Community | September 09, 2011 | 166 comments

Real Shared Sacrifice: It’s Time For Churches To Pay Taxes

Image
moodyblue
http://www.politicususa.com/en/churches-taxes

"For the past two years, there has been a fair amount of talk concerning shared sacrifice. In theory it is a reasonable concept, but in practice it is non-existent. Republicans think it is reasonable for 98% of the population to share the sacrifice so the wealthiest 2% can avoid sacrificing anything. However, there is another class of Americans who avoid sharing or sacrificing and it is high-time they start contributing to America and stop living off the government dole. As more Americans are telling the government to increase taxes on corporations and their wealthy owners to pay down the deficit, create jobs, and rebuild America’s struggling economy, a silent cult of welfare recipients escapes the public’s ire regarding shared sacrifice.

Americans are complaining that the wealthy and corporations pay too little in taxes, but at least they pay something. The religious community though, is paying nothing and it is time they start contributing to their community, state, and Federal governments for the resources they consume and damage they have wrought on this country. It is finally the time to eliminate the tax-exempt, non-profit status of every church in America whether it is the vile Southern Baptist Convention affiliates, Islamic Mosques, Jewish Tabernacles or Buddhist monasteries. At the same time, the tax code must be revised to eliminate the double-dipping statutes that allow the clergy to avoid paying the same rate of income tax as the rest of the American population. Religion has taken welfare from the American people long enough and with communities laying off fire fighters, police officers, and school teachers while struggling to make ends meet, churches of every denomination are enjoying government entitlements working Americans never receive.

There is absolutely no valid reason to give churches tax-exempt status; in fact it is unconstitutional. Religious fanatics and normal people alike give myriad reasons for why churches should not pay property tax or income tax, but they are all based on the belief that religious people are special and deserve taxpayers’ largesse. Many Americans say that churches and the clergy are doing god’s work and warrant special privileges. If they are doing god’s work, then let god give them welfare now or make them wait till they die and go wherever they think they’re going for their reward. There are other Americans who claim Christian churches deserve welfare because they are doing good work in their communities. Nurses, teachers, fire-fighters, and police officers really do good work in their communities but they are not exempt from paying their fair share in taxes."

More at link.

-----------------------------------------------------

This seems obvious to me. Why should churches be tax exempt?I've seen churches that cost millions of dollars.. easily, millions of dollars to build, and they dont pay taxes?
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Humanism
  2. tags:
    Religion Taxes Church
  3. recommended by:
    unimatrix0
  4.     
    |

166 comments // Real Shared Sacrifice: It’s Time For Churches To Pay Taxes

  • OlBlue
  • DanCastro
    • 0
      DanCastro  
    • Man, the firestorm over this will come at the perfect time, as we begin to see the impact of "the church" on the Presidential candidates that the right is running! Can we get the Supremes to rule on this? Now that would be the final irony! ;-)

    • 9 months ago
  • TheAmbivalante
    • 0
      TheAmbivalante  
    • I agree. Fuck 'em. Right wingers might say that many churches will have to shut down their many grade schools and community services. I say that if they produced anything but delusional (there's a magic man in the sky and you will burn in hell for being bad) kids, they could maintain their tax exempt status. As it is right now, they are exclusionary and doctrinaire.

      The right wing hates public schools and claims they are failing which is of course a lie, built by starving them of funding.

      What's more, religious institutions receive tax dollars. As beneficiaries of state welfare, they should be tested as rigorously as say, welfare recipients. How about means and drug testing priests and churches and other cults. Why not? After all, we allow right wingers to arbitrarily impose that kind of garbage on people who are on the edge of homelessness for no other reason than some fucknut right winger manufactured a story about someone who "makes money" from Welfare by having children.

      How about Cap & Trade for religious lies? Every time you they say "life begins at conception," they pay. Every time you hear "Jesus is the son of God," they pay. Every time they tell a kid, "You'll go to hell if..." they pay. Every time a priest manipulates a child, they pay.

      Think of all the money that could go to actually helping people instead of an institution. High schools have campuses that some colleges would envy. High schools. And of course, they're private and religious. How about the half a million that went to the football field gets cut in half so some kid whose parents are broke can have a meal instead? Poverty, Chastity and Obedience where have you gone?

