Obama Medical Marijuana Policies Now Worse Than Bush: DPA
source: http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/2011/10/obama-administration-escalates-war-medical-marijuana-...
-
-
- Anonmaly
- added this
Obama Administration's Medical Marijuana Policies Now Worse Than Bush and Clinton Policies
Despite the Obama Administration's promise to respect state law and leave medical marijuana patients alone, its attack on patients and providers operating legally under state law is rapidly escalating. At least 16 landlords in California this week received letters stating that they are violating federal drugs laws and that state law will not protect them. The four US Attorneys in California are holding a press conference in Sacramento today in which they are expected to announce a broad crackdown on medical marijuana.
A series of administration actions in the past month makes it clear that they are engaged in a full scale assault on medical marijuana patients' rights and their ability to access medicine and that they have reconsidered their willingness to allow states with medical marijuana laws to implement those policies without federal interference. The Treasury Dept. is forcing banks in Colorado to close accounts of medical marijuana businesses operating legally under state law. The IRS now says it will not recognize legitimate business expenses of dispensaries and is requiring owners to pay taxes required of no other businesses; the result will be closure of the most well regulated dispensaries and loss of millions of dollars in tax revenue for local governments. And the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives last week ruled that state-sanctioned medical marijuana patients cannot legally possess firearms.
"The Obama administration's latest moves strongly suggest that their medical marijuana policies are now being driven by over-zealous prosecutors and the anti-marijuana ideologues who dominated policymaking in past administrations," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "Barack Obama is betraying promises made when he ran for president and turning his back on the sensible policies announced during his first year in office. Instead of encouraging state and local authorities to regulate medical marijuana distribution in the interests of public safety and health, his administration seems determined to re-criminalize as much as possible. It all adds up to bad policy, bad politics and bad faith."
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/2011/10/obama-administration-escalates-war-medica...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Politics, Actual News, 3 more
-
- tags:
- Obama, Hypocrisy, War on Personal Freedoms
-
-
noxidereus
-
One of the most obvious ways to tell whether a politician is either standing with the people he serves or wishes to control and oppress them instead is to look at their position on marijuana prohibition. Obama, as someone who is intelligent and who has had first hand experience smoking marijuana, knows that marijuana prohibition was never intended to serve the good of the people. He knows that prohibition is implemented as a means of profit and of control over the population. Nixon used it to arrest war protesters. It continues to be used to fund the prison industrial complex, which is why America (the land of the free?) imprisons more people than any other nation on the planet (even though we only constitute 5% of the population of Earth).
In conclusion there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Obama does not stand with the people. He is perfectly fine with putting people in cages so that those who profit by putting people in cages may continue to do so.
"But just like the senseless and monumentally wasteful Endless military War, America’s Drug War feeds the pockets of a powerful private industry: the growing privatized prison industry, which needs more and more prisoners for profits, gets many from drug convictions, and thus vehemently opposes and lobbies against any reform to the nation’s drug laws as well as reform of harsh criminal sentencing. That, combined with self-righteous, deeply hypocritical anti-drug moralizing and complete obliviousness to evidence, has ensured not only that the Drug War and its prison obsession endures, but that it remains outside the scope of what can even be discussed in mainstream political circles. And as the Obama DOJ’s newly intensified attacks on marijuana demonstrate, the problem is, in many respects, getting worse, even as most of the world moves toward a much more restrained and health-based (rather than crime-based) approach to dealing with drug usage."
Above quote is from an article written by Glenn Greenwald found here: http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/08/steve_jobs_and_drug_policy/
- 8 months ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
bluestranger
-
As he solicits liberal support, where is he on this issue?
- 8 months ago
-
bluestranger
-
-
mybologna
-
sign the petition to reschedule marijuana at whitehouse.gov
- 8 months ago
-
mybologna
-
-
trut
-
Obama is an admitted drug user in his past and yet he goes after pot smokers worse than any president in the past. He must really like to incarcerate people. As long as it's not him.
- 8 months ago
-
trut
-
-
DanCastro
-
Of all the stupid ways to create jobs this has to be at the top of the shit pile! We know the drug is not nearly dangerous, so who can look you in the eye and say this is in the "spirit of the law"? If a law is crazy, we don't enforce it until we can get it off the books. Priorities?
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
David, I have to believe we will win this fight! Elmer Gantry religious posturing have resulted in immense damage to this nation and still we refuse to see why our founders put in "separation of church and state" Watch PBS "Prohibition" and go "back to the future"!
