Community | June 29, 2011 | 99 comments

The Forgotten Slaves: Whites in Servitude in Early America

Image
congoboy
Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.

Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia.

The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.

In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual." These accounts have been policed out of the much touted "standard reference works" such as Abbott Emerson Smith's laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage.

I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more "servitude" on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html
  1. groups:
    Community,   Not News,   Right Wing Nuts,   Trash Can,   2 more
  2. tags:
    White Slavery
  3.     
    |

99 comments // The Forgotten Slaves: Whites in Servitude in Early America

  • cons_Objector
  • congoboy
  • 2helenahandbasket
    • 0
      2helenahandbasket  
    • Of course. Anyone who has studied American history knows of "Indentured" servants. But the folks here will never admit that there were ever any slaves in America except black ones. Admitting it would only serve to take something away from their belief that only black people were victims.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • Wicks934
    • +2
      Wicks934  
    • I believe you have your facts wrong on the status of white indentured servants. I'm pretty sure you have your facts wrong on the number of African slaves shipped to this country. I've been aware that whites enslaved whites. The Vikings captured Irish to sell as slaves. Irish captured English for slaves. This doesn't make slavery OK. So, humans have been inhumane, big surprise.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • Persecuted
    • -1
      Persecuted  
    • this story is a right wing nut who changed history to fit his own agenda... here are the last few lines of this story from the website... get ready...

      "If this seems admirable from the pathological viewpoint of Marxism or cosmopolitan liberalism, the Black and Third World "beneficiaries" of White ruling class "esteem" ought to consider what sort of "friends" they actually have.

      The Bible declares that the man who does not take care of his own family is "worse than an infidel." This also applies to one's racial kindred. The man who neglects his own children to care for yours has true love for neither.

      White, self-hating liberals and greed-head conservatives who claim to care for the "civil rights" of Black and Third World people, discard the working class of their own people on the garbage heap of history. When they are finished with their own they shall surely turn on others.

      Those who care for their own kind first are not practicing "hate" but kindness, which is the very root of the word."

      in other words... WHITE POWER!

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • demsbeans527
    • +2
      demsbeans527  
    • I am sure glad you posted this. Now I can feel better about my ancestor not only being enslaved but suppressed up until about fifty years ago. Yes, I will surely be sure to visit that revisionist museum where there will be pictures of blacks portrayed as monkeys hanging up alongside those of whites portrayed as ?? Anyway, I will definitely look for those those American cities that were prosperous, like Rosewood that were burned to the ground. I certainly can't wait to visit the white churches that were bombed with the children in them. I apologize for not recognizing all the Caucasians that were hung or dragged along the streets because of their skin color. I wonder if Florida is where the CIA deposited crack into the white communities. Maybe The Caucasian trailer park is where the government decided to practice medical experiments.

      My point is, it is not simply about enslavement, it is about a system of dehumanization, at a time when we were supposed to be becoming a civilized society. A campaign of suppression that is to a certain degree still in existence because there is no hiding 'Africanism.' Blacks and Native Americans have never truly been able to fully blend in and collectively "pick themselves up by the bootstrap". Not for lack of trying but for lack of ability to overcome inherent racism. The kind of racism that inspires people to write material like this, that seeks to downplay or ignore that there was more than slavery involved in the wronging of a race of people.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • demsbeans527:

      i feel for you dude and there is no excuse for bigotry regardless to who's on the receiving end. but one has to eventually quit blaming others, take responsibility for themselves, and move on. those are the folks who we can call successful. although some prefer uncle tom

    • 11 months ago
  • Persecuted
    • +1
      Persecuted  
    • yep... white people have always owned slaves... even other white people... what is your point? that white people are off the hook now for enslaving their own people as well as other races and religions?