    • 9 months ago
  • DBF_SS
  • jim_b
  • DBF_SS
  • David_H
  • TheAmbivalante
  • jim_b
  • David_H
  • crabbyoldguy
  • wally60
  • jonlemnh
  • OlBlue
  • BRAVATRAVELS
  • OlBlue
  • alexandrek
  • OlBlue
  • callenstewart
    • +1
      callenstewart  
    • Maybe they should be required to report the financial value of the community service and balance it to the taxes they would otherwise pay to the government.

    • 9 months ago
  • ampersand
    • +5
      ampersand  
    • If you send me five dollars I'll promise to save you from hell in the afterlife.
      ---a solemn message from The First Church of Ampersand....

    • 9 months ago
  • crabbyoldguy
  • ampersand
  • ThirdSection
  • ampersand
  • Wyley_Wombat
  • crabbyoldguy
  • ThirdSection
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • ThirdSection:

      Oh, my dear you have strayed from the ONE TRUE FAITH.
      REPENT SINNER!
      Send $29.95 now to Our Lady Of Perpetual Motion Ministries
      c/o Father Gladhand and we will save you.
      Last chance to avoid the fires of eternal damnation and receive our special faux gold medallion depicting the Flaming Passion of St. Bruce.

    • 9 months ago
  • ThirdSection
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • ThirdSection:

      I have spoken to the Council of Elders and they have seen the wisdom of elevating you to the position of Theocratic Magi First Class in charge of developing New Mysteries of Belief.
      This position comes with a fully functional Leather Goddess communicator console.
      Congratulations, ThirdSection!

    • 9 months ago
  • mickyjon420
  • ThirdSection
  • ampersand
  • mickyjon420
  • jim_b
  • OlBlue
  • TanzaniteDiamonds
  • OlBlue
  • TanzaniteDiamonds
  • OlBlue
  • crabbyoldguy
    • +1
      crabbyoldguy  
    • IMO the fallout of revolking the churches tax exempt status would open all organizations for revocation. So what might start out as a crusade to get the churches to pay taxes might turn into the gutting of the exempt NGOs and you have to admit NGOs, and their founders, do some creative things with their money.

    • 9 months ago
  • CalgarC
  • elbie
    • +1
      elbie  
    • taking out the religious message of the church...they are still charitable organizations that help their communities a lot. Removing their non-profit status would take away funds that could otherwise be used for this.

      And if you don't think churches help their communities at all, take a look at the wildfires that are currently happening in Texas: many churches there are serving as donation sites, helping to feed firefighters, and serving as shelters for evacuees, as well as recruiting volunteers. Without their help, the situation of the wildfires would be much worse.

      While I am not a church attendee, my parents' church has done many missions volunteering at food banks, helping fix up people's houses that otherwise would not be able to afford the repairs, housing homeless people, and much more.

      Therefore, while I disagree with the message of many churches, I do believe that, until there are enough charitable organizations to take their place, they serve a vital role as a non-profit in their communities.

    • 9 months ago
  • jonlemnh
  • maasanova
    • +1
      maasanova  
    • The whole idea of "seperation of church and state" ends with the 501-C3 tax exempt status, and if you don't think that some of these mega churces aren't giving a cut to the government in some way, or aren't involved in some illegal activity of which the federal government turns a blind eye, you're just a fool.

      The 501-C3 tax exempt status is to require that religious institutions follow certain federal guidelines, but I see that this is all lost on this article.

      In other words, it's like a bribe from the government to make sure that churches aren't saying, teaching or doing anything that the federal government does not agree with, such as preaching unapproved religious doctrines or organizing an unapproved state militia.

      One might even argue that the state (the Federal government) has a lot more to lose by RENEGING on their CONTRACT and forcing churches to pay taxes.

    • 9 months ago
  • budsnews
  • moodyblue
    • +3
      moodyblue  
    • Great comments everyone.

      Lets look at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints..from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finances_of_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-da...

