Community | July 14, 2011 | 85 comments

The McDonald's Coffee Spill Lawsuit Is Not What You Think. Think Again!

lookatmypix
Watch trailer below in the comments.

This is a must-see documentary if you wish to realize how mainstream media manipulates the information, and does it brainwashing the entire world. Hard to believe? This is why we are promoting this documentary because you will be shocked and surprised to know the truth about the famous McDonald's coffee spill lawsuit and many others alike.

Most of us will remember this lady Mrs. Stella Liebeck spilling the hot coffee while driving and causing minor burns on her legs. The truth is that she wasn't driving and neither was the vehicle moving, she was sitting in the passenger seat and the vehicle was parked. While trying to remove the lid, the coffee spilled into her lap as the cup was between her knees. This caused a third-degree burn that disabled her for two years. If you see the pictures of the burns, you will be sickened by these.

The coffee was being served at temperatures between 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit which cause third degree burns, and 700 people tried to sue McDonald for a similar incident before her but with no success.

An other lie was to make us all think she was greedy and tried to get rich out of this. The truth is that she had asked initially for $20.000 but McDonald's instead offered her $800. Again when you will see the pictures of the injury you will think of McDonald's as a cruel, heartless DEVIL.
This is the reason why the case went to trial. She ultimately got $640,000 and not the millions they made us believe!

Lawsuits like this one were promoted as frivolous and that were pursued by greedy, cunning individuals but it was far from the truth.
Moreover big corporations have used these lawsuits to their advantage with massive, false propaganda, and lobbied and pressured our congress to take away fundamental rights at a state level!

What to do then?
Visit: http://hotcoffeethemovie.com/takeaction-5/ for more info and various ways to take action.

Here are a few crucial actions you can take right now:

"Stand Up for Patients' Rights
Tell Your Representative to Oppose H.R. 5

One out of every three hospital patients is sickened, injured, killed or otherwise harmed because of a medical error.

Meanwhile, our members of Congress could be making their own grave error: they could pass H.R. 5, an extreme bill that would limit our rights and offer a handout to the medical industry by allowing it to go virtually unpunished when patients are harmed or killed."
www.citizen.org

"Tell Congress: Stop the Corporate Attack on Our Rights and End Forced Arbitration.

In the fine print of contracts, corporations often insert a “forced arbitration” clause to strip consumers and employees of the right to hold them accountable in a court.

Instead, consumers and employees who have been hurt or ripped off are forced into a private system that favors corporations.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently made this bad situation worse. In AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, the court ruled that corporations can now use this fine print to deny people the right to band together for a class action lawsuit.

In practice, this means if a company decides to illegally charge an extra $10 to its 10 million customers, there is virtually no way for consumers to hold the company accountable for this theft of $100 million."
http://action.citizen.org

Finally contact your elected officials: http://www.usa.gov and and tell them to oppose “caps” which limit the compensation an injured person can receive by a jury, and the so-called “tort reform” that changes our civil justice system.

When it will happen to you, don't count on Justice because it isn't there.
Get back your freedom and your rights, do it now for yourself, your children and the people you love!

Article by: http://organiclegion.org/pt/The-McDonalds-Coffee-Spill-Lawsuit-Is-Not-What-You-T...

Trailer from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBKRjxeQnT4
Documentary: http://www.youtube.com/user/hotcoffeethemovie


Join the Organic Movement:
http://current.com/groups/organicgreen/
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Organic,   Community Spotlight,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Civil Rights Lawsuit Corporate Personhood Unite 14 more
  3.     
    |

85 comments // The McDonald's Coffee Spill Lawsuit Is Not What You Think. Think Again! // Video

  • jackshin
    • 0
      jackshin  
    • --This is a frivolous lawsuit, because the lawyer asked for the sky in court, and not because the lady filed the lawsuit. --

      "McDonald's corporate policy purposefully raised the coffee 70 degrees higher than the "hot coffee" known to served in the industry which also happens to be a safety threshold degree."