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • Persecuted
    • 0
      Persecuted  
    • congoboy:

      yes but the vast majority of whites in america came on their own free will... they were not stripped of their heritage, culture, language, and religion, then treated enslaved, then freed only to be beaten and killed and treated like garbage for another 200 years... your perspective is so warped

    • 11 months ago
  • Persecuted
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • cztheday
    • +3
      cztheday  
    • Free Black property owners "strutted" the streets while some Whites were enslaved? STRUTTED? How do we know that the free Blacks didn't "mosey" or "saunter" or "watusi?" Perhaps they even "walked." Slavery was (and is) an evil institution, regardless of the race of the slave. But the point of this article appears to be that we should be particularly horrified that some Whites were enslaved at the same time that a few Blacks were not -- as though the few free Blacks should have been enslaved before anyone turned to enslaving Whites.

      Nobody should have been enslaved. Nobody's civil rights should have been impinged upon then -- nor should they be impinged upon now. But the majority of our current Supreme Court, the ugly legacy of Reagan and the Bushes, apparently does not have those qualms. Thank you for the history lesson, but the far more important issue is whether the many groups that continue to face legally institutionalized denial of their civil rights will ever have any hope of being treated equally under the law.

    • 11 months ago
  • dalistuff
  • Kelly_Balthrop
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • cztheday:

      dude you make a couple of valid points. but the dems have continued the course of slavery by creating a government folks are overly dependent on. if you rely on someone else for your existence than you shall never be free

    • 11 months ago
  • Wicks934
  • congoboy
  • zoomy1
  • congoboy
  • toadware
  • dalistuff
  • Conniepae
    • +1
      Conniepae  
    • I see no basis for this post, other than race baiting. Are you trying to re-write history and make white slavery equal to black slavery, thinking we should all 'move along' to black slavery? They are equal?

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • Conniepae:

      no i am not trying to rewrite history, that is a tactic of the left. nor am i trying to race bait, another tactic of the left. yes slavery is slavery whether black or white. suffering is subjective, some slaves both black and white were treated quite well and lived comfortable lives. others both black and white were tortured mercilessly. so yeah i guess i am saying slavery was basically the same for anyone of any race. sorry if you find truth and history so distrubing. reality's a bitch sometimes, especially when your view of it is so narrow

    • 11 months ago
  • samthesixth
  • ZiggyStrange
  • littlwarrior
    • 0
      littlwarrior  
    • My great great great... well you get the picture it was back in like 1612, grandfather came to America as an indentured servant, his contract worked out all right thought becuase he bought a big tract of land and his line has gone on to many great things, and some not so great.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • littlwarrior
  • congoboy
  • littlwarrior
  • congoboy
  • littlwarrior
  • freecrack
  • congoboy
  • freecrack
    • +2
      freecrack  
    • congoboy:

      only parts of convinience seem to be applied.

      both(tea party and open racists) endorse policies that literaly would mean that they literaly would not benefit from.like by supporting infanite attacks on illegal aliens whilst forgetting that they themselves, as citizens are the result of the very thing they are claiming is wrong.making themselves wrong.

      they ignore the reality that thier european ass's are of immigrants themselves.in action stating that we are a nation comprised of people who sought freedom.that inherent desire alone,is the greatest concept upon the rest is built.the desire for freedom.

      the part you guys like to ignore,is all these illegals are victims of the political bullshit.they are just people who seek freedom as all of our ancestors did.the fact that the country they come from doesnt have a gov w/ a special deal with our gov,doesnt make thier quest any less legitimate than that wich is our inheritance.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • freecrack:

      and they are free to do so when using the proper channels. the difference being most of us come from legal immigation heritage. the issue has never been immigration, just the legal and proper means of becoming a citizen

    • 11 months ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • congoboy:

      "proper channels" is the fucked up part you see as some valid concept that supercedes the human desire for freedom wich we are all here as a result of.

      so we took a pen to some paper, and all of a sudden what was good enough for us is illegal for them?

      most of us are not legal.if you think that you really gotta do some serious homework on this

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • freecrack:

      guess this is where we differ on the rule of law. we have a difficult enough time sustaining our current population. i am all for allowing folks to live and work here as long as they remain productive members but i also believe in accountability and documentation.

