Community | August 04, 2011 | 30 comments

NO ORGANIC FOOD FOR YOU! The FDA along with LAPD raids a local organic market

Image
Pfailblog
The time for citizen arrests is now.

A combined force of feds and Los Angeles cops raided a private market in Venice California for the crime of selling raw milk and products made from raw organic milk. The owner of Rawsome Foods, James Stewart, was arrested and is being held on $123,000 bail. He will be charged with conspiracy to commit a crime.

Additional people arrested include Sharon Palmer of Healthy Family Farms who is currently in jail with bond set at $120,000. Palmer was featured in the documentary Farmageddon. Victoria Bloch, an L.A. county liaison for the Weston A. Price Foundation has also been arrested.

According to the government, selling healthy food is now the equivalent of selling marijuana and other drugs. In addition to raiding producers and retailers of raw milk, the federal government has indicated it will move against the sale of medical marijuana in California and a handful of other states.

Video here:

http://www.politicalfailblog.com/2011/08/no-organic-food-for-you-fda-along-with....
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Green,   Current Tonight,   14 more
  2. tags:
    Police State Organic FDA raw milk
  3.     
    |

30 comments // NO ORGANIC FOOD FOR YOU! The FDA along with LAPD raids a local organic market

  • Arnab_Sen_anthropology
  • Arnab_Sen_anthropology
  • bjdorsho
    • 0
      bjdorsho  
    • Isn't selling raw milk and raw milk derived products illegal? Then you shouldn't be surprised when you get raided. The whole cow shares and donation based milk supply are simply trying to skirt the laws. If you don't like the laws then work to change them, not break them, or as the lady in the video said, buy your own cow. Unfortunately the science is pretty clear that the public safety benefits of pasteurization greatly outweigh any perceived benefit of drinking raw milk.

    • 10 months ago
  • newmayamary
    • 0
      newmayamary  
    • btw, most of the milk sold in stores that is "pasteurized" come from cows fed antibiotics and hormones & milked by machines that bruise their teets to the point of bleeding. that's right, all that goes into "SAFE p[asteruized" milk.

    • 10 months ago
  • newmayamary
    • 0
      newmayamary  
    • outrageous... but it's ok for big agra biz to grow & sell GMO produce that wrecks havoc in our digestive systems... oh, that's right, Monsanto owns Congress!

    • 10 months ago
  • coolplanet
    • 0
      coolplanet  
    • In the good old days people had to become sick or die from food before the authorities closed them down.
      Ever since Shock & Awe (2003 in Iraq) preemptive policing now defines our homeland security.

    • 10 months ago
  • Warren_Merrill
    • +1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • Image
    • Regardless of the possibility they have healthy products, they broke the law repeatedly:

      Prosecutors in Los Angeles alleged that Stewart, 64, operates a Venice market called Rawesome Foods through which he illegally sold dairy products that did not meet health standards because they were unpasteurized or were produced at unlicensed facilities.

      Palmer, 51, has operated Healthy Family Farms in Santa Paula since 2007 without the required licensing for milk production, prosecutors allege. She and her company face nine charges related to the production of unpasteurized milk products.

      The arrests followed a one-year investigation during which undercover agents purchased unpasteurized dairy products from Healthy Family Farms stands in Los Angeles, Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, said Matthew Krasnowski, a district attorney spokesman. The products included unpasteurized goat milk, cheese and yogurt.

      http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-milk-raid-20110804,0,7791693.story

    • 10 months ago
  • Paratus
  • blaino
    • 0
      blaino  
    • Paratus:

      You bring up a fine point.

      unfortunately the public gave the government this power back during the early 1900's. See corporations were just as fucked up then as they are now, company's really didn't care what went into the food they were producing. And conditions were filthy disgusting, so people of the day got pissed and told on the corporations to the government and since then we have relied and those no good fucks over at the FDA to watch over our food for us.

      but since corporations have bought out the government, effectively what happened is these big business's have their own army to shut down the better alternative. giving them unchecked power, which just makes things so much uglier for us.

      moral, don't rely on a third party to take care of things for you because they will just fuck things up even worse..

    • 10 months ago
  • stupidamericanz
  • Nabe8
    • 0
      Nabe8  
    • Destruction of property is not listed on the official documents. Also, the seizure of produce was only permitted after testing of samples were done. These will hopefully be legal setbacks to the legality of the excessive action that was taken. However, the search warrant is clearly designed to utterly destroy this organic company beyond repair and to eliminate the local network that has sprung around it. The search warrant even allowed the confiscation of prescription bottles. They took over $4k in cash.

    • 10 months ago
  • lazloman
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • The folks at big pharm want us to be sick because they have a pill that will do something. Not cure but do something thats the whole deal. they don't want to cure what they can treat. They would lose money.