      I am in favor of class actions suit, but doesn't it bother you that you give no reason as to why McDonalds had it set at 70 degrees higher. Furthermore, 700 complaints about hot coffee, from just that store in the last year or the entire US for over 30 years. Your key evidence of culpability is a poorly cited corporate manual. However, what is not important is that QA guy be specifically from McDonalds. Couldn't any QA guy, or just most high school chem students say the same thing at a cheaper price. I understand you are making a claim, but all you seem to have argued is that hot things melt things ergo McDonalds is guilty. From your post, there is no proof here that McDonalds the corporation forced their franchises to comply with the temperature setting. There is no proof that McDonalds was attempting some sort of cover up to continue this awful trade. For this case there is no proof that McDonald is big tobacco. Why this is a frivolous lawsuit is because the lawyer asked for the sky in court, not because the lady filed the lawsuit.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mark701
    • +3
      Mark701  
    • I had a conversation with an attorney I know over two years ago who explained what happened in this case, and his description backs this article up 100%. Ms. Liebeck's attorney offered to settle for a much lower amount as indicated but McDonald's refused. As a result the case was tried in court and McDonald's lost. Conservatives then turned around and tried to use the case as an example of how mistreated corporations are by the little people.

      A I write this it's beginning to crystallize in my mind how the entire conversation in this country, when it comes to corporate abuse, has been twisted by the corporate media to make corporations appear the victims.

    • 11 months ago
  • Blueshound9
    • +4
      Blueshound9  
    • I've spilled coffee in my lap while driving a number of times and NEVER have I had any more than a tiny bit of redness.

      For a cup of coffee to do that much damage it literally must have been boiling.

    • 11 months ago
  • Mark701
    • +1
      Mark701  
    • Blueshound9:

      Ms. Liebeck was 79 when this happened. Generally the skin on the elderly is much thinner than younger people and third degree burns resulting from a very hot cup of coffee are quite likely.

    • 11 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  
    • if you read their food labels, or trace the origins of their food (and I use that word food loosely), you already "think of McDonald's as a cruel, heartless DEVIL."

    • 11 months ago
  • chipokae
    • -3
      chipokae  
    • Please explain why she should have received any money at all for doing something stupid? I was in a bar fight once ,was injured and found out by a lawyer I could actually of sued the owner for letting me get so drunk ,I did not... because I can take responsibility for my own actions and have a modicum of f@#cking honor.How did having compassion for someone that hurts themselves get twisted into giving them money and taking care of them?

    • 11 months ago
  • SandyBerman
  • chipokae
    • -4
      chipokae  
    • SandyBerman:

      That is ridiculous "I knew the coffee was hot but,I didnt know it was that hot,If I would have known it was that hot I would have taken extra precautions to not dump it in my lap,because reg coffee is only going to burn me a little."gimme a break... and I didnt deliberately do a damn thing...life happens.

    • 11 months ago
  • Fishinflick
    • +5
      Fishinflick  
    • chipokae:

      I used to be a bar-room brawler and all-around general idiot, one of the reasons I quit drinking, now I can just be an all-around general idiot. But if it was my grandma or loved one injured by an unsafe product I would brawl for them - legally. I think you would too if it was your grandma. The freaking cup melted and there had been over 700 complaints of the SAME thing happening, they could of fixed it!

      What's simply's not fair is that from lead paint in toys for tots, poison in food that USED to be safe, and a host of other harmful and unsafe products out there due to stripped down regulatory enforcement we're at the point where we don't even know what's in the s**t we buy anymore. Add to that that legal regress is now severely restricted, we're now basically blinded captives to any injury, including death, without due process. I know you don't square up with that.

      I don't care if it's on the streets or on a shelf, you're only as good as your word. And as a businessman, I believe your product is the same as your word. And if it ain't worth s**t, you're just another scumbag.

    • 11 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +5
      Incredulous  
    • Image
    • chipokae:

      here's the picture of the burns. Fuck McDonalds....80 something-year-old woman.

      I don't know about your grandma, but if somebody handed my grandma a cup of coffee hot enough to do that kind of damage, I'd be shopping for a rocket launcher, not a lawyer.