      When the LDS church takes in more donations than it pays out in period expenses, it uses the surplus to build a reserve for capital expenditures and for future years when period expenses may exceed donations

      The LDS church has not publicly disclosed its financial statements in the United States since 1959.

      In a June 2011 cover story, Newsweek magazine stated that the LDS church "resembles a sanctified multinational corporation—the General Electric of American religion, with global ambitions and an estimated net worth of $30 billion

      The LDS church uses most of its financial resources to construct and maintain buildings and other facilities

      That is just one of the mega churches.. These are not churches helping the little old lady down the street pay her light bill. This is a business. Period. They should be paying taxes.

    • 9 months ago
  • danitassin
    • 0
      danitassin  
    • moodyblue:

      In Colorado, they're called Focus on the Family. They have a huge multi-million dollar facility in Colorado Springs. The goers are malicious, hate spewing, horrible excuses for human beings.

    • 9 months ago
  • alexandrek
  • DBF_SS
    • 0
      DBF_SS  
    • alexandrek:

      Religion should be banned? Anything else in the bill of rights you want to trample on? How about freedom of speech, morons and imbicles shouldn't be allowed to tallk.

      What an idiot.

    • 9 months ago
  • alexandrek
  • DBF_SS
    • 0
      DBF_SS  
    • alexandrek:

      The constitution IS trampled everyday. By people like you who excuse their damage by saying "everyone else does it".

      What is it to you if people believe in God, or Jesus, or Scientology, or little green men from outer space. Who are you to say that any one of them is wrong and even if they are wrong so what.

      The Christian faith tells its members to provide witness to Gods works, which is no big deal to me because I can change the channel. Islam says convert or die, which is somewhat more problemmatic...

      The biggest item for for the 2012 election will be the national debt and the uncontrolled growth of the government. Not religion.

    • 9 months ago
  • percipi224
    • +2
      percipi224  
    • it is worse than that. mega churches preach hatred and fear and people give their money to them by the ton, but if a preacher suddenly (like in Tulsa) starts to preach love...he loses his mega church. hypocrites all. they also get "faith based" funding for counseling, which has decimated mental health clinics and taken jobs from trained psychologists and social workers. did you know that the compound in texas built by Warren Jeffs (only one of many) was built because of "faith based" dollars and govornment contracts. freedom of religion is like free market, free to abuse and screw is all that means. they all do it. I have watched in disgust as at least three church groups with faith money have come to our town, gotten donations, used it for their own greed, and then left town owing rent and bills. grifters that is all. I have yet to see any church do any damn good whatsoever, there is always a price to pay for their presence and so called help. just like the military industrial complex waving a damn flag the church invokes jesus in answer to any criticism. then meld the two and sprinkle it with freidmanism and what have you got?? a monster devouring our planet and crushing all of us.

    • 9 months ago
  • danitassin
    • +1
      danitassin  
    • I agree that everyone should pay into the system. However, I don't think whining about how "it's not fair, I pay more than you" is going to help anything. It just makes us all look like children. The best way to get people to change is to lead by example. How you do that is up to you. I will continue to pay my own taxes and encourage others to do the same.

    • 9 months ago
  • kvb1
    • -1
      kvb1  
    • We have a tendency in this country to attack the symptoms rather than the problems itself. Taxing churches would violate the not only the letter of the law in the Constitution, but also the spirit of the law. Religious freedom is a founding principle of this country.

      I agree, with the intent of the Shared Sacrifice theme here. Many of these mega-churches spend millions to build their luxurious church any of which also have video production facilities included, and the Catholic church is close to, if not the single largest landowner in the country. Many of these churches have missionary services that go all over the world.

      So maybe the problem is not in taxing the church, but rather in how and where they are spending their money. Mega churches should have their books audited randomly every 3 years. The same would go for these pastors that set the churches up, especially when they are dressed in $1000 suits and wearing enough bling to make a rapper choke. After all of the sex scandals in the Catholic church, their books should be audited as well. Any preacher that makes comments from the pulpit that says anything other than you should vote on election day should be investigated, and they should loose their tax exempt status if it is found that they made multiple comments on politics.

      If the state has to keep out of religion, religion must keep out of politics or loose their tax exempt status. The these preachers could say what they want.

