FDA declares walnuts a drug
source: http://www.politicalfailblog.com/2011/07/fda-declares-california-walnuts-drug.html
-
-
- Pfailblog
- added this
Unless, that is, they want to apply for an application that would consider their product a drug.
Read more:
http://www.politicalfailblog.com/2011/07/fda-declares-california-walnuts-drug.ht...
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, Green, Current Tonight, 14 more
-
- tags:
- Government, Drugs, FDA, Nuts
-
-
ausetkmt
-
this is why the fda budget should be thoroughly investigated and items such as this immediately removed. the waste factor for things such as this is abhorrent. such a bunch of pinheads..
- 10 months ago
-
ausetkmt
-
-
ecoalex
-
Foods are medicines.This shows once again the corporate control of labeling laws.The politics of food labeling such as non Gbgh milk clearly shows how Monsanto and other food corps use labeling to shield them from consumer information.80% of consumers would not buy gmo foods if they knew the foods contained gmos.
- 10 months ago
-
ecoalex
-
-
JCSAtx71
-
Considering the number of advertisements for drugs APPROVED by the FDA of which potential side effects range anywhere from shortness of breath to internal bleeding all the way up to stroke and death, perhaps any decisions made by the agency should be considered circumspect.
- 10 months ago
-
JCSAtx71
-
-
Saladin
-
I don't understand.
Don't foods like cheerios advertise that they're good for your heart? Does the FDA consider them as being drugs?
This really doesn't make any sense. Isn't it their job to evaluate and verify these conditions, not prevent you from advertising them if they're true?
- 10 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Piper_Lynch
-
Saladin:
Didn't they think smoking was good for you too once upon a time? I dunno. Just askin'.
- 10 months ago
-
Piper_Lynch
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
Piper_Lynch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCMzjJjuxQI
Doctor recommended. - 10 months ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
Hardytoo
-
I vote it's from The Onion, like the new story about McCain criticizing teabaggers.
- 10 months ago
-
Hardytoo
-
-
Sarah_Honea
-
Is this an article from The Onion? Or have I stumbled into the Twilight Zone?
- 10 months ago
-
Sarah_Honea
-
-
Piper_Lynch
-
Sarah_Honea:
It depends. Did you say WTF? Or did you just start laughing?
- 10 months ago
-
Piper_Lynch
-
-
Hardytoo
-
It's lunchtime here and I'm runnin' over to the Elementary School to peddle some nuts - anything to make my fortune.
- 10 months ago
-
Hardytoo
-
-
Piper_Lynch
-
Hardytoo:
Laughed, out loud, in public. I think I'm in love.
- 10 months ago
-
Piper_Lynch
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://livingfoodvillage.com/features/36-general/143-walnuts-are-unapproved-drug...
The Alliance for Natural Health, a nonprofit organization committed to protecting access to natural and integrative medicine, has recently come up with a Congressional bill designed to stop government censorship of truthful, scientific health claims about natural foods and herbs, and restore free speech to natural health. The Free Speech About Science Act (FSAS), also known as HR 4913, will allow manufacturers and producers to reference peer-reviewed, scientific studies that highlight the health benefits of a particular food or herb that they grow or sell.For too long, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have blatantly censored the truth about food, herbs and dietary supplements. These government agencies are supposed to be protecting public health and well-being, but they accomplish precisely the opposite by actively censoring the truth about natural products and working to keep the public ignorant about the health benefits of nutritional products. It's all part of the plan to prop up the profits of Big Pharma by eliminating the competition.
Current law restricts health claims to drugs only The FDA says, ridiculously, that only pharmaceutical drugs are capable of preventing or treating disease. Even though this is scientifically false, the agency has structured the rules to categorize anything that treats or prevents disease as a drug. So if you eat walnuts, and those walnuts lower high cholesterol (which they do), the FDA declares your walnuts to be "drugs."
Existing law dictates that if anything is advertised as providing health benefits without the FDA's approval, it's automatically considered to be an "unapproved drug", even if it's a common, everyday food like walnuts, cherries, grapes or oranges.
Amazingly, references to peer-reviewed scientific studies are not allowed to be made by companies without permission from the FDA because the agency considers this to be an illegal health claim. So if you sell walnuts, and your website merely links to published scientific studies that describe the cholesterol-lowering benefits of walnuts, then you can be threatened, arrested, imprisoned and fined millions of dollars by the FDA for selling "unapproved drugs."
If you flee the country, you can be then be listed on INTERPOL as an international fugitive wanted for "drug offenses." This is exactly what happened to Greg Caton, who was recently kidnapped from Ecuador by U.S. agents working on behalf of the FDA (http://www.naturalnews.com/027750_G...), brought back to the USA against his will, and sentenced to federal prison where he remains to this day.
The FDA thinks walnuts are drugs
If you're skeptical that what I'm saying here is true, take a look at the warning letter the FDA sent to Diamond Food, Inc. back in February concerning the health claims the company had been making about its walnuts.
Diamond Food, Inc., a large producer of nuts and nut products, had put some information on its website about the health benefits of walnuts (which are rich in omega-3 fatty acids). Some of this information included the following statements (all of which are verifiably true):
1) "Studies indicate that the omega-3 fatty acids found in walnuts may help lower cholesterol; protect against heart disease, stroke and some cancers; ease arthritis and other inflammatory diseases; and even fight depression and other mental illnesses."
2) "[O]mega-3 fatty acids inhibit tumor growth that is promoted by the acids found in other fats..."
3) "[I]n treating major depression, for example, omega-3s seem to work by making it easier for brain cell receptors to process mood-related signals from neighboring neurons."
4) "The omega-3s found in fish oil are thought to be responsible for the significantly lower incidence of breast cancer in Japanese women as compared to women in the United States."
All of these statements are true and have been demonstrated in various scientific studies about omega-3s. In fact, the University of Maryland has a complete reference page about the benefits of omega-3s that verifies the statements made by Diamond Food. Sixty-five different scientific studies are cited on that reference page alone!
But apparently the FDA has little concern with truth and science, because the agency wrote in its warning letter to Diamond that, "[b]ecause of these intended uses, your walnut products are drugs... they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced conditions." It goes on to say that, "they may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application."
When all was said and done, Diamond was essentially coerced into removing virtually all the truthful information about the health benefits of walnuts from its website in order to stay in compliance with the FDA's ridiculous demands.
So when science discovers the amazing health-promoting and healing abilities of natural, whole foods, you are not allowed to actually tell people about it. If you do, those foods automatically become unapproved drugs, according to the FDA, and they are subject to seizure. This is how the FDA enforces nutritional ignorance across America. The agency is actually an ANTI-EDUCATION group of knowledge destroyers who want the American people to remain ignorant of the health benefits of natural foods and supplements.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.4913:
Link for the bill.
-----
But remember, pesticides, GMOs and anything produced by either a pharmaceutical or war chemical company is good for you. - 10 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
nobsartist
-
JanforGore:
I say all you need is good herb and a shot glass of vinegar every day to promote good health. Drinking vinegar on a daily basis will eliminate your need for pain medication and statins from big pharma. this is why they want to keep marijuana illegal. Also because they are racists.
- 10 months ago
-
nobsartist
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
Oh for fuck's sake! Really?! You can not give nutritional information without FDA (who does a shit job of regulating the drug companies) approval.
This diseased slave colony gets dumber and more corrupt by the minute.
- 10 months ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
Hardytoo
-
Don't anyone dare take away my medicinal walnuts; I shall smoke what I want, thank you. Keep your hands off my nuts.
- 10 months ago
-
Hardytoo
-
-
EmperorThan
-
Not the first time this has happened, cheerios had to remove their 'cures heart disease' bullshit a few years ago when the FDA called their bluff and told them 'either you produce a double blind study PROVING your product does this or you can't claim things that only a drug could do.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Cholesterol/story?id=7574156&page=1
- 10 months ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
H2O_4U
-
Libertarians will do anything to make life impossible. Thanks FDA!
- 10 months ago
-
H2O_4U
-
-
EmperorThan
-
H2O_4U:
Libertarians???????? Wtf?
- 10 months ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
H2O_4U
-
EmperorThan:
Libertarians only want to further big business.
- 10 months ago
-
H2O_4U
-
-
riffmage
-
Fox is trying to defend it. WARNING alarm goes off. Those folks are nuckin futs :)
- 10 months ago
-
riffmage
-
-
bailey78
-
Look folks if it will help keep ya healthy they want a ban on it. This just goes to show that Big Pharm has bought the F.D.A.
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
TrishR
-
bailey78:
Actually, this was not a ban. This was a company being asked to remove health claims from their packaging when they didn't have the evidence to support those specific claims. This policy was created as a less-draconian policy than permitting the FDA to regulate all vitamins, diet supplements & even raw foods as if they are pharmaceuticals.
I don't think this is a big deal. If I want to know what the health benefits of walnuts are, I know how to find out. And why should corporations be permitted to fill their labels with health claims they have spent zero money to research, claims that could be spurious or misunderstood science (like tho old thing about all humans needing 8 glasses of water a day, which was a decades-long game of telephone misreporting a single early 20th century nutrition study about how much water it would take to digest the average human adult caloric consumption, bot a recipe for optimal health) or any old urban legend or rumor that would look good when half-read in the florescent lights of a supermarket.
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
Dusty_King
-
TrishR:
I really hate to break it to the fucking morons at the FDA but all nuts in general, in moderation, are in fact good for the human body. Between the fiber and good fats 20-30 nuts a day actually help.
More than enough research on this, but of course the FDA is too busy ignoring the shit fake drugs coming in from China. Assholes.
- 10 months ago
-
Dusty_King
-
-
bailey78
-
TrishR:
They spoke the truth and were asked to not do so. I see that as a ban at the very least.
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
Joeydee44
-
Kind of a leap of faith to say that because the FDA is saying Diamond can't advertise the health benefits without approval that it means the FDA is declaring walnuts are a "drug". The title of this article is pretty misleading.
- 10 months ago
-
Joeydee44
-
-
Paratus
-
Joeydee44:
I agree with you. I clicked on this to say how ignorant the FDA is, they usually are anyhow, on this but after reading the post found out that the facts as written and the title are not the same.
- 10 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
TrishR
-
Joeydee44:
I agree. Limiting the claims of health benefits on packaging to those specifically backed up by scientific research about that specific product/consumable item was done as a compromise instead of letting the FDA regulate vitamins, dietary supplements & foods.
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
bailey78
-
Joeydee44:
No I don't see it like that. Because they are saying in order to say nuts are good for you They need to declare them a drug.
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
chew_chew
-
I knew sumpthin was up when that pusher-man dude on the street corner gave me 7 walnuts for free one day, but the next day wanted to charge for those suckers by the pound.
- 10 months ago
-
chew_chew
-
-
TrishR
-
chew_chew:
Seriously, was anyone reading this ever been offered sample drugs by a stranger? And why, if the drug business is so lucrative, why do all the people I've ever met who do that need a day job?
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
Piper_Lynch
-
chew_chew:
I laughed so hard I cried AND peed in my pants a little. Freakin' hilarious!
- 10 months ago
-
Piper_Lynch
-
-
kvb1
-
What we are seeing is Big Pharma trying to push around the food industry. Somehow it got Omega-3 labeled a drug under the name Lavaza. People have been taking Omega -3 pills for decades. Will the FDA(Big Pharma) go after the fishing industry as well?
This is what happens when we allow politics to be clouded by money. Bush and the RIPublicans have jammed the government with people from the industries that they were supposed to be regulating. I am not talking about the department secretaries, but the hiring spree for underlings filled them with radical liaise-faire free market types that had no problem with not enforcing regulations, and just doing the bidding of their former masters.
- 10 months ago
-
kvb1
-
-
Almibry
-
GODAMN SON OF A BITCH!! First nutmeg now walnuts! How the hell am I supposed to make banana bread?!? *grumbling*
- 10 months ago
-
Almibry
-
-
Piper_Lynch
-
Someone already asked if they're nuts, right?
- 10 months ago
-
Piper_Lynch
-
-
figgdimension
-
Is it me or are our articles and news getting funnier and funnier i needed it fo real it frickin"Nuts" "nuts" "nuts" look at the rethuglicans "Nutz"!!!
- 10 months ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
figgdimension
-
I like Paulie Wallnuts too
- 10 months ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
artemis6
-
Time to plant a walnut tree near you .....