    • 11 months ago
  • jackshin
  • nobsartist
    • 0
      nobsartist  
    • Hey hurley burly, you petty 2 year old...
      Dont mow your lawn without adult supervision. Did that really offend you? I am bamboozeled by your gutlessness.

    • 11 months ago
  • jackshin
    • +1
      jackshin  
    • I agree, from what I understand frivolous was originally used to describe insurance suits, like traffic accidents, slipping on your porch, and coffee spills. (to the poster: I might have picked another case.) And personally, as a small business owner, lawsuits scare the crap out of me. But it does gall me to hear corporations effectively spin, that when it comes to lawsuits, they are just like every other small business and homeowner. When I know the reality is, if you ever had to file suit against a corporation, you probably lost something that you can't cure with money.

      A class action lawsuit is the only way communities can enforce the law on corporations; everything else is politics and a lot more expensive.

    • 11 months ago
  • Swisher
    • +3
      Swisher  
    • Before you judge the "Hot Coffee" verdict, you must see this documentary. And it goes WAY Beyond that. It exposes how the Chamber of Commerce is buying conservative judges by pouring money into the election system. Money has not only taken away our Executive and Legislative branches of government, it has also corrupted our Judicial system. It's a very depressing thing to see, but I highly recommend it.

    • 11 months ago
  • Valence
    • 0
      Valence  
    • Uhh... Trying to open Lid of Hot Coffee Between Legs While Operating a Car?....

      I'm not trying to disregard the fact that the lady got hurt and Mcdonald Corp tried to scuff her off with a couple Hundred, but common sense should have said to ANYONE, "Hot thing must put in cup holder" ....

    • 11 months ago
  • Fishinflick
    • +1
      Fishinflick  
    • Valence:

      Was NOT trying to operate a car, was NOT driving, her daughter was and they PULLED OVER and PARKED so she could do what we have all done millions of times before, without a stable surface. AND all she tried to do was get McBillions to pay the difference between her medicare costs to cover - SKIN GRAFTS - it was that f***ing serious a burn. It escalated into a law suit while the fattener of the nation dumped McMillions into discrediting her. It worked all too well.

    • 11 months ago
  • Valence
    • -1
      Valence  
    • Fishinflick:

      "I'm not trying to disregard the fact that the lady got hurt and Mcdonald Corp tried to scuff her off with a couple Hundred, but common sense should have said to ANYONE, "Hot thing must put in cup holder" ...."

      ...OK.

      "her daughter was ..."

      I didn't know her daughter was Operating the Car.

      "...do what we have all done millions of times before, without a stable surface..."

      Idk about anybody else but i certainly do not put hot coffee in between my legs when trying to open the lid, the cup holder is obviously the best choice, specially in a " PULLED OVER and PARKED " Car.

    • 11 months ago
  • SandyBerman
    • SandyBerman  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • floydyboy
  • nikonwilly
    • +2
      nikonwilly  
    • You can't legislate stupidity, but at the same time you can't use one particular case to fuck with our ability for compensation ...especially when it's discovered that a company is doing something purposely unsafe for the sake of a larger profit.
      The real crime in the coffee case......simply going to McDonalds in the first place....uck! lol

    • 11 months ago
  • Saladin
    • +3
      Saladin  
    • I've been trying to convince people of this for years. So many so-called "frivolous" lawsuits are, in fact, very good lawsuits that are taken for a ride by an all too eager corporate media trying to garner support for their own bad practices.

      Same reason you won't see many (or any) stories about corporate pollution or other fuckups. Why would they sabotage their own business interests? Not like they give a shit about the truth, everyone on tv is just an actor. You'd be lucky if any of them even have journalism degrees at all, or if they had any experience doing it.

    • 11 months ago
  • queenofit
  • Warren_Merrill
    • +1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • I knew the facts of this case long ago. All the previous complaints were important factors in the case. But what kind of moron opens a hot drink (even at the correct temperature) or any drink with a snap on lid while holding it between their legs? I joke I like working without a net since I'll drink coffee while driving without a lid. But I pop the lid while the cup is in the console.

    • 11 months ago
  • Saladin
  • nobsartist
  • katsmetalarmy
    • +5
      katsmetalarmy  
    • Image
    • Frivolous lawsuits-What Insurance Companies do to lie to the Court ?

