The Day America Died: The only Future for Americans is a Nightmare
source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-day-america-died-the-only-future-for-americans-is-a-nightmar...
-
-
- Anonmaly
- added this
In other words, any American citizen who is moved into the threat category has no rights and can be executed without trial or evidence.
On September 30 Obama used this asserted new power of the president and had two American citizens, Anwar Awlaki and Samir Khan murdered. Khan was a wacky character associated with Inspire Magazine and does not readily come to mind as a serious threat.
Awlaki was a moderate American Muslim cleric who served as an advisor to the US government after 9/11 on ways to counter Muslim extremism. Awlaki was gradually radicalized by Washington’s use of lies to justify military attacks on Muslim countries. He became a critic of the US government and told Muslims that they did not have to passively accept American aggression and had the right to resist and to fight back. As a result Awlaki was demonized and became a threat.
All we know that Awlaki did was to give sermons critical of Washington’s indiscriminate assaults on Muslim peoples. Washington’s argument is that his sermons might have had an influence on some who are accused of attempting terrorist acts, thus making Awlaki responsible for the attempts.
Obama’s assertion that Awlaki was some kind of high-level Al Qaeda operative is merely an assertion.Jason Ditz concluded that the reason Awlaki was murdered rather than brought to trial is that the US government had no real evidence that Awlaki was an Al Qaeda operative.
But what Awlaki did or might have done is beside the point. The US Constitution requires that even the worst murderer cannot be punished until he is convicted in a court of law. When the American Civil Liberties Union challenged in federal court Obama’s assertion that he had the power to order assassinations of American citizens, the Obama Justice (sic) Department argued that Obama’s decision to have Americans murdered was an executive power beyond the reach of the judiciary.
In a decision that sealed America’s fate, federal district court judge John Bates ignored the Constitution’s requirement that no person shall be deprived of life without due process of law and dismissed the case, saying that it was up to Congress to decide. Obama acted before an appeal could be heard, thus using Judge Bates’ acquiescence to establish the power and advance the transformation of the president into a Caesar that began under George W. Bush.
Attorneys Glenn Greenwald and Jonathan Turley point out that Awlaki’s assassination terminated the Constitution’s restraint on the power of government. Now the US government not only can seize a US citizen and confine him in prison for the rest of his life without ever presenting evidence and obtaining a conviction, but also can have him shot down in the street or blown up by a drone.
(allot more @ link)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-day-america-died-the-only-future-for-americans-i...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Politics, Orwellian Nightmare
-
- tags:
- Assassination
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Presidential contender Mr. Herman Cain has a "999" Tax Plan that can turn the entire nightmare into dreamsicle cones for EVERYONE!
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
JohnA
-
To anyone that expected President Obama to re-establish the accountability of government, please, please, at least look at the voting record of who you are voting for. Is that too much to ask? All you had to do was look at his resume and you would have known he was going to be a bad President. And he is. So please, learn from your mistakes at least, will you?
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Saladin
-
JohnA:
I admit, after he voted for telecomm immunity in the FISA bill, I had to hold my nose as I voted for him.
I was under the impression he voted for that stuff to keep a mild tone during the election. I was completely wrong.
- 8 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Paratus
-
Obummer has further made a mockery of the "rule of law". We will try to remedy the slide to a "nightmare" next November
- 8 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
Saladin
-
Paratus:
I agree with that, but what the hell is the alternative?
It's not as if Batshit Bachmann or Prick Perry would have done anything differently. If anything, they'd have gone way further.
- 8 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Paratus
-
Saladin:
Oh believe me, I am not a fan of Perry or Romney. Don't want either in the WH. However, I cannot vote for Obama. I don't like Marxism or the other "isms" (socialism, statism), loss of freedom, the huge & nanny central government, poor fiscal responsibility etc. Will Perry or Romney be better? Can't say but it will not be Obama and that is the acid test. Bachman, I don't think she will be a factor although she could not be worse than what we have. You say she is "Batshit" but at least she does not say there are 57 states in the Union.