    • 9 months ago
  • jim_b
    • 0
      jim_b  
    • kvb1:

      What does the constitution say about about political organizations hiding under the guise of "church " to maintain tax exempt status and launder money?

    • 9 months ago
  • sffsmessiah
    • -1
      sffsmessiah  
    • This is an absolutely terrible idea. Separation between Church and State does not just mean the State is Independent of the Church. The activities of the Church SHOULD NOT be regulated by the STATE. 501(C)3's are tax-deductible--that includes churches. Should everything you donate be taxed?

    • 9 months ago
  • Frosty46
    • +3
      Frosty46  
    • The Catholic Church will fight this very hard, they are the number one landowner on the planet. The Evangelical's run a close second and are well known for their stinginess. Yes multimillion dollar churches are a blasphemy according to their own teachings. But I'm sure they all have developed many foolproof excuses for their greed and avarice. Golden candle sticks for the poor?

    • 9 months ago
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • 0
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • Frosty46:

      When you fly into Wash DC in the morning on of the things you can't miss is the gold leaf coated roof of the Mormon Temple. The church of Rome may be the richest church but the Morini's are not far behind.

    • 9 months ago
  • LiberalSaviour
  • crabbyoldguy
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • LiberalSaviour:

      I just posted this , kind of religion i can deal with ! It is the ancient old tyme religion . The ancient ruins of lingam and yoni are all over the world ..... legalize prostitution and create jobs ! Yes , and tax and regulate it too . Better to be safe .

    • 9 months ago
  • jpvt
    • +6
      jpvt  
    • A million time YES!!! Religious institutions are always sticking their noses in politics anyway. When you look at the land they own and the money they take it is absolutely insane that they are not taxed. Growing up my neighbors ran a fundamentalist church. They had everything: a full playground (like at a public park) in their backyard, a giant satellite dish (this was the 80s), two new cars every year, a school bus for the church, they built several additions on to their house, and built a garage that was larger than most of the other houses on the block. They were total creeps, and they clearly were taking money from church donations and funding their lavish lifestyle, not paying taxes on it the whole time.

      Several years later I worked at a bank and there was a church across the street from it that was one of the bank's customers. Every week someone from the church would show up with a sack full of money--thousands of dollars--so much that it would about 20 minuets to count it all. This happened every single week I worked there! It makes me sick that these "holy" people scam insecure people out of their money and don't have to pay a nickle in taxes.

    • 9 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
  • letsliveinpeace
  • Richard_Wyatt
  • ampersand
    • +4
      ampersand  
    • Churches and fake "ministries" of all kinds are huge businesses.
      Congressional investigations of blatant fraud and abuse by these Rolex-clad con men are purposefully dead-ended by the equally corrupt Congressmen who depend on the delivery of that block of brain-dead voters.
      There is no reason in the modern world that exempts religious businesses from taxation.
      If they can prove actual charitable works in a quantitative way, fine.
      If not, tax the hell out of them.

    • 9 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
  • Sparky2U
  • GENERALNATTY
    • +5
      GENERALNATTY  
    • I believe the u.s should follow the canadian system and treat churches as charities which have to provide 90 percent of its income to charitable works, that would eliminate people getting into the religious business to get paid, eliminate most corruption within the institutions themselves surrounding money.

      I think there should be reshaped guidelines for church businesses who sell special items like holy water and other special religious items on their broadcasts to allow the that stuff to be a taxed depending on cost/profit ratio, if they are offering items for little or nothing profit then their should be no tax.

      I am against any government reaching to a church or a bloody buddhist monastery and saying "pay up" its just sleezy the donations the church recieves from its patrons are not just income, they are donations and expression of the people who are religious to express their devotion and freedom of religion through charity.

      I believe that the minute the public system starts allocating church income for its own use that many of the arguement's held by certain atheists and agnostics about where they want their money to go and what it can and cannot be spent on goes out the window.

      How do you successfully argue that its against the law to have public funds to be used to restore a religious monument when your tax system takes in millions from those institutions?

      As for churches being political, i think as long as it is limited it is alright, people from those institutions have the right to help shape the society they live in and to maintain their religious freedoms and way of life.

