Community | August 04, 2011 | 49 comments

1% of US Americans earn nearly a quarter of the country's income and control an astonishing 40% of its wealth

Miguel_Teixeira
The richest 1% of US Americans earn nearly a quarter of the country's income and control an astonishing 40% of its wealth. Inequality in the US is more extreme than it's been in almost a century — and the gap between the super rich and the poor and middle class people has widened drastically over the last 30 years.

Meanwhile, in Washington, a bitter partisan debate over how to cut deficit spending and reduce the US' 14.3 trillion dollar debt is underway. As low and middle class wages stagnate and unemployment remains above 9%, Republicans and Democrats are tussling over whether to slash funding for the medical and retirement programs that are the backbone of the US's social safety net, and whether to raise taxes — or to cut them further.

The budget debate and the economy are the battleground on which the 2012 presidential election race will be fought. And the United States has never seemed so divided — both politically and economically.

How did the gap grow so wide, and so quickly? And how are the convictions, campaign contributions and charitable donations of the top 1% impacting the other 99% of Americans? Fault Lines investigates the gap between the rich and the rest.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Entertainment,   Politics,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Capitalism Class plutocracy Classes 3 more
  3.     
    |

49 comments // 1% of US Americans earn nearly a quarter of the country's income and control an astonishing 40% of its wealth // Video

  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • I believe your stats may be wrong, I am under the impression from reading varioius sources that less than 1% pays 46 % of taxes they also earn over 80% of all earnings. Those earnings would include bonuses, deferred income, stock options, etc... which in 99% of the time only 15% capital gains tax was paid. It should also be noted that those who derive their incomes in the millions where they can they take income as bonuses and capital gains so they do not have to pay income tax rates. Part of our huge tax problem. If I were you I go recheck your statisics. I assure you they are vastly underestimated. As a matter of fact, I know I'm right

    • 10 months ago
  • Jake_Leonard
    • +1
      Jake_Leonard  
    • Fantastic journalism work. Just added an RSS feed to my toolbar for Al Jazeera (something I should've done a long time ago).

      My only counterargument is with Obama's seeking campaign funding. To put it simply, one cannot invoke change without first playing by the rules of the game—especially in the system we've set up for ourselves. It is an unfortunate fact that candidates require more money than intelligence to lead this country. To be an idealist (and not sound like a hypocrite) in this struggle for power means almost certain defeat.

      It just makes it that much more difficult for us to separate the liars from those with good intentions.

    • 10 months ago
  • thedirtman
    • 0
      thedirtman  
    • Problem: American workers have been deserted while third world nations struggle to build safe infrastructures that provide drinking water, sanitation, and energy to homes.

      Solution: Increase taxes on wealth. The government needs to put people to work on science and technological research in order to recover a basic industry for America. Pay people what they are worth globally. No more hiring people to work without providing standards of health, safety, and environment in third world nations.

    • 10 months ago
  • DBF_SS
    • 0
      DBF_SS  
    • thedirtman:

      How would you enforce that? Would you make a decision to not hire people from poor countries? Would you penalize small foriegn businesses because they didn't have the ability to give their workers all of the things you mentioned? Would it be ok if that business owner fired a third of his workforce in order give those things to the other two thirds? What would you say to the third that just lost their jobs?

    • 10 months ago
  • thedirtman
    • 0
      thedirtman  
    • DBF_SS:

      Those are multi-national corporations (MNCs) that hire third-workers for pennies on the dollar. They are not small foreign businesses at all, although some may be foreign MNCs. Small foreign businesses are being strangled just like those in America. MNCs buyout and restrict the growth of entrepeneurships through unnecessary and unwanted government regulation. It's become so evil and encompassing that children cannot even make their own lemonade stands anymore.

      The task of penalizing MNCs for hiring workers and failing to provide health standards has to fall on organization, so the task begins with organizing nations and people across borders. It's going to be tough medicine, but its necessary.

      Would I make a decision to not hire people from poor countries? No. Not, if I were doing business within that country. Hire locally, think globally. But again, health standards belong to everyone. If one persons suffers from poor health due to lack of standards then we will all inevitably suffer from those same diseases.

      Would it be ok if that business owners fired a third of his workforce in order to give those things to other two thirds? That would be unnecessary. If you pay people enough they will be able to purchase the items they produce. This expands production and capital. That's how the economy truly works in capitalism. When incomes increase then tax revenues will increase (even without increasing rates). That money should be used for health and infrastructure in India, China and Indonesia. In America, Europe and parts of Asia, that revenue should be used to advance technology.

