Image
navider
Up to 42,000 gallons surge overnight Friday into the Yellowstone River, and some say Exxon Mobil's cleanup needs more oversight.

An oil spill in Montana's Yellowstone River surged toward North Dakota on Sunday as outraged residents demanded more government oversight of Exxon Mobil's cleanup.

An estimated 750 to 1,000 barrels, or up to 42,000 gallons, spilled through a damaged pipeline in the riverbed, Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers said. The break near Billings could be related to the river's high water level, officials said.

More than 120 people were working on the cleanup late Sunday, Jeffers said. But local officials said because of the raging floodwaters, only a handful of crews were laying absorbent pads and booms to trap the oil along short stretches of the river between Billings and Laurel. In some areas, residents said, oil may be flowing underneath the booms and continuing downstream in the murky water.

Jeffers said most of the oil was believed to be within 10 miles of the spill site, and Exxon crews were flying over the area late Sunday to assess how far it had spread since the Friday night spill.

But Montana's governor disputed the 10-mile estimate.

"Nobody can say definitively," Gov. Brian Schweitzer said. "It's too early. We need boats on the water," not just flyovers. Because of the high water, however, boats were potentially unsafe.

There were reports of oil as far as 100 miles away near the town of Hysham, Yellowstone County Commissioner Bill Kennedy said.

Although the spill is downstream from Yellowstone National Park and the fertile Yellowstone fly-fishing grounds, some officials worried it could harm the tourism industry, which draws 11 million visitors a year to a state with a population of just 980,000.

"We take our rivers very seriously here in Montana," said Schweitzer, a soil scientist who planned to visit the spill site Tuesday. "We will not allow this catastrophe to affect the $400-million trout industry in Montana."

Schweitzer, a Democrat, said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had been working with state agencies to investigate the cause of the spill and would test air, water and soil samples. Exxon will be expected to pay for the cleanup so that "everybody along that river is made whole," he said.

But residents were worried.

"We can't really tell what it's going to do for our fisheries downstream," Eric Beebee, 37, said as he worked Sunday at Bighorn Fly and Tackle Shop in Billings. "If it was going to affect anybody, it's going to be the farmers and the ranchers because the water is pushed up so high, when it recedes [the oil is] going to be left on their land."

Goat rancher Alexis Bonogofsky pulled on waders and slogged through the oily residue at the bottom of her pasture, snapping photographs of oily grass and water.

"Places where the water has gone down the soil is shiny, there's residue oil and you can see where the grass is already dying. I'm really concerned about the wildlife," said Bonogofsky, 30, who also works for the National Wildlife Federation. "I've seen Canada geese try to take off and they can't get lift because of oil on their wings."

An Exxon crew arrived at her ranch south of Billings late Sunday to lay absorbent pads on oil patches.

Bonogofsky and husband Mike Scott, 31, who works for the Sierra Club, were trying to organize landowners to demand more transparency and accountability from Exxon. She faulted local public health officials for failing to conduct their own reports and relying instead on Exxon.

"Exxon says they are monitoring it, but we don't have access to that data," Bonogofsky said.

"We're sort of in limbo here," Scott said. "We have been spending a lot of time in the soil, and our livestock has. Nobody is telling us what we could have been exposed to."

Jeffers said he met with some residents Sunday and assured them that company tests, including air quality monitoring, showed no cause for alarm.

"There's no effort to withhold important information from the public," he said. "We have not seen anything that causes public health concern."

Exxon pipeline workers became aware of a problem shortly before midnight Friday when pressure readings in the pipeline dropped, Exxon Mobil Pipeline Co. President Gary Pruessing said Sunday. Workers turned off the pumps within six minutes, he said.

Jeffers said Exxon had temporarily turned off the foot-wide pipeline in May out of concern that seasonal flooding could damage it. The company reopened it a day later after reviewing the 20-year-old pipeline's safety record.

"We did a safety analysis and concluded the line was safe to operate," Jeffers said.

The pipeline was last inspected in 2009 using a robotic device designed to detect corrosion and other flaws, Jeffers said.

The most recent depth tests, in December, showed the pipe was 5 to 8 feet below the riverbed, he said. But that was before record rains and melting snowpack flooded the river in May, which Exxon and government officials have said may have exposed the pipe to damage from debris.

"That's just speculation at this point," Jeffers said. "We don't know at this point what caused it."

Some officials feared the oil would reach the Missouri River, just across the border in North Dakota.

