hey if they don't get the job done, no pay sounds pretty fair to me, then they will be forced to live off their bribes.
- 12 months ago
-
letsliveinpeace
-
-
KB723
-
Hmmm Very Interesting PA...
- 12 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
artemis6
-
Go Cali ! How much of a "dock " are we talking here ? All , would be good .
- 12 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
artemis6:
I think the message communicated by the voters to the State legislators is having more impact on the them than losing the pay would. But I don't know any legislators anymore, so I don't know how important the pay from the State is to them.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Leen61
-
This would have meant that the 14 WI State Senators who were trying to block Scott Walker's terrible budget bill stripping public workers of their collective bargaining rights would've been punished for standing up for the people. It cuts both ways. The pols can be punished for trying to help the people as well as the other way. So, I can also see this as incentive to force a budget through that will totally screw the public. Who wins in that case? Not the people. The joke certainly would've been on the people of WI.
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
JanforGore
-
Leen61:
I thought the same thing. They can pass anything now just to save their own wallets.
- 12 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Leen61:
If we don't pass good laws that advance the people's best interests, because of the fear that politicians will misuse them against us, we would pass no good laws.
I understand your point, but I don't think we can afford to allow the politician filth who abuse the system to hold hostage our willingness to work for the laws that help the people.
Just my opinion, your mileage may vary.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
JanforGore:
I don't think they will do that. I really don't. The California legislators were SHOCKED when the initiative made it to the ballot, and SHOCKED when it passed. There was a lot of funding fighting the passage of that initiative, and I don't think they expected it to be successful.
IMO, politicians are now getting cocky because they think they have so "down-trodden" us that we won't rise up and fight them at their own gain.
For YEARS, California's legislators wouldn't pass a balanced budget for months, and the people suffered. Home-care for children with MS, CP, brain injuries stopped--everything stopped. Except for the politicians' paychecks.
I am surprised that there is a negative look at this at all. I guess if you haven't experienced it, the anguish from the people who suffered damage from it, you can't understand it.
THIS IS A FIRST STEP TO BRINGING THE POWER BACK TO THE PEOPLE! We keep bitching about "no power to the people," and then when a positive step is taken that brings some power back to the people of California, it's not a good idea?
NO step we take to bring power back to us is going to be 100% perfect for everyone. It shouldn't matter to us that it isn't. That "me first" attitude is a conservative value, not a liberal/progressive value.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
JanforGore
-
PoliticalAmazon:
l didn't say it wasn't a good idea. I stated it can lead to less than what the people deserve when their welfare is on the line. That isn't negativity, that is the damn reality, and it IS based on experience of seeing it happen over and over again. Hopefully, it won't this time. And how do you know what "damage" I have or have not experienced? A one sentence comment gives you the impression I don't give a damn otherwise or don't understand what it is like to suffer as well? Wasn't it you in another thread who used the term, "worthless politicians?" This is why I usually abstain from responding in political threads. Tired of my words being twisted and the jumping to conclusion kneejerk reactions. And what is the point of the line: "That "me first" attitude is a conservative value, not a liberal/progressive value." How do you get that out of just one typed sentence agreeing with the person above me? Caring about the people not being duped is NOT a me first attitude.
- 12 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Leen61
-
PoliticalAmazon:
The problem is that this makes no guarantee that the pols will rush through crappy laws that will still punish the people and kill programs in the long run to balance that budget just to save their own paychecks. Personally, I like the way WI people showed the pols they wouldn't just roll over and take what was being rammed down our throats. I am all for the people seizing control of their destiny against the pols, I just don't see this initiative doing much to accomplish that. It still keeps the power in the hands of the pols to pass whatever legislation they want. That doesn't change, they just have to pass it faster.
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
Leen61
-
JanforGore:
Thanks for seeing my point, Jan.
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
Incredulous
-
Leen61:
Well then maybe the people of Wisconsin would learn not to elect douche-bag governors and representatives anymore...if it's ever going to change, there is going to have to be some risk taking.
- 12 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
Leen61: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
JanforGore:
My apologies if you think I misunderstood you. For the record, regarding the "damage," what part of "if" is unclear for you?
I'll skip your posts in the future. We just don't understand each other in a posting environment.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Leen61:
If you truly believe, after the state voters spanked the state legislators by taking way their paycheck when they dick around and don't get their work done on time, that the legislators are going to risk doing anything to evoke another initiative, then we certainly have a different outlook on how to deal with politicians who forget they are accountable to the people.
There are a million things that the legislators COULD do, but they could have done it before they had to deal with the results of the passage of the initiative.
We have to take risks if we want change. Change isn't going to come to us without taking risks. Not at this point.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-

-
Leen61:
Leen, I guess I'm disappointed by your focus on the possible negatives because when Wisconsin was going through its governor issues, and when the people, and the Dem politicians, stood up to the governor, I was so proud (and a bit envious) of the Wisconsin folks. I felt I was really supportive. I'm sure I could have found possible problems that could have resulted from the Democratic political activism against the governor, especially with the Dems leaving the state.