    • 9 months ago
  • Kitten_of_D00M
    • +3
      Kitten_of_D00M  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      Excellent post. I'm in favor of churches paying taxes, but your remarks about the intentions of the congregation regarding their donations really struck a chord. As long as the funds are used just for charitable causes, I could see allowing the income tax exemption to stand, but they would need to pay property and sales taxes like everybody else. The problem is that churches cannot be trusted to stay out of politics. And they MUST stay out of politics because they cannot be trusted not to try to legislate their religious beliefs. Ohio's Evangelicals wield a grossly disproportionate political power for their demographic.

      People who do not ascribe to a particular religion don't have the centuries-old tradition of the Sunday meeting and its attendant collection plate. It's not enough to say "Ok, go form your own groups!", because the rest of us don't have what is essentially a culturally entrenched captive audience. People who go to church will do so every week, whether there is an election or not. They are sitting ducks, waiting for their votes and pocketbooks to be plucked, and they dutifully follow the instructions of their minister, voting for the candidate he has deemed most God-fearing.

    • 9 months ago
  • GENERALNATTY
    • +1
      GENERALNATTY  
    • Kitten_of_D00M:

      Much of church property is in prime real estate areas and are worth millions that assessed tax amount would be astronomical some as much as 30k-100k nevermind cathedral's and we haven't even gotten into megachurches as yet. Anytime a old neighbourhood starts too get revamped and property value shoots through the roof a church has to go to its congregation and tell them we need a extra 200 thousand to pay property taxes? no i reject that notion. If a man goes to church he should not have to give what he does not have to just to keep his religious institution afloat.

      It would be similar to what is happening to small farmers across north america, where the property taxes are so expensive even though they run a business that the profits are becoming so slim, it forces many too close down all it takes is a drought a bad crop and your screwed. A church during a down economy would be in a similar situation if people don't have anything to give how can they stay open, a parishioner should always act to give out of charity not out of obligation, you give what you can, a dollar or 20 dollars a church should not be about money.

      Its a lose/lose situation and heres why if you force churches to pay that kind of taxes then you ultimately force them to become businesses to stay afloat because they can't possibly take all the money they need from their congregation especially if you have them giving 90 percent of their money to charitable works.

      You would force churches to close and therefore congregations would have to be "merged" with other congregations of these new church corporations, these new church corporations are considered "people" and therefore have full rights to involve themselves in politics without restriction.

      After selling billions of dollars of property these new church corporations will have a larger than life fund to wage their political war with, and they will wage that war after being marginalized by the left, and thousands of churches with pastors reverends and deacons you would have never ever even heard of because their congregations were just 60-100 people and that were not politically on the right would be put together into megachurch after mega-church.

      If implemented the democrats will politically lose a crippling amount of their own base, the entire african-american leadership is mostly made up of religious men shutting down churches in harlem because the parishioners cannot afford to keep the church going, its enough to get a large amount of the black vote on the other side of the aisle and the latino vote as well.

      Fox News would be on TV saying, what if Martin luther king was barred from getting involved in politics because he was a reverend? and they would be right.

      You would be handing the tea party a buffet, many people who would otherwise never vote republican or independent value their religious beliefs above all else will be in there voting against anything that looks remotely liberal.

      Overall politically most church denominations are quiet on politics, we really don't see much involvement outside evangelists these days, but taxing the churches is going to be like a political pearl harbour not only would you have awoke a sleeping giant they will come back vengeful and more fundamentalist than ever.

    • 9 months ago
  • Stoneyroad
    • +4
      Stoneyroad  
    • (my unfinished poem comparing the church to the mob)
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

      Organized Religion & Organized Crime
      they've both been around for quite a long time

      You may not have noticed - but they're somewhat the same
      commandments to follow - and hell to pay

      The Godfather is the Pope - the Cardinal a Made Man
      while the Priests and Enforcers spread their Gospel through the land

      Weather it's the Ring on their Finger - or the Collar around their Neck,
      it's the same message they are sending - a demand for respect
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

      after reading this post - i'll have to work in something about tax exempt status and how Al Copone was only busted on tax evasion & maybe suggest that organized religion could be charged with violating the RICO statute.
      they clearly are running a Racket!

