Community | June 21, 2011 | 22 comments

Nebraska Nuclear Threat: As Predictable as Fukushima

BPGulfLeak
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8pmKsYhqH8&feature=player_embedded


Nuclear accidents - like oil spills and financial meltdowns - happen because big companies push to make more money by cutting every safety measure in the books.

The accident at Fukushima was predictable.

Likewise, the potential problem at the Fort Calhoun reactor in Nebraska was predictable. (For background, see this and this.)

As Ketv reported in March:

Fort Calhoun's nuclear power plant is one of three reactors across the country that federal regulators said they are most concerned about.

***

Last year, federal regulators questioned the station's flood protection protocol. NRC officials said they felt the Omaha Public Power District should do more than sandbagging in the event of major flooding along the Missouri river.

OPPD officials said they have already made amends and added new flood gates.

"We updated our flood protection strategy and have tested and re-tested our new strategy. The issue is operationally resolved, and at no time was there a threat to public safety or was public health at risk," OPPD President and Chief Executive Officer Gary Gates said.
The New York Times noted yesterday:

Last year, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission cited the Fort Calhoun plant for not being adequately prepared for floods and rated the safety violation in the “yellow” category, the second most serious. The agency ordered changes because it said that under the plan in place at the time ...

After initially contesting the findings, the plant’s operators, Omaha Public Power District, said that the problems had been resolved.

The Daily Mail writes today:

A nuclear plant was inches away from being engulfed by the bloated Missouri River after several levees in the area failed to hold back its surging waters, raising fears it could become America's Fukushima.

Dramatic pictures show the moment the plant was threatened with being shut down today, as water levels rose ominously to within 18 inches of its walls.

The river has to hit 902 feet above sea level at Brownville before officials will shut down the Cooper Nuclear Plant, which sits at 903 feet. It stopped and ebbed slightly yesterday, a reprieve caused by levee breaches in northwest Missouri - for now.

Flooding is a major concern all along the river because of the massive amounts of water that the Army Corps of Engineers has released from six dams. Any significant rain could worsen the flooding especially if it falls in Nebraska, Iowa or Missouri, which are downstream of the dams.

The river is expected to rise as much as five to seven feet above the official 'flood stage' in much of Nebraska and Iowa and as much as 10 feet over in parts of Missouri. The corps predicts the river will remain that high until at least August.

***

The river has risen at least 1.5 feet higher than Fort Calhoun's 1,004-foot elevation above sea level. The plant can handle water up to 1,014 feet, according to OPPD. The water is being held back by a series of protective barriers, including an 8-foot rubber wall outside the reactor building.
(See the Daily Mail article for photos.)

Likewise, the Cooper nuclear reactor - also in Nebraska - is threatened by the flooding as well.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission reports that flooding has already caused oil to spill: (read the remainder at Washington's Blog)
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth Care,   Nuclear News
  2. tags:
    Nuclear Power Nebraska Nuclear power plant Fort Calhoun 2 more
  3.     
    |

22 comments // Nebraska Nuclear Threat: As Predictable as Fukushima // Video

  • xhuffpo
    • +1
      xhuffpo  
    • Image
    • Check out this link, not sure what is going on but it does not pass the smell test.

      nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/International/18-Jun-2011/US-orders-news-blackout-over-crippled-Nebraska-Nuclear-Plant-report

    • 11 months ago
  • jpvt
    • +1
      jpvt  
    • This is why I hate privatizing services that should be public. If this were a public building the government agency telling the power plant that they need to do more to prevent flooding would simply order them to do it and they would comply because it would all be a part of the same system. Energy bills would be lower because they wouldn't need to profit from it, and it would be easier to mandate that they be more energy efficient and cleaner because it would save money over time.

    • 11 months ago
  • Wetdog
    • +2
      Wetdog  
    • I was just reading about an off shore wind farm near Fukushima this morning.

      It went through both the earthquake and the tsunami, and continued to generate electricity the whole time.

    • 11 months ago
  • oldbanjo
    • +1
      oldbanjo  
    • If it has a problem It won't be a cloud of particles like Japan. It will be the River and farm land that will have a problem. There should be plenty of warning for the people. The Owners say the Plant can survive being flooded, that's to be seen. This is still to dangerous to have in the US. I guess I have always overestimated our leaders, now I think most of them are stupid.

    • 11 months ago
  • sue4e3
  • sue4e3
    • +1
      sue4e3  
    • I think that this story is something to keep an eye on. I too have family members close to this plant .There is something to keep in mind here even the real happy to report a secret big disaster people are not saying that this plant has been breeched or that this is an actual event yet.
      BPgulf Leak is wise to keep bringing it up. .just so we know we are paying attention. but right now the sky is not falling atleast with this power plant

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • Goop post BPGulfLeak and voted up. Thom Hartmann and RT rock! I knew that's what the no fly zone was about...so nobody can report on this. Just like they wanted nobody reporting on the BP disaster. Thom points out just how scary and dangerous this is and I think it's just terrible that the media isn't reporting on this and telling the public how bad it really is. I also like how Thom talked about the other nuclear plants that are accidents waiting to happen as well. It's just a matter of time.

    • 11 months ago
  • Nick19
    • 0
      Nick19  
    • I would be careful about using RTV as a source since they do get millions from the Russian government in order to report stories of a highly cynical nature and attempt to portray the US as a faltering empire by bringing in conspiracy theorists. Now, there are problems within the US and RTV addresses it but it does so in a highly cynical tone.

    • 11 months ago
  • hombre76
    • +2
      hombre76  
    • dude good post I suppose but weird how your the only one posting comments and that it still is near the top....your not employing sock puppets are you? cause thats not realy nessisary here.

    • 11 months ago
  • oldbanjo
    • +1
      oldbanjo  
    • hombre76:

      There's been plenty of comments made on these Reactors on this site for a week or so. This does have the potential to be a major problem. I'm concerned and I live approx 1300 miles from it.

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
    • 0
      BPGulfLeak  
    • Image
    • Inches away from being America's Fukushima: Nuclear plant dangerously close to being engulfed by Missouri floods

      -Nuclear plant inches from being totally flooded, but is saved - for now
      -Damage would be likely to cause energy prices to soar
      -Six to 12 inches of heavy rainfall over the last few weeks
      -Record floods hit 44.4 feet, topping 44.3 feet record set in 1993
      -Levees fail to stem surge of water and sand is running out
      -Flooding expected to continue until August
      -Residents begin burning wood to avoid it becoming flood debris
      -Meanwhile, engineers close the Bonnet Carre Spillway near New Orleans

      By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
      Last updated at 5:37 PM on 21st June 2011

      "A nuclear plant was inches away from being engulfed by the bloated Missouri River after several levees in the area failed to hold back its surging waters, raising fears it could become America's Fukushima.
      Dramatic pictures show the moment the plant was threatened with being shut down today, as water levels rose ominously to within 18 inches of its walls.
      The river has to hit 902 feet above sea level at Brownville before officials will shut down the Cooper Nuclear Plant, which sits at 903 feet. It stopped and ebbed slightly yesterday, a reprieve caused by levee breaches in northwest Missouri - for now."

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005758/Missouri-river-floods-250-reside..."

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
    • +1
      BPGulfLeak  
    • Rising water, falling journalism
      BY DAWN STOVER | 16 JUNE 2011
      Every evening, my father climbs the levee along the Missouri River in Council Bluffs, Iowa, and peers down into the black water that swallows the road. The water is rising, and the Army Corps of Engineers says the levee has never faced such a test. Dad, a retired professor, is packing his books and papers. If the levee doesn't hold, his one-story house could be underwater for months.

      A little farther up the Missouri, at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Station near Blair, Nebraska, the river is already lapping at the Aqua Dams -- giant plastic tubes filled with water -- that form a stockade around the plant's buildings. The plant has become an island.

      In Blair, in Council Bluffs, and in my hometown of Omaha -- which are all less than 20 miles from the Fort Calhoun Station -- some people haven't forgotten that flooding is what caused the power loss at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and the disastrous partial meltdowns that followed. They're wondering what the floodwaters might do if they were to reach Fort Calhoun's electrical systems.

      The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a "yellow finding PDF" (indicating a safety significance somewhere between moderate and high) for the plant last October, after determining that the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) "did not adequately prescribe steps to mitigate external flood conditions in the auxiliary building and intake structure" in the event of a worst-case Missouri River flood. The auxiliary building -- which surrounds the reactor building like a horseshoe flung around a stake -- is where the plant's spent-fuel pool and emergency generators are located.

      OPPD has since taken corrective measures, including sealing potential floodwater-penetration points, installing emergency flood panels, and revising sandbagging procedures. It's extremely unlikely that this year's flood, no matter how historic, will turn into a worst-case scenario: That would happen only if an upstream dam were to instantaneously disintegrate. Nevertheless, in March of this year the NRC identified Fort Calhoun as one of three nuclear plants requiring the agency's highest level of oversight. In the meantime, the water continues to rise.

      No guarantees. On June 7, there was a fire -- apparently unrelated to the flooding -- in an electrical switchgear room at Fort Calhoun. For about 90 minutes, the pool where spent fuel is stored had no power for cooling. OPPD reported that "offsite power remained available, as well as the emergency diesel generators if needed." But the incident was yet another reminder of the plant's potential vulnerability.

      And so, Fort Calhoun remains on emergency alert because of the flood -- which is expected to worsen by early next week. On June 9, the Army Corps of Engineers announced PDF that the Missouri River would crest at least two feet higher in Blair than previously anticipated.

      The Fort Calhoun plant has never experienced a flood like this before. The plant began commercial operation in 1973, long after the construction of six huge dams -- from Fort Peck in Montana to Gavins Point in South Dakota -- that control the Missouri River flows and normally prevent major floods. But, this spring, heavy rains and high snowpack levels in Montana, northern Wyoming, and the western Dakotas have filled reservoirs to capacity, and unprecedented releases from the dams are now reaching Omaha and other cities in the Missouri River valley. Floodgates that haven't been opened in 50 years are spilling 150,000 cubic feet per second -- enough water to fill more than a hundred Olympic-size swimming pools in one minute. And Fort Calhoun isn't the only power plant affected by flooding on the Missouri: The much larger Cooper Nuclear Station in Brownville, Nebraska, sits below the Missouri's confluence with the Platte River -- which is also flooding. Workers at Cooper have constructed barriers and stockpiled fuel for the plant's three diesel generators while, like their colleagues at Fort Calhoun, they wait for the inevitable.

      To be sure, there are coal-fired power plants on the river in Sioux City and Council Bluffs, Iowa -- north and south of Fort Calhoun, respectively -- that presumably could provide backup power if the nuclear plant were to lose power. Operators at the coal plants are protecting critical structures with berms and sandbags, but they can't guarantee that a levee break won't take the plants offline.

      Failure of the fourth estate. Newspapers and websites all over the country have reported on the flooding and fire at Fort Calhoun, but most articles simply paraphrase and regurgitate information from the NRC and OPPD press releases, which aggregators and bloggers then, in turn, simply cut and paste. Even the Omaha World-Herald didn't send local reporters to cover the story; instead, the newspaper published an article on the recent fire written by Associated Press reporters -- based in Atlanta and Washington.

      Unsurprisingly, much of the information in recent press reports has lacked context. For example: (con't) http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists/dawn-stover/rising-water-falli...

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
    • +1
      BPGulfLeak  
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aa003oVQe4

      "...Here’s why Reuters says you should not panic:

      The Fort Calhoun nuclear power station in Nebraska remains shut down due to Missouri River flooding, but the plant itself has not flooded and is expected to remain safe, the federal government said Friday.

      The rising river “has certainly affected the site, but the plant itself, the actual reactor is still dry,” said Scott Burnell, Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman.

      The 478-megawatt plant north of Omaha shut April 9 to refuel, and has remained shut because of the flooding, said Omaha Public Power District spokesman Jeff Hanson.

      “When the river reaches 1,004 feet above mean sea level, we shut down,” said Hanson. “We don’t have any idea when we’ll be able to start again.”

      …The Fort Calhoun station is owned and operated by the Omaha Public Power District and supplies power to Nebraska’s largest city. Contractors at the plant have completed construction of an earthen berm around the plant’s switch yard and are protecting the plant and other facilities with large temporary structures filled with water.

      [Link.]

      Whatever you might say about me, I don’t through the “Corporate Stooge” label around that carelessly, but in this case I can’t avoid it. Reuters isn’t telling even part of the story….it’s actually telling less than none of the story, and the NRC sounds asleep at the wheel here, as far as public information goes.

