Taxes and the Right Wing's Big Lie
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html
-
-
- kvb1
- added this
Forty-seven percent.That’s the portion of American households that owe no income tax for 2009. The number is up from 38 percent in 2007, and it has become a popular talking point on cable television and talk radio. 47 percent has become shorthand for the notion that the wealthy face a much higher tax burden than they once did while growing numbers of Americans are effectively on the dole.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Donald-Marron/2011/0728/Why-do-half-of-America...
The true fact — about half of Americans do not pay federal income taxes – often gets transmogrified in public discourse into the decidedly untrue claim that half of Americans pay no taxes. That simply isn’t so. There are many other taxes in our fair land, including payroll taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, state income taxes, and property taxes. Most people who don’t pay federal income taxes still encounter some of these other taxes.
TPC released a new study that examines why these people end up paying no federal income tax.
The number one reason should come as no surprise. It’s because they have low incomes. As my colleague Bob Williams notes:
A couple with two children earning less than $26,400 will pay no federal income tax this year because their $11,600 standard deduction and four exemptions of $3,700 each reduce their taxable income to zero. The basic structure of the income tax simply exempts subsistence levels of income from tax.
Low incomes (or, if you prefer, the standard deduction and personal exemptions) account for fully half of the people who pay no federal income tax.
The second reason is that for many senior citizens, Social Security benefits are exempt from federal income taxes. That accounts for about 22% of the people who pay no federal income tax.
The third reason is that America uses the tax code to provide benefits to low-income families, particularly those with children. Taken together, the earned income tax credit, the child credit, and the childcare credit account for about 15% of the people who pay no federal income tax.
The actual number of Americans who don’t pay any taxes isn’t half, but 14%. This group of non-taxpayers of any kind is largely composed of the elderly and disabled. The people who don’t pay taxes do so because they can’t work.
The myth that the wealthy are carrying the tax burden for America is used to justify tax cuts for the rich. Conservatives use the inaccurate statistic hand in hand with their, “wealthy are the job creators argument.” One statistic that was intended to demonstrate the loss of income due to the recession, along with the impact of the Obama tax cuts has been distorted and misused to justify a policy of not asking the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share.
The truth is that 86% of Americans pay taxes. In one recession strapped year (2009), less than half of single filer taxpayers paid federal income taxes.
Millions of Americans are not being told the truth that almost 90% of us pay taxes, and that much of the reason why there were fewer people paying federal income taxes in 2009 was that Barack Obama signed the largest tax cut in US history.
Since the truth undercuts the conservative’s reverse Robin Hood steal from the poor to give to the rich policy, they are going to do their best to keep the facts buried under a mountain of misinformation.
Anytime anyone tells you that half of Americans paid no taxes, do your country a favor and straighten them out. We have the facts. It’s time to tear down this talking point.
It's something the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tracks annually: the top 400 highest adjusted gross incomes. In 2007, the last year with IRS data, the average income for those 400 was nearly $345 million. Their average federal income tax rate was 17 percent, down from 26 percent in 1992. Meanwhile, the average federal income tax rate for all taxpayers declined from 9.9 percent to 9.3 percent.
The top federal income tax rate is 35 percent, but the top rate on capital gains is 15 percent. Also, there are deductions that most would say are political suicide to touch, such as the mortgage deduction, child deduction, and on and on.
Aside from the fact that most people don't read these statistics, why, therefore, is it so hard to raise taxes on the wealthy? Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, notes that the super-rich will use tax loopholes and deductions anyway, so "the government should aim high." He added that during the 1950s, when the top income tax rate was 91 percent, the rich used loopholes and deductions that reduced their effective top rate by 50 percent to 60 percent.
In fact, some of the wealthy want to pay more. While Senator Orrin Hatch, (R-UT), Republican on the Senate Finance Committee believes that the rich should just voluntarily pay more, there is a group called United for a Fair Economy who believes the rich should be forced to pay more, via higher tax rates. And the members of that group are all rich themselves.
On such rich person, Eric Schoenberg, spoke to AP. He inherited money and has a healthy portfolio from when he was an investment banker. 2009 was a bad year for him; his investments "only" brought him $200K. Normally, he makes "north of half a million a year." In 2009, his bad year, his federal income tax bill was slightly more than $2,000. "I simply point out to people, 'Do you think this is reasonable, that somebody in my circumstances should only be paying 1 percent of their income in tax?'"
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Progressive America, LABOR
-
- tags:
- Taxes, Lies, Right Wing
-
-
JohnA
-
But payroll taxes, Social Security and Medicare, we'll all get back right? Isn't that the way it's supposed to work?