      I represent a very nice lady who was sitting as the PASSENGER in a car PARKED in a McDonald’s parking lot. Just sitting there. Her daughter, who was the driver was talking on her cell phone so she decided, correctly, to NOT DRIVE while talking.

      A young teen age girl who had her driver’s license for only a few months started to drive away from the drive in window where she had picked up her Big Mac order. She stomped on the accelerator too hard, panicked and tried to slam on the brakes, but succeeded only in hitting the accelerator even harder.

      Not surprisingly, she slammed into the back of my client’s car.

      We were unable to settle the case with the insurance company who basically ignored the demands for settlement. We sued and in OFFICIAL COURT PAPERS this is what the lawyer for the insurance company said:

      We PLEAD that the teenage driver was in no way responsible for this accident.

      They lie and they cheat and then they scream for tort reform!

      http://www.vamedmal.com/library/frivolous-lawsuitsinsurance-company-defenses-tha...

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • Dusty_King
    • 0
      Dusty_King  
    • nobsartist:

      The point is I ALWAYS take my own notes or carry a digital recorder and tape any and all interactions I have, including my own lawyer. I then go home type it ALL up, put the tape or the hand written note with the new notes and put them all together in a binder. If I ever need the information, there it is, right where I need it, and I have needed it.
      I had an AME doctor lie so badly about the appointments he had with me I forced him into a hard core deposition. Everything he said in his report was a lie, and because I took such careful notes, came home, wrote them up, and had them ready to rock, I knew I would nail his sleazy ass. And I did. TWICE.

      That's what you do. If you can't video tape the cops, have a small digital recorder in your car at ALL TIMES. Don't think for one second things are going to get better soon. We have to protect ourselves from these assholes and I have and will continue to do so.

      Always practice CYA.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • +1
      nobsartist  
    • Dusty_King:

      I do the same thing. I nailed a health care rep lying when she tried to refuse me treatment for a torn acl. Now I am not able to purchase health insurance from that company. But I did get them to fix my acl and pay for all rehab. The health insurance companies are organized crime and I am sure they had something to do with how the coffee thing turned out.

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +7
      Leen61  
    • I watched "HOT COFFEE" on HBO last Sunday. Excellent documentary! The Stella Liebeck case is discussed along with 3 other cases. All legit. In the coffee case, you learn also that the media spin did their job and got the result they wanted. Watch the movie before you pass judgement. I didn't know any of this UNTIL I saw the movie. I won't say too much as I do not want to give away everything. This is a must see. You will learn what tort reform is all about....people on the street were asked and they didn't know what tort reform was...they thought it was something you ate....not joking. Just shows how so many Americans are just plain clueless. Thanks for posting this, lookatmypix. Nothing stupid here at all. People should watch this and learn something. I can't believe some of the awful comments I see here. Maybe they should be forced to drink 180 degree coffee....

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • +2
      nobsartist  
    • Leen61:

      I understand what "tort reform" is and I also understand what stupidity is. I also understand the concept of twisting facts around to make a case. If I was a judge, I would not have allowed her to collect anyhing over medical costs and I would not award those until she signed a paper stating that she would NEVER DRINK HOT COFFEE AGAIN or buy anything from any fast food place again.

      I understand that the republiCONs want "tort reform" but I doubt that they know what that means. It is just another right that they want to strip from us. Funny how Ford got off easy on the tire recall even though the high center of gravity of the base design was the reason for the loss of control of those vehicles. Funny how they also got out of the exploding gas tanks on crown vics and the pinto, also.

      We do not need "tort reform". We do need to emphasize that stupidity and lack of common sense is not a defense in product liability law suits.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • +2
      nobsartist  
    • Leen61:

      By the way, if you ask, MCDONALDS WILL GIVE YOU A FREE CUP OF ICE and they have been doing that for decades.

      Wake up and smell the coffee.

      Prove that they sell 180 degree coffee.

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • nobsartist:

      They don't sell 180 degree coffee anymore since this incident. They lowered it to 170 degrees...wow. So what about the ice? You still have to take the lid off to put the ice in the cup.

