Community | September 13, 2011 | 17 comments

A Raging Case of Bailout Fatigue

Image
Schnookums
I’ve used the term “outrage fatigue” on numerous occasions as a way of explaining why there has been such a muted outcry from the general population, as the tally of financial atrocities committed against American citizens has exploded.

August 22 was just another average day with another average headline that could easily have been ripped from some radical economic watchdog website (liberal or conservative, either one): Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion from Fed.

But the line wasn’t the work of someone out there on the anti-capitalist or anti-government fringe. It was attached to an article from the very mainstream Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg has been engaged in a long, frustrating FOIA litigation battle with the Federal Reserve over that entity’s reluctance publicly to reveal what it has been doing with our money. Slowly, the stone wall has been coming down. And looking at what’s behind it, it’s pretty obvious why the Fed would have preferred to keep its deeds locked away from all prying eyes.

Thus the above headline. And here’s an ugly truth that goes along with it: It’s a near certainty that the vast majority of those who saw it — probably not too many in number, since the story got scant coverage on the network news — said to themselves, Yeah, we already knew that. Ho hum.

Call it “bailout fatigue.”

Because, guess what? This is not a recycled story from last year. This is news that we didn’t know before the 22nd of just last month!

This money is not a part of the $16.1 trillion in emergency loans the Fed handed to US and foreign financial institutions between Dec. 1, 2007 and July 21, 2010, according to figures produced by the first-ever, one-time-only GAO audit of the central bank ordered by Dodd-Frank. Nor is it part of the $2 trillion quantitative easing program. Nor is TARP’s $700 billion in there, either.

Read that again. This $1.2 trillion — and perhaps we also have trillion fatigue, because that’s a lot of money — is separate from all that other stuff. It’s another hitherto secret funding program that we never would have heard of if Bloomberg hadn’t torn it from the Fed’s mouth like a rotten tooth........



Read on at:
http://dailyreckoning.com/a-raging-case-of-bailout-fatigue/#ixzz1XqizSzKi
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Business News & Analysis
  2. tags:
    Bailout Banks Federal Reserve
  3.     
    |

17 comments // A Raging Case of Bailout Fatigue

  • letsliveinpeace
  • wolfess
    • +3
      wolfess  
    • I suggested this the first time I heard that the fed had given Wall St 16 trillion over the last few years ... our debt ceiling was at ?what? 3 weeks prior to Aug 22? $14.3 trillion -- I realize that 14.3 can't be explained this easily, but I find it quite interesting that we have given those worthless banks MORE than what it would take to WIPE-OUT our entire debt! Why the FUCK aren't we nationalizing a few banks and deleting all the remaining pigs (banks)?
      Pwr 2 the peons! Dismember the reptards AND the banks!

    • 9 months ago
  • Schnookums
  • Mark701
    • +3
      Mark701  
    • wolfess:

      For better or worse, the US government doesn't give the Fed a dime. In fact it's the opposite. The only way the US government can get money is by selling the Fed US bonds. For example, lets say the US government needs 10 billion dollars. They create US bonds equal to that amount and "sell" them to the Fed who in return gives the government 10 billion Federal Reserve Notes i.e. dollars. This represents a "debt" to the US government because at some point in the future the dollar value on the bonds has to be paid off. With regard deficit it means we'd have to sell 14 trillion dollars in bonds to get 14 trillion dollars. In other words we'd still have a 14 trillion dollar deficit.

      IMO the creation of the Fed represents the privatization of the US Treasury Dept. and the most important function of any government, the control of its money supply. Unfortunately, like all things privatized, their first and foremost concern is them, not us. In the case of the Fed doling out trillions to banks, they are protecting THEIR investments at the expense of the US taxpayer who becomes responsible for any loses they incur.

    • 9 months ago
  • wolfess
    • +2
      wolfess  
    • Mark701:

      Thank you -- I now understand the connection much better (and see how ignorant I was about the real situation); now, let me try this again ... when you talked about the 14 trillion in bonds to pay the Fed we'd still have a $14 trillion deficit, it sounded kind of like what the paycheck places do -- you 'borrow' $100 and pay it with a check they don't cash (as long as you get back in there b4 the 2 weeks are up), but the only way to break free of that trap is to have $200 so you can pay off the 100 you owe them and still have another 100 you can actually spend on bills. Yeah, personal experience sucks sometimes :-). The good news is -- true story -- when some idiot ran into us we got enough extra out of it to pay off that LAST postdated check and have never had to go back to that.