    • 10 months ago
  • mitekillem
    • +1
      mitekillem  
    • "If we are to be compelled to drink pasteurized milk, we should at least understand what pasteurization means. It set out to accomplish two things: Destruction of certain disease-carrying germs and the prevention of souring milk. These results are obtained by keeping the milk at a temperature of 145 degrees to 150 degrees F. for half an hour, at least, and then reducing the temperature to not more than 55 degrees F.

      It is undoubtedly beneficial to destroy dangerous germs, but pasteurization does more than this-it kills off harmless and useful germs alike, and by subjecting the milk to high temperatures, destroys some nutritious constituents.

      With regards to the prevention of souring; sour raw milk is very widely used. It is given to invalids, being easily digested, laxative in its properties, and not unpleasant to take. But, after pasteurization, the lactic acid bacilli are killed. The milk, in consequence, cannot become sour and quickly decomposes, while undesirable germs multiply very quickly."
      June 1938 - Armchair Science (a British Medical Journal)

    • 10 months ago
  • Sarah_Honea
    • +2
      Sarah_Honea  
    • More outbreaks of e.coli and food poisoning come from the establishment mass dairies and factory farms, Unless the whole story is put out here without bias it is just the FEDs at their old game: Intimidate, incriminate, incarcerate against their bribers competitors.

    • 10 months ago
  • Swisher
    • +3
      Swisher  
    • Let's not let hysteria get in the way of the facts. Raw milk is NOT illegal to sell in California, but you must be licensed to do so. You must allow inspections of your cattle, the prep areas, your equipment, your procedures. Rawesome had been on notice since June, 2010 but continued to operate without the above conditions. Why, you ask, should the Feds be involved in the sales between a local market and its willing customers? Should we have the right to buy and eat/drink products that may be dangerous because of the way they were stored/prepared? In my opinion, no. Would you feel comfortable if the FAA decided that aircraft safety inspections were no longer necessary? That a pilot didn't have to have a license if he didn't want to get one? Okay, you may feel that's not a fair analogy because the consumers of raw milk feel they're making a healthier choice. But is it fair to me that my insurance premiums go up because a group of people partake in a health risk? I guess if Rawesome also had a mandatory cooperative health plan for all its customers, I'd have no problem at all.

    • 10 months ago
  • Schnookums
    • +1
      Schnookums  
    • Producers selling their products to willing consumers without the interference of Government sounds like the stuff this country was founded on. The East India Company 300 years ago squashed or absorbed competition, and received special tax treatment and subsidies that unfairly (the colonists thought) put the one-family business operation at a significant disadvantage.

      This just appears to be the modern-day version of that.

    • 10 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • good_stuff
    • +1
      good_stuff  
    • The police/feds should be charged with excessive force, as what else can you call a raid of this sort?

      Also, although it is stupid, I feel like these stores should change their practice in how they "sell" their milk. Correct me if I'm wrong, but they can always give the milk away for free, right? Just sell a pack of gum for $8, and include a promotion for "free" raw milk for every purchase of that particular pack of gum. Or, maybe they could sell it as "prehemogenized" for home homogenization or something.

      Perhaps Big Ag has closed all possible loopholes, but I find that hard to beleive. Quite silly of the government to care about this crap considering the fact that you can buy hamburger meat and eat it raw all day long without anyone bothering you or the store that sells it.

    • 10 months ago
  • chew_chew
  • Schnookums
    • +2
      Schnookums  
    • chew_chew:

      They are concerned about disease transfer from animal to human. As long as safe practices are observed in the collection of the milk, there is little to be worried about.

      Disease outbreaks, when they occur, also tend to effect a smaller number of people when the distribution is local. Commercial operations which may have smaller numbers of incidents still tend to effect significantly more people, actually making them less safe statistically. Even still, the likelihood in both cases is small.

      To me, the risk is well worth it. I grew up on a farm and had bulk-tank milk everyday. It tastes nothing like pasteurized, homogenized, fortified, with the fat content removed, milk stored in plastic you get from a store. Aside from the taste, drinking pseudo-milk has the same effect on me as pouring Draino down a clogged kitchen sink.

    • 10 months ago
  • chew_chew
  • squarethecircle
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
    • +5
      COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM  
    • The FDA can't bust a dairy for having unlawful chemicals into milk, but they raid health food stores. Government is not concerned about the chemicals which industry and big AG puts in our foods, but on behalf of Monsanto and Big Dairy they're concerned about milk that doesn't come through the Big Chain system. How much money are FDA execs accepting to prosecute this war on the small dairyman?

    • 10 months ago
  • lordsbassman
  • Pfailblog
    • +3
      Pfailblog  
    • Is there like a different current site for the UK? The post here says it has 118 views, but according to my blog stats, there are over 200 visitors coming from this current link from the UK... Strange.

    • 10 months ago
  • figgdimension
  • Pfailblog
  • artemis6
  • bailey78
more from Community:

top videos