Independence Day - Time For History To Repeat Itself
source: http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5368/independence-day-time-for-history-to-repeat-itself/
-
-
- shanklinmike
- added this
July 4th, 1776. A divided continental congress was forced to unite in a cry for independence against England when a handful of the bunch told England that they were through. Subsidies, high taxes, the imprisonment of political renegades, and the favoritism showed by those in power to their favorite producers had gone to far. The declaration was recieved with a myriad or responses, some in shock, others in wounded pride. The sum of the resulting confusion and chaos cannot be crammed into a mere short article so I will spare everyone the history lesson.
In the end, many people died for many different reasons. Some felt it was their duty, some thier wellbeing, and others for a crack at a name for themselves. In the end, a high death toll, an economical disaster, and a fractured idea of what to do next plagued the newly free people. In spite of the odds, the people got back onto their feet, and began to rebuid and regroup.
Less then a decade after the fighting ceased, all of that would come to nothing. Ideas of grandeur began to seep into the heads of the politically powerful. The idea that America needed to become an Empire became the driving factor into the minds of those that held the power, and the rest as they say, is history.
So here we are, celebrating the 235 year old demopublic. The conditions of today are no different that those found in 1776 – high taxes, corpatism, subsidies, iron clad rule, and enough regultation to make a drill sergeant cringe. Of course its not all bad – never was, and until the breaking point is reached, nor will it be. There is a plus side to America’s paciveness to its government, and that is the acknowledgement that violent revolutions only replace one tyrant with another. In point of fact, violent revolutions often bring forward the most misguided, and in the midst of the confusion, grants them power.
Personally I hate the idea that i find myself questioning things to the level that i do. Ignorance in many cases was bliss as it aloud me the simple minded belief that we were doing well as a country, and that we just hit a bump in the road. History is a very disturbing wake up call.
I say we stop this pattern. Nations come and go, and the US is no different having already proved herself more then apt to inheret the ideals of failing societies the world over. The truth is that the colonial experiment was hijacked by the American Experiment – ripped from the hands of the people and turned over to the hands of politicians and bureaucrats.
You see long before the Stars and Stripes, there was liberty, and i have become all to aware of the difference between the two. Many of our so called ‘leaders’ follow in the foosteps in their predecessors. Arrogantly assuming that a law bent on the futile notion of solving the foibles of the human condition was a possible task, they have enacted law upon law on themselves until liberty has become no more then a fleeting vision.
I would like to remind people on this day of where we came from and what made us. After 235 years, its time we grew up, and rid ourselves of the notion that socialism, and statist mindsets are the keys to ‘civilized living’. These are nothing more then theives shaking right hands with you and robbing you with their left. The truth is that no Nation nor Empire can ever exist in pusruance with the ideals of liberty – for that is something that can only truly be had and maintained by the individual.
So lets have a revolution. Screw the state and the horse it rode in on. Its power is great only because it carries the threat and use of force. Yet the people hold a far greated power – one that never ceases to rise against the odds and overcome, and that is the power of individuals truly united upon the foundations of human rights. Violence is not the answer and will solve nothing. You cannot force your fellow man to your views – thats the states job. So be better then that – set an example. Show them by example that civilization needs no force to exist save that used in true defense. Educate yourselves and never stop, for in the end, it will yeild far more benefit then gold.
In the immortal words of Frederic Bastiat “Away, then, with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, and their chains, and their hooks, and their pincers! Away with their artificial methods! Away with their social laboratories, their governmental whims, their centralization, their tariffs, their universities, their State religions, their inflationary or monopolizing banks, their limitations, their restrictions, their moralizations, and their equalization by taxation! And now, after having vainly inflicted upon the social body so many systems, let them end where they ought to have begun—reject all systems, and try liberty” – The Law.
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5368/independence-day-time-for-history-to-repe...
-
- groups:
- Community, Liberty, Decepticons, ShankLitarian Propaganda
-
- tags:
- Economy, War, World, Government, 45 more
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
You talk the talk but are you ready too shed blood?
- 11 months ago
-
GENERALNATTY
-
-
davids80
-
GENERALNATTY:
I can only shed blood when direct action is taken against me. It is not only immoral to do otherwise, but foolish as well. There is a time to kill, but we have not hit that point yet.
- 11 months ago
-
davids80
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
davids80:
People die in revolutions, people will die if a process is undertaken against the government to remove it from power, force will be required in such an action on both sides, some people think they can be revolutionaries behind their computer, if you aren't ready too die, you're not ready for a revolution.
If you think you can do sit in's to overthrow the most powerful government in the world you are delusional
If you're afraid to bleed don't think about revolution, if people that support your way of thinking are afraid to bleed than their resolve to see thru the revolution to the end can be easily shattered and fail before it begins.
- 11 months ago
-
GENERALNATTY
-
-
southrabbit [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
southrabbit [removed]
-
-
shanklinmike
-
southrabbit:
I don't want a democracy though... I am against the use of violence on peaceful people. I instead, call for a free society where individuals are allowed to do as they wish as long as they don't infringe on the rights of others. What do you need violent democracy for? Why can't you let peaceful people live free?!?