      What people lack more than anything at this time is vision. There is so much more that can be done if only we realized the benefits of clean and unlimited energy. With solar technology we could create an industry in which more demand produces lower energy costs because as production increases we could apply more efficient assembly processes - just like IT and the boom that was created and lasted throughout the 90's.

    • 10 months ago
  • DBF_SS
    • 0
      DBF_SS  
    • thedirtman:

      No, how capitalism works is you buy low and sell high. Most people look for the cheapest tee shirts on the shelf, which is why the textile industry in America has moved to Indonesia. Your health standards paragraph when broken down is nonsense. Don't you feel just a bit arrogent saying "People lack vision"? The implication being that you have the vision if only the unwashed masses would just let you lead them to the light. You are absolutely correct about tax revenues our problem is ~48% of Americans pay no income tax, and a good number of those actually get a tax return. Technology evolves at it own pace and that pace is getting ever faster. Coal fired electric plants are unbelievably more efficient than they were 50 years ago. But not because they were mandated to it was because the owners wanted to increase their profit margins.

    • 10 months ago
  • DBF_SS
    • 0
      DBF_SS  
    • OK, so there are some really wealthy people out there. If they worked hard and made a fortune good for them. I'm not the least bit envious.

    • 10 months ago
  • notrepublican
  • DBF_SS
  • thedirtman
  • thedirtman
  • DBF_SS
  • notrepublican
    • 0
      notrepublican  
    • DBF_SS:

      I believe scientists should be the highest paid members of society, in terms of personal spending money. If someone gets lucky and makes a billion dollars they should be able to reinvest most of the money within a certain time. Now they would just let it sit in a bank and earn interest. 19% of the top 1%'s wealth comes from actually working. Google: "income inequality" and look at some of the bizarre statistics yourself.

    • 10 months ago
  • DBF_SS
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • Excellent video even though it was hard to watch. Welcome to the second Gilded Age. The disconnect will remain until the reality bites these rich in the ass that all these millions they are making doesn't benefit the rest of the country. Only themselves.

    • 10 months ago
  • CalgarC
    • +2
      CalgarC  
    • unless the top 1% can take the 40% of wealth and build a bullet proof shelter the 99% of us will take over... and if the 99% of us are fighting the 1% of them, whos left to build the shelter hahahaha

    • 10 months ago
  • notrepublican
  • CalgarC
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • So what do you plan to do about this? Is the solution to take what some people have and spread it around or is the solution to work and have more income for yourself. I understand that everyone cannot be in the top 1%, if they were they would be the top 100% but in reading some posts here I am seeing solutions such as burning mansions, or blaming a group whose chief offense seems to be the desire to return to fiscal responsibility (the Tea Party). Frankly both are solutions that are rather ignorant and in the first case could be more than a little dangerous. Meanwhile our government has created an unConstitutional "Super Congress" to bypass more debate regarding legislation. Where is the outrage?

    • 10 months ago
  • notrepublican
    • 0
      notrepublican  
    • Paratus:

      The way the Tea Party wants to "return to fiscal responsibility" is what pisses people off. Many Tea Partiers in congress wanted to default, they seem to support policies that help the uber rich get richer, and their leaders are batshit crazy.
      Super Congress or no Super Congress our government does not seem to be working.

    • 10 months ago
  • Vic_Romano
  • Davey_Pants
    • 0
      Davey_Pants  
    • i think the more n more this fact is reported the more n more likely it will be that the angry redbloods of this country will finally turn their hate to the ultra rich and leading to a long and drawn-out (and modern) 'Bastille Decade.' Mansions being burned down/bombings etc, could totally see that.

    • 10 months ago
  • Frosty46
    • 0
      Frosty46  
    • Not to worry folks our glorious leaders are working on a solution to our problems--------America will soon have a horrific terrorist attack-----just guessing.

    • 10 months ago
  • harleyblueswoman
    • +3
      harleyblueswoman  
    • vote in some more republicans and see how bad it gets...........................we need to fight them where it hurts....dump these teabaggers and right wing nuts so the President doesnt have to beat his head against the wall everytime something needs to be done!!!!!!!!!! We could have already been on the road to better times if the 2010 election had gone differently but NO.....too many people voted Republican cause they lied their way into office and promised everyone jobs........which they have done absolutely nothing about....in fact they have done absolutely nothing period except make things worse with their greed!!!! Greed caused this and we are not going to get out of this mess till people wake up and quit voting these greedy morons into office!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think there must be a brain cell deficeit in people who just cant see this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 10 months ago
  • citizenKay
    • 0
      citizenKay  
    • @shengled: Don't ever give up. You did the right thing by furthering your education. You set a great example for your kids. Get out and beat the bushes every day until you find a job, and remember that we Americans have it better than 95% of the rest of the world. Involve yourself in your community and press for positive change that will strengthen the middle class. You are not alone.

