Gay's Force Agenda on Innocent School Children

thanks for the spell check and glad to see youre a jesus expert. but my mind was opened and free lifetimes ago, long before santa mythology. now jesus doesnt happen to be my personal savior but he does some folks pretty good.

those whose parents dont care. the rest of them wont have to

hey gays have their delicate sensibilities, we have ours. i'm willing to avoid theirs if theyre willing to avoid mine. sounds like a reasonable compromise to me

nice try. this guy doesnt even address the point here

your take is less valid if for no other reason than you are completely ok with ignoring peoples individuality in favor of a stereotype.

switch lesbian for jew, and breeder for goyum,and you are spewing the same crap david duke does.

thier are lesbians who hate men, as well as heterosexual woman who hate men.as well as lesbians who like men just fine.as well as gay dudes o hate woman, and gay dudes wo like woman just fine.

point being on the gay side of affairs, they arent killing breeders, or supporting those who wish to change them.the like or dislike of heteros stays no more than words.it is only the hetero side that refuses to live and let live.

let me know when the gays start talking about legislating the breeders.until then it is one sided.

you really believe the circumcision thing is a real thing?
i guess you think sharia was on its way to oklahoma too?

you have the right to want or not want what ever, but you do not have the right to have your wants trump anothers rights.i want mel gibson dead.but unfortunately he has the right to live.oh well i have to accept and move on.

hey man i was playing according to your generalizations.i stated clearly that humanity has inherent individuality that stereotypes spit in the face of.i personaly am not of the opinion or philosophy that lesbians are this that or the other.they are people there fore are all things as any other group would be.you dont get to be use stereotypes as a basis for your position, then fault some one else for playing along with the flawed logic that you relied upon.

the difference that you arent seeing (wich i think you see but are just being a devils advocate dick about it) is a bazillion homos can kill a bazillion heteros as a matter of coincidence.and it wouldnt matter as much as one homo killing one hetero based on the idea that the hetero didnt have the right to freely exist.just based on being a hetero.

hey man, i dont know about you,but im not ok with anyone killing anyone based on criteria that the victim has no control over.cuz he/she is a jew,or black,or what ever other thing is part of thier identity.

btw not to belabor the point, but you are literaly doing the david duke dance.picking out the select few instances that vaguely support your position whilst ignoring the larger issues at hand.just skip all the middle ground and ignore all the hate crime gays have ever recieved and pretend it is only them who do fucked up shit.then get mad at others for classifying them based on sexuality despite you yourself basing your position on it.in no time at all you can be ready to show how the media is run by those evil jews by just listing all those jewish names and ignoring the gentile ones.same half cocked bullshit.

no one should be bullied. not fat kids, not wimpy kids nor gays or jews. you are right i was picking but that wasnt really the point anyway. i understand where you are coming from and you a right that my rights should not trump anothers but that same theory works in reverse. lets say i dont want my kids reading romance novels so i dont purchase them by choice or some other parent doesnt want their kids reading about bondage and masochism. most likely theyll not give their kids a book on that subject matter. not all of us agree with the gay lifestyle. would i tell someone else who they can or cannot sleep with? no. i dont really care what two people do in the privacy of their own home as long as both party's are agreeable and no children are involved. and i dont really care if someone wants to develope a book on gays in history and place it in a book store or a library for those who are interested and are seeking more knowledge on the topic. my beef is someone else assuming and trumping my rights as a parent forcing views i may be disagreeable with in a classroom setting. at the very least if this type of curriculum is going to be forced through legislation on an unwilling public the parents should be made aware of the subject matter and given the choice to pull their kid out for the day.

you know full well the public education system will always have some thing you dissaprove of, and that wich you approve of some one else dissaproves of.that is how it works.cant please all the people all the time.

you are entitled to take issue with what ever material you like or dislike as the case may be.but you arent entitled to express it by attacking people.either directly by claiming thier life styles to be unacceptable or wrong, or imply a malevolent scheme by catagorizing thier plight as an "agenda".

hate gays all day for all i care.i personaly find gay sex to be rather revolting.well not the sex so much but men kissing skeeves me out.but my personal view on this has no basis in creating any policy for anyone else.

and you are welcome to your opinion. i still stand on cutting sexual preferences from school curriculum and i am sure most folks would agree, maybe not here, that references to a persons sexual leanings are irrelevant to lessons and textbooks. and i agree that your personal view on this has no basis in creating policy for anyone else but i also believe that no one elses personal view, especially in regard to sexuality has no basis for creating policy for anyone else. this legislation was introduced by one gay senator from san francisco. so because he and his constituents decide this is a good thing it may become law? the least they could do is put it up for a vote by california voters. of course if they did it would most likely fail. maybe jerry brown will veto it like arnold did. fortunately for most of us we neither live in california or orange county.