    • 9 months ago
  • JohnA
  • zeropiate
    • -3
      zeropiate  
    • Ah yes, the often promoted Statist tactic of marginalizing religious entities under the guise of "fairness" through tax reform. Unfortunately, that essentially means handing the state the power to leverage authority over institutions that may be contrary to their agenda, all in the name of "progress." Fortunately, this has historically been shown to fail disastrously and ironically shown to be the "totalitarian" power grab that it is. Just another case of same shit, different era.

    • 9 months ago
  • grammabet
  • Georgia_Jim
  • GRC54
    • +2
      GRC54  
    • I don't know about anyone else but have you ever heard about a church that is broke?
      Look at the churches and see how much they have as the people donate to them like they are giving out candy for free.
      If you want to be rich person then I suggest you start your own religion and have the followers build the church and pay you to run it cause government will not tax your church and they will give you a special tax rate.

    • 9 months ago
  • Paratus
  • mrtraffic
  • Sparky2U
  • ampersand
  • Frosty46
  • mrtraffic
  • alexandrek
  • Paratus
    • -3
      Paratus  
    • ampersand:

      No, no idea at all. I have worked for two, audited them while in public accounting, kept the books for several more, produced the financial sttements for them and completed the 990. NO, I really don't know anything at all about them.
      You are just another fool who thinks they know it all because you are some liberal but actually know nothing about anything including me. So now that you have proven yourself to be just ignorant and lazy in all respects I suggest that you keep your mouth shut about things you know noting about so that you may merely appear a fool rather opening it and erasing all doubt that you are, in fact, a complete fool.

    • 9 months ago
  • Paratus
    • -2
      Paratus  
    • ampersand:

      No, no idea at all. I have worked for two, audited them while in public accounting, kept the books for several more, produced the financial sttements for them and completed the 990. NO, I really don't know anything at all about them.
      You are just another fool who thinks they know it all because you are some liberal but actually know nothing about anything including me. So now that you have proven yourself to be just ignorant and lazy in all respects I suggest that you keep your mouth shut about things you know noting about so that you may merely appear a fool rather opening it and erasing all doubt that you are, in fact, a complete fool.

    • 9 months ago
  • Paratus
  • Paratus
  • ampersand
    • +1
      ampersand  
    • Paratus:

      You cite experience with filing forms for non-profits yet you decry salaries paid by legitimate non-profits as making them non-exempt.
      It's still obvious you are unclear on the concept.
      Your attempt at misdirection is a perfect example of why it's pointless to engage with someone who is purposefully and willfully ignorant.
      Next you'll tell me that God told you so.

    • 9 months ago
  • alexandrek
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • ampersand:

      You are the one who brought up the fact that I know nothing about what not for profit means. I have forgotten more about C3's than you will ever know so don't try to escape your ignorance. Actually not for profit does not mean they operate without trying or without the intention of making a profit. The description refers to their mission and the intent of the corp. Stop trying to appear as though you know anything when all you have done it two posts is try to accuse me of misdirection when you have yet to illustrate that you know anything on the subject. This is classic. Nothing in your posts tells me you know what you are talking about yet you try to appear an authority by insulting. Typical misdirection on your part and a much used tactic when people like yourself want to appear relevant yet are so, so moronic. I don't know why I even respond to such b.s. and lies. I don't even have to prove you a fool, you have done that all by yourself by your wording.

    • 9 months ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • alexandrek:

      Nice try, but no cigar. Your idiot friend ampersand wanted to make hay out of this but couldn't make a go of it. Next time you fools want to tell someone they know nothing on a subject you may want to find out the truth. It will keep you from being embarrassed and be a new experience for you.

    • 9 months ago
  • ampersand
  • ThirdSection
    • +3
      ThirdSection  
    • Supposing there were a wall of separation between church and state (just humor me, okay). Does this mean my tax dollars would still have to subsidize the churches' tax-exempt status?

    • 9 months ago
  • Oba_min_ation
  • Paratus
  • ThirdSection
  • ThirdSection
  • Frosty46
1 - 100 of 166
more from Community:

top videos