Gaddafi Set To Receive UN Humanitarian Award In March 2012

Not "WOULD SELL but HAVE SOLD."

Then why why why did you place the title "Gaddafi Set To Recieve UN Humanitarian Reward"? If the intention wasn't to say boo hoo hoo over Gaddafi then what was the intention? Where does the intention of our own leaders come into all this? You placed an article and set the title to what it was above and the report was a mix bag to show the "humanitarian" efforts of the Libyan regime. That doesn't sound very "truthful" to me, sounds more like intellectual dishonestly by placing a misleading title and then going off a tangent by bashing "our" leaders as it were. This is the problem with Conspiracy Theorists, they are intellectually dishonest and live within their own version of "truth" based on an information bubble that has been brewing on the internet. Its funny since that last half of your incoherent rant almost sounds like you're talking about religion except you omit God and add "truth" and conspiracy theory and bingo, you've entered the light to the real TRUTH! The Truth of something something something that will open the conspiracy and your mind.

you are never going to understand apparently and I can't make you...you can only do that, good luck

which of our leaders deserves it? gotta go back a ways to even consider one

somebody that's been paying attention to more than the usual sources, thank you for the perspective

voted down? Did you even look at the info or watch the video? We have been best friends with Gaddafi for years and now that he's doing things we don't like and loosening our hold we make sure that won't happen. We don't want to free repressed countries, just take over the world for the benefit of a few...and if you think that's not the case...WAKE UP!!!

I could be wrong, but I seriously doubt the validity of the reports that described the origins of the rebellion as you have. Other reports have explained it very differently and it would be very strange if mass news media were accurate in their reports about a conflict the US was involved in. Especially when oil, gold, and finance are significant.

Yes, I think that may be the case as well

that was not just reports I saw the live video feeds on Youtube being smuggled out before the US or NATO even got involved. Heres an idea how bout we all admit gadaffi was a fucking prick who got what he deserved.

how about we all agree enough death and destruction

I see someone wants more death and destruction...I am sorry for your soul whoever you may be

You betcha just as soon as you get all the warlords dictators and just plain greedy ass motherfuckers to agree to stop I'm happy to beat my sword into a plow.

I am not standing up for anyone just saying we are jaded. All the fingers pointed in Gaddafi's direction can be pointed with more vigor in ours.

Ok then, well tell me where in the report did it say Gaddafi was getting a UN Humanitarian Award? I don't see what you mean by that last sentence as it was Gaddafi's fault for shooting his own people when they asked for democratic rights. It wasn't the US fault for starting an uprising, it was the people on the domestic front of Libyan affairs that started the uprising. I don't think you understand the dynamics of domestic affairs. The finger remains pointed to Gaddafi end of story. He shot his people, his actions led to NATO intervention. If the opposite happened and he accepted his people's frustration, he would have surrendered power after 42 years and give his people democratic reforms. But he didn't of course.

very frustrating, it is like talking to a wall to get even my family to remove their blinders and look beyond their zone of comfort...even if they did they would search down paths that only affirm their set point of view

Highly doubtful that this was a grassroots movement. I do not believe that the reports by the major media outlets describe what happened accurately. Given the last 50 years of mass media outlets' war coverage, you would be more accurate if you believed exactly the opposite of most "news" reports. I can't remember the man's name off the top of my head but a former US congressman was visiting Libya on a goodwill tour and had to go into hiding amongst the general populace when all this went down. He had a very very different story to tell.

Thats just one man's account and he wasn't a Libyan who lived in the country (So you rather believe the account of an American instead of the account of a Libyan?). Why are you doubtful of this whole process? Imagine being under the rule of one man for 42 years! 42 years of repression and you expect people to remain idle to that? 42 years of living under the cult of personality of one individual? This doesn't even have to do with mass media for christ sakes. It has to do with the domestic disputes resulting from being repressed for 42 years under one man rule and at the same time, getting access to information that allows for greater unity among the population to organize opposition. It has everything to do with a large youthful population that has searched for inspiration from the Tunisian and Egyptian uprising.

You are so certain you make the point in the other direction...nothing about our "conflicts" has been clear to the US population. If you were to say well there are so many differing stories about this you might be believable in your assuredness and points, but you buy your surroundings as truth all too often...always.

How about this for some truth

http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2011/03/23/mccains-libyan-flip-flo...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCVMIrKwruc

THAT has nothing to do with anything I just said. I wasn't talking about motives rather, I'm talking about the fact that the Libyan uprising was started by the people and not by the CIA. NATO involvement resulted BECAUSE Gaddafi shot his own citizens and BECAUSE Benghazi would have become the site of possible political genocide. Lets get this straight, this wasn't a US led operation, most of this was conducted by European Member States so what John McCain thinks is irrelevant. You're not reading my comment. Also, what TRUTH is there to that title? Where in the UN report did it say that Gaddafi was getting a Humanitarian Award? Oh, you probably propagated that in order to sugarcoat Gaddafi because I see no other way you could have added that EXTREMELY misleading title.

