Community | July 08, 2011 | 37 comments

CA Bill Could Put Gay History In School Text Books

Image
Stoneyroad
There’s a whole new branch of classroom history -- gay history -- and California plans to teach it in public schools.
Officially -- it’s called state Senate Bill 48.
Now sitting on California Governor Jerry Brown’s desk -- awaiting signature.

full story
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/california-gay-textbooks-_n_891464.html
  1. groups:
    Community,   Culture
  2. tags:
    LGBT CA Text Books Gay History
  3.     
    |

37 comments // CA Bill Could Put Gay History In School Text Books

  • AntonioNG
    • 0
      AntonioNG  
    • New York just passed gay marriage and now California wishes to pass this bill for gay history to be taught in school.. why is it that all of a sudden America has just realized that there are gays upon this land waiting to be justified? Though I find it weird that all of these great changes are being made at the same time after being ignored for so long, im glad that we are finally becoming a true free nation.

    • 1 year ago
  • TheChameleon
  • nashkildare
  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • This is a very good Bill! Education is the key to tolerance..
      I think that Governor Brown will sign the Bill...

    • 1 year ago
  • Stoneyroad
    • +2
      Stoneyroad  
    • (Here is some "Gay History" for the class)

      This is the first film to depict homosexual activity in a positive light, and it discusses the issue in a very frank and straight forward fashion. The movie is a rally against Paragraph 175 of the German Penal Code which made homosexuality between men against the law.

      This film has an interesting history behind it. Paragraph 175 had been a source of contention for a number of years. Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, a German sexologist and scholar, thought that homosexuals were actually a third sex, and they were just acting on their nature. During WWI, Hirschfeld teamed up with director Richard Oswald to produce a series of films on sexual education. They filmed stories on prostitution, VD and the like. After the war the censor restrictions were lifted in German and Hirschfeld saw his chance. He and Oswald made Different from the Others, part educational and part political, their film was very controversial when it was released. It was banned in 1920, and all copies were burned by Nazis. Today the film only exists in an incomplete form discovered in a film archive in Russia.

      The film stars Conrad Veidt (Cesare from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari) as a virtuoso violinist, Paul Körner. He takes on a handsome young student, Kurt (Fritz Schulz,) and the two soon fall in love. Unfortunately, Paul is being blackmailed by Franz Bollek (Reinhold Schünzel) a shifty crook who has found out that Paul is a homosexual. Hes bleeding Paul for all hes worth, and though Körner could have Franz arrested for blackmail, he would be arrested too for violating Paragraph 175. Why, the film asks, should someone, an artist no less, be condemned for just loving someone?

    • 1 year ago
  • BullDogg
  • TheChameleon
  • BullDogg
  • Stoneyroad
    • 0
      Stoneyroad  
    • SandyBerman:

      i am a big fan of your comments sandy, your the kind of new blood this place needs.

      some of the names on this list surprised me - James Dean, really?
      and i was pleased to see a hometown hero of mine up there - Allen Ginsberg

      It's a shame there are so many significant historical figures that noone ever heard of because they were gay, and just as many that everyone has heard of but noone talks about them being gay.

      (but i think students can go without learning about John Holmes & John Wayne Gacy)

    • 1 year ago
  • SandyBerman
  • Stoneyroad
  • freehit
  • tlbuffin
  • VFORVENDETTA
  • nashkildare
  • TheChameleon
    • +1
      TheChameleon  
    • SandyBerman:

      Fun List Burman. But Where's Raymond Burr? Jim(aka)Roger McGuinn? Long John Baldry? Me? Some of these names are "eye of the beholder" choices IMHO. Ceasar like most Roman men did partake in the beauty of the younger male fare available to him on the trail but he was also know to enjoy females as well. Not the case for Alexander the Great or Hadrian who were exclusively gay men. Alot of these are Bi or in the case of people like Manson for instance taking what's available to them in prison. I know for instance that I had sex with many young men when i was young and few of them were actually gay. Most ended up happily married with wives and families of their own. To have partaken a few times in experimentation does not make one Gay. If that be the case then the dozens of times I had sex with women in my early years makes me straight. And trust me... I'm not.

    • 1 year ago
  • of10rot10
  • BKsaysAction
  • Leen61
    • +4
      Leen61  
    • This is a step forward for sure. The contributions from gay people in our history should be taught. They contributed many great things to our country.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +9
      UtopianSky  
    • How is it going to be taught?

