MICHELE BACHMANN,CHUTZPAH, & THE JEWS

you honestly lost the point over all when you stated that michele bachmann is a smart woman.outside of the malevolent joy of picking on anothers errors, the essance of stupidity is authenticaly well documented and not debatable.even by michele herself.

who herself has stated "i may not always get my words right".when words are the vehicle for expressing ideas/concepts/thoughts,and she gets them wrong, it means she isnt getting her ideas right.
an argument can be made that she means not getting words right she is claiming mechanical errors like mispronunciations.but that isnt ever the error at hand to adress, with such a statement.

bachmann herself is so not smart, that she both claims to be stupid, and doesnt know that doing so publicaly is itself stupid, when appealing to the public for their confidence in her abilities.the shear levels of stupidity this woman posseses is astounding.

as far as strategy goes, your scenerio still supports my position wich is that her use of the word is still a disengenous abuse of making ones identity political fodder.wich is still massively woraly wrong.you and i have different ideas as to her motivation in doing this, but regardless, in doing it she is offensive.you position is that the explanation for bachmann's use of chutzpah, was to not offend some by appearing too jewish.you are validating a person who is supposed to represent americans regardless of religion or race, adjusting herself to appease xenophobes as opposed to fighting prejudicial thoughts.maybe she should drop the "mann" from the end of her name as it may send the "wrong" message to the electorate about her relation to others whos name ends in "mann" like goldman or spielman.

why thank you good sir.

wow.that was impressive.

i feel you are right in general, but that thier is a relationship between the craziness of the palestinians and the craziness of the israeli settlers.
i dont think the settlers deal is of thier own creation.
yes they are misguided westerners (very misguided), but their craziness has been ever so slowly increasing over time.

israel cant excise them.peace needs to be reached as these settlers are reactionaries.getting just a lil more crazy, a lil more violent with every palestinian piece of aggression.if no peace at this rate, in 50 yrs they too will be sneaking over borders killing innocents.if peace is reached they will fall back into the israeli mass's as just another group.

just my theory

why thank you my dear.
that is why i made the commentary.just as anglo america failed (for far too long) to recognize our misdeeds in regards to the black community, we do it to many communities.sure we see the evening news ONLY showing black faces associated with crime, but dont notice it, or notice the larger effect it has on a social narrative.
i wouldnt imagine anyone who doesnt have a jewish identity would have noticed what is going on.not to be a hyperbolic alarmist, but had pre ww2 germany taken notice of the manipulation at hand, history may have been very different.
the difference between people thinking "the jews are evil" or "oh that is that line of bullshit those nazi idealogues are trying to sell but isnt true".

thanks for giving it a fair listen.

im not sure exactly what the print is behind me.it is a picture of a guy and a gal kissing on a long empty road, with a castle of some sort in the distance, all in sepia tone.

I totally agree with the larger effect it has on a social narrative, great point...I come from Irish Catholic lineage, but we mostly make fun of our own heritage, and I mean really, it's either laugh about it or drink all day. LOL!

the print is lovely....noticed it in your previous video too.

well that is the famous jewish sense of humor.i mean imagine how jewish mockery would play if we had the irish/italian/latino firey reaction.we would be in jihad mode.i kid i kid.

oh wich catholic, irish?cuz that is the fun side, the roman catholics are way too fucking serious.

i asked the wife what the title of that print was.
she responded :clearence.

so i guess we got it for budgetary reasons.all the while i was under some crazy impression she let me get the picture i liked just cuz i like it.lol.the steady stream of tiny lies that is marraige lol.

i would agree.i hate to agree not only cuz it is cynical, but im turning overt kindness on thier part as a reason to point a finger at them.it feels wrong, despite knowing it is probably true.

if they were legitimate, it wouldnt be the subtle (to the evangelics but overt to the rest) use of judaica.its like they can only appreciate others to a level of a wink and a nod, but can never bring themselves to outright say it.like they are trying to appease all sides.pandering to jews, and evangelics, while not daring to offend the racist core.

what about the one that you should grow like an onion,with your head in the ground?

KEEP "EM COMING! Hilarious!!

i was hoping you would pop by.

my vid both supports and argues your political position.
care to wiegh in?
preferably without liberal baiting

defunding obamacare

http://talks.gu

liberal baiting, whatever do you mean? those of us that are looking for a different change we can believe in are carefully watching the conservative candidates. so far the pickins are slim. romney, creepy and his religion is the least of it. bachmann, like most politicians speaks out both sides of her mouth but hasent learned how to do so effectively enough to convince me. newt, super creepy and a perv. lost any credibility with me long ago. i kinda like cain as he adds a fresh perspective to politics but i havent heard him speak enough yet to make a complete decision. i liked palin 3 years ago but shes gotten too much media and has become less appealing the more she talks. guiliani? i like how he handled n.y. especially after 9/11 but dont think he has enough skills to run the country. perry, they seem to like him in texas but i dont know enough about him yet to have an opinion. pawlenty seems ok but again need to hear more from him.

thats one of her best ones. one mans junk is another mans treasure my friend

well if you are a comedy writer,her good decisions are to open her mouth and speak.as it is always comedy gold.

isnt being a conservative literaly antithetical to change.doesnt conservatism by defenition not want to change?
what change is being offered by the right btw?

you would honestly consider voting for perry as president of the union, when he threatened cessesion?
that would be like asking hamas to provide security for jerusalem.

it is slim pickens for you guys right now.and it doesnt seem like it is gunna get better this time around.10 bucks says watch cantor over the next four years.he will be at least a vp candidate.

but doesnt that tell you something is fundamentaly wrong with your side of the aisle, when you lack viable representation?

lol it may be a fools errand but it was worth a shot.

so you arent a crazy person.did my theory in this video hold water?
or am i on a crazy jew tangent?

viable representation, like obama and biden? dude both sides are hurtin in that dept.

i love you tbuff, but in a safe and protected kinda way

it seems to me that the left have been coming up with the most explosive anti jew rhetoric of late. excluding you of course

congoboy forgot about gary johnson....I really think he is too good for the GOP...he is way better than paul (not as crazy), but that is precisely the reason congoboy forgot him and MSM is not including him in the debates -- Paul plays to emotion, Johnson plays to reason, and emotion just generates more attention.

My father in law was disappointed with the choices last time, as he usually votes republican, so he did not vote. My mom is a yellow dog, but I just might convince her to vote other than Obama, if not Republcan. I refuse to vote for Obama, so I might just have to write in Johnson. Maybe we can start a write in campaign. But if it is between Obama and Paul, I would go with Paul, even though he is crazy, that's how much Obama sucks.

I don't think we could ever possibly be 100% libertarian society, maybe in rural areas, but cities need good management, and markets need good referees. There is no such thing as the free market unless all consumers are fully informed which can't be the case with suckers born every minute; Free markets exist in a vacuum (and only in a few basic marketplaces in reality), and quickly fade when you observe the realities that obscure the market forces, like monopolies and cheaters who use regulation against the good of the consumer. We do need radical change to actually change the direction we are headed, which is straight down the crapper. Don't look at Paul and Johnson as crazy libertarians, they are just highly principled--they have chutzpah.

Way to connect the dots on this one freecrack, pure genius, ^+d

crazy is often a good thing, it gets us fresh ideas

lol thanks.
always trying to check and make sure im not around the bend.

on our side of the aisle, we criticize obama and biden, but in the desire to light a fire under thier ass's.we arent displeased with them to a degree as to not have them serve as viable representation.we want more from them, and from obama expect it.biden not so much.both dueto the position he holds, as a vp doesnt really do shit, and recognition that he is mr foot in the mouth.

despite our criticism of him, he will have our support again.not to mention the field is rife with options for us.from hillary to barney frank, to a variety of junior officials.

thank you.
it is hard to put yourself out there to this degree so i do truly appreciate it.

i will never be a leader of men.if so we are all doomed.but i do like the idea of the crazy coming out so better minds can distill the viable parts.

good luck with that

i could validate your theory if you could show the purpose of the mispronunciation.

like bush senior calling saddam "saddum" as a means of disrespect and deminishing his status.

there exists no benefit or purpose to this error on bachmanns part wich to validate the idea that it was intentional.

btw, yiddish is an all but dead language, not just with jews in diaspora but across the world.dont forget that israel is comprised of jews from across the world, each with thier own indiginous mother tongues.the only official language in israel is hebrew.just like in the west, yiddish is only known and used commonly amongst that ww2 generation.

israel never had yiddish communities.

Spin baby Spin!

There are people who spend their entire lives in the United States and still don't know many ESSENTIAL facts about it. With Michele having stated that she went to a Kibbutz to support Israel, the land of the BIBLE, including the christian ones, it is not to be expected that she ever made an effort to assimilate Israeli culture, let alone recall it's vocabulary all these years later. If she wanted to distance herself from an association of being jewish, she wouldn't have used the word at all, friend! Her mispronunciation of it hasn't suppressed you from referencing it in a very public forum.

i wonder if they would even wave good bye to us as jesus takes them to heaven before he smites us?
ya know like "thanks for building the temple guys,but we gotta bounce"

i think the republicans are just the party of old codgers and as a result vote for the pretty face with no criteria for brains.but im a tad bit cynical.

part of what pisses me off about all the antisemitic conspiracy bullshit about jewish influence in our political discourse is the complete lack of reality in it.i dont care about the neurotic mockery,cuz in many instances we tend to be.we tend to also be mommas boys.i dont mind mockery of nuanced truth's.

but when it comes to our political discourse jews are ALWAYS split.never on the same page with each side claiming the other is failing thier jewish identity in the policies they hold.if lieberman being a vp candidate couldnt galvenize the jews, it is clear jews do not vote thier ethnicity or religion.wich is what makes that particular libel so fucking rediculous.

jewish tradition mixed with american culture and values tends to result in a very liberal perspective.wich is why every human rights movement in our country has massive jewish involvement.wether it is the freedom riders, or the aclu.

then you have the emotinaly charged jews, just like emotionaly charged christians, who vote based on religion.wich the republicans expliot through zionism.cuz even if you arent a zionist, but you support israel, the right offers this.

each side thinks the other side wrong.
"how can you vote for those democrats cuz they dont support our only nation"
and
"how can you vote for those republicans as they are against all that judaism is"

same thing as christian politics, only fsome reason jews are painted as if unified.
christians can vote either pro-life (right) or pro choice (left) and it is understood as common place.but common perception is that jews all vote the same.wich is the opposite of the truth

You make points, but I believe that Republicans are far more menacing that simple "old codgers". They are conspirators of death, in pro life costumes, with a "grab it all for me"at whatever cost psyche. They in fact can not control their behavior, it is wired into them. They are like the monkeys who put their hand into the small holed jar and are trapped by their own unwillingness to release that which they have clenched in their fists. In other words, they will greedily consume all that is around them even if it contributes to their own deaths. How can anyone reason with psyches like those? They simply are not rational.

As for the jewish factor, it occurred to me that the woman in question was actually pointing out that being republican equals acting in one's own selfish interest primarily, if not exclusively. And, that by definition, being jewish requires altruism and group interest dominating individual self centeredness, with altruism and group interest being Democratic principles.

my apologies for not going deeper in my explanation.
yes the republican machine and philosophy is as malevolent as it gets and are a very real viable threat.
i was just refering to one of the many vehicle they use to get over with the maerican public in general.they want religious votes, so they jump on the abortion issue.they want to lock in the seniors as they are most vulnerable to fear mongering, so they sell thier message through pretty faces.i also believe for a lot of fox viewers, due to thier conservative beliefs, see megan kelly and such as the closest thing to porn that is acceptable.but that is just a theory.

you are right.there is reality and then thier is the fox version.leaving us with two different realities to negotiate in order to survive as a civilization

why thank you kind sir

i am saying that jewish issues is a ficticious concept.as we are not unified as a singular community in order to have issues.
jews have assimilated so much into american society that the jewish distinction has no relevance.

this is so much the case, that even the stereo types dont match as they are based on extrapilations of reality.
the jews are greedy and bleed us dry through an organized control of the banks.
then at the same time, the jews are all about being school teachers to corrupt the minds of our youth.
these claim that jews both seek to have all the money and influence, as well as work at jobs that pay the least money and influence.

there is a line about the jews being all about this zionist support for israel, wich makes them republicans.
while at the same time,jewish liberal sensabilities are equaly famous.thus countering the initial libel.

yes we have religious jewish communities, just like every other group.but even they arent unified.the ultra orthodox hold a completely different belief system and values from the lebavitch, and both think all the other jews arent real jews.id bet money that they dont even get involved with the political process as they see it as idol worship and beneath them.unless god himself runs, they dont give a shit, cuz they are fucking crazy.they make up less than 10 percent of american jewry.

im sure aipac has influence over our government and policies.but that influence is based on israel not judaism.i mean if we passed a law making it illegal for jews to not work on the sabbath,i dont imagine for a second that aipac would give a shit either way.have you heard aipac way in on anything that is a jewish issue vs an israeli issue?

nor do i think aipac has any more influence than any other pac funded at the level that they are.as a pac they have rules they have to follow,just like every other pac.if they were up to some shinanigans,unlike other pacs,you know they would be busted right quick as no shortage of people are just looking for it.so much so they make shit up in lue of actual tresspasses.

im no fan of pacts, but at the same time i cant be pissed at them.sure they manipulate the democratic process.but at the same time the devil i know is better than the one i dont.at least with the pact system it is out in the open as opposed to the unregulated alternative.

i dont agree that aipac benefits from the fear of being called an antisemite.the way those who are antisemites try to cover it is by using "israel"(amongst other terms like zionist) instead of saying jews.if anything aipac is a lightning rod for antisemites.if you can handle having your intillect raped spend a little time watching david duke videos to see what i mean.shit even on here on current aipac gets a ton of shit.with no fear of antisemite label.

hey if you are in the mood to watch david duke get mercilessly mocked just check out my youtube channel.i got two videos that i think are funny about him.

stonerism.sorry i forgot to mention other pacs to compare aipac to.
oil and beef.
just those two alone have more pull than aipac ever will.
even with aipa, israel gets attacked ceaselessly,with no intervention from us.bearly an honerable mention.wether it is just one country attacking them or the whole lot of the middle east ganging up on her.all aipac has been able to do (at best) is get israel able to purchase weapons.wich isnt all that special considering we offer the same to half the world,even without massve governmental lobbying groups.
yet saddam makes a move on kuwait, and viola,there we are.dedicating troops and global political capital to help out a people who in the grand scheme of things matter to none of us as american citizens.
and forget how much coddling the beef industry gets.they can kill as many americans as they like and never get a lick of regulation or fines.

israel builds settlements and our leadership condems them for it over and over again.even going so far as to put the blame on israel alone for holding up the peace process as a result.
but the beef industry gets mad cow,wich is a direct result of greed, and it is treated as if its just some bad luck.cuz beef is just too important an industry to not help at all costs.

not saying aipac isnt messing about.but thier are plenty of lobbies way way more powerfull.as i smoke my next cancer stick.

lol your use of zionist and israel is then the odd exception of what is actualy appropriate lol.

i mean no one on current who has been around for a minute would shy away from stating antisemitism is my shtick.it is.yet i seldom drop the charge on people due to exactly what you experienced.i have no problem with legit criticism of israel and zionism.im niether an israeli or a zionist, and nothing is above criticism.i even let a lot of shit slide actualy.

take note of when you are called an antisemite who calls you it.cuz i bet you anything more often than not they arent even jews, but well meaning fools.

i only called you out on it once, despite the infanite number of times we have argued this stuff.and even then it wasnt so much directed at you the person, but the ideas yu thought were valid.wich doesnt make you an antisemite, just subject to bad info.

i see what your saying with the charge with politicians.but that is on the right,where the charge effects votes.cuz at the end of the day,just like a neo-con wont vote for a democrat,a liberal jew isnt gunna vote for a republican.even if the alternative is some one who is seemingly antisemitic.on the right it is a death sentence as the evangelic vote is important.on the left it doesnt matter cuz like i say,jewish voting doesnt sway shit.
http://www.youtube.com/user/mrfreecrack?feature=mhee

i try to make the channel diverse.but it is a new work in project.
speaking out against beef or oil will certainly lose you an election.ask nader.oil will get to secretly removed by koch brother type politicos.and beef will lose you the vote of the heart land.shit look how crazy the right has gone over the obama administration,not even them themselves,changing the food pyramid.imagine if thier were an industry attached with a powerfull lobby like beef.

i dont know how you/we do it,but some how the conversation just keeps going.twisting and turning but always compelling.

