Community | September 14, 2011 | 20 comments

Rising sea levels could take economic toll on California beaches

Image
PoliticalAmazon
Before those not living in California think "this won't impact me," remember just two things about California:

1. It grows the vast majority of the produce consumed by Americans.

2. California, like New York and other "liberal" states, provide far more in taxpayer revenue to the federal government than we receive back in services. How can governors like Rick Perry function if he doesn't have the taxpayers of California to bail him out when the state he has been running finally starts to fail thanks to the inept leadership of Perry and the prior incompetent who ran the state, GWBush?

-----------------------------------------------------------

latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0914-rising-sea-20110914,0,7520410.story
latimes.com

Rising sea levels could take economic toll on California beaches

A state-commissioned study by San Francisco State says erosion and storm damage by the advancing ocean over the next century could cut into tourism and tax revenue.

By Tony Barboza, Los Angeles Times

September 14, 2011

As rising sea levels eat away at the California coastline over the next century, the advancing ocean could cause hundreds of millions of dollars in damage to beach communities as tourism and tax revenue is swept away, according to a state-commissioned study released Tuesday.

As climate change warms and expands the ocean, increased storm damage and erosion will narrow the state's beaches and diminish their appeal to both tourists and wildlife, economists at San Francisco State predict.

"You need a certain amount of space for people to recreate, and, as beaches erode, you lose beach size and you lose tourism," said study author Phillip King, associate professor of economics at San Francisco State.

The study, commissioned by the California Department of Boating and Waterways, looked at five California beach communities, using sea-level-rise projections to estimate economic losses from flooding and beach erosion.

Venice Beach, for instance, could lose up to $440 million in tourism and tax revenue if the Pacific Ocean rises 55 inches by 2100, as scientists predict.

A drop-off in visitors to an eroded Zuma Beach and Broad Beach in Malibu would cost as much as $500 million in tourism spending and tax revenue, the study found.

The effect of more destructive storm surges and higher tides would reverberate through the local and state economy, researchers said.

The ocean's expansion would be particularly hard on Southern California, where the heavily used shoreline generates big bucks to businesses, which pass some of it on to local governments in taxes.

Elsewhere in the state, homes and roads would be particularly vulnerable.

At San Francisco's Ocean Beach, the increasingly erosive power of storm surges could cause $540 million in damage to land, buildings and infrastructure by century's end, researchers project.

The study also examined beaches at Torrey Pines in San Diego County and Carpinteria in Santa Barbara County.

The research underscores the pressing need for beach communities to adapt to the rising waters by building sea walls, replenishing beach sand or pushing homes and structures away from the shoreline, King said.

"Sea-level rise is here," King said, "and we need to start planning for it."

The ocean has risen about 8 inches in the last century and is expected to swell at an increasing rate with global warming.

But California may have been spared the full strength of the ocean's advance for the last few decades, recent research suggests....
[ARTICLE CONTINUES AT URL, ABOVE]

--------------------
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Green,   US Politics
  2. tags:
    Economy Climate Change Global Warming California 1 more
  3.     
    |

20 comments // Rising sea levels could take economic toll on California beaches

  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • California has had it. It's gone. Too many people want to live there. And they want to live by the ocean. If I were an insurance company I simply wouldn't insure anything near the beach, too risky. And $540 million damage to Ocean Beach by the end of the century is but a drop in the bucket.

    • 8 months ago
  • Milieu
    • 0
      Milieu  
    • "How can governors like Rick Perry function if he doesn't have the taxpayers of California to bail him out when the state he has been running finally starts to fail thanks to the inept leadership of Perry and the prior incompetent who ran the state, GWBush?"

      Good Hair will just keep creating below minimum wage jobs.

    • 8 months ago
  • Gravity_Man
  • cmc101
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • cmc101
  • FreetobeyoUandme7
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • percipi224
  • SoCalFramer
    • +4
      SoCalFramer  
    • This is a good thing for the coast. It is natural for the coastal bluffs to fall into the sea. It creates sand and beaches. With all the coastal development and the damming of all the rivers our beaches would have to be rebuilt every summer with sand from else where. The rich that own homes on the edge of the Pacific are asking everyone else that can't see the ocean to subsidize thier property and views. These ocean front homes and homes built where wetlands were drained need to fall back into the sea. The best thing for us to do is bulldoze the homes, clean up the waste and let the sea heal itself.

    • 8 months ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • SoCalFramer:

      QUOTING SOCALFARMER: "The rich that own homes on the edge of the Pacific are asking everyone else that can't see the ocean to subsidize thier property and views."

      ======

      Just like the folks that live in the midwest near rivers ask us to literally bail them out whenever it floods.

      Just like people who live in deserts are using up natural resources faster than people who live in Central Coast California, causing us to place more pressure on our energy-delivery system, and driving up the cost for all of us.

      Just like people who live in the midwest and south asking us to subsidize their poor choice of home location, right where tornadoes predictably swoop through.

      There is no longer a "safe" place to live. The weather is so screwy, most places are experiencing extremes of weather, including places like Oklahoma and Arkansas which routinely get tornadoes tearing them up, anyway.

      But I don't remember ONCE reading a Californian bitching at the people who live where it snows, where it is uber-hot, or where there are tornadoes for asking the rest of us to "subsidize" their choice of lifestyle.

      And you're a Californian? What are you thinking?

    • 8 months ago
  • PIANORAMA
  • treewolf39
    • +1
      treewolf39  
    • The next 10 years are going to change everything. I hope we can hold the idea of democracy together in the face of catastrophic weather. Wing nuts like Rick Perry keep stating prayer will fix the problem. Fortunately for him he has the money to move to higher ground. I believe the powers that be are already actively experimenting with Geo engineering.

    • 8 months ago
  • PIANORAMA
  • treewolf39
  • PIANORAMA
  • cmc101
  • Dusty_King
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • PIANORAMA:

      Yeah, I laughed out loud about that.

      Here Perry loud-mouths about California's economic condition, and then has to literally BEG us for our firefighters, when Perry and his rich cronies in Texas are too greedy to even fund adequate firefighting personnel.

      Well, at least we pay for our firefighters in California, and, even with the cutbacks, we are a sight better at our firefighting coverage than Texas is.

    • 8 months ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
more from Community:

top videos