"The water is fast and furious," said Kennedy, the Yellowstone County official. "I'm hoping that we get it cleaned up and stopped before it even approaches there."
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    Exxon Mobil oil spil Broken Oil Pipe
  3.     
    |

24 comments // Oil spill outrages Montana residents

  • letsliveinpeace
  • idealist
  • Saladin
    • -2
      Saladin  
    • Yeah, they're so outraged, they'll vote for Republicans again, the way Louisiana, Mississippi and Florida all did after the BP oil spill.

      They can be pissed off all they want, but until they turn that anger into political change, they practically deserve what they get.

      I'm sick and tired of red states getting angry about their fucked up environments after voting in people actively against environmental protections. It's hypocritical and it's stupid. You reap what you sow.

    • 11 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • HarukoHaruhara
  • Saladin
  • Nabe8
    • +3
      Nabe8  
    • Saladin:

      With all due respect and with an understanding of your frustrations for red state politics, nobody deserves these man-made disasters.

      I'm a lifelong resident of Louisiana and I vote Democrat. Unfortunately I live in a state where the majority consistently votes Republican. Roughly half of America votes Republican, including in the blue states.

      So I implore you to reconsider your feelings, because I'm a Democrat in a majority Republican state. And the whole state of Louisiana does not deserve to be raped of our resources and soiled upon by oil companies and bureaucrats because of a 60% majority.

      ~~

      As humans we tend to make sweeping generalizations of groups because it is convenient. We are all guilty of it.

      Not all Louisianians are Republican. Governor Bobby Jindal and Senator David Vitter do not represent my interests. I did not vote for them. I am not a hypocrite and I do not deserve having my homeland trashed, and I feel disrespected, or at the very least, disregarded when I read statements declaring that I and the people around me deserve this: irreversible damage to our waterways, to our estuaries, to our wildlife, our fisheries, our marshland that protects our cities, to our way of life, damages that endanger our culture, our personal health, and the very future of the city of New Orleans.

      Please open your perspective to people like me who are trapped in a political conundrum.

    • 11 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • Saladin:

      Matters that the GOP does not have a veto proof majority and the guv is not afraid to use that veto brand he registered to make a point about the fact that the legislature is not running the state.

    • 11 months ago
  • HarukoHaruhara
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • Nabe8:

      Thank you!

      The habit some have of slamming entire populations in red states is not especially helpful to those of us busting our humps to get more DEMS, and more progressive DEMs in office. Slamming entire populations is a knee jerk bigotry reaction. It is counterproductive and it is what TPTB want us to do to keep us fighting each other instead of dealing with the root of our problems.

      Reinforcing the RW pundits' harangues that DEMs are elitists who hate rural Americans is not how to change hearts and open minds in the heartland. Reinforcing false RW claims about elitist DEMS also makes same error the far right often makes about ignoring nuance.

      Fact: GOP pols, and many DEM pols say what the voters what to hear, then do what the puppet masters want done. Voters in red states can't count on pols doing what they say any more that voters in blue states can. True, voters SHOULD be remembering what is done over what is said, but the fact that the WHOLE COUNTRY is having the same problems would indicate the problem of lying pols and inattentive voters is not a red v blue thing. The nation is purple and fighting amongst ourselves over imaginary 'issues' is how the Hoarder Class Minority ends up running everything, everywhere.

    • 11 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • HarukoHaruhara:

      Yep, and made such an amusing production out of it that Media wanted to cover the vetos, so he got the last word and was able to point out just how much time/money the demagogues wasted on trying to score points with the teabagger types while knowing the laws were not good for the people of Montana.

      Back in the bush days, he went to DC to make the case for why Montana's National Guard helicopters needed to be returned to Montana from Iraq. We were facing horrible fire seasons, the state was in a prolonged drought, and those 7 or 9 (my memory is fuzzy) choppers were essential to fire fighting management and deployment. Guess what? We got our birds back. bush/cheney/rummy caved because Brian was not going to back down and STFU. He was speaking truth to power about how they were abusing the states' guard units which were meant to handle emergency situations in their states, only deployed in war abroad as last resort. bush/cheney/rummy used the guard to supplement the army so they would not have to resort to a draft, which would have turned the country against the war much faster. They caved because he would have kept up until more governors would have been forced to get behind him. Now, keeping up the fight might have been better for the nation as a whole, but Brian's job was/is to take care of Montana and he did. If the other governors had any spine, they would follow suit. He can't make other DEMS fight, but he constantly teaches how to fight, if they care to pay attention and grow a pair too.