    • 11 months ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • congoboy:

      strict adherence to the rule of law, as it seems you prefer,would serve as antithetical to progress.if not actively questioned and protested when would unjust laws be changes to just ones?

      im with you on the productive part, but not at the point of saying "go back to your third world shit hole and starve to death" as a result of not being productive.cut them off from social securtiy,welfare,or what ever else by wich they could cause a social burden.

      but no persecution should be tolerated

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • freecrack:

      never said that. but if they arent going to be productive members of society and seek admission and residency through some type of legal means then they should be forced to go back to their 3rd world shit hole. at the very least we should be charging the mexican government say a barrel of oil per week per alien for our gracious hospitality

    • 11 months ago
  • freecrack
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • freecrack:

      sure it does. but we're doing a pretty shitty job of taking care of our own. too many celebs adopting foreign babies and trying to save other parts of the world. i say charity starts at home and that we should do more to feed our own hungry kids. if mexico werent so corrupt they could also care for their own, instead the mexican government encourages people to go north. less folks for them to have to worry about. if a starving family legal or otherwise knocked on my back door asking for food of course i would feed them a meal but i cant support them indefinitely.

    • 11 months ago
  • riffmage
    • +2
      riffmage  
    • It is obvious at some time in the past every race has been a slave. There are people of every race enslaved today. Many of them Women and children. :(

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +4
      ZiggyStrange  
    • What a bunch of hogwash. Voted down Congoboy. Why don't you post the one about how blacks never wanted to be free. I suppose all whites in jail are slaves too right. You are something else. Poor forgotten downtrodden white people. God help us.

    • 11 months ago
  • stupidamericanz
  • ZiggyStrange
  • samthesixth
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      you got it ziggs, slavery is slavery. it dont matter if youre white, black, yellow, brown. its just plain wrong. always was. always will be. folks of all races have suffered under the man and we are all brothers under the skin. sorry if you find history so difficult. i myself find it quite cathartic.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +3
      ZiggyStrange  
    • congoboy:

      I'm fully cognizant of History CB, False equivalences, and revisionism appear to be your choice for interpreting it. There is no question that these things happened. The problem is your twisted presentation. What was the point of this article but to throw some race cards on the table. If you want to talk smack be prepared to get dissenting responses.

      Sam talks straight, we differ but I respect his opinions, you are a poor excuse for a sophist. You can write a novel and not get a rise out of me.
      To be brow beaten by "you" is a joke.

    • 11 months ago
  • ZiggyStrange
  • CaptSutter
    • 0
      CaptSutter  
    • congoboy:

      The source of all sin is treating people as things.

      You can compete with Palin and Beck for inflamatory baseless accusations. Climbing inside yourself to distinguish between racism and self doubt is tough.

      My measure is that you should show respect to all. It is when you start to denigrate someone or a whole group because of "race" or religion or ethnicity.... It is a hard one to pull off, but I think Will Rogers oft misquoted statement

      "I never met a man I COULDN'T like." says it better than most.

      Are we all racists because we think about culture and how it affects us? Are we all racists because we consider the argument before we discard it? Are we all racists because our lizard brain can so easily be triggered by fear of the unknown. By fear that the different coloured skin implies more basic differences or enmities....

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • CaptSutter:

      well put capt and almost totally agreed. but inflamatory baseless accusations are not just a beck/palin phenomenon. the left has their own pundits who could also be accused of such things. if everyone were honest with themselves they would indeed see that racism lies within all of us. its what we do about it that truly matters.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      slavery is slavery. black, white, yellow, brown. all bad, all equivalent. no revisionism. nothing twisted. some folks just dont like admiting that theres plenty of guilt to be spread around. your opinion of me is irrelevent. your opinion in regard to my posts is as welcome as anyone elses as mine is to the posts i comment on. i dont brow beat but if i did you'd be on the losing end

    • 11 months ago
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • congoboy:

      I am probably too old for this, but when I read things that Bill Clinton said about how twenty years ago Obama would have been serving him coffee,
      I would have to have been in the room and heard the tone of his voice to know if it was racist. When I first heard the comparisons between Obama and Curious George, I couldn't tell but it didn't take long to see that those were hurtful and and racist comments.

      It is a sad world where we never hear the timber of a man's voice before we judge them.