    • 10 months ago
  • shengled
    • +3
      shengled  
    • This is a great story. Al Jazeera reports like we wish American TV and Journalism did. There is no inflammatory rhetoric..no bi-partisan slants, just the facts. Thanks for doing such a great job. Being one of the lower 90%, I am scared to death of graduating in this economy. My major being Construction Management, it is no wonder why I don't sleep well. I've apologized to my children for not being able to provide, at the very least, what my parents were able to afford me. It is very nerve racking to think that I waited so long to get an education that I wont be able to pay my financial aid back when I graduate. I feel as though I missed out on an opportunity, the last 20 years of my life really, because I had children early in my life and just barely being able to support myself and my children in the best of times. Now I am unemployed but getting good grades. I will not be able to afford Harvard or even UF. I will be getting my degree from a little known but affordable, just turned 4 year degree college. I see that the employed managers all have degrees from prestigious colleges with curriculum's that are much tougher than my own or have many years as top level managers. The name on the paper matters very much as the General Contractors will only be hiring the top students from the best schools. I don't blame them really. When you have your choice of picking from the top down rather than from the general pool of graduates, I don't think in this economy they will be looking for a recent 42 year old graduate with little experience at this level. But I push on...for the possibility of a better life for myself and my children who, unfortunately, will see little of my accomplishments because they will be adults by the time I earn my way up through the ranks and live humbly while paying back my student loans that will top $55,000 by the time I have completed my course work. Having made some bad decisions in my early 20's, I cant work in retail or even McDonald's as they will not hire someone with felonies. It has been a struggle to find work while in school, generally working for myself because, even thought the felonies are 20 years old, they are looked at as if they happened yesterday. I applaud places like California, who only look back 8 years by law. It seems as though I'm stuck in a plebeian class that will take an absolute miracle to emerge from.....and I push on

    • 10 months ago
  • Warren_Merrill
    • -1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • shengled:

      Where you attend college opens doors when you graduate. There isn't a rule that says you can't attend a lesser college and kick down the doors. After a few years of building your reputation what you accomplished becomes more important than where you went to college. Top grades are important. Colleges are handing out good grades like candy. Good luck!

    • 10 months ago
  • shengled
    • 0
      shengled  
    • Warren_Merrill:

      That's great to hear! I have noticed that the content of some of my classes seems to have gotten easier, like just showing up can get you a better grade. I feel slighted a little. I don't want to take classes that are "gimme's", The content seems more important than the easy A...with a respectable 3.25 gpa I'm sure I'll graduate with good grades as most of the harder classes are completed. I'm going to try to double major and give myself some more options but my school is limited on degrees atm. Thanks for the reassurance, I needed to hear that. Cheers

    • 10 months ago
  • hoosierdaddy
  • warman1138
    • +3
      warman1138  
    • The poor are screwed, the elderly and disabled are screwed, the average person lucky enough to have a job is screwed and everyone else is eating viagra like candy. Welcome to America, land of the many, owened by the few.

    • 10 months ago
  • mitekillem
    • +4
      mitekillem  
    • Until we reach our breaking point, it's only going to get worse.
      Send the Unemployed to DC all at once. And let them deal with Washington.
      At 9% Unemployment, that's est. 28,072,396. (based on population clock).

      28 Million are currently without jobs.
      I don't think it's because their lazy. I think it's because there's no jobs (outside of McDonalds).

    • 10 months ago
  • gfar713
  • bailey78
  • SoCalFramer
    • +6
      SoCalFramer  
    • This was produced by Al Jazeera, what a great story. This is what the foriegn media is showing it's viewers overseas. Our media has not picked up on the story yet, I wonder why? Oh I know the revolution will not be televised.

    • 10 months ago
  • telcod
  • CalgarC
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • telcod
  • Vierotchka
  • telcod
  • kvb1
  • remanns
  • telcod
  • remanns
  • remanns
  • telcod
    • +2
      telcod  
    • remanns:

      Look away Dixieland. Lookin for some common ground with the last bunch of brothers and sisters from the South who took on the heavy hand of the federal/corporate government. Rereading Patrick Henry. Options seem to be dwindling ain't they?

    • 10 months ago
  • bailey78
  • telcod
  • bailey78
more from Community:

top videos