But I didn't even go there because it was such a great thing to see someone standing up to The Man, and the important thing was I wanted to support the Wisconsin activists and citizens.
There are so few events anymore where the people successfully stand up to the Oligarchy...I guess I feel we should rejoice, congratulate each other, and not spoil the moment by focusing on possible negatives.
I mean, y'all were political activists in THE SNOW. The idea makes me a little faint =)
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Leen61
-
Incredulous:
That's got nothing to do with this story. For starters, we had a Democratic governor for 8 years. And this asshole is going to get booted in one. Your point?
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
Leen61
-
David_H:
For starters, we are in the process of booting our losers BEFORE the next scheduled election through RECALL. The people of WI learned of the mistake made in 2 MONTHS. The 14 Democratic Senators who left the state in protest did it as the only recourse to turn the tide on draconian legislation and to bring national attention to what the GOP was about to do nationwide. Without them doing that drastic measure, who knows where this country would be headed right now as well as this state. The voters are in full resistant mode to this corporate takeover. And we are getting our state in order in a way no other state has done in recent memory. That is what is called Power to the People. Picking up a paycheck to screw the state's voters is not in my opinion constructive. This is a truly grassroots movement to block a Koch takeover that NOBODY envisioned. Now that the majority does, we are taking action to correct the mistake the voters who put these idiots in office made. That's democracy in action. If that is what will come back to haunt anyone, there is something wrong with this country. The Democratic state convention was just held over the weekend and in two separate straw polls, Russ Feingold won for both the Governor and Senate nomination. We will get him back in one capacity or the other and when the remaining recalls take place, sanity will return to WI.
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
Leen61: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
Leen61
-
David_H:
We will agree to disagree on this one. Where would I like to see Feingold? I would like him to be back in the senate, but if Tom Barrett doesn't run again for governor, then I would of course want to see Feingold go for the governor's mansion because we have to have a strong candidate to get Walker out of there.
You have a good day as well, David.
- 12 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-

-
I bet you'e already thought, "I think those bastards have already found a loophole."
Well, while your suspicions are well- founded, and while the State Senate lawyers say they can pass a partial budget and still get their paychecks--that's not the case. The "loophole" they claim doesn't exist, and our State Controller [SMOOOCH!!!] is the one who cuts the checks, and he doesn't believe there is a loophole, either.
Also, as the following op-ed points out, if legislators try to pull that, they will face the wrath of the voters like they've never seen before.
Oh, did I mention that the budget must be BALANCED, and that if the legislators don't pass a balanced budget by June 16, they PERMANENTLY forfeit their paycheck for each week the budget goes un-passed?
MUAH-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!
Voters revenge...it's about time!
---------------------
"CALIF. LEGISLATORS RISK VOTER BACKLASH IF THEY TRY TO USE THE NO-PAY LOOPHOLE."
California voters passed Proposition 25 to punish lawmakers if they fail to pass a budget by the June 15 deadline. And the budget must be balanced.
BY: George Skelton | May 23, 2011You may have read The Times' article Friday by Sacramento reporters Evan Halper and Patrick McGreevy. They reported there's a legal opinion by the Legislature's lawyer asserting that the lawmakers could keep collecting their checks even if they didn't make any more budget progress before the June 15 deadline.
A partial-budget bill the Legislature passed in March that closed about half the state's deficit is sufficient, the theory goes.
"Technically, the budget bill was passed on March 17," said Greg Schmidt, the secretary of the Senate who requested the legal opinion. What lawmakers must do to get paid, he continued, "has already been done."
I'm no lawyer, but this would be fun to watch in court.
To begin with, there's Prop. 58 — the 2004 measure that then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger assured us would mean "tearing up the credit card and throwing it away." Never mind that.
Prop. 58 forbade the Legislature to ever again send the governor a budget that wasn't balanced.
This was in the measure's official title that voters read: "Requires enactment of a balanced budget where general fund expenditures do not exceed estimated general fund revenues." And the actual legal text decreed that "the Legislature may not send to the governor for consideration, nor may the governor sign into law" an unbalanced budget.
Granted, many budgets since then have become unbalanced before the ink dried on the governor's signature. But under no stretch of a fairy tale could the March so-called budget be construed to be balanced.
Gov. Jerry Brown last week placed the latest deficit figure at $10.8 billion.
Back to Prop. 25: It did not remove from the state Constitution the budget-balancing requirement of Prop. 58.
It did proclaim in its official title that "if the Legislature fails to pass a budget bill by June 15, all members of the Legislature will permanently forfeit any reimbursement for salary and expenses for every day until the day the Legislature passes a budget bill." - 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
letsliveinpeace
-
PoliticalAmazon:
I just love your clip art photo, I got to have it, I know it will come in handy one day.
- 12 months ago
-
letsliveinpeace
-
-
Incredulous
-
PoliticalAmazon:
"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage."
- John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath, Chapter 25
- 12 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
letsliveinpeace:
Thanks! Enjoy.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Incredulous:
OMG. Thank you. My parents were avid union supporters. GOW is one of my favorite Steinbeck stories.
- 12 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon