Community | July 18, 2011 | 8 comments

Ice wars: Burn the riches beneath the melting Arctic ice

Image
JanforGore
On a small, floating piece of ice in the Beaufort Sea, several hundred miles north of Alaska, a group of scientists are documenting what some dub an "Arctic meltdown."

According to climate scientists, the warming of the region is shrinking the polar ice cap at an alarming rate, reducing the permafrost layer and wreaking havoc on polar bears, arctic foxes and other indigenous wildlife in the region.

What is bad for the animals, though, has been good for commerce.

The recession of the sea ice and the reduction in permafrost -- combined with advances in technology -- have allowed access to oil, mineral and natural gas deposits that were previously trapped in the ice.

The abundance of these valuable resources and the opportunity to exploit them has created a gold rush-like scramble in the high north, with fierce competition to determine which countries have the right to access the riches of the Arctic.

This competition has brought in its wake a host of naval and military activities that the Arctic hasn't seen since the end of the Cold War.

Now, one of the coldest places on Earth is heating up as nuclear submarines, Aegis-class frigates, strategic bombers and a new generation of icebreakers are resuming operations there.

Just how much oil and natural gas is under the Arctic ice?
The Arctic is home to approximately 90 billion barrels of undiscovered but recoverable oil, according to a 2008 study by the U.S. Geological Survey. And preliminary estimates are that one-third of the world's natural gas may be harbored in the Arctic ice.

But that's not all that's up for grabs. The Arctic also contains rich mineral deposits. Canada, which was not historically a diamond-producing nation, is now the third-largest diamond producer in the world.

If the global warming trend continues as many scientists project it to, it is likely that more and more resources will be discovered as the ice melts further.

Who are the countries competing for resources?

The United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Sweden and Finland all stake a claim to a portion of the Arctic. These countries make up the Arctic Council, a diplomatic forum designed to mediate disputes on Arctic issues

Lawson Brigham, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and an Arctic expert, says "cooperation in the Arctic has never been higher."

But like the oil trapped on the Arctic sea floor, much of the activity of the Arctic Council is happening below the surface.

In secret diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks, Danish Foreign Minister Per Stieg Moeller was quoted as saying to the United States, "If you stay out, the rest of us will have more to carve up the Arctic."

At the root of Moeller's statement is a dispute over control of territories that is pitting friend against foe and against friend. Canada and the U.S., strategic allies in NATO and Afghanistan, are in a diplomatic dispute over the Northwest Passage. Canada and Russia have recently signed development agreements together.

In the same way a compass goes awry approaching the North Pole, traditional strategic alliances are impacted at the top of the world.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/americas/07/15/larsen.arctic.ice.wars/index.html

More at the link
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Culture,   Earth and Science,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Environment War Climate Change Oil 15 more
  3.     
    |

8 comments // Ice wars: Burn the riches beneath the melting Arctic ice

  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • I suppose this is to be expected. What will happen when the frozen swamps in Russia start to release methane?

      AAARGHH!!! This could be amusing if you were an ice person who was not a person at all.

    • 10 months ago
  • Gray_Alan
    • 0
      Gray_Alan  
    • Image
    • I am very interested in whether the White House is talking to Bloom energy about the possibilities of helping them ramp up their ability to produce bloom energy servers. With their technology, and our recently discovered abundance of natural gas, it seems to me like this solution should be supported by the government as a solar alternative.

      One commercial size bloom energy server (about the footprint of one parking spot) can supply the electrical needs of 100 average homes, but they also make a unit that is about the size of a home air conditioner unit that can power your entire home, and all you supply is natural gas! There is no combustion, it is a chemical reaction in the fuel cell that creates the power.

      http://www.bloomenergy.com/benefits/more-benefits-and-applications/

    • 10 months ago
  • Gray_Alan
    • 0
      Gray_Alan  
    • Forget about the current heatwave that has almost our entire country over 100 degrees.....there is money to be made! Imagine how many out of work people could be put to work if the President passed legislation to require the installation of solar panels on every rooftop in America. We could dramatically lower our use of coal, the resulting global warming gases, put a huge dent in the unemployment problem, and help stimulate the solar industry in this country in one sweeping bill. Is it possible? YES! Would it be smart? YES! Will we do it?
      NO!

      Why not?

    • 10 months ago
  • Saladin
    • +3
      Saladin  
    • Here's what's really fucked up, the world currently uses 30 billion barrels of oil per year. Which means the ENTIRE arctic reserve is only enough oil for three years time, assuming it's all actually recoverable and the rate doesn't increase.

      Worth it? Not really.

      How fucked up is our energy policy? Seriously.

    • 10 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Saladin:

      They are also already mining minerals. Russia already has 25 operational mines in the Russian Arctic. But you are right in that only 25% of the world's oil and natural gas reserves are in the Arctic. But then, peak oil comes into play and having control over as much of what is left is a very lucrative business. It is insanity, but then that is what greed ultimately many times leads to.

    • 10 months ago
  • Swisher
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Burning the fossil fuels that are melting the Arctic to go and get some more to burn it and melt more. This is why climate change is being continued to go unadressed by governments of the world. They along with oil companies will make more profit from doing so. They care nothing for preserving the sustainability of this planet for the future. It is only about present gain at any cost.

      "Danish Foreign Minister Per Stieg Moeller was quoted as saying to the United States, "If you stay out, the rest of us will have more to carve up the Arctic."

      They aren't even giving us or the species that live there any say in this matter.

    • 10 months ago
  • Saladin
more from Community:

top videos