It is possible to recognize that the US, over many years, propped up dictators who then turned against the US imperialism, the latter being reasonable. It is possible to recognize the US and corporations had an interest in removing their propped up dictators gone bad.

And it is possible to recognize all the above AND still recognize that some dictators got so bad to their own people that their own people just flat out said "ENOUGH" and took action.

I agree, is that what happened? Do we know or will we? How so? From who's mouth will it come? 20 months ago we are praising him as we did for years....then we decide to wack him? I just don't buy it...you know they are lying so how can you believe anything they put in your face? Just looking for some truth...I have found the more I search the less I know and Certainly haven't come to conclusions other than, Love not Fear, and People and Planet are what count.

I understand you definitely think so

Who is this "we"? ROFLMAO

We referring to Square and his homeboys trying to spam the trend with worthless conspiracy theories.

Thank you.

No problem, always a pleasure spreading the TRUTH!

That's good to know. Some of these stories are like fairy tales for knuckle draggers.

As someone who is majoring in a subject involving lots of research papers, a little common sense and actual research takes you a long way. Reading the UN report simply negates what Square has been propagating in this trend.

Ah, thanks. I was about to get my back up over another idiot making assumptions about "We" and trying to include those of us who do not agree. Thanks for clearing that up.

Simple common sense would help. I haven't had to do a research paper for many years, but thank goodness I do use many different tools try to find out the truth or some semblance of it for my own personal reasons. I just don't put much stock in complete nonsense, but the sad fact is many people do.

He's a first hand witness and yes, I believe him over accounts by entities that have proven themselves to be consistently unreliable, especially when it comes to US involvement in violent foreign conflicts.

Or, maybe he could have been a good and just leader who would be remembered with love by his people instead of the memories of him they and the world will have.

I've read about all the myriad of citizens' benefits under Kadafy's rule.
They were a much more liberalized expansion of the same benefits
available to Saudi Arabian citizens. With all that spreading around
money from oil revenues, it was only a matter of time before the
greedy smelled the color of their money as sharks smell the blood
of their victims. It's damn dangerous to have a military Jaggernaut
around to flex it's muscles. Obvious too the Bankster powermongers
fueling the Corporations in the M.I.C. (which Eisenhaur warned us of
in Jan. 1961) have taken over NATO, which is now a fascade for the
M.I.C international. Kadafy expressed that the Western powers pay
for his countries Oil in Gold. That HAD to freak them out. If the Western
powers had listened to Nicola Tesla, the original green inventor genius
in 1900, developed an alternate recyclable energy source like electricity
instead of depending on fossil fuels, to promote Monopoly domination,
we wouldn't be seeing these belligerent military atrocities play out today.
Libya also has an underground reservoir of pure, fresh water that makes
the Saudi's, all other Western industrialized nation covet as theirs run out.

Oil & Water drive the food production of the USA's agricultureal system.
Without it, the cost of t6hat essential commodity would skyrocket here.
During the 1800s, many European powers invaded Africa to plunder
their natural resources. Centuries later History repeats itself. Their
pattern of colonialism is simply more subtle these days. Banksters
have advised them it takes more financial investment to have a military
presence there. And less to use up ordinance to keep the 1% in power.

One of the massive benefits of Social Networking may well be the opportunity to stop with "them vs us" approach. If we can learn we are all the same species and we can manage the world if we press tech vs. oil/coal) Our goal should be green, we do what we can to reverse all harm and that is our future "job" until the planet is restored and we all (peoples of the world) have a decent living. Is this "fairy tale" talk or could it just be possible if we can stop hating each other for long enough? Por que no?

Si, esta la verdad

I would hope that we can learn to accept our strengths and our weaknesses. There are no perfect humans and no humans are all good. I see this as a matter of fact of our species, not a statement on a particular person. We have to expect that "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" we don't always/usually control that stuff, our genes do! If we don't expect perfection and move people from positions of power on a rotational basis, we can minimize the corruption, but we will never fully eliminate it (or the unreasoning hate!)

What more should be necessary than the oath of office, if faithfully engaged in and w/o prior promises or oaths! ;-)

Totally with you, it is US who have the power and we, the people, are reminding (OWS) the pols they owe their jobs to US, so get US jobs! I just can't understand why OWS won't get behind demanding the passage of the American Jobs Bill? Does this mean the President is "untouchable" from the right and now (OWS) the left too? Et Tu time? If it has ideas from both parties and it will create jobs, why is this "political purity test" so "in" when we know our system is about pols and cutting deals (but always for the good of most of the people!)? Are these "jobs" some how not as good?

If it comes down to control of the government or the corps, I would rather use the government as those are people we vote in or out of office. We don't control Corps and they have acted in their best money making manner by sending our jobs overseas, hardly the "models" of faith and trust for a healthy middle or working class!