      I don't think is should be isolated as "gay history", like one chapter separate from all of the other history. It should be fully integrated.

      When covering Alexander the Great, mention the fact that he was gay and his lover was Hephaestion.

      When covering Shakespeare, mention both "The Dark Lady" and "The Fair Lord".

      When covering the civil rights movement, include the Stonewall riot, and Harvy Milk.

      We are not a separate nation or a separate culture with a separate history- we are all fully integrated into all of history.

    • 1 year ago
  • of10rot10
  • TDK729
    • +2
      TDK729  
    • This is a good thing! What makes this country is what has happened in our past and what continues to happen as we progress. LGBT movement is something that should be taught in schools, it's current and relevant to how this country is moving. There are so many things that happened in our past I don't like or agree with but I don't think we should stop teaching those things.This would be like some racist wanting to take out the part of our studies about how black men became free. Whether you agree with the issue or not it all becomes part of our history and needs to be taught so the younger generation knows how things have shaped the world they live in

    • 1 year ago
  • rustyred
    • +7
      rustyred  
    • Image
    • This is a good thing. Contrary to homophobe Congoboy's rants about this issue, this is NOT about teaching the gay and lesbian lifestyle or agenda. It is about acknowledging the historical contributions of great people who happen to be or were gay and lesbian in their lifetime. This is a step forward.

    • 1 year ago
  • jubal
    • +7
      jubal  
    • This is a must, if we are going to change the fundamental anti gay attitude that still prevails in the US.

    • 1 year ago
  • Stoneyroad
    • +1
      Stoneyroad  
    • jubal:

      i am dying to learn about the transgender part of this curriculum, except for Chaz Bono i am drawing a complete blank.
      J. Edgar Hoover ? - (nobody would claim him would they)

    • 1 year ago
  • Saladin
    • +4
      Saladin  
    • jubal:

      TBH, it's not a problem for nearly anyone under 30 in this country.

      My generation is overwhelmingly accepting of it, it's the boomers, as usual, who are fucking things up.

    • 1 year ago
  • TDK729
    • +2
      TDK729  
    • Saladin:

      I agree I'm will be 32 this month, but when I was in High school people were hesitant about it but for the most part accepting. Some of my best friends are gay, and one of my friends she had moved to NY 3 years go and met someone she fell in love with and now she can finally get married now. We just need the old people to just get over the fact that this is not their generation any more and times are changing.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +4
      UtopianSky  
    • Stoneyroad:

      Oh, there are lots in modern history- Alexis Arquette, Candis Cayne, Wendy Carlos, Model and "Bond Girl" Tula, etc. LOTS of them.

      Before there was surgery, it would be harder as an outside observer to define a transgendered person from a cross dresser. (BTW- Hoover was definitely just a cross-dresser.)

      Off the top of my head I'm not good with names, but there was a famous Jazz musician who was a female-to-male. Even his children (step children, from his wife's previous marriage) did not know he was a biological female until he died.

      And author George Sand was a woman who always dressed as a man, and "married" a woman- Alice B Toklass, of the famous brownies.

      A great example from Fiction was Virginia Wolfe's "Orlando", who was an imortal, who after living for centuries as a man, woke up one morning as a woman.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
  • Leen61
    • +4
      Leen61  
    • Saladin:

      For starters, there are plenty of young people who are just as homophobic as boomers and act out violently against gays. I'm seeing that more and more in the news. Secondly, there are many boomers in the gay community. Plenty of them post here at Current. You can not make such a blanket statement attacking my generation.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
  • SandyBerman
  • UtopianSky
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • Leen61:

      It's not a generalization, it's just straight numbers.

      Less than 40% of people aged 50 and up support gay marriage and it's more than 70% for those 30 and under.

      In this country, 70% is a super-majority. Gay marriage would actually be legal here in California my fellow young citizens weren't such buttholes too lazy to vote.

    • 1 year ago
  • freehit
  • Leen61
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • Saladin:

      Sorry to hear about your generation's voter apathy. That as much as anything feeds into the continuation of antiquated policy. Start voting and maybe you'll get more politicians who agree with you elected. It can't hurt. I still don't like blanket statements, no matter what generation it is.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos