Community | October 12, 2011 | 8 comments

Who Else is on Obama's Secret Kill List? (More Americans that have never been proven to have harmed any ANYONE?)

Anonmaly
According to the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, Americans are never to be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Constitution is not some aspirational statement of values, allowing exceptions when convenient, but rather, it is the law of the land. It is the basis of our Republic and our principal bulwark against tyranny.

Last week’s assassination of two American citizens, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, is an outrage and a criminal act carried out by the President and his administration. If the law protecting us against government-sanctioned assassination can be voided when there is a “really bad American”, is there any meaning left to the rule of law in the United States? If, as we learned last week, a secret government committee, not subject to congressional oversight or judicial review, can now target certain Americans for assassination, under what moral authority do we presume to lecture the rest of the world about protecting human rights? Didn’t we just bomb Libya into oblivion under the auspices of protecting the civilians from being targeted by their government? Timothy McVeigh was certainly a threat, as were Nidal Hassan and Jared Lee Loughner. They killed people in front of many witnesses. They took up arms against their government in a literal way, yet were still afforded trials. These constitutional protections are in place because our Founders realized it is a very serious matter to deprive any individual of life or liberty. Our outrage against even the obviously guilty is not worth the sacrifice of the rule of law. Al-Awlaki has been outspoken against the United States and we are told he encouraged violence against Americans. We do not know that he actually committed any acts of violence. Ironically, he was once invited to the Pentagon as part of an outreach to moderate Muslims after 9/11. As the US attacks against Muslims in the Middle East and Central Asia expanded, it is said that he became more fervent and radical in his opposition to US foreign policy.

Many cheer this killing because they believe that in a time of war, due process is not necessary – not even for citizens, and especially not for those overseas. However, there has been no formal declaration of war and certainly not one against Yemen. The post-9/11 authorization for force would not have covered these two Americans because no one is claiming they had any connection to that attack. Al-Awlaki was on a kill list compiled by a secret panel within President Obama’s National Security Council and Justice Department. How many more Americans citizens are on that list? They won’t tell us. What are the criteria? They won’t tell us. Where is the evidence? They won’t tell us.

Al-Awlaki’s father tried desperately to get the administration to at least allow his son to have legal representation to challenge the “kill” order. He was denied. Rather than give him his day in court, the administration, behind closed doors, served as prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner.The most worrisome aspect of this is that any new powers this administration accrues will serve as precedents for future administrations. Even those who completely trust this administration must understand that if this usurpation of power and denial of due process is allowed to stand, these powers will remain to be expanded on by the next administration and then the next. Will you trust them? History shows that once a population gives up its rights, they are not easily won back. Beware.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_uy29aFzCU&feature=player_embedded
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Actual News,   2 more
  2. tags:
    Law Ron Paul The Constitution
  3.     
    |

8 comments // Who Else is on Obama's Secret Kill List? (More Americans that have never been proven to have harmed any ANYONE?) // Video

  • DEM46
    • +1
      DEM46  
    • Hey, if one wants to remain in this country and rail against it under the 1st amendment fine. Although, when you advocate violence in video, in an online magazine, and are tied to terrorist plots, acts, or attempted acts and move to a foreign country without extradition to the U.S.

      A Predator strike will be in your future.

      oh, and, BTW: Good riddance.

    • 8 months ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • +1
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  
    • This was a secret? I don't think it was a secret to Al-Awlaki or Khan.

      If an American citizen proclaims their allegiance to an anti American cause dedicated to killing Americans, then I would expect the authorities to kill them if they do not give up peacefully. I guess every American citizen now has the right to kill as many people as they want until they are apprehended.

    • 8 months ago
  • vaxart
    • 0
      vaxart  
    • Al-awlaki is so important.... that is sad. There are so many people jobless, homeless, children in the poverty line, children being abused.... et al, which are more impending issues that America can focus on. A would-be, might-be, might-not-be terrorist does not need so much attention.

    • 8 months ago
  • maasanova
    • -4
      maasanova  
    • I'm convinced that Al-Awlaki was on Obama's kill list because he tried to steal something very valuable from the Pentagon when he was invited for dinner with America's top brass. Like some expensive china, the good silverware or a valued heirloom or something!

    • 8 months ago
  • Anonmaly
    • -1
      Anonmaly  
    • Please someone, anyone, explain to me how this secret "kill list" is acceptable?... Really I'd like to know, and how is it not fascist?

      No due process.....

      Secret evidence....

      No trial....

      Which parts of the constitution retains any value? If none, what constitutes this country, and what are the checks and balances...?

      This really concerns me, it's not about anything other than the fact that the very foundation (albeit corrupt as hell to start with) has eroded away into dog-eat-dog fascism.... where;

      It's okay to torture....

      it's okay to indefinitely detain....

      it's okay to murder.....

      it's okay to do any number of things (if you're the "government") when it's been shown time and time again, not only is the election process totally flawed it's 100% corruptible... Not only that, corporations can give unlimited anonymous campaign contributions which basically amount to bribery of whomever THEY want "elected"......

      Who can support a "world leader" that finds this acceptable? Please point yourselves out one more time, and bash the voice of reason....

    • 8 months ago
  • David_H
  • CaptSutter
  • Paratus
more from Community:

top videos