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
And, when you look at the list of the "prohibited", they were all pronounced "evil" or "products of Satan" which sealed the deal. I'm with JC (Jimmy Carter ;-) when he says the punishment for drug related crime should not be worse than the effects of the drug on its user! Punishment to fit the crime, how novel! But worse of all is that this new 'war' flies in the face of all scientific evidence which shows this is a drug of minor "harm" if any, so why do we continue to spend so much money on it?
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
wolfess
-
David_H:
I voted for him (mainly b/c Reagan wasn't even a good ACTOR) and his loss to raygun is what drove me to register as an independent -- didn't want to waste my time voting for some idiot that had no business being in office! Too bad I wasted my time/vote/effort on shrub-dark.
- 8 months ago
-
wolfess
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
"the moving hand having writ, moves on"! I have a weakness for Eisenhower myself! ;-)
What we have to look at is who can move US in the right direction. Like a giant liner, the country moves slowly, but she does respond, so there is hope yet! - 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
Until OWS matures and social media allows more direct democracy we only have two choices and I see nothing on the right that begins to appeal and their history of helping corporations oppress the country and attempting to demean them by calling peaceful Americans assembling to address their grievances to their government as is their right? What's your choice?
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
David, don't start to drool now! ;-) I meant "today" and "here and now". Yes, we could have an independent run, but we are where we are and while more of his right wing leanings have been paraded before our dazed eyes, I will vote for him. Else, follow the "I ain't voting til I get a 'pure' candidate" and "welcome to Tea Bag Lane'! NO! I will not willingly cooperate in a "stay home" to register your "dismay" reaction, that's 2010 & how we got the tea baggers and wound up with the "Party of No!" and their Greedy Old Pig cronies! The most 'faithful' voters are the old and those of the "born agains" who are very susceptible to the Elmer Gantry brand of persuasion which we have seen on multiple display as the "candidates" show how hypocritical their rise to power has been!
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
I'm not going down the path of "purity of essence" no way, no how! I will not fall for "letting the perfect be the enemy of the good". Believe me, I would rather have Obama and the dems "large & in charge" than tea baggers who want to deport me and mine as well as take away our right to vote. People who want to kill my government and it's attempts at protection/oversight of clean food, water, air and land. NO! These are not the people who want the same kind of "progress" as I do. If peaceful gatherings of a wide variety of people earns them the name of 'mob', count me in!
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
EEK! Obama and the dems are not 'perfect'! Run for the hills! Never vote again in your life!
I'm sorry, David, but I'm not going to continue this convo. I believe that democracy is the worst form of government that humans have ever invented, except for all the rest. I don't like sausage every day, but I will drop into the factory and maybe install cameras and mikes so I can keep up. ;-) - 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
David, one final disagreement "for old times sakes". According to science, unless you plan to die relatively soon, there may be real options for living forever! Just think you might get to use that bomb shelter and freeze dried food! ;-) From one old fogey to another, keep your stick on the ice. We're all in this together! ;-)
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
David, Damn you are good "just when I'm almost out, they drag me back in", of course I am speaking of my masters, vanity and pride, to name a few. I only wish I had the linguistic skill to open your eyes to the massive scale of the fraud that has been perpetrated on the American people, I could die happy! You may call me a conspiracy nut case and I maybe am more than half-way there, but I look and I look and each time I see a organized group of wealthy elites funding candidates whose "Manchurian Candidate" like mandate is the takeover of the government of the US from within! There I shat it! It's been like a log in my throat and it feels wonderful to say it so you can point out my errors of logic and my stupidity and I can once again fall into the dream that I am a free man and I fought in the Vietnam war so that land could continue to be free, am I free???
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
Chimps be good at playing games and isn't that what this is? We, the people, have to out wit the Greedy Old Pigs (video game, plz!) I also have a movie plot for you: This group of 100 people are stranded on the Island and 99% of them work under the direction of the 1 because the voices in his head (could be female, little fuzzy on final details) then one day one of the 99 begins to question why he has to work while the 1 lays in the sun and gets all the hot women...I still working on the ending, but I think it might have major "redistribution of wealth" in it. Power to the chimps!
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
DanCastro: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
DanCastro
-
David_H:
Buddy, don't let your hormones lead you too far off the path of rational thinking. I've had more than my share of "bad" luck when little dan is "small but in control"! Imagine for a moment, a future in which there is no want. All people are educated and are equal before the law. Labor is rewarded, but recognition of excess is made by the community as in our past. We shun the shop keeper who routinely has a "thumb" on the scales, why not the same with corporations? We could do it if we used the money we spend on war/death/hate/torture!
- 8 months ago
-
DanCastro
