Nothing about 9/11 is funny. There are too many facts to disprove the deception. We just can't fathom that we could be so duped and it makes us mad that anyone would suggest it possible. Sorry for our egos, but look into it if you think it's bunk.

Theres a flaw in your "logic" if the government was willing to do this they would have no qualms about landing those planes in some air base and just gassing or shooting the passengers.
There are so many holes in the 9/11 official story heres just a few:
An AA pilot has said that the plane numbers for the 9/11 planes were not even scheduled to fly that day, and most are still listed as in service! And he personally tracked down I think 3 of them and they were still flying years later!
Transportation sec Mineta testifed he witnessed Cheney give stand down order repeatedly to prevent interception of planes!
Analysis of the ground zero dust turns up nano thermite particles at the time this was only found in a gov lab at los alamos where it was created.
The weekend before the Towers power and security cameras were shut off for hours for first time in their history while many "workers" installed allot of "cable" throughout the buildings....

these are just a few facts look into to it for yourself is you dont believe me before you just comment that its not true.

Where the real plane and passengers ended up is a piece of slight of hand that is beyond my ability to answer, but one thing I can say with total conviction is; 1, No airplne crashed in Shanksville, and,2, whatever hit the Pentagon was not an airplane! I had seen a while back that on at least one of the planes,all of the registered passengers were Raytheon employees.
Raytheon is one of the biggest military contractors in the world. Just one more in a blizzard of 9/11 coincidences?

the movie "In Plane Sight" is excellent, though it certainly brings up more questios than it answers

To just crash the planes would involve too many variables that could not be controlled.There is always the slim chance that someone might survive, or the remote control equipment might be found in the wreckage, just to to name two. No, this had to be very tightly controlled. If you control the media, then you can control the story. They couldn't have any heros surviving to contradict the official lie.
And the lie has to be repeated over and over by the familiar faces on our TV sets. 19 Arab hijackers, boxcutters, Al Quida- Al Quida- Al Quida!
No matter how much evidence is presented, you never back away from the BIG LIE!

Well,David ,you answered one of my questions. You are just trolling . If you have to ask what evidence I have of the Pentagon missile, it shows me that you haven't even bothered to look at the mountain of evidence on the web. I'm not going to respond to any of your comments any more, because it's clear that you are only here as an agent provocatuer.
Good Bye!

actually the documentary that you are referring to that shows plane parts was created and release just last year 9 years after 9/11, why did this take so long? It sure was plenty of time to make fake videos.

Heres the facts about the pentagon explosion:

Not a single human being witnessed anything hit the pentagon!
All videos in the area do not show a large plane or anything for that matter
All expert pilots agree not even the best pilots in the world could fly a plane that size that low to the ground for that distance its impossible
To do what they claim it would have knocked over many street lights and security cams
The initial hole in the building is too small and shows no damage where wings with engines on them would have hit.

The list goes on and on

The pentagon hit was most likely a cruise missile
The planes were most likely military and controlled remotely
This is not far fetched for many reasons photo analysis shows the planes are irregular to the commercial ones and what is not talked about is the fact you can verify online that there were actually several military exercises going on that day including one simulating the flying planes into the WTC!
A timeline has been worked out into a plausible theory that all the "hijacked" planes could have been rerouted to one airfield passengers told a story about safety etc, then they were transfered to one plane and flown off to who knows where. The more you look into it the more incredible things there are to find.

Actually there is nothing "loony" in healthy skepticism and looking into proven facts like that fact that Cheney order the interceptors to stand down............

Really a bunch of arabs pulling this off is more likely than the biggest military and intelligence agencies in the world?

Here's a big question to ask in all the history of terrorist operations have you ever heard of one that only pulled off the one biggest attack in history and did very little before or since that isnt even terrorism, terrorism is keeping up many attacks for years so that your opponent is always afraid that anything could happen at any moment and who has done that in the last 10 years? ..... oh wait i know the Bush administration and Homeland Security with its constant threat levels etc.... hmmmmm

The name of the documentary is "9/11: In Plane Site"
info contained in the video has been "debunked", yet this debunking has ALSO been debunked
try googling it - lots of articles worth reading

Heh.. you mean just about like the amount of time they spent investigating the background and qualifications of our current commander and thief?.. roflmfao

What a pity you waste so much oxygen others could use!

I knew it! - - Headline News..! - - Extra, extra, read all about it!.. "Liberal progressives brain dead from oxygen deprivation!"

CHA - CHING!!!

Are you one of those paid trolls that I heard about, or are you one of the half dozen people that truly believe the BIG LIE?
Bet you still think L.H. Oswald shot Kennedy. (hint; if you answer yes, you are not qualified to continue commenting here or ay place else).

Contest my pov if you will, but ad hominem adds nothing to yours..!
... btw, are you a 'truther'?

That was not an attack on you. It was a qualifying question. BTW, I noticed you didn't answer it.
If by "truther" you mean do I seek truth in an ocean of lies and disinformation. Uncatagorically,YES!

No... I do not believe it was Oswald who actually killed Kennedy, he may have been guilty of pulling a trigger... whether it was from his weapon or not, there was a purpose for the murder of Kennedy... and not a random act of madness, imho.