Community | June 22, 2011 | 46 comments

Paul/Frank: End the Prohibition on Pot - Bipartisan

Image
rodstradamus
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul and outspoken Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank want to get the federal government out of the marijuana regulation business.

States should make their own rules concerning the leafy green stuff, and regulate it themselves, the pair propose in legislation that will be introduced Thursday.

The bill would allow the Feds to continue enforcing cross-border or inter-state smuggling, but states would set their own laws, and people could grow and sell marijuana in places that choose to make it legal.

The bill is, of course, a longshot. But making it a law isn't the whole point, according to Morgan Fox, communications manager at the Marijuana Policy Project.

"A bill like this is going to get talked about quite a bit," Fox said. "I think it will spark a strong debate in the media, and we hope to get some [House] floor time for it."

more at link...

Don't forget Ron Paul's Industrial Hemp Act.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Green,   H.E.M.P.,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Marijuana Ron Paul Pot Prohibition 1 more
  3.     
    |

46 comments // Paul/Frank: End the Prohibition on Pot - Bipartisan

  • Littlewolf
    • 0
      Littlewolf  
    • Posted this on another similar story on Current

      I wonder if the rabid anti-smoking campaign is in preparation for prevention of inhaling in public - one of the new restrictions is against renters in NY and California - you can be evicted if you smoke cigarettes/cigars/pipes in your apartment - & you can't smoke in your own car in certain parts of New York if you have someone under 18 in the car with you - they call CPS & take your kid away for child abuse evaluation. No more smoking in public parks in NYC now, which Calif has had for quite awhile. If they can't outlaw the peace-pipe, they'll just try to prohibit lighting it anywhere.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFq1Qip5cY&feature=related

    • 11 months ago
  • GRC54
    • +1
      GRC54  
    • And once more sane pols are trying to do the right thing. And again the nay sayers will come out with the bogus info to keep it illeagal as usual.
      Get real and just get it done. Enough with the bullshi.Enough said.

    • 11 months ago
  • sugarmountian
    • +1
      sugarmountian  
    • It was a shock watching KO last nite. He had a running gag through his whole show acting like a asshole at the thought of legalization. Does he think all his followers are against ending pot prohibition?

    • 11 months ago
  • Littlewolf
  • coolplanet
    • +1
      coolplanet  
    • Now THAT is a picture worth a million words!

      Back in the 1960s who would have ever thunk that pot would be legal in Russia decades before it is in America?

    • 11 months ago
  • CursingOldGoat
    • +1
      CursingOldGoat  
    • A Devastating Failure
      It’s time to come clean. Governments can no longer spend untold trillions of dollars waging a global drug war on the citizens of the world. A new report, released by the Global Commission on Drug Policy on June 2, states exactly that.
      by Dan Skye
      An elite, 19-member commission composed a withering, 24-page paper which states that the “global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world.’’ Members of the commission included political and public figures: former UN secretary general Kofi Annan, George Schultz, who held Cabinet posts under Presidents Reagan and Nixon, former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, and the current prime minister of Greece. Plus, the former presidents of Mexico, Brazil, Switzerland and Colombia added their names. Richard Branson, head of the Virgin Group, as well as writers Carlos Fuentes and Mario Vargas Llosa were also part of the commission. As a group, they wrote: “Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not been, and cannot, be won.”
      The report urges governments to end criminalization of drug use, experiment with legal models that would undermine organized crime, and offer health and treatment services for drug users instead of incarcerating them.
      Naturally, the Office of National Drug Control Policy called the report misguided. An ONDCP spokesperson said, “Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated. Making drugs more available, as this report suggests, will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe.’’
      However, the report was especially critical of the US for its brutal anti-crime approach to drug use. “We hope this country will at least start to think there are alternatives," said former Colombian president Cesar Gaviria.”
      Consider the murderous drug war in Mexico. In 2008, the Obama administration pledged $1.5 billion in equipment and training to aid. The results? The number of drug-related deaths rose to 15,273 in 2010, a 60 percent increase from the previous year. In fact, over the four years since Mexican president Felipe Calderon ordered 6,500 troops to engage the “enemy,” 34,612 people have died. Of those, 30,913 were execution-style killings. And still, despite US funding, the market for pot, ecstasy and meth grew. On the world stage, the Drug War is just as ineffective. According to UN stats, from 1998 to 2008, opiate use increased 35% worldwide, cocaine by 27%, and cannabis by 8.5%.
      The report recommends that drug policies should be based on methods proven to reduce crime and promote economic and social development.

    • 11 months ago
  • Hardytoo
    • +1
      Hardytoo  
    • What a great pairing these two are!! Bring on reefer madness, a little toke for each of us and don't Bogart that joint please; you first Ron - and share it.

    • 11 months ago
  • RMattnerTours
  • Collectionsgirl60
  • AmericanStandard
  • littlwarrior
    • +2
      littlwarrior  
    • Ya know Paul and I dont always agree on everything but sometimes I just love this man. Might even think about voting for him, I almost did last time he ran.

    • 11 months ago
  • SoCalFramer
  • rodstradamus
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • Barny Frank has always been one of my favorite politicians . He has earned my respect over the years by taking unpopular positions and the flack that goes along with them .

    • 11 months ago
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • +3
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • I am no fan of Ron Paul but could you imagine any of the tea baggers or for that matter Boehner in this scenario. It would never happen. As for the legislation, it has no chance of going anyplace but it may be the seed that will one day take root. One can always hope.

    • 11 months ago
  • DEM46
  • love_is_my_religion
    • +3
      love_is_my_religion  
    • Image
    • We must not forget HEMP!

      Here are two simple ways to help industrial hemp blossom in the marketplace: Buy hemp and vote hemp!

      http://www.votehemp.com/what_can_i_do.html

      Vote Hemp is working to shift federal regulation of industrial hemp farming out of the hands of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and get hemp farming regulated on the state level.

      Vote Hemp also works to defend against any new laws, regulations or policies that would prohibit or restrict hemp commerce or imports.

    • 11 months ago
  • chew_chew
  • Nexis_Hexus
    • +5
      Nexis_Hexus  
    • I'd prefer if Ron Paul would exercise his credential as a Dr. rather than a free marketer that treating drug abuse and misuse as a medical problem , not a punitive problem. Thats putting the credential on the table. Free marketers don't have credibility on the humanistic sense. Being just about profit has low value, its poor reasoning even if it sounds good in low economic times.

    • 11 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • Littlewolf
  • Buddha2112
    • +3
      Buddha2112  
    • Just another reason to love Ron Paul, and that other guy up there... what... he's a DEMOCRAT? oh no! it seems like parties don't matter when people stick up for the constitution... For once I agree with a Masshole. Oh the horrors...

    • 11 months ago
  • floydyboy
  • stubones
    • +2
      stubones  
    • Buddha2112:

      All the more reason that voters should vote for "Individuals" on their merits and not just strictly repub or Democratic...If we aren't going to have the sense to create A strong "Labor" party with middle class values in mind, let's at least vote "Smart"...
      At present we have two ploitical partys representing 1 or 2% of our population, representing essentially 400 Ultra-Rich Families and their Industies...

      What really needs to happen is Electoral REFORM, so that the Corporate owned Media and their Political shills don't have A monopoly over the masses...How many good men can raise A Billion dollars to get elected to the Presidency??? And even if they could collect this much, to what extent would their integrity be compromised??? This alleged "Democracy/Republic" needs an overhaul if it is going to work for the people as I would like to think it was originally designed for!!!

    • 11 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • stubones:

      I always vote for the "best idea" . I do not actually like Ron Paul , but THIS is the right and decent thing to do . We all know this , and have for decades . I was under the impression that Obama would be doing something along these lines , but someone needs to step up . Ya have to admit , considering the likelihood of success , they have some courage , even if one of them is a nut ....

    • 11 months ago
  • Buddha2112
    • 0
      Buddha2112  
    • stubones:

      I think we should get rid of parties all together... Sure there needs to be a semblance of order, but why can't groups just get behind one candidate like they do now... and have them debate each other... openly... I don't get the point of "republican debates" and then "democrat debates"

      We do need electoral reform, and we need a country wide reform to not just get rid of the corporations but relinquish this death grip by world banks....

      As for a strong "labor" party... I don't really want to go down that road... Labor Party... really? lol.

    • 11 months ago
  • Littlewolf
  • Emucratic
  • Littlewolf
  • fuj
  • bluestranger
    • +3
      bluestranger  
    • I'll give Papa Paul a break and skip my usual diatribe. Barney is being Barney and that's usually a good thing. I was watching a documentary, "How Weed Won the West" and they had a great quote at the beginning. How can a nation that forces you to take vaccinations make it illegal to smoke a flower, or something close to that. Peace.

    • 11 months ago
  • mikem0487
  • Littlewolf
  • rustyred
  • Emucratic
  • rustyred
  • simplecj
    • +3
      simplecj  
    • Emucratic:

      What do you mean by "fake"?

      This is a picture of Obama smoking something, could be tobacco, but the way he's holding it leads you to think otherwise. This is no fake, this the Pres during his college years. And as rusty said, Obama has already openly admitted to smoking weed in his past.

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +6
      Leen61  
    • Just let this happen! It's time to join the 21st Century. Let the states set their own laws and let people grow pot and smoke it for whatever reason they want. Especially for the people who need pot for medical reasons.

    • 11 months ago
  • JohnA
    • +6
      JohnA  
    • Leen61:

      State's rights. Yes. The Federal Government is out of control. Power to the people! Bring the power back to the states like the Constitution was written. The Founding Fathers did not intend the federal government to have the power they have taken, or any power not subspecifically subscribred by them.

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
  • letsliveinpeace
  • boothanew
    • +5
      boothanew  
    • I don't personally smoke but I do believe people have a right to grow and partake in any way they like.Who am I to judge of tell people what they can and can't do.I also believe its disgusting that its not completely available to people who are sick and dying.
      People will always do drugs and drink but weed is a non issue in my opinion.
      Everyone that smokes does it to relax what's so wrong with that?

    • 11 months ago
  • Littlewolf
  • Conniepae
  • bluestranger
  • mickyjon420
    • +4
      mickyjon420  
    • Thanks for the news Rod, was going to post and you beat me to it. I thought Jeannie would have posted it. With this put out to the public, it looks like they might get a good backing for the political race.

    • 11 months ago
more from Community:

top videos