    • 11 months ago
  • Buddha2112
    • +1
      Buddha2112  
    • nobsartist:

      180 degrees still isn't bad... That's just 5 degrees over maximum recommended serving temp (175 F)...

      I can't believe some are purporting that raising the temp increases profits by making more coffee:

      Step 1: Get Coffee
      Step 2: Heat 5 degrees hotter than normal
      Step 3: ??????
      Step 4: Profit!

      I'm pretty sure thermal expansion can't account for noticeably more coffee... It would make more sense to water it down...

    • 11 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • nobsartist:

      In the movie, the woman's family was looking for McDonald's to only cover the costs of her medical bills and they offered her a pittance that wouldn't have covered a fraction of those costs. I'm sure after this happened she never set her foot back in a McDonald's let alone drink another cup of their coffee. The ONLY reason they went to court in the first place was because McDonald's would not even do the least to make it right. They are a multi-billion dollar corporation who figures they can just get their way. Republicans know exactly what tort reform means for them and their corporate overlords, punishing the public for trying to get rightful claims against negligent corporations satisfied. Their bread and butter.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
    • 0
      nobsartist  
    • Leen61:

      Put yourself in their place for a moment. If you owned a store and someone bought a coffee from you and then returned complaining that you got burned from thier coffee, what would you do? Would you offer them a million dollars? I dont think so. I would offer them another coffee and then tell them not to come back here again. If they sued me, I would counter sue for "tort of outrage". Ever hear of that one? I will bet not.

      As far as "not doing the least to make it right" why should they? She bought "hot coffee" and spilled it on herself. If she was a 2 year old, bought an ice cream from you and dropped it , I could see replacing it. If a 50 year old bought a cup of coffee, spilled it on themselves, where is the liability?

      There is none. The only reason she got ANYTHING is because it was McDonalds and not some catering truck.

      She should have STUPID tattooed on her forhead to forewarn the rest of us.

    • 11 months ago
  • Dusty_King
  • Leen61
  • nobsartist
    • +2
      nobsartist  
    • Dusty_King:

      But I thought that this morons attorney was an expert on coffee serving temps, not someone like "starbucks".

      I think the old bat did it on purpose because she failed to save enough money for retirement.

    • 11 months ago
  • hurleyburly
    • +6
      hurleyburly  
    • I watched this on HBO..and I was bamboozled. I remembered the outrage out of lawsuits..and all the lawyer jokes...but, when I saw the pics of the ladies injuries..I would have given her waaaaaaaaaaay more. We've all been had by BIG BUSINESS and CORPS.....I am now wide awake. Good show HBO.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • Leen61
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
  • katsmetalarmy
    • +3
      katsmetalarmy  
    • Don't think YOU WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF IF - YOUR in "Accident" NO FAULT of your own, corporations or Insurance will pay OFF to make the court case go away behind the scene. Payoffs, bribes, Payoff Doctors & Lawyers! EVEN COURTS. It happens everyday.

      the corporations or Insurance companies will NOT be FAIR....

      it's ALL A LIE! they will screw you over in a HEARTBEAT!

      AND THEY CAN MOVE YOUR BODY to another location without ambulance or trained personnel "NO LAWS" - AND THE REASON TO NOT STOP THE PARTY!

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • ejasun
    • +4
      ejasun  
    • Image
    • She burned her female genital off and the money she got did not even pay for HER EXPENSES? The coffee was OVER THE EXCESSIVE LIMIT!

      WHAT HAPPENED TO MEDIA RESPONSIBILITY? Judge overturned award decision!

      MEDIA LIES - People in America ARE living in a false sense of security YOU think when something happens YOUR in "Accident" NO FAULT of your own?

      GREED FOR READERSHIP OVER TRUTH!

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • 0
      nobsartist  
    • I hate to say it but when you put a paper cup beween your legs, they have a tendency to collapse. When that happens, the lid has a tendency to pop off, spilling the contents.

      In addition to the money, she should have recieved an award for
      MORON OF THE YEAR.

      Some people are just so stupid you have to wonder how they survive.