      I tend to err on the side on the side of being too kind, and too understanding, because I can't hear the voice.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • CaptSutter:

      tone definitely makes a difference. when reading a comment in writing its very difficult to judge. thats why i am sometimes accused of things that are not true either. good that you err on the side of compassion though. but you know had george bush made the coffee serving comment we'd still be hearing about it.

    • 11 months ago
  • PrivateBurke
    • +1
      PrivateBurke  
    • Yup... Stopped caring about anything he said when I read that this was written by Michael Hoffman II a nutty Holocaust denier. If you want a history lesson in what really happened through American History read Howard Zinn's A People's Guide to American History. Not this "whites had it worse then blacks" shit.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • CaptSutter
    • 0
      CaptSutter  
    • congoboy:

      Whites got it first? We have got at least 10,000 years of common history to sort that one out, and the evidence is pretty hard to distinguish. Just try and figure out what coour skin the three kings/wisemen/philosphers/astronomers had... Were the first slaves Aryan because the first culture was in the Indus Valley? And were those Aryans what you would call "White"??? I generally think they are closer to what you would denigrate as "Gypies",

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • CaptSutter:

      i stand corrected. my reference was to america after colonial occupation. slavery is almost as old as mankind. the jews, christians, greeks, romans, etc. etc. so many people and races have been affected. this does not excuse the way blacks in america were short changed over the years it just gives a broader perspective to an age old problem.

    • 11 months ago
  • GENERALNATTY
    • +6
      GENERALNATTY  
    • in those times, a irishman was treated worse than a blackman but european's had long since mistreated one another, , irish slaves were sold for 5 sterling during the beginning of the trans-atlantic slave trade while the african was sold for 60 sterling, it was also common practice for irish slaves to be forceably bred with african slaves to produce mulatto children which were considered more valuable, however eventually the practice was outlawed.

      In the 1600's at one point on the caribbean island of montserrat 70 percent of the inhabitants were irish slaves.

      It is foolish to apply the american standard of view of race and creed today to that of hundreds of years ago, because racism always existed in europe but the definition of "race" at that point was not so much of colour of skin, so much as it was about ethnic origin, the english hated the french, the irish hated the english, the people in the north of italy looked down upon sicilians, the portuguese were looked down upon as well for centuries, in fact in canada portuguese people were officially listed as negro until about 1960.

      In the early part of the last century there were incidents of italians ( who are now considered white by american standards) being lynched in the south.

      Indentured servitude usually lasted about 5 years, in fact hundreds of thousands of indentured servants were brought over from india to the british west indies after slavery was abolished.

      Lets be honest, nowadays a irishman is like any other white person but even in right into the 1960's the irish were discriminated against in america and in the united kingdom.

      In england after world war 2 the irish were badly discriminated against, there were signs int he windows that said "no blacks, no irish"

      Its not a case of "white slavery" it was another chapter in the horrible mistreatment of the irish by the english and by the english diaspora in the united states.

      As for the children in industrial britain, thats what we call child labor now, a practice that not only still exists, but is likely responsible for a lot of the clothes in your closet today, in any nation where there is horrible poverty there are people there to do horrible things to take advantage.

      Sex tourists from the united states travel all around the world to places like mexico, brazil and thailand to sleep with underaged girls as young as 10.

      Asians bring people over from china and enslave them today.

      Yes its a interesting piece of history that should be noted but the attitude of the author of the article, seems to suggest that somehow, this piece of history is too the significance that american whites have somehow pandered too much to the black suffering while forgetting their past when in actuality for most whites in america it isn't their past, the fact is the vast majority of people of irish ancestry in america arrived as immigrants and not as slaves and it was the irish that were enslaved while there were likely other groups of europeans also involved, they were so low in number it is barely worth mentioning.