you are right with the abuse of money in regards to representative government.but pacs are yesterdays news in that regard,as the supreme court opened up the "buying an election" floodgates with corperate money.we have a lot of work to do before we come even close to adressing the influence of pacs compared to what is coming down the pike.the scary part is we never do anything proactively.wich means we will fix it.but it will most likely be the result of a tyranical despot really fucking shit up first so that we learn.

i take a softer approach on saddam but ya aint wrong.sure we may have thought he would use that wich we gave him the way others do.stock pile only.at the same time we are also guilty for giving him the stuff to begin with.then again that is how global politics go.we will always run the risk when chosing an ally.it would be nice if we only had to side up with those we choose due to idealogic similarities.but that will never happen.

domesticaly western condemnation of settlements is lip service.as we all know nothing will come of it either way with us.but we wield a pretty big stick globaly speaking, wich makes any condemnation of israel fuel for her enemies.wich are never in short supply.i mean imagine what would happen if we had a president that the middle east like.say a muslim guy.condemnation of settlements can easily be taken, or manipulated into a call to action against them.as thier muslim brother in west gave them the wink and a nod to act, when they already want to.as is our condemnation helps those against israel with material upon wich to further stoke the flames politicaly.ya know how israel is the little satan.so it isnt like the standard of judgement is too high.

lol same to you, and same here.no time better than dinner time for inciting the munchies

but in our democracy, wich despite its flaws it still is, isnt the publican partisanship the what that money buys?
isnt that blind partisanship what we are talking about as the negative result of the big money election fixers?
the insurance lobby turning us into partisans afraid of death pannels?
the tobacco lobby making smoking a matter of freedom?
these arent organic responses to legislation, but manipulation of public perception.

i dont agree.obama can maybe call out big oil, as they are heavily invested in the right and not the left, wich obama aint getting those votes any way.even if the stigmata appears on his hands they will call him a secret muslim terrorist.but really cuz oils opposition has gained enough steam and influence to balance it out.
but if he went against beef.forget it.we would vote for the palin/bachmann ticket.
cuz it would play out, by the beef industries purchased influence, that obama is against american tradition entirely.from our love of steak as a status symbol of wealth being obama is against us being successfull.an attack on fast food alone would turn us against anyone.
and that doesnt even get into the economy play.wich would be an unarguable job killer wich reaches the entirety of the heartland.from cali to new york.all against whom ever is against our biggest most successfull domestic industry.as that is how it would play.

i dont remember where you live.but where i live is an intillectual cesspit.where pick up trucks fill the road ways and have pro-beef bumper stickers.i shit you not.even with zero opposition to the beef industry, they are still promoting themselves.

nader makes sense.and the pacs use thier money to convince the mass's that he is crazy due to his ideas being so not mainstream.they just omit the part that what is main stream is actualy bad wich makes nader good.

just the jew i was hoping would pop up as you prove my position.unless you turned zionist over night lol.

honestly the stats are bullshit anyway,cuz they arent based in reality.it isnt like of the stats any litmus test exists to find out who lives according to judaism vs who doesnt but happened to have been born of jewish parents.they are still statisticaly considered jewish despite actualy not being in any practicle way.wich then would require a jew scale to measure the level of judaim in each jew, wich is like even a stupider notion that nazi eugenics.

but even if every person born of a jewish mother is what is considered a jew we are less than one percent.the second largest group after the christian majority is actualy islam,despite the common perception being that judaism is americas #2 religious group.

fuck being a bigot.wearing a symbol of anything,while not having reverence for that thing is wrong.insulting and as disrespectfull to those wich that symbol represents as you have degraded it to nothing more than an accessory.not to mention what it says about her faith, that she was able to swap it out like that.

i know you and i arent observant, but i sure as shit couldnt wear a cross.

lol that jew-jitsu pic gets me every time.im pretty sure it was probably created for negative purposes but it is just funny awesome

l'chiam
partner

i wear a star of david and a chai (wich always get tangled) as im proud of my culture and heritage, as well as they are family hand me downs.but at the same time it is for me and no one else so i make a point to wear them under my shirt.as often as i check my fly to make sure it isnt open (wich is an ocd level of frequnce) i check my judaica.

hey dont give bachmann that much credit.she isnt smart enough to handle such grand concepts as facism.or any ism for that matter.