      I believe in culling the herd. That is how you prevent morons like that WHORE bachmann from running for office.

    • 11 months ago
  • TheAmbivalante
    • +4
      TheAmbivalante  
    • nobsartist:

      Sorry, nobby, you're wrong.

      When a company heats their coffee over 140 degrees, they are putting you and everyone else at risk. Mrs. Liebeck was not the only victim of this make-our-coffee-the-hottest-on-earth marketing move by McDonald's.

      What's more, she was made the butt of every late night comedy show joke. She had to have skin grafts on her genitals, for shitssake.

      McDonald's was punished by a jury of people just like you because they had their chance to do the right thing and didn't.

      Your lack of compassion is disturbing.

    • 11 months ago
  • charliesommers
    • +2
      charliesommers  
    • TheAmbivalante:

      I was involved in a lawsuit against a cellphone chatting lady who rear-ended me and broke five of my ribs a short time after this incident. I mentioned the McDonald's case to my lawyer who informed me that what the media failed to pass on was the fact that McDonald's was able to extract more cups from coffee if the water was heated above the recommended level. They knew the practice was dangerous to the consumer but placed more emphasis on profits than on safety.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • +1
      nobsartist  
    • TheAmbivalante:

      The lack of common sense in a lot of people is disturbing to me. McDonalds wasnt being sued because some talk show host made fun of someone who, even though they were offered a CARRIER for their coffee, was not smart enough to deduce the structural qualities of a fucking paper cup. I like my coffee hot so it lasts longer. I also usually ask for a FREE CUP OF ICE so I can cool it down if it is too FUCKING HOT. I suppose if someone ran their foot over with a lawn mower, that would also be the fault of the lawn mower manufacturer.

      The lady is a MORON and should not be allowed to step foot on any fast food property.
      I wouldnt have awarded her a penny. After all, it is advertised as HOT COFFEE.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • 0
      nobsartist  
    • charliesommers:

      I find that difficult to believe. Kindly explain the thermodynamics of this. I do not believe that a 20 degree temp change is going to make much difference in a carafe of coffee, but I may be wrong. I am sure that your attorney knows far more about that subject than I do.

      Next time pay attention when you drive.

    • 11 months ago
  • charliesommers
    • 0
      charliesommers  
    • nobsartist:

      The temperature difference between a safe cup of coffee and what the poor old lady was served was more like 40 or 50 degrees.

      How does paying attention when your driving prevent you from being rear ended by a cell phone user while your sitting still at a stop light? I've been driving for 53 years and never caused an accident.

    • 11 months ago
  • oldbanjo
  • PigFarmington
  • Buddha2112
    • +2
      Buddha2112  
    • Actually, here, another reason this post is stupid:

      "She ultimately got $640,000 and not the millions they made us believe!"

      No the reward went from a couple million down to that, but still, they settled out of court for undisclosed amount, which means, you have no idea how much she got...

      So she did not ultimately get $640,000... Which is still ludicrous for burning yourself.

    • 11 months ago
  • TheAmbivalante
    • +3
      TheAmbivalante  
    • Buddha2112:

      PUNITIVE DAMAGES, Buddha. That means that the JURY awarded the money to punish McDonalds. They were in the wrong. They had a chance to make things right and they didn't. So a JURY made of people just like you decided to bitch-slap an irresponsible group of people back to their senses.

      Mrs. Liebeck never asked for millions. She asked for the difference between what her Medicare covered and what the SKIN GRAFTS ON HER GENITALS actually cost. Oh, the horror!

    • 11 months ago
  • Buddha2112
    • -1
      Buddha2112  
    • TheAmbivalante:

      What a jury decides isn't what's right nor does it define what someone does is 'wrong', it's what we call 'justice'... There's a difference. The jury ruled wrong in my opinion, but this is pocket change to McDonald's... So... Lawl... Real punishment there. Now all I can get at McDonald's is colder coffee improperly served... Thanks to a dumb bitch who can't keep coffee off her self.