      The irish were so fiercely discriminated against in america, not only by the elite but but the poor americans as well that in new york up to 80 percent of irish children born to irish immigrants died, the acceptance of the irish as whites in america only started to begin after other immigrant groups began to arrive in droves, then the hatred was directed elsewhere.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      no question that blacks have suffered under white majority rule throughout he world. many people of all race and creeds have suffered at the hands of slave masters. we can not discount the suffering of any person. but eventually we have to grow up, pull up our boot straps and do the best we can with what the world has to offer. it worked well for obama as it did for bush and reagan

    • 11 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • I learned about this in history class , public school . Indentured servitude , and the Irish slaves , but the extent , was not this clear . Thank you : )

    • 11 months ago
  • onemalefla
  • congoboy
  • Peacey
    • +1
      Peacey  
    • But those had the chance & choice to work their way out of slavery. Ethnic slaves did not, that was lifetime deal. Not only that but their children were born slaves.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • +1
      congoboy  
    • Peacey:

      not in all cases. but there were also blacks who could pay off and attain freedom. at any rate this post isnt to excuse slavery just to remind folks not everything they read or learn is black and white...

      According to the first enumeration of residents in Fayette County taken in 1790, there were thirty-two free African Americans. This small group of individuals had purchased their freedom and that of their family members. Some of them helped secure the freedom of other individuals, as well. Before 1861, the number of freed men and women had increased to nearly six hundred. These men and women bought and built homes, purchased other real estate and paid taxes; the businesses they owned and managed provided service to the growing Lexington community. Their names appear in deeds as trustees of churches and educational institutions and in written histories and news articles concerning the upward movement of African Americans in the decades after 1865. http://www.hathawaymuseum.org/freeblacks.html

    • 11 months ago
  • WagonMaster
    • +2
      WagonMaster  
    • One of the biggest gifts going to the victors is the ability to rewrite history, as in " indenured servitude" used in place of " slavery ". Years ago I read some books on the real history of the world that mentioned this blot on democracy and the length taken to gloss it over. Rewrite sux. Another good read was a couple books on the true old west. " Save the Last Bullet For Yourself" was a good read, as well as "The Donkeys", about WWI. Molder was right, you just have to look for the truth.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • WagonMaster:

      thanks for the input wm. many folks know very little about american history thanks to the revisionists and apologists. it is unfortunate that many will pass this post up for fear of seeing some truth

    • 11 months ago
  • samthesixth
  • samthesixth
    • +3
      samthesixth  
    • I have German immigrant ancestors who came to Virginia in the early 1700s. They spoke no English. On the way over the ship captain died and the entire family was enslaved by then Gov. Alexander Spotswood to work in his mines. My ancestor learned English and sued for his family's freedom and won. It was the first successful lawsuit against a sitting governor by a colonial subject in VA.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +4
      ZiggyStrange  
    • samthesixth:

      Voted up -

      I'm aware of the injustices perpetrated on the Irish and newcomers on general. I do draw a line at the enslavement of black people in America. Indentured service, kidnapping, abuse are horrible. But blacks were dehumanized. At least your ancestor was considered human, and could seek recourse. Some of mine were enslaved during the crusades, almost half were Irish, and Scottish. It still all pales compared to slavery in America.

    • 11 months ago
  • samthesixth
    • +2
      samthesixth  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      Zig, I agree that the degradation suffered by black slaves was worse than what happened to other races in the US. Some of the treatment of enslaved Indians is pretty shameful as well. Our history includes slavery of every race, but the average high school grad probably doesn't know that.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
  • congoboy
  • 14_Crusaders
  • congoboy
  • 14_Crusaders
  • congoboy
  • 14_Crusaders
  • ZiggyStrange
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
    • +3
      ZiggyStrange  
    • congoboy:

      Now there you again with the nonsense. I don't care if you are purple. I see your statements not your color. My statement is not relegated to White people, it's used to point out racist dogma. Which is what your presentation of colored (no pun intended) truisms is. What was the point to give a history lesson?
      Thanks Congoboy, I'll take a pass. I prefer mine to be quoted from a reliable source not the ramblings of a revisionist.

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • ZiggyStrange:

      my point is always to show the other side or sides of things. i tire of whitey always takin the blame. there are no living african american slaves nor are there any living slave owners. its long past time to forgive, pull up our boot straps, quit blaming others, get responsible and productive with our lives and move forward. i dont know what he is but the documentaion he uses is available elsewhere. even a few testimonials on this thread

    • 11 months ago
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
  • Buddha2112
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • ZiggyStrange
more from Community:

top videos