Wesley Clark reveals Neocon plot to destroy 7 nations in 5 years

How do we stop these Psychos, we have to become our own military, intelligence, they are deranged mass murdering thieving psychos, how do we get rid of them. it is either them or us, unfortunately, shooting that bastards will simply get us killed / jailed, so how do we do it, it's a problem WE must solve, weapon of choice for the moment is wider public education about stuff like this, if the MSM wont broadcast it to the public, we must.

This is weird I can't find much on what he is doing recently. something is not right. what is
he doing now?
Wesley Clark, who knew? We had a bloodless coup in 2000 with the theft of the presidency and then they let the 911 attackers come through the gate. we lost control of our military then and we are seeing the horrors of a police state and its growth.
Also, If the miltary and this admin wanted to stay in Iraq, we would be.

These neocons are crazy. We all knew that they attacked Iraq for oil, but it's startling to hear a former general admit what really went on.

This is what the Neocons wanted but they figured out it wasn't as easy as they thought it was going to be. The simplistic minds of PNAC never thought it out fully. The folly of a land war in the middle east was quickly made evident, which derailed their grand plan. So now they try to accomplish the same ends with their fruitless drone campaigns with Obama at the helm. Which won't work either.

It's not just the middle east.

So I wonder who is guarding the 80 tons of GOLD now.

This story fits perfectly with intel I was receiving around 2004, and explains why this information was being circulated. I was told that Iraq moved their WMD's to Syria, that we knew the exact date and time of the movement. Syria was going to be next.

Dumb question.....

And exactly which candidate are you supposing it is that will actually put a stop to this insanity?

(good post btw, nice to see some truth coming from the mouths of high ranking people )

A bit of truth in a bunch of lies...and on we go

Great post...missed it before ...glad for the repost

the love of $ men would sell SOULS - Financial Slavery NWO style

Thanks for posting this massanova!

only 7? does that also include The United States?? they are doing their best to destroy us

I will go view this in its entirety this evening or tomorrow evening. I remember seeing something about this (may have been here on Current), but I never heard his complete talk. I am interested.

Thanks for posting this, maasanova.

This is the end game. It's implementation is driven by forces bigger than any of the two parties.

Both Zbigniew Brzezinski (former Jimmy Carter National Security Adviser) and Henry Kissinger (National Security Adviser and Secretary of State under Richard Nixon) have been driving this agenda for decades.

"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. (pp 24-5)

"For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia... Now a non-Eurasian power is preeminent in Eurasia - and America's global primacy is directly dependent on how long and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is sustained."

"In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. Eurasia is the globe's largest continent and is geopolitically axial. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of the world's GNP and about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)

----Zbigniew Brzezinski "The Grand Chessboard"----

Gaddafi's Real Crimes

Throughout his reign, Gaddafi insisted on a much larger (and fairer) share of his country's oil profits than multinational oil companies were used to accepting. Indeed, in a 2009 talk given to students at Georgetown University, Gaddafi threatened to kick Western oil companies out of Libya altogether by nationalising its oil and natural gas.

What is beyond dispute is that Gaddafi used his nation's oil wealth to turn Libya into the most progressive and modern of all African nations. In a 2007 African executive magazine it was noted that Libya, "unlike other oil producing countries such as Nigeria [where major Western oil companies have a stranglehold on the government], utilised the revenue from its oil to develop its country."

Gaddafi was also instrumental in establishing the African Union. He invested heavily and generously, to the tune of $6 billion, in many other African nations. Throughout Africa, hospitals, schools, hotels and roads bear Gaddafi's name as a sign of gratitude to the 'brutal dictator'. Libyan investments have helped to connect most of Africa by telephone, television, radio broadcasting, etc. Many major African companies, in which Gaddafi had invested via the 'Libya Arab Africa Investment Portfolio', now face financial ruin as Libyan oil money is diverted to the West under Libya's new rulers.

But undoubtedly the greatest threat posed by Gaddafi to NATO warmongers was his efforts to fast-track the creation of an African Monetary Fund and an African Central Bank and to establish the gold dinar as a pan-African currency (Libya has 144 tons of gold with a population of just 6 million, no external debt and $150 billion in cash reserves).

Gaddafi's idea was that African and Muslim nations would join together to create this new currency and use it to purchase oil and other resources to the exclusion of the dollar and other currencies. While a Russia Today report called it "an idea that would shift the economic balance of the world", Gaddafi's plans for a radical financial overhaul of African economies would undoubtedly have sounded the death knell for IMF looting of African economies, not to mention the 'CFA Franc', a colonial currency tied to the Euro and the French central bank and used in twelve formerly French-ruled African countries (hence the unbridled enthusiasm with which the French government joined the fray).

Writing in April 2011 for the London Evening Post, writer Jean-Paul Pougala had this to say about Gaddafi:

"For most Africans, Gaddafi is a generous man, a humanist, known for his unselfish support for the struggle against the racist regime in South Africa. If he had been an egotist, he wouldn't have risked the wrath of the West to help the ANC both militarily and financially in the fight against apartheid. This was why Mandela, soon after his release from 27 years in jail, decided to break the UN embargo and travel to Libya on 23 October 1997.

Mandela didn't mince his words when the former US president Bill Clinton said the visit was an 'unwelcome' one: "No country can claim to be the policeman of the world and no state can dictate to another what it should do." He added, "Those that yesterday were friends of our enemies have the gall today to tell me not to visit my brother Gaddafi, they are advising us to be ungrateful and forget our friends of the past."

Writing in September this year in the Guardian, Julian Borger and Terry Macalister pointed out that Western oil companies had planned to carve up Libyan oil before the so-called 'revolution'. Are we surprised? Is it mere coincidence that the NATO bombing campaign began on the 8th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq? The Egyptian uprising was more or less legitimate based on the psychopathic policies of a real 'brutal dictator' - Hosni Mubarak - who had brought millions of Egyptians to the brink of starvation. And take note how Mubarak was dealt with in comparison to Gaddafi. But no such conditions existed in socialist Libya.

The plain truth is that there was no widespread popular revolution against Gaddafi; there were only ever hired mercenaries, a well-orchestrated Western media campaign, which played out a script dictated to it from start to finish, heavy infiltration by military intelligence agents of the US and European countries, and NATO bombs. Lots of NATO bombs.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/236679-Naked-Bloody-Imperialism-or-We-Came-We-...