      It doesn't matter how much she asked for, or that her vag shriveled up. She still spilled it on herself... How irresponsible... Someone should bitch-slap some sense into her

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
  • Buddha2112
  • nobsartist
  • Buddha2112
  • TheAmbivalante
    • 0
      TheAmbivalante  
    • Buddha2112:

      You should learn the facts before you open your pie hole. McDonalds heated their coffee 40 degrees above scalding.Safety standards exist for just this reason. They ignored them for marketing purposes. They suffered the consequences.

    • 11 months ago
  • charliesommers
    • 0
      charliesommers  
    • Buddha2112:

      First off I don't think you should be using the Buddha as part of your username, then, you need to consider that McDonald's KNEW they were extracting coffee at an unsafe temperature but their greed for more cups per pound outweighed there care for their customers. They got what they deserved.

    • 11 months ago
  • Buddha2112
    • +1
      Buddha2112  
    • TheAmbivalante:

      I still think she's a moron. Basically, it's McDonald's fault for heating the coffee?? No, it's her fault for spilling the coffee... It would have caused 3rd degree burns even if it wasn't 40 degrees above 'scalding' even though the temperature they served it as IS the recommended temperature for coffee... Seriously look it up before you open your coffee hole.

      She seriously must have just turned the cup upside down into her pants... she's friggin retarded...

    • 11 months ago
  • Buddha2112
    • 0
      Buddha2112  
    • charliesommers:

      First off, Buddha taught personal responsibility and not expecting anyone else to take care of you or your mistakes.

      They were 5 degrees above recommended temperature... Big deal. That difference doesn't make it more or less likely to burn you, still causes third degree burns on naked skin... Even if it was 20 or 30 degrees...

      From the Red Cross:

      at 113 degrees you get a 3rd degree burn after 5 hours
      at 116.6 degrees, after 45 minutes
      at 118.4 degrees, after 20 minutes
      at 120, after 10 minutes
      at 124, after 4.2 minutes
      at 131, after 30 seconds
      and at 140, after 5 seconds.

      So what, they're going to serve cold coffee? Lmao.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
    • 0
      nobsartist  
    • Buddha2112:

      Cull the herd. Remove her genitals NOW! Please make sure that she is not allowed to pro-create without advanced instructions.

      Now you know why ABORTIONS should be mandatory for some people.

      Had that philosophy been used by bachmanns and palins parents we would not be subjected to them now.

    • 11 months ago
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
  • charliesommers
  • Buddha2112
    • -2
      Buddha2112  
    • charliesommers:

      I'd have more compassion if they weren't so stupid sometimes. Glad to see that's all you can respond with... Lmao.

      Tenzin Gyatso is a hack anyway... Almost all buddhists are nowadays. I enjoy the story of Buddha, but I denounce it as any kind of faith... Hell even in Buddha's own words he did not want a religion... And since when was forcing a child into "Buddha-dom" compassionate? the LLamas are chosen at birth.. Makes NO fucking sense at all... Where's the freedom of choice that Buddha himself had?

    • 11 months ago
  • cmc101
  • nobsartist
  • nobsartist
  • charliesommers
  • noxidereus
  • totally_dilapidated
    • +5
      totally_dilapidated  
    • MSM - Mainstream Media is a misnomer
      it is
      CMM - Corporate Manipulation Media

      nearly all the main media outlets are corporate owned
      there is a corporate agenda
      it is not mainstream
      it is not for the common good
      it is for the minority wealth good

      just calling the kettle black...

    • 11 months ago
  • FoosMaster
  • Earl_Dixon
  • TheAmbivalante
  • FoosMaster
    • +4
      FoosMaster  
    • I remember all that and the TV interview of a McDonalds executive complaining that the "public" is being allowed to destroy corporations with law suits. He also stated that we need a separate court to decide if a law suite will even be allowed to be filed in a real court so that they would not have to spend money on lawyers in a real court and that the judges on those courts should be "appointed", I'm sure by someone paid by the corporations to make sure the judges will always vote for the corporate interests. 95% of our laws were enacted for reasons of MONEY and that needs to change.
      STOP THE CORPORATE GREED that is destroying our country!!!

    • 11 months ago
  • lookatmypix
more from Community:

top videos