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
kvb1
-
JohnA:
In a way, all taxes work there way back to the people. Social Security and Medicare are supposed to be dedicated taxes for specific benefits that are realized when we reach 65. Payroll taxes go into the general fund, but they help pay for roads, education, defense, etc. So in a way we realize those tax benefits immediately. Unfortunately, we as a people have not done enough to prevent uncontrolled spending for two unnecessary wars, outsourcing work by contractors that could be done less expensively and better audited by the government. #OWS is the start to taking back that control.
- 8 months ago
-
kvb1
-
-
JohnA
-
kvb1:
What other payroll taxes are there besides income tax, state and federal, Social Security, and Medicare. That's all that comes out of my check. And the income taxes you get back at the end of the year if you are one of the ones that doesn't pay.
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
alexandrek [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
-
JohnA
-
alexandrek:
Oh yeah, the banks will just happily pay that out of their own pockets, no way they would ever pass the cost down to us.
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
JohnA: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
-
JohnA
-
alexandrek:
They are not going to let their bottom lines suffer. They have a responsibility to their stockholders. If we raise the taxes on them, they will find other ways of making it up which will be charging you and I more. They are not going to lose their profits. As far as a personal matter, the government gets way too much of my money now, which they obscenely waste, why would I want them to have any more?
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
JohnA: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
-
JohnA
-
alexandrek:
I don't care for them. But they are the government and they do make the laws and most Americans will follow what they tell them. Look at the last two Presidents if you don't believe that.
- 8 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Paratus
-
The so called "big lie" is that almost half of all people with income in this country pay no income tax. That is not a lie. I have said many times, here and other places, that there are a lot of other taxes that remove our money from our pockets. Some of these taxes flow to manufacturers which we wind up paying as the costs of doing business, others we get hit with. The problem with the Warren Buffet thing which added to the dust up is that Buffet, and others who liked to jump on the bandwagon, were comparing two different things that really cannot be equated. That said, does anyone here have a solution to this. I would like to see many of these taxes done away with. I don't know if we can wean the government off the money spigot they have come to enjoy but we should. Cains 999 plan is a good place to begin the discussion.
- 8 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
mitekillem
-
Paratus:
1. Taxes on gas go up. 2. Cost of gas goes up. 3. Cost of living goes up as a result. 4. Other businesses suffer. 5. Employers lay off workers to increase profits/or increase price of product, i.e. gas. 6. Wage earners below 90K/year see no increase. 7. Taxes gained from Gas tax get subverted to pay for unemployment caused by step 1. Repeat starting at Step 1.
A businesses can afford the taxes, because it is us who ultimately pays for it, while they reap record profits. However, wage earners see no increase in pay.
What is happening now is that American's are on the verge of becoming a 3rd world country.
The top has record profits, and the gap between the rich and the poor has quadrupled from 1979.Believe or not there is a very simple solution to all of this. It's called a Graduated Tax.
The idea is to rewrite the tax code to exclude any and all deductions.
It would work something like this; those making 10k /yr would pay 10%. A person making 35k would pay 10% for the first 10k, then 15% for the next 15k, and so on and so forth.
So a person making 35k might pay $1500, While a person who makes 350k would pay the 10% for the first 10k, 15% for the next 15k, and so on, and so fourth. So a person making 350k might pay somewhere around 80K in taxes, still keeping 270K of their own money (speculative). It's a bit more proportionate when you consider the cost of necessities vs. luxury.
It makes sense, especially when you consider it is the duty of the Job creator to facilitate his employ with the means to FUEL the economy and obtain necessities.
What you see in NY, DC, LA, Chicago, and Seattle, etc Today is a direct result of corporations not fulfilling their duty.They are not being punished for becoming wealthy. They are being punished for allowing their greed to not TRICKLE DOWN to their employees, and thus keeping them to be more SELF RELIANT.
Funny, republican's preach self-reliance all day long, but they don't seem to understand why the poor are so poor...and then blame the victims.
You cannot compete on an uneven playing field.
Do you really think I could start an oil company tomorrow and be successful as things are Today? If you say yes, then you're more out of touch with reality than those who are put away in state run mental institutions. - 8 months ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
kvb1
-
mitekillem:
That graduated tax was what existed before Reagan changed the tax code. During Eisenhower's administration it was set all the way to 90%. There were still too many deductions then, but it did not harm the economy. More importantly, corporations paid a greater percent of federal revenue then they do today. The really big issue is that until the tax code was changed during Wilson's administration, nearly all federal revenue was generated through import tariffs. When these were lowered, the revenue lost was replaced with a federal income tax.
- 8 months ago
-
kvb1
-
-
Kelly_Balthrop
-
Nice article, and well researched, thanks.
- 8 months ago
-
Kelly_Balthrop