- 10 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
attilatheblond
-
artemis6:
sow some flax while you're at it. Big Pharma will be sending their FDA minions after flax seed any time now. They intend to control any food with food value so we have to buy their crap or die. Monsanto is working hard globally to put independent farmers outta business.
Soylent Green kiosks, next stop.
- 10 months ago
-
attilatheblond
-
-
artemis6
-
They have excellent medicinal properties and can compete against certain drugs , just hating on the competition .....
- 10 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
cherry5000
-
this is ridiculous, I am still going to eat my walnuts.
- 10 months ago
-
cherry5000
-
-
bailey78
-
cherry5000:
just don't play with your walnuts
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
coolplanet
-
So now Omega-3 is considered a drug by the FDA.
So why don't doctors start prescribing walnuts?
Silly question, I know..... - 10 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
kvb1
-
coolplanet:
Yeah, you know, take two walnuts and call me in the morning!
- 10 months ago
-
kvb1
-
-
attilatheblond
-
coolplanet:
Some doctors did start doing that, Why do you suppose Big Pharma got their g-strings in a was about walnuts?
- 10 months ago
-
attilatheblond
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
I would have commented sooner but I was at Betty Ford trying to kick my Wal habit.
They call it Wal for short on the streets.
- 10 months ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
attilatheblond
-
lifestudentno83:
Psssssst, hey kid.... wanna Walnetto?
- 10 months ago
-
attilatheblond
-
-
bailey78
-
lifestudentno83:
Wal oil man i just some good wal oil for sale.
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
mspray11
-
This is another step towards banning all kinds of holistic medicines and Nutritional Supplements just so big pharma can make more money. Come on people we have to feed the rich now!
- 10 months ago
-
mspray11
-
-
bailey78
-
mspray11:
no matter what they ban you can always get it for your livestock. then do with it what you please
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
mspray11
-
Just as long as they leave my hallucinogenic nutmeg alone damnitt!!
- 10 months ago
-
mspray11
-
-
TrishR
-
mspray11:
Shh, they might hear your.
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
jonwyderka
-
I like walnuts. I'll eat them regardless of how the FDA forces a change in label. It's amazing; we actually send the government money to waste it on foolish ideas like this. I work in the pre-clinical testing industry for new medical products being submitted to the FDA. They're usually not this nutty (no pun intended). Government employees love to say no; it helps them build a dynasty and justify their inflated budgets. - Jon Wyderka -
- 10 months ago
-
jonwyderka
-
-
neocongo
-
jonwyderka:
And protects people from false medical claims, regardless of the benefits of walnuts.
- 10 months ago
-
neocongo
-
-
marcy73
-
That's Nuts!!
- 10 months ago
-
marcy73
-
-
Pfailblog
-
Damn it! Now the price of walnuts is gonna go through the roof and now I might get shot trying to score some nuts.
- 10 months ago
-
Pfailblog
-
-
TrishR
-
Pfailblog:
Not to mention having to piss in a cup for some kangaroo drug court...
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
TrishR
-
Hmm, a product of a natural plant declared a drug...when have we ever seen that before?
Can you say Marijuana?
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
Pfailblog
-
TrishR:
Marijuana
- 10 months ago
-
Pfailblog
-
-
wizardofoz
-
TrishR:
Good One Trish! Can you say Vitamin C....The FDA tried to declare Vitamin C as a drug so it could be regulated....Glad that didn't happen.
- 10 months ago
-
wizardofoz
-
-
TrishR
-
wizardofoz:
Thanks, it was such an easy set-up.
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
TrishR
-
Pfailblog:
I knew you could.
- 10 months ago
-
TrishR
-
-
wizardofoz
-
God forbid that natural food could be healthy for you. No money in it.
- 10 months ago
-
wizardofoz
-
-
artemis6
-
wizardofoz:
Not for big pharma and the medical industry .....
- 10 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
bailey78
-
artemis6:
who's haten on you man? i see somebody is voted ya down a lot.
- 10 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
artemis6
-
bailey78:
Looks like i picked up a troll . That means i am doing good ! : ) They have yet to challenge me with debate . Down votes from such cowardly persons are a badge of honor . I have no idea who it is though . I have been flagged as well . so , if my comment here vanishes , you know what happened .
- 10 months ago
-
artemis6