- 8 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
Saladin
-
Paratus:
Can't say I agree with that or the "Marxist" interpretation (just so you know, there are actually Marxist parties in Europe. If you want an idea of what they're really like, look them up.) I also don't agree that things couldn't be worse under a Republican president. Firstly, things can *ALWAYS* get worse. If I've learned anything from history, it's definitely that. There is no such thing as rock bottom. Second, Republicans not only have not changed substantially since Bush, they've embraced all of his shitty policies. How would that be a solution to the crap going on right now?
I don't think there are going to be any good choices in 2012. Whoever I vote for, I will hold my nose and have no expectation that they'll fix anything. Unless Kucinich or Sanders runs or something.
- 8 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
2hellnwait
-
I'd find this article interesting. . . if it weren't written by a 9'11 "truther" and Muslim apologist
- 8 months ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
Progresshiv
-
Some Americans have long yearned for a monarch, a daddy who would lead them into green pastures, and they have been willing to cede civic responsibility to get one. It is no surprise that the monarch now uses the Constitution to wipe his ass.
- 8 months ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
Progresshiv:
Very funny Prog, good point, now is sleep time, good night to all!!! See ya later!!!
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
unimatrix0
-
A rather pessimistic headline, and Prison Planet is a total joke.
I can't imagine what it must be like to live in a world where Alex Jones is taken seriously. I feel sorry for the poor deluded souls snared by this conspiracy theory con man. He is like a preacher, hustling money and attention from the gullible faithful.
Awlaki's assassination was nothing new, and the true underlying problem is one that is much bigger than Obama or Bush, a problem that has been built into the presidency itself over the last 200 years.
One could ask the same sort of questions about George Washington putting down the Whiskey Rebellion.
- 8 months ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
Saladin
-
unimatrix0:
That was a really dark moment in American history, but the constitution actually *gives* the president the authority to put down rebellions.
It does *not* give him the right to murder U.S. citizens for no reason, without a trial and with no consequences.
If you want to live in a security state, move to China. We have a bill of rights for a reason.
- 8 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Saladin:
When do the remote control attack drones flying over U.S. soil achieve sentience and write their own "bill of rights"? Enquire-ing minds wanna know. Do they have to form a Union first?
Do the drones have to have embedded chips like us or are they Above the Law like Steven Seagal getting to punch anybody they want to (when they chase you on land that is)?
Do we get to know where the drones are? Seems only fair since they know where we are. If the drones can't get shot down shouldn't that mean we can't get shot down either?
Perhaps we should sue. Maybe we can get the same great deal the drones get. Just a thought. What about judge & jury first? Do Americans still get that?
What say you Grasshopper Saladin? We who are about to die salute you! Our treasured Way of Life bites da dust soon.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
America died in the early 1970's when we began shopping school clothes for our children from Yard Sales and flea markets. When I saw that I saw America disappear then. It's been one long sliding board ever since.
One prolonged nightmare now long of tooth.
The money started going into weapons and weapons systems THAT WE NEEDED BECAUSE WE STIRRED UP SLEEPING HORNETS.
SO, HOW DO YA GET HORNETS TO GO BACK TO SLEEP?
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Gravity_Man:
I know! Hornets like to be lullabied to sleep with Jobs-a-Coming music! HA HA Hornet wives like to hear paycheck shuffling sounds coming from the kitchen table while paying bills. Children hornets like hearing chore money being laid aside for every Saturday!
Wow. Foreign hornets are a lot like us. We are like them!
Major revelation, major revelation here! Yes!
Treat them like us!!!! Solar cookers!
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
PIANORAMA
-
I believe this kind of thing is nothing new and has been going on for years. The U.S. has taken out democratically elected leaders in Latin and South American countries, Africa, and in other parts of the world . . . The difference is that now with the internet we find out about it much more quickly and government is brazen enough to publicize what they're doing. And what about the atom bombs dropped in Japan, killing thousands of people without bringing them to any kind of just trial beforehand. These were innocent citizens, not terrorists.
Good post, Anonmaly, should bring up a lot of controversy.
- 8 months ago
-
PIANORAMA
-
-
Wyley_Wombat
-
PIANORAMA:
Not only have they "taken out democratically elected leaders", they have inserted their own puppets. This has been done both to establish political control or sometimes at the behest of the corporate world.
- 8 months ago
-
Wyley_Wombat
-
-
PIANORAMA
-
Wyley_Wombat:
Yes, that was the purpose . . .
- 8 months ago
-
PIANORAMA
-
-
Kilnsapper
-
Wyley_Wombat:
That is why Iran is pissed off at us.
- 8 months ago
-
Kilnsapper
-
-
Anonmaly
-
PIANORAMA:
The intention wasn't to stir up controversy, really no way around it though. I almost didn't post the article, I read through it, and have read Dr. Paul Craig Roberts articles before, once again I feel he's hit the nail on the head.
And you're right there isn't a whole lot new to this but two factors; he was an American citizen, and there was no case, no actual charges, just execution. It is an awful precedent to set. The author is correct too, no president is going to want to relinquish any amount of perceived powers even if they conflict with our constitution. It's a scary thing...
Idk I watch too many documentaries, I tend to believe the guy who did "Confessions of an Economic Hit-man". I see that, that money rides over it all and controls political and military or police actions allot of times only serving corporate interests. It's wrong and needs to be further examined and addressed.
Another thing, I'm not sure about the line, a seemingly ever moving line away from freedoms and liberties we once took for granted. Where is it going to end? Thankfully a few even politicians speak out on this garbage...
I could go on and on, but when I read that article it was like the author had already picked a big portion of my thoughts... I'm just worried about the future, and where this police state is headed, because it really doesn't look good.
- 8 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Anonmaly:
Interesting comment A-man. Jesus did something once that to my knowledge has never been defined. He squatted down and "drew a line on the ground", or in the sand, something like that. Your comment about the line moving sounds like you nailed it pretty close.
Perhaps he was giving us the last final sign to watch for, the day would come when politicians begin "moving the line" wherever they feel froggy. Works for me.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
PIANORAMA:
Very good points, after all, you can bet your sweet ass that George Washington and the rest of his crew would in all likelihood had been hanged as traitors and terrorist, had they lost the Revolutionary war, of course it is a sad reality, that even though they certainly did not have the technology devised for killing that we have now, many innocent people were still maimed and killed nonetheless, it is an unfortunate certainty of war. Nice to see you PIANO..^+
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
Juas
-
PIANORAMA:
My Country, Honduras, its the first one on this Century to go through a Coup.
The ousted president, kidnapped, was taken to an American Military Base, before being kicked out to another country.As soon the new puppet came in, and after some lobbying, they dissapeared the Country's Education System and replaced it with corporate bullshit, exactly what they did on New Orleans. Thats one things out of hundreds of them.
Weve been protesting ever since.
Im glad you are finally seeing it.
Theres a reason why America is hated in some parts of the world. - 8 months ago
-
Juas
-
-
hombre76
-
Anon you know I love your stuff, but this here is a pile o' bullsheet. There was nothing illegal about the exicution of these two terrorists. the constitution states these two seperate things; A: no person shall be convicted of treason with out two wittnesses testifing to the act of treason before congress. this testimony can be given in a closed seasion for national security reasons. the Other part of this constitutional statement says that no Confession shal be accepted unless made in an open court. this prevents some one from producing a confession after you are dead. sorry but while we may not like what this government does in the world they are not legaly without recource to pursue those who claim rightly or wrongly to be the enemy of this government and or the people of this nation. I for one will not be bitching when in my strugle against what I feel to be unjust or wrong I find myself at the recieving end of a fatal attack by my sworn enemy. BTW there are lots of Inocent people like Bradly Manning that could further your efforts to stanch this governments abuse of truely innocent consciencious political objectors and activists that are falsely accused of crime by this government. you weaken your argument by defending people known to engage in violent acts of aggression. Gandi and Martin Luther King showed this to be true.
- 8 months ago
-
hombre76
-
-
Anonmaly
-
hombre76:
"treason" is an interesting and not most clearly defined word....
"Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour."
(wikipedia)We can and have the potential to "overthrow" existing political/government structures every 4 years on the national level and every 2 on the state level.... We have made drastic changes over the course of one election. Is it treason to completely overturn existing bullshit? Because what 85% on some of that latest poles want to "fire congress", would that not be an overthrow...?
Very slippery slope, and no so far we haven't faced definitions of treason being so harsh, but do you trust these clowns to maintain sanity... Because IF history is any indication?
They need to define treason, and make it clear, then I'll shut my mouth and migrate, pretending I don't visibly see them wanting to take it to the extreme.....
And show me just which violent act he took part in?.... Really I'd like to know, you know proof......
Agree with you about Manning it's total bullshit, he should receive "whistle blower status", and a damn congressional medal of honor, as well as a decent settlement for the portion of his life he was unduly deprived of. But he won't he posed a threat to a very large profit margin, and probably still is.....
And what about all of us, we've been deemed "subjects" of a soft fascist inverted totalitarian regime (love that phrase, so fitting), and the fascism is ever hardening, and will regress into traditional fascism within a decade or two at this rate....
- 8 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
I'm not worthy of a remote-control drone. Isn't that like being pooped on by an airborne worm or something?
POOP you're Gone? Wait. POOF. hmm. Oh Waiter! Yes Mr. Benny sir? Waiter, I'd like one of those radiation burgers pleez.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Gravity_Man:
POOF to whoever voted me up this is an OUTRAGE! If this doesn't come to a fast halt I'll, I'll, have to quit Current yeah, that's it. HA HA
Wait. Trust in Jesus first. He has a good plan not imaginary jobs.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Nick19
-
Prisonplanet is nothing but a constant stream of doomsday prophesy by people like the founder/owner of it, Alex Jones.
- 8 months ago
-
Nick19
-
-
Dagum
-
Nick19:
Are you really even a member of Current.com? It's seems like all you do is post comments on articles that consist solely of attacking the source.
Can you add more personality/discussion?
Maybe you need a direct prompt: How do you feel about unconstitutional extrajudicial killings without due process of the law?
- 8 months ago
-
Dagum
-
-
Nick19
-
Dagum:
Its called a diversity of opinion. Also, I don't attack everything. Look at my posts on Occupy Wallstreet. I obviously support it. What I don't support are conspiracy sites or anyone attempting to divert attention with any sort of worthless conspiracy theory with obviously questionable sources. Also, I dislike source material from RTV since its owned by the Russian government in order to propagate material. Whats wrong with questioning source materials anyways? So I should just accept everything at face value? Sounds like everything on Fox News is always correct then. Forget how they got that information.
- 8 months ago
-
Nick19
-
-
Kilnsapper
-
Nick19:
Not all of it is nuts.
- 8 months ago
-
Kilnsapper
-
-
Kilnsapper
-
Nick19:
What do you think about NaF in your water? That isn't a theory.
- 8 months ago
-
Kilnsapper
-
-
Nick19
-
Kilnsapper:
Fluoride is in our water and other products yes. The thing is that there are many other things in daily life that could negatively effect your health and hence, it would be difficult to find a direct correlation between just fluorinated water causing all your health problems. I myself do consume bottled water from time to time but I do consume tap water as well for my delicious cup of coffee. Some suggest mind control and that its a communist threat to impurify all men...oh wait thats Dr. Strangelove.
- 8 months ago
-
Nick19
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
Nick19:
Amen.
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
nikonwilly
-
They kill whoever they think is a threat to their power structure. Everything from environmental , Wall street finance, health and welfare to 9 11 events......it makes no difference what the issue ...if they feel threatened , can't shut you up and stop truthful information , you are on their list . It's been going on for years , but now in the information age it's going to become much more prevalent ...
- 8 months ago
-
nikonwilly
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
nikonwilly:
Very true, good to see you nikon. ^+++
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
sugarmountian
-
Teapublicans are a threat to this country. Maybe they should watch out for drones.
- 8 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
sugarmountian
-
sugarmountian:
All jokeing aside, Why didn't they just arrest them? They were americans, and the drone located them. Why not use the SEALS to arrest and detain them for trial?