agreed. you are a wise man

big·ot noun \ˈbi-gət\

Definition of BIGOT
: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance. try another definition. i am neither hateful or intolerant. just disagreeable with a curricular mandate.

apparently you do need a dictionary and a brain. you have no basis to accuse me on your baseless accusations. it is not ignorance it is one mans opinion which is apparently shared by more than just myself. stay healthy my friend. peace

you know nat. my belief is that a man or woman's great contributions to society should be acknowledged. does their sexuality make a difference in that contribution? no. why should they, but if some progressive teacher somewhere decides to add it as a foot note in their lesson so be it. to mandate it into school curriculum is ridiculous and an added expense on top of it. its forcing an issue into the learning process that a lot of parents and probably a great deal of kids feel uncomfortable with. whats next, great child molesting and beastiality practitioners in history? give me a break

quit pretending that sexuality does not play into your rational. anyone who has paid any attention to your hate spewing nonsence know that you are all about being hung up on sexuality. Let us analize this shall we....bible beating christ-hating "CHRISTIAN" obsessed with sexuality.....................you must be a self hating gay. You really should consider professional treatment, and I don't mean faus treatment like offered by Mr. Bachmann.................you sir need help

ahhh tbuff. i can always count on you to twist, spin and revise

again another leftylib trying to paint out someone of a differing opinion as being hateful. i suppose you were on the anyone who disagrees with obama was a racist bandwagon? i dont think its my rational where sexuality is an issue. it seems to be with the gays and their indocrinate the children mandates. btw and although it doesnt matter in the scope of educating the children, im a jew

No as a matter of fact I do not always agree with Obama. However I notice that you want to deny any civil liberites to anyone who is not asmall-minded bible-stroker like yourself. You have absolutely no interest in Freedom or Liberty it is all a sham on your part. I have watched many many people like you who shout your hateful nonsence from the heights and then low and behold they turn out to be exactly what they have spent a great deal of time and energy railling against. I am sorry for your pain, but really you should not be inflicting your pain on others.

besides you are all for indoctrination as long as it is your conservative christy mythology that is being shoved down childrens throats.

Gay history month is right around the corner.

we dont paint you as hateful, you are. And you are not a Jew you are a dung beetle.

terrified john?

thanks, id kiss you if i were gay. of course the avatar who represents you killed gays. you might want to choose another

whats this story even have to do with civil liberties? . hateful, where? because i offer an opinion different than yours i am somehow labeled hateful? so because i disagree with obama i am automatically labeled a racist? actually your comments appear more hateful than anything i could ever dream of. pain? dont make me laugh. nice try though, try a different spin.

boy you sure desperately grasp at unsubstantiated allegations when on the losing end of an argument. i also believe religion as well as sexuality have no place in public schools

do you have any posters available?

We already have pride month, I really dont think we need another month, besides all the other good months are taken, June is perfect for us though, its bright, sunny, and fun. Just like the gays (i know its a stereotype, thats the point.) But its not like it wouldn't be fun, we could talk about Alexander the Great, Sparta, Rome, King James, the one that gave us the KJV bible, and many many more, OMG I so reserve the right to run the Greek part of that month. I mean really what more fabulous gay man has there been since Alexander? He was beautiful, looked great in uniform, conquered most of the known world, and built a cult following that lasted for generations. Not to mention hes kinda my idol, and he was just plain dreamy. John I think you have a fabulous idea with this gay history month thing. I could use it as a recruiting point for my gay army, after all gays should rule the world if you ask me.

My pleasure, glad I could help. Just remember when you do take over, it was my idea, so maybe we could work out an ambassadorship or something, some place warm I'm thinking.

Well just not Arizona, my plan is to put all the homophobes and haters and racists ect there, build a giant wall around it and allow no one and no thing in or out. It has a certain flavor of Irony I am fond of. But how do you feel about the Caribbean? I am thinking the grand palace shall be there, take several Islands and dedicate them to a certain branch of my new world governments. You know have the high courts in like Jamaica, maybe the executive branch on Cuba. The islands are beautiful, warm year round, and the water borders would make them more defensible. Plus its a very central location, right on top of both of the Americas, fairly close to Europe and Africa, so the only times I would have to travel very far is when there is trouble in Asia.

Ouch, perfectly good point, but still that's gotta sting. Poor hombre76, he probably didn't know that little tid bit.

Sounds good. I was thinking Aruba, they got Casinos there.

OMG poor Dorthy!