That's a worthwhile goal to work for. De aquerdo, por lo cierto.

gotta sell goods to make money for the projects listed in the story...might as well sell local

Point taken. If Pinochiobama can receive the Nobel Peace prize, it can't
mean that much anymore. Alfred Nobel desired that the dynamite he
invented to clear the way for roads, railroads, and canals be used for
benign, peaceful, constructive purposes. He was so horrified when our
planet of apes saw the potential to use it to destroy instead, that he
reaffirmed his will by starting his Nobel Peace prize foundation. He was
a genuine humanitarian. NATO's humanitarian claim is so overreaching
it's flagrant propaganda. Hitler's inner circle would wish they'd come up
with that line of merde. Meanwhile Alfred Nobel's likely rolling in his grave,
and his spirit wishing he'd gone into farming instead of inventing. As a
cynical person this is a prize example of the old Dow chemical slogan:
" Better living through chemistry " ( So long as you're not on the
business end of the explosives anyway)

Speaking of "business end of the explosives", I wonder when those unaccounted for SAM's will start showing up on Ebay.

Looks like somebody was getting ready to go deer hunting

Ya, ya ought to see the kid's room when elk season comes around.

lol I can just imagine

Question: What is Alfred's rotational momentum ?

That would be a hoot to see. The law would be on them faster than fleas
attacking an unprotected dog. 50 States have very stringent penal Statutes
outlawing explosives. Even the military has stringent security procedures
handling that type of ordinance. They don't want it ending up in the wrong
hands. The trouble lies in that, less tongue in cheek, it already has. The
outrageous way chemical Corporations control the civilian Government
which then uses the military as Corporate pawns to accomplish foreign
invasions to promote Corporate Piracy in Iraq, Afghanistan etc,,,,,has
already seen to that. Fascism is as Fascism does.

Yeah. I'd be lol if it weren't so tragic.

It leads to Lindsey Graham saying that there is money to be made in those countries.

Turkey is on the list? I missed that one.

Keep watching

yep

I am guessing Syria will be next followed by Turkey and then Iran. The disaster which is the Obama "foeign policy" now has resulted in Afghanistan backing up Pakistan in any war with the US. When it comes to Iran we will find Afghans, Pakis and Iranians all fighting the Obama NWO / NATO war machine. Clinton had a laugh when she heard Gaddafi was dead, on live TV she laughed at the murder of the man and stated "We Came, We Saw and We Conquered". But "we were not at war according to Obama. He should be impeached and jailed.

All sources are compromised these days...you never get all truth...but there is some here

Agreed.

Yawohl. They're Corporations too. That article posted by KennyMotown
recently in which Swiss researchers discovered upon analysis that 1%,
some 147 of 43,000 interconnected multi lateral Corporations control
over 40% of all the world's wealth, and economies is very telling. It used
to be circa 65 Corporations that controlled the TV excuse for news in
the 60s. Now they've merged into only 10 superCorporations. You should
check out that article if you haven't blogged it already. The immage looks
like a pin cushion of colorful points of light, though they're not benevolent.
I'm sure Murdock, Koch, et al power mongers have intimate connections
to that 1% of Corporations, which is why they're part of the 1/10 of 1%.

conspiracy seeing the light of day...a good post, you're right

I will check that out, PressCore. If I haven't yet, I don't know how I missed it. Where's a good trust busting president when you need one?

I think he got his face carved into Mt. Rushmore national park in the
Dakota's. The man who chiseled their 4 presdiential faces into Mt.
Rushmore also made a scuplture of chief Crazy Horse not that far
away as a courtesy to the written letters from Native Amercians
petitioning him to. The History channel features a series called
Brad Meltzer's Decoded. I saw the 3rd episode of their 2nd season
recently which I recorded on my Dish satelite network DVR about
that place. It's a fascinating series. If you like to learn secrets as
I do, you'll want to check out all their 1st season episodes too.
The opener for their new season was about the supposed Gold
depostory at Ft. Knox. That one could make it to the Chiller channel.

This sounds really interesting, PressCore. I'll have to check it out.

I don't believe so...interesting though that the link to read the UN resolution has been removed.

no it hasnt been removed yoiu just cant access it via current. if you click the link on the top, which is where this 'story' came from, you will be able to read the entire report from that page. but i dont reccommend it lol its a little dry.. it is from January of this year and titled "Report of the Working Group on the Universal
Periodic Review*
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

looked through other means and couldn't get to it but I'll go back to the beginning, thanks

very interesting indeed...transparency is happening whether the powers that be want it to or not

Well they did have Sudan on the human rights council if I remember correctly.

Good Morning Kenny, I am curious why Amanpour made no mention of his death in her Memorium section this morning...

maybe or maybe his "invasions" and "backing" of terrorists were to help other countries out from under our thumb...seems as if that has been his main goal. Who among us hasn't done things we wish we hadn't and the only good that came of it was that we learned.

Morning KB!