- 8 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
Ronni_Gonzales_Williams
-
I can say that i thought i was intelligently informed until i got to current tv. I had NO idea that these two men that were assassinated were AMERICAN citizens. THAT surely wasnt mentioned on main stream media! thanks for teaching me something today with the first story i came to. I am part of the 99%
- 8 months ago
-
Ronni_Gonzales_Williams
-
-
noxidereus
-
I agree. Targeted assassinations of American citizens without due process is not a good thing by any stretch of the imagination. Glenn Greenwald and Jonathan Turley are indeed correct. This is very bad indeed. When I say I no longer can support Obama, and I call Obama out for being a war criminal, this is one of the reasons for that. I cannot in good conscience vote for him. The Democratic propaganda machine cannot make me afraid enough of the Republicans to make me vote for a conservative war criminal as president. I'd rather vote for a 3rd party candidate with no chance of winning then to be on record supporting a wall-street puppet, conservative war criminal like Obama. I am just about as disgusted with Obama as I was with Bush.
- 8 months ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
jackshin
-
noxidereus:
I don't blame you, I don't. In fact, the reasons Awlaki went to war against the US, I don't blame him for that either. It was bullshit. The U.S. and the Bush administration declared a war, justified by lies, on a country that had nothing to do with 9-11. In doing so they killed at least 600,000 Iraqians. But Awlaki did make that choice. He could have protested the war here, even protested the war in a non-combative nation, but he threw his hat in the ring, he clearly said he was at war with the U.S. That's treason.
And if one argues that he was a citizen, why? Does that make him more human than any of the other terrorists killed? He was given a year’s notice, his father petition to the court on his behalf. He knew the U.S. was determined to get him. That is much better than what the other terrorists got.
Ironically, everything that this article argues is more on point in regards to Osama bin Ladden. Unfortunately, for most, that is not a strong case, but I can't think of any violation morally worse than to shoot a man who was unarmed and had surrendered.
- 8 months ago
-
jackshin
-
-
noxidereus
-
jackshin:
My point is that it is wrong for an America to assassinate any of its citizens without due process. I mean we have to follow the rule of law. I would argue that it is wrong for any government to kill anyone without due process of the law, but in this case I am responding to a specific instance. Nobody is more or less human than anyone else. Further, I say that it is not valid to make an exception based on the character of the person who was denied due process. It is wrong to interpret laws differently depending on who the person is.
- 8 months ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
PIANORAMA
-
jackshin:
I agree.
- 8 months ago
-
PIANORAMA
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
noxidereus:
America exercising a "Divine Right of Kings" to guide world affairs? If I recall my history classes that was done by the "Bad Guys" of times long ago. Did I blink and we all retrograded back to being Vikings???
Mel Gibsons?
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
noxidereus:
If I may add a slightly different angle on this. I voted for Obama, but because I was making a philosophical transition at the time, I also made a vow. From every realist position, Obama was identified as a plutocrat, and despite all the rhetoric such as "change" and such, would act not only to protect, but to further a plutocratic agenda, which is exactly what he has done, therefore in keeping with my vow, I not only will not vote for Obama, but I will not vote for anyone who chooses to affiliate themselves in the plutocratic system. What I've noticed many people are doing, is being angry and upset with Obama which I feel is absurd, I could no more be angry with Obama, then I could at a fox who's going into the hen house, both are doing exactly what they are programmed to do, foxes will always go after chickens in hen houses, and plutocrats-no matter how well spoken or charismatic-always seek to further the agenda of a plutocracy, ALWAYS, there is no fucking mystery here, just many many millions of Americans, who project and see and believe what they want to see and believe, and refuse to believe, what something actually is.
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
noxidereus
-
VFORVENDETTA:
I agree with you. Unfortunately at the time that I voted for Obama I was not aware that he was a plutocrat. I was not fully aware of how things worked. I wrongly expected more of Obama. Perhaps it is because I have only recently become aware of such things that I feel anger towards Obama. I also feel anger towards all who knowingly further the plutocratic agenda, even if it is just their nature to be as they are. I can't help but feel this way.
- 8 months ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
noxidereus:
Thank you for responding nox, I totally understand where you're coming from, and that is exactly the bigger point that I'm trying to make. The entire point of everything that's going on politically, is as a show, a diversion, and amongst other things, it is specifically designed to engage the masses emotionally-just like a soap opera-with an endless stream of infinite battles between the right and left, on issues that have already been thoroughly decided, remember, your entire life you are only programmed to be a consumer, and this is yet something else for you to consume, in reality, very little of this actually matters, and although I can certainly sympathize about anger and frustration, remember that that is part of the manipulation, don't waste your time,effort or energy, it is pointless within the confines of the current paradigm, fortunately, there is another way.
- 8 months ago
-
VFORVENDETTA
-
-
artemis6
-
We need to turn this around , soon .
- 8 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
Wow! Normally, I dismiss Infowars and Prison Planet as a bunch of paranoid rantings and right wing bullshit; but this article is so dead on!
“Terrorist” and “giving aid to terrorists” are increasingly elastic concepts. Homeland Security has declared that the vast federal police bureaucracy has shifted its focus from terrorists to “domestic extremists.”
First they came for the terrorists....and I was glad they got the sonsobitches.
"Instead of seeing the danger, most Americans will merely conclude that the government is getting tough on terrorists, and it will meet with their approval. Smiling with satisfaction over the demise of their enemies, Americans are being led down the garden path to rule by government unrestrained by law and armed with the weapons of the medieval dungeon."
And then they came for the communists.....and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
"What do Americans think will be their fate now that the “war on terror” has destroyed the protection once afforded them by the US Constitution? If Awlaki really needed to be assassinated, why did not President Obama protect American citizens from the precedent that their deaths can be ordered without due process of law by first stripping Awlaki of his US citizenship? If the government can strip Awlaki of his life, it certainly can strip him of citizenship. The implication is hard to avoid that the executive branch desires the power to terminate citizens without due process of law."
And then they came for the trade unionists....and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
"Readers ask me what they can do. Americans not only feel powerless, they are powerless. They cannot do anything. The highly concentrated, corporate-owned, government-subservient print and TV media are useless and no longer capable of performing the historic role of protecting our rights and holding government accountable. Even many antiwar Internet sites shield the government from 9/11 skepticism, and most defend the government’s “righteous intent” in its war on terror. Acceptable criticism has to be couched in words such as “it doesn’t serve our interests.”"
And who are they going after next.....
And if people cannot see what kind of hideous Pandora's Box this policy has opened, then they probably get what they deserve. The American republic is truly dead, and all we need now is some batshit crazy wannabe dictator to drive this notion home.
- 8 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
tverdell
-
Vic_Romano:
Alex jones is highly credible.
But not all of his theories are well thought out.I disagree with him a lot but he nailed 911 to the cross.
- 8 months ago
-
tverdell
-
-
PIANORAMA
-
Vic_Romano:
Man, that Michele Bachmann looks absolutely loonybins . . .
- 8 months ago
-
PIANORAMA
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
PIANORAMA:
You really have to imagine this kind of power being in the hands of someone like her to truly appreciate how dangerous a precedent this is.
- 8 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
Anonmaly
-
Vic_Romano:
Well, I picked the only article on the site worth posting... That's a Dr. as the author, and 2 Lawyers totally agreeing with him....
I mean I didn't post it to be partisan, I'm not a t-party-er...
- 8 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
lazloman
-
Yes, its all very troubling.
- 8 months ago
-
lazloman
-
-
Anonmaly
-
-
What now everyone should encourage all the countries we've invaded to just accept they're occupied, don't resist, don't defend your homeland and way of life? How many youtube videos leaked out illustrating the violence, and psychotic behavior of Americas armed forces?
How much evidence has linked, actually clearly demonstrating Bin Laden was responsible for ANYTHING?
And Awlaki.... The people of the world needs to know exactly where that line is that he crossed?
What happens if the US gets invaded? Does any other country really expect us to take it lying down?.... I doubt it.
If the shoe was on the other foot over half of the US would be considered "enemy combatants" and subject to extra judicial executions...
- 8 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
PIANORAMA
-
Anonmaly:
Good points, Anonmaly.
Eisenhower warned us about the increasing and unrelenting power of the U.S. military industry.
- 8 months ago
-
PIANORAMA
-
-
Kilnsapper
-
PIANORAMA:
YES!!
- 8 months ago
-
Kilnsapper