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • wolfess:

      Slow Day

      It's a slow day in a small Florida town and streets are deserted. Times are tough, everybody is in debt, and everybody is living on credit. A rich tourist drives through town, stops at the motel, and lays a $100 on the desk saying he wants to inspect the rooms upstairs to pick one for the night. As soon as he walks upstairs, the motel owner grabs the bill and runs next door to pay his debt to the butcher. The butcher takes the $100 and runs down the street to retire his debt to the pig farmer. The pig farmer takes the $100 and heads off to pay his bill to the Farmer's Co-op. The guy at the Co-op takes the $100 and runs to pay his debt to the local hooker, who has also been facing hard times and has had to offer her "services" on credit. The hooker rushes to the hotel and pays off her bill with the hotel owner. The hotel proprietor then places the $100 back on the counter so the rich traveler will not suspect anything. At that moment the traveler comes down the stairs, states that the rooms are not satisfactory, picks up the $100 and leaves town. No one produced anything. No one earned anything. However, the whole town is now out of debt and now looks towards the future with a lot more optimism.

      And that is how America conducts business today!

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • wolfess:

      The National Debt Showdown By The Numbers - As Reported On CBS News Sunday Morning, July 31, 2011.

      "The debt is at it's legal ceiling, 14.3 trillion dollars. Up from one trillion dollars in 1981. Of that, 3.6 trillion dollars is owed to us, the public, including financial institutions, pension funds and individuals. If you own a U.S. Savings Bond, you are part of the debt. The Federal government owes another 6.2 trillion dollars to the Federal government, including 1.6 trillion dollars to the Federal Reserve System, 4.6 trillion dollars to various government trust funds including Social Security. Nearly a third of the remaining debt, 4.5 trillion dollars, is owed to Foreign governments, with China topping the list with 1.2 trillion dollars. So, in what sort of shape is the Federal government to pay off this debt? As of Friday, the Treasury had just 39 billion dollars in cash on hand. By Tuesday, August 2nd, Deadline Day, that balance drops to 26 billion dollars. And by Wednesday, August 3rd, the government will have just about 15 billion dollars available with 23 billion dollars in Social Security checks to send out. There's new hope now that the negotiators on Capital Hill and at the White House have reached a deal to raise the debt ceiling avoiding the unimaginable. And on a subject of unimaginable, consider this, yesterday we learned that Apple, the computer maker, had 76 billion dollars in the bank at the end of June. That is more than twice as much as the U.S. Treasury had on hand at the close of business yesterday."

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
  • wolfess
    • 0
      wolfess  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      Disembowel Regutlicans and stomp on their guts!!! But you're not bitter :-)!!!

      You know, I have this theory ... if Wall St and the koch kiddies, and Grover Norquist can get the soon-2-be-disemboweled regutlicans to roll over as easily and completely as they have then they are the ones who are truly weak-kneed, lily-livered, shit-eating whiners and we really have no reason to pay any attention to them. Kinda like those stupid Subway commercials where the 'adults' talked in kids' voices and behaved like the 2-year-old reptards have been doing since Obama took office :-)!
      Pwr 2 all of us who have been pee'd on since the advent of trickle-down economics! Dismember, disembowel, stomp out all reptards and their allies!

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Image
    • wolfess:

      No, I'm not bitter. Actually it was a "tribute", in a way, to you!

      As how you close many of your posts on this site.

      When I do refer to or make a remark about someone and something happening to them, it should be taken as a metaphor and not literally.

      I wish no ill will upon anyone as I know full well that if I were to hope for bad to befall another human being, odds are a "boomerang effect" would turn against me in wanting anything like that to happen.

      The WORST thing I have EVER done to another?

      I write their name down on a piece of paper and draw a line through it to represent my not ever having anything to do with them from that moment on. Just as soon as my pen lifts from the paper, that person no longer exist in my world. They are no longer welcome to be a part of my life, either physically, mentally or spiritually!

      That's it.

      PWR to people's homes so they can operate appliances to cook, sew, clean, entertain themselves and plug their computers in to keep them functioning so they can come here and rant, share happy stories and any other form of communication they need to use!

    • 8 months ago
  • Mark701
  • Buckeye_Bill
  • Schnookums
  • Schnookums
  • Vic_Romano
    • +1
      Vic_Romano  
    • At this point, it is simply astounding to think that the institution known as the Federal Reserve is still being defended by people. And while the idea of a central bank being necessary to avoid financial panics has plenty of merit to it; one should not use that notion as a means of intellectual complacency. Such a central bank can easily serve as a means of further enriching an already corrupt and bloated plutocracy at the expense of the poor and working classes. Learning of these bailouts should have people questioning this institution, not defending it.

    • 9 months ago
  • ahiguy
  • Schnookums
    • +3
      Schnookums  
    • It should be pointed out that people like Bernie Sanders, Alan Grayson, and Dennis Kucinich, among many other progressives, are also for major changes in the Fed's ownership structure and business model.

    • 9 months ago
more from Community:

top videos