      It is odd that a couple of MT DEMS are so good at getting what we need addressed in DC, considering we are such a bunch of bad, red state, foolish voters ;^)

    • 11 months ago
  • Saladin
    • +1
      Saladin  
    • Nabe8:

      Point taken, I take it back as a generalization.

      It just pisses me off to no end that people consistently elect the fuckers who do this to them but never put two and two together. They'll vote for the people that slash environmental protections and then get all surprised when people engage in mountaintop removal or because their groundwater is polluted by pig farm runoff or that their land is fucked up by oil spills.

      I know it's not all of you, it's not even a large majority of you. But it is a majority, and it is incredibly frustrating. Especially since these issues have been getting worse for the past two decades, not better.

      It is a stereotype, and maybe an unfair one at that. But I'm not given a whole lot to work with here, especially when this happens -consistently-.

    • 11 months ago
  • Fishinflick
    • 0
      Fishinflick  
    • attilatheblond:

      You speak truth - It's a dog & pony show, a good cop bad cop routine - the whole game's rigged for corporations. I'm constantly advocating for an alternative approach to wasting time, votes, energy and endless petitions to legislators and agencies that simply have no intention of serving the electorate. Obama sold a "brand" to progressives (myself included) with dismal and predictable results, and when we called the administration to task were branded as "the cultural left" who are always "unsatisfied"; Rahm described us in obscene epitaphs. The right has no such worries with their base of the fearful and hateful fifth, they are gleefully willing to be useful idiots for the corporate coup.

      So we are left hung out to dry while our livelihoods, rights, quality of life and environment are rapidly going down the tubes. We have been sold out. Period.

      The 2012 Presidential Election Conventions should become prime targets for disruption and civil disobedience. We must usurp the stage from the corporate lap dogs running for office. They have stolen everything from us. Turn the spotlight on issues and away from politics.

      As for the Yellowstone, I'm sick to my stomach. Montana was a trout fishers paradise. As an avid angler who KNOWS the power of rivers I can assure you the spill will have a tremendous impact and no amount of spin from elected officials can stop that flowing water from carrying it's death load well beyond predicted points downriver.

    • 11 months ago
  • HarukoHaruhara
    • +1
      HarukoHaruhara  
    • attilatheblond:

      I'm actually not a big Baucus fan, but I ♥ Jon Tester, even if I disagreed with him on the debit card fees. I sort of like Schweitzer, but boy, he sure can be an egomaniac sometimes.

      I think my favourite of them all is Jag. ☺

    • 11 months ago
  • HarukoHaruhara
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • HarukoHaruhara:

      Baucus sold out and he is on my list of DINOS who have to go. Tester rocks. I know DEMS/Libs nationwide question his judgment, DEM cred, but they are not grasping the voters here when they doubt him. He cares. He is REALLY a farmer, not a pretend farmer. He understands what people here are dealing with.

      When he was attacked for the swipe fee issue, people in the east didn't understand that he was really looking out for a lot of local, solvent, safe small, independent banks here. He was looking out for the communities those banks serve and the food producers those banks serve with operational business. I hope those who attacked him didn't do it with a mouthful of Montana meat or grain, made possible by those small, independent banks and the producers they serve. ;^)

      The national DEMs need to work a bit more to understand just how much Tester really stands up for the old Democratic Party values that farmers, ranchers, working class people used to support. The national DEMs also need to grasp the fact that the GOP will pour a lot of cash in here for the idiot Rehberg. A senate vote is a senate vote on the Hill, but to win the seat in MT is a lot cheaper than doing same in more populous states.

      Tester gets a lot of small donations from real people. Denny Rehberg is a whore and usually a drunk one, but he does what he is told so really fat cats will invest in his run.

      Baucus should have retired long ago. He is not looking out for Montana or the people of the nation. He fell victim to the contagion and is serving lobbyists who are not doing anything good for the people.

    • 11 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • JanforGore:

      Absolutely. There are no red states, blue states and what hits one really does 'trickle down' and hit all, one way or another.

      Union. Union is the word we would do well to remember. Your air blows to my state. My state's water flows three directions: To the Gulf Of Mexico, the Pacific Ocean and to the Atlantic via Hudson Bay (yes, some water basins here drain to the north east)

      It is one planet.

    • 11 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • nashkildare
    • +2
      nashkildare  
    • They are never going to put the necessary messures to stop these spills cause we keep buying their gasoline. We need a strong EPA or some big government muscle to tackle the behemoth. I call a tax rate hike on caviar.

    • 11 months ago
  • PIANORAMA
  • attilatheblond
  • Vic_Romano
  • PIANORAMA
more from Community:

top videos