      The backstory, from a June 8 Wall Street Journal article: On June 7, there was a fire at the Ft. Calhoun nuclear facility, and the FAA established a no-fly zone over Ft. Calhoun, after the facility “briefly lost the ability to cool spent fuel rods,” following the fire. Here’s the actual no-fly order; it is, however, possible that it’s being overstated. The restriction is only for altitudes under 3,500 feet, which lends credence to the idea that it’s a PR move, not a safety issue. I don’t know enough about airplane altitudes to say.

      Anyway, here’s the WSJ on June 8, following the fire at Ft. Calhoun and the resultant establishment of the no-fly (which is still in effect):

      The NRC said the plant recovered cooling ability without activating backup systems and “temperatures in the pool remained at safe levels.” The public was not in danger because the plant has been shut down since early April for a refueling outage, the agency said.

      Spent fuel pools in the U.S. have received increased scrutiny after a recent crisis in Japan involving potentially overheated nuclear fuel and the release of dangerous radiation.

      The agency declared an alert, the second of four emergency classes, at 9:40 a.m., 10 minutes after “an indication of fire” in a building at the plant. The NRC didn’t disclose the cause of the fire. Automatic fire control systems activated and the fire was out by 10:20 a.m., the agency said. The plant is operated by the Omaha Public Power District.

      [Link.]

      Spent fuel, of course, was — and is — a huge part of the problem at Fukushima, and one of the things Tepco consistently lied about.

      The above, incidentally, comes to me based on to this very helpful Metafilter post (and its sources), and one Metafilter commenter sensibly points out: “One has to wonder if keeping planes, helicopters, etc. in a two-mile radius outside the nuclear plant is really just to keep any embarrassing pictures from being taken and published in the news. Out of sight, out of mind.”

      Given how (relatively) few photos have been published of the Fukushima site, and how full of crap the Japanese government, Tepco, and the news was in the Japanese crisis, and how sluggish US public health response was, and the mixed messages and bland disinterest in putting out correct info about, for instance, iodine, and how the Fukushima crisis just seems to keep getting worse despite the recurring ridicule of the pro-nuclear trolls, I’m left asking the same question…and about a million more." http://techyum.com/2011/06/no-fly-zone-level-4-emergency-at-fort-calhoun-nuclear...

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
  • BPGulfLeak
  • BPGulfLeak
    • +1
      BPGulfLeak  
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aWwfiZJ10M
      Uploaded by RTAmerica on Jun 20, 2011
      Much of the mainstream media has passed by the case of a nuclear plant in Nebraska that suffered from a fire two weeks ago. Officials there say it was extinguished in about 20 minutes, but now there is cause for a new concern - water in the river is rising and specialists believe it could pose a whole new problem. There has been an ongoing no-fly zone there as well, but the officials say it has nothing to do with potential radiation, yet the public remains skeptic. Tyson Slocum, director of the Public Citizen's Energy Program, explains whether Americans should be suspicious about the
      nuke plant.

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
  • BPGulfLeak
    • +1
      BPGulfLeak  
    • As we know from Fukushima, it's the 'spent' fuel rods being permanently stored that are the issue.

      "
      Spent fuel rods from nuclear power plants are the most highly radioactive of all nuclear wastes.
      The nuclear plant operated by the Omaha Public Power District south of Blair has a 40-foot-deep pool next to the nuclear reactor for spent fuel rods after they are removed from the reactor.
      Storage in the pool was to be temporary.
      Nine years after OPPD opened its Fort Calhoun plant, Congress passed legislation in 1982 that obligated the federal government to accept nuclear waste for permanent disposal at a national site.
      But the pool at the Fort Calhoun plant was reaching capacity. So OPPD in 2006 also began to temporarily store spent fuel rods above ground in mausoleum-like concrete structures outside the nuclear plant.
      Now the power company says it could store the plant's nuclear waste on-site forever."

      http://www.enterprisepub.com/news/article_c622e2ac-55a5-5c14-b1b2-d8adfe92484a.h...

    • 11 months ago
  • BPGulfLeak
  • Nick19
  • BPGulfLeak
  • Leen61
more from Community:

top videos