Corporations have Hijacked Copyright Law, too !
-
-
- figgdimension
- added this
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/the_history_and_meaning_of_copyright_201108...
Posted on Aug 31, 2011
C.G.P. Grey
Copyright originated in early 1700s England as a contract between authors and society, “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times [28 years] to Authors … the exclusive right to their respective Writings.” After that point, the public was free to mix, remake and build upon an author’s creative idea. In short, to evolve culture.
For a time, that scheme functioned well for members of the art-making and -appreciating public on both sides of the Atlantic, including Walt Disney, who built his animation empire with stories that had entered the public domain. But then, corporations seeking greater profits lobbied for the extension of copyright life far beyond the original length of three decades, and cultural evolution was stymied for their financial benefit.
As C.G.P. Grey, author of the video below argues: “This near-infinite control subverts the whole purpose of copyright which is to promote the creation of more books and movies, not to give companies the power to stop people making new creative works based on the efforts of their long-dead founders. New directors and authors need the freedom to take what came before to remake and remix. And they should be able to use creative material from their own lifetimes to do so, not just be limited to the work of previous generations. —ARK
Posted on Aug 31, 2011
C.G.P. Grey
Copyright originated in early 1700s England as a contract between authors and society, “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times [28 years] to Authors … the exclusive right to their respective Writings.” After that point, the public was free to mix, remake and build upon an author’s creative idea. In short, to evolve culture.
For a time, that scheme functioned well for members of the art-making and -appreciating public on both sides of the Atlantic, including Walt Disney, who built his animation empire with stories that had entered the public domain. But then, corporations seeking greater profits lobbied for the extension of copyright life far beyond the original length of three decades, and cultural evolution was stymied for their financial benefit.
As C.G.P. Grey, author of the video below argues: “This near-infinite control subverts the whole purpose of copyright which is to promote the creation of more books and movies, not to give companies the power to stop people making new creative works based on the efforts of their long-dead founders. New directors and authors need the freedom to take what came before to remake and remix. And they should be able to use creative material from their own lifetimes to do so, not just be limited to the work of previous generations. —ARK
-
- groups:
- Community, Art and Style, WTF, Current Tonight, 10 more
-
- tags:
- Corporations, Artists, Writers, Copyright Laws
-
-
inge4art
-
Totally agree with you figgdimension.
- 9 months ago
-
inge4art
-
-
figgdimension
-

-
copyrights do not protect artists limited ones do so other artists can create thats the point to protect art and culture it has been wrongly perverted as many other long held beliefs and institutions
- 9 months ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
figgdimension
-

-
you do not own us!!!! or our art!!!!!
- 9 months ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
figgdimension
-
douche bags have stifled art & culture toooooooooo long we are taking back our licenses and corporate charters and all things owned by those long dead
- 9 months ago
-
figgdimension