Aruba would be Fabulous, I could make it the retirement place for individuals who were good to the cause but need to just settle down, gamble, and work on their tan for a while.

totally agreed nat. you are one of the few voices of reason on current, even surpassing mine, hah. sure i dont have a problem mentioning 60's riots for gay rights nor mentioning gays as a group in history ie: the holocaust etc. but youre right, to scour history books making additions and foot notes on individual contributors to society who also happen to be gay is assinine. just as it would be to point out the sexuality of all the heterosexual contributors in history. its irrelevant and stupid, especially with a budget crisis. all just to make political points.

might be more apropos for those who engage in risky sexual behavior. ie: anal sex

she was great in bed, even better than the scarecrow

the greatest irony is that if you switch gay for jew his position would turn dramaticaly despite the it being the same bullshit.

its fucked up but i wouldnt mind the gays running shit.
pretty much anyone aside from white males works for me.

and no jews either.we have enough shit without one of ours pulling a gw bush and fucking us beyond repair

And wouldnt the world as a whole be more fabulous if the gays ruled?

at the risk of feeding a stereotype..............yes

As long as its a fabulous stereotype, feed away ;)

well as a known fool myself i will value our time until you can no longer suffer me as well lol.

re-education. hidden meaning communism. i dont need re-education, you should feel honored that i am at least tolerant. homophobia=a fear of. give me a break. maybe you suffer from christophobia. disagreement and bigotry do not always go hand in hand

dude, gotta like because i have a differing opinion on school curriculum and the insignificance of someones sexuality when it comes to an education and a persons contribution to society that you attempt to paint me out as a phelps wannabe. i thought you knew me better than that by now.

honored that your tolorant the only thing that keeps you and every bigot out there from getting your teeth busted on the curb is that your just smart enough not to talk your BS in public and only on faceles nameless internet blog sit like current. And christophobi cant be real because you cant fear what you dont beleive exists dumb ass.

well homophobia doesnt exist either cause who could ever be afraid of a pansy like you

and enjoying every minute of it

You betcha. You started it.

started what? actually i think orange county started it

LMFAO!!!

i am not playing victim. that appears to be a liberal game

No we are not your victems, we could never be victems to some one as lame and ineffectual as you and people like you.

not as lame and ineffectual as the teachers in atlanta...http://current.com/community/93327864_liberals-cheat-to-pass-kids-in-atlanta.htm...

Good comment. I like the picture.

according to some sources my avatar was gay. but that wasnt his great contribution to society, his art was. so why bring up the other. if i was so hung up on homophobia i certainly wouldnt have chosen artwork created by an alleged gay man. really only gay folks are the ones interested in gay contributors of history so talk amongst yourselves and keep your legislation out of our schools

try the bars

Dude, no. Not just art. Art great in stuff. I didn't know a black man invented the ice cream truck untill I went to Betty Davis museum in Chattanooga. Even before then, I knew there was a black guy who invented blood donating. Black guy made the white house. I don't know what gays have done for our country but I know it's more than art. You know a museum?

By the way, thanks for letting me know about your art and its history.

any bar in san francisco

tbuff. if i were to mandate that all school curriculum mention all the hetero's who contributed to society we'd have to triple the size of text books. dont you think it would be kinda silly if everytime thomas edison were mentioned there was a...by the way he was straight. this whole argument is a silly one or kinda gay.

you guys really need to come up with a new definition. homophobe, a fear of. girl i dont fear anything so get it...err, ah, straight

Why do you assume I must have been referring to you...?

if you werent then i take it back. but folks are sometimes too quick to label someone either homophobic, bigoted or racist just because they disagree

i know right? you'd think californians would have better things to worry about

counteract what, the truth? i didnt make this shit up. some idiot legislator in california did

more attempts by the left at censoring the truth. congratulations!

alex, you make some good points and i admire your upbringing. the point of this post is not to hide or closet folks. it is to point out the irrelevence to ones sexuality when it comes to contributions made to society. there is no point in pointing out that so and so was a great mathematician or artist and by the way he was also a practicing homosexual. its irrelevent and for many people uncomfortable. self tortured rejected people from all walks of life need help and hopefully will find it

Thank you tl !!

During open discrimination of a trait, that trait is never irrelevant. The color of one's skin was not irrelevant in the 50's. You're a coward because you hide your own bigotry behind bullshit pleas that we should be past all this already. We are not. We are not because of you, people like you and the people you vote for.

The only way people evolve on this issue is by learning who gay people are. You can not stop the children from learning this. We all know damn well what you want to teach your kids behind closed doors. You will not do it unchallenged. Deal with it.

wrong again dougy. if you want to teach your child behind closed doors about significant men who fucked men in history thats your choice. the rest of us prefer to teach our children about the men and women of significance in history and their contributions without discussing sexual habits. i might be willing to meet you half way if you were agreeable that we mention the fact in every instance that certain folks in history practiced a heterosexual lifestyle such as...grover washington carter a black man who by the way was a practicing heterosexual invented peanut butter. or would that be even more ridiculous?

There are a lot of straight people that might take offense to that, I'm just saying, I have a very straight brother who gets very aggressive when people start their gay bashing.

who's bashing? you know me better than that