- 11 months ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
Nick19
-
"The conditions of today are no different that those found in 1776 – high taxes, corpatism, subsidies, iron clad rule, and enough regultation to make a drill sergeant cringe."
"Ignorance in many cases was bliss as it aloud me the simple minded belief that we were doing well as a country, and that we just hit a bump in the road. History is a very disturbing wake up call"
This is some top quality writing. How long did this rant take you to write, 5 minutes or so?
Now, lets be realistic about our history. The American Revolution was more divisive than most basic history courses will tell you. Somewhere around a third of the entire population were tories and quite a few left the US after the war's end. The revolutionaries who wrote the constitution were among the rich land owning aristocrats of society. To suggest this to be a popular "People's Movement" isn't really true. Now, did we change over time to allow more representation for the people? The answer to that is an obvious yes! We first gave rights to all white males in society and eventually to the rest of society by the early 1900s and later 20th century when 18 year olds were allowed to vote. Another failed article from the Shanklin egotist blog.
- 11 months ago
-
Nick19
-
-
davids80
-
Nick19:
"How long did this rant take you to write, 5 minutes or so? " - 30 to be exact - I was working on a network at the time so i lacked time. In addition, I have found that people do not read anything over a few pages anyway, so i skipped the details...damned if you do....
"The American Revolution was more divisive than most basic history courses will tell you. "
Glorious Cause Robert Middlekauf, Empire of Liberty - Revolutionary Characters - The Radicalism of the American Revolution - All Written by Gordon S Wood, and Concieved in Liberty by Rothbard....I know darn well the revolution was Divisive - I have written many articles saying as much, and even referred to such in this article."To suggest this to be a popular "People's Movement" isn't really true." --- Where in the article did I say it was? I am more then aware that the Northern states were (with the exception of some in VA) the main drivers to the revolution, hence I spoke to the political drivers etc....
The point is that by declaring independence of all colonies to England, they were forced to either unite and fight the Brits, or continue to be imbalanced - a situation i do not like either. The books i listed above top well over 8K pages in total, and I summed it up as best I could without losing the readers attention.
I appreciate the critique though :-)
- 11 months ago
-
davids80
-
-
LoveDignitary [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
LoveDignitary [removed]
-
-
wynnmeg61
-
LoveDignitary:
veru good
- 11 months ago
-
wynnmeg61
-
-
Factoid [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Factoid [removed]
-
-
SideEffects
-
Factoid:
if spelling counts here, i am in trouble!
- 11 months ago
-
SideEffects
-
-
david0austin
-
-
readers may enjoy this related video by Stefan Molyneux
The Sunset of the State
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLCEXtpTNYU - 11 months ago
-
david0austin
-
-
Stoneyroad
-
david0austin:
i enjoyed this video alright,
the part that showed the B.A.R.T. shooting and said it was because he didn't pay his taxes was especially entertaining. - 11 months ago
-
Stoneyroad
-
-
Daniel_Summers
-
Good one. Ron Paul 2012!
- 11 months ago
-
Daniel_Summers
-
-
shanklinmike
-
-
Daniel_Summers:
We are actually against human ownership/politics altogether. I truly believe Ron Paul is an honest, good hearted person, but I cannot support anyone inside statism. Statism is a version of serfdom.
- 11 months ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
Daniel_Summers
-
shanklinmike:
Baby steps. =)
- 11 months ago
-
Daniel_Summers
-
-
Daniel_Summers
-
shanklinmike:
I understand.
- 11 months ago
-
Daniel_Summers
-
-
PressCore
-
Daniel_Summers:
Yes, I agree. Ron Paul's stance is to avert foreign wars, end prohibition,
and end the Fed. He may justly succeed where the others failed to
accomplish real change for the better so long as he gets the people
behind him by taking his case to them first. At this point it's a Herculean
task to reign in the military industrial complex, and the corruption spread
by Corporations out of control. The Fed and IMF are killing the USA with
their Bankster Monopoly, and have bankrupted the USA. So long as
he's willing to risk his life by standing by his promises, a radical is what
we need. I'd vote for former Rep. Grayson as his VP. Greyson has been
on the HDNET news/Dan Rather world reports for exposing the in bed
relationship between the Fed & the Wall st Banksters backing junk bonds
to engineer the give away of huge sums to continue their corruption. The
USA has been sinking in 10 kinds of quicksand and is in real trouble.
The idealogues and their mindless followers can't talk their way out of the
USA's imperiled future. We need a peaceful, bloodless Revolution to turn
things around. As Plato said, citizens who don't get interested in politics
can guarantee themselves only tyrany in return for their non investment. - 11 months ago
-
PressCore
-
-
jonlemnh
-
shanklinmike:
I at first liked Ron Paul myself at first! Now that i have seen him with the bobble head twins "Palin and Bachman" and hearing his son do some wacky and stupid shit; I just cant fathom voting for him because of all the crazy dingbat shit they all talk about.
- 11 months ago
-
jonlemnh
-
-
benjamingon
-
good article
- 11 months ago
-
benjamingon
