Radio Show Distributed By NPR Fires Host After She Takes Part In Protests
source: http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/10/20/348851/npr-distributed-radio-show-fires-host/
-
-
- WakeUpPeople
- added this
These media sources implied or incorrectly stated that Simeone worked for National Public Radio (NPR), noting that NPR has prohibitions on “engag[ing] in public relations work, paid or unpaid.” The truth is that Simeone was not an NPR employee and rather served as a host on a show that was distributed by some NPR stations.
Yet NPR reacted sharply to pressure from conservative media outlets, sending out an e-mail to its staffers noting that it was “in conversations” with radio station WDAV, which produces one of Simeone’s shows, about “how to handle this. We of course take this issue very seriously.” And late last night, WDAV caved to pressure from NPR and fired Simeone from her job hosting Soundpoint after NPR’s code of conduct was read to her.
In an interview with journalist David Swanson, Simeone noted that she wasn’t even an NPR employee and that her show did not cover politics. She also noted that a wide variety of NPR’s other employees appear as commentators on conservative media or take speaking fees for their work:
Simeone told me: “I find it puzzling that NPR objects to my exercising my rights as an American citizen — the right to free speech, the right to peaceable assembly — on my own time in my own life. I’m not an NPR employee. I’m a freelancer. NPR doesn’t pay me. I’m also not a news reporter. I don’t cover politics. I’ve never brought a whiff of my political activities into the work I’ve done for NPR World of Opera. What is NPR afraid I’ll do — insert a seditious comment into a synopsis of Madame Butterfly?
“This sudden concern with my political activities is also surprising in light of the fact that Mara Liaason reports on politics for NPR yet appears as a commentator on FoxTV, Scott Simon hosts an NPR news show yet writes political op-eds for national newspapers, Cokie Roberts reports on politics for NPR yet accepts large speaking fees from businesses. Does NPR also send out ‘Communications Alerts’ about their activities?”
Last month, NPR’s ombudsman explained that the station was choosing not to cover the protests on Wall Street because it didn’t view them to be sufficiently newsworthy. Now, it appears that the station is going out of its way to pressure independent stations like WDAV to fire hosts who take part in similar protests.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Culture, US Politics, 5 more
-
- tags:
- occupy wall street, NPR, 99%, people power
-
- recommended by:
- WakeUpPeople
-
-
Incredulous
-
NPR just lost my support...
- 7 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
tverdell
-
National Propaganda Radio
- 7 months ago
-
tverdell
-
-
remanns
-
Added to "Culture".
- 7 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
An ACTUAL news organization tries to maintain a neutral stance when it comes to a lot of "controversial" issues, whether or not those issues are controversial. The purpose of an ACTUAL news organization is to report news and information, not to take sides, and if one of their hosts and/or reporters participates in something in such a manner that it shows favor towards one side or another, then that host and/or reporter can become a liability if the news organization is supposed to be unbiased.
News agencies use to require their reporters to request whether or not they could participate in political movements or activities because a it could place the reporters reputation for being a neutral figure, as well as the agencies, in jeopardy and with it there goes there credibility as an actual news source.
However, since she was not employed by NPR, they should have had no means to bring about her termination from the radio station she worked for. If NPR really was disturbed by her activity, they should have just dropped the show. But the overall question I have here is, why the fuck does NPR care about what FOX News claims and/or believes? The people who are watching FOX News for their actual news are not going to be listening to NPR for the same, and if FOX really wants to try to use that false information to slander NPR, then fucking sue FOX for slander. They have, or should have, fact checkers, and FOX is at fault for not using their fact checkers.
- 7 months ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
Novek
-
npr. just as progressive as fox...
- 7 months ago
-
Novek
