Community | November 04, 2011 | 28 comments

Have We Raised An Entire Generation Of Young Men That Do Not Know How To Be Men?

Image
Revelation1217
Have we completely and totally failed an entire generation of young men? Have we failed to equip them with the tools that they need? Have we raised an entire generation of young men that do not know how to be men? Today, young adult men are nearly twice as likely to live with their parents as young adult women are, and young adult men are much less likely to go to college than young adult women are. Now I want to make something perfectly clear before we proceed. The point of this article is not to slam women or drag them down. Not at all. Rather, the goal of this article is to point out that we have a real problem with our young men and that they are lagging way behind. Vast numbers of them don't want to go to college, don't want to pursue careers, don't want to get married and don't want to take on any serious responsibilities. Of course there are always exceptions. In fact, there are some young men out there that are absolutely outstanding. However, what this article is trying to say is that the overall trends all point to the fact that our system has raised up a crop of young men that are generally weak, directionless, wimpified and unwilling to take responsibility. This is not a good thing.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics
  2. tags:
    News Politics Religion Women 7 more
  3.     
    |

28 comments // Have We Raised An Entire Generation Of Young Men That Do Not Know How To Be Men?

  • Imzadi
    • +2
      Imzadi  
    • First of all, what is the definition of being a "man"?

      What filter is the author using while writing this tome? How old is he?

      I have serious issues with most of this article. Questions that come to mind:
      1) Is it generational?
      2) Is it cultural?
      3) Is it something to do with the fact that we have become a society dominated by multi-media vs. personal interaction? (The Hangover comes to mind)

      And why did the author feel there was a reason for the disclaimer about women?

    • 7 months ago
  • cwebbpt4
    • +2
      cwebbpt4  
    • By the way, whoever wrote this article is a moron. If you need sweeping generalizations and blanket statements to make your point you are probably worse then those you claim to have pigeonholed.

    • 7 months ago
  • cwebbpt4
    • +5
      cwebbpt4  
    • Your assigning blame in the wrong place. The headline should read "Did the Entire Baby Boom Generation totally fail at parenting?"

    • 7 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • cwebbpt4:

      I agree about generalizing, but I also don't think the entire baby boom generation failed at parenting. My parents didn't, I didn't and I know others who haven't. There are social factors involved in this as well. Families are also not as cohesive as they once were, and I think that is where much of the strength and support in society comes from.

    • 7 months ago
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  
    • cwebbpt4:

      Most of the parents of this generation didn't raise their kids at all. Let the bus pick them up in the morning. Go to day care after school. Or sports when they are older.

      The rest of the time they were raised by the television. (god forbid a parent actually spend a half hour a day with their offspring.) And yes being raised by snooki and shows like jersey shore has made for a pretty fucked up generation.

    • 7 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Dagum:

      And also in this day and age it seems the substitution for many parents is ritalin and drugging their kids up because they have "attention deficit disorder." In other words, they drug their children so they have an excuse for not raising them right. There was never a day when my son was in school that I didn't know what he was doing or didn't help him and spend time with him. Still do. So again you make a point about society and families. And it isn't just boys.

    • 7 months ago
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • JanforGore:

      It's a societal problem. I don't have children. But I don't understand the need to drug your children with ritalin and other pharms so they're calm little brain-dead zombies and then find ways to spend as little time as possible raising them. If they hate spending time with their children then why have them?

    • 7 months ago
  • cwebbpt4
    • 0
      cwebbpt4  
    • JanforGore:

      I would tend to agree with you about families at in the larger societal context, but would expand that even further to the broader cultural paradigm. The consumer culture has really wreaked havoc on our cultural conditioning process and this is just one of the things you wills see as a result. I, like you, resent generalizations since I would fall into the category (man age 23) of person being generalized.

    • 7 months ago
  • GENERALNATTY
  • SageRockandRoll
  • BKsaysAction
    • 0
      BKsaysAction  
    • Look, my generation was told to go to college and get a decent job except now that we went to college there are no longer decent jobs. So we then have to work two part time jobs barely making above minimum wage just to kind of get by. We then either have to live with our parents or live with multiple room mates in the same situation. This generation is in that state of limbo until we can get career jobs that can afford for us to have our own places and good job security. Because there is no current stability in the work environment we're not able to plunge forward into the rest of our lives.

    • 7 months ago
  • Anonmaly
    • +2
      Anonmaly  
    • Worst economic situation since the 20's or 30's....

      Only 47% of working aged adults have a full time job, the gap in wages is larger than ever, and inflation has compounded the low wage situation to the point of virtual slavery in the majority of jobs....

      We have less rights, less freedoms, and are demanded to surrender more in the name of; "The war on terror"..... We don't even have say over our own bodies... I mean sure a woman can legally have an abortion (A "right" I'm not disputing), but a grown anyone can't posses/consume a little marijuana?

      Do you want to talk about fuct up, because that isn't the half of it......

      So what is being a "man" in our culture...? Submitting to debt and wage slavery in order to try to take care of a family? Perpetuating a broke down system? Being "patriotic" and going overseas to kill solely for violent capitalistic gains?

      Just wtf is a "man"?...... Because what the media, what your war veteran neighbors push on you, what the T.V. tells you to do, what we're lead to believe by pop culture means "being a man" is generally BULLSHIT as is......

      I tell you what a man is....

      A man is someone willing to work to gain things of value, things of values in all aspects of life; physical, spiritual, psychological (not just trivial shit, electronic gadgets, drugs, etc.).... Not work to maintain a grip on his indulgent spending and credit card debts....

      A man is someone who knows that the majority of things and people out there are just wanting to control you, or take your money....

      A man is someone like Terence McKenna, who knows; "Culture is not your friend"

      A man is someone who loves without expecting anything in return, and is always grateful when it is returned....

      A man is someone who would give you the shirt off his back, or share his last little bit of whatever should he find himself and other in a bad situation....

      A man is someone who seeks to make his and the lives of those around him easier in whichever capacity he can....

      So.... Not having a regular "job" doesn't make some less of a man.....

      You judge somebody by what they'd be worth if they had nothing, not what they're worth with a pocket or bank account full of money.....

      Yeah laying around like an overgrown teenager depending on your parent or grandparents when you have more options... Not very manly....

      I guess men are few and far between up to a certain age.... But look at society, societal conditions, the brainwashing of pop-culture.... Mommy and daddy weren't there anyway they became debt slaves and left the T.V. to do the raising......

      Break the cycle....

    • 7 months ago
  • Milieu
    • -2
      Milieu  
    • If you're not the entrepreneurial kill at all costs and take no prisoners type, the Republic Syndicate has no use for you.

      So, if you can't "Kill" on command from Kochs et al, you're not a real man.

    • 7 months ago
  • Ambill94
    • -1
      Ambill94  
    • Some of what was in the article is probably true, but even a cursory look at the supporting evidence from CNN indicates both genders have seen increases in the return home rate over the past 6 years...nothing conclusive here since we have no data except that one snapshot...is this a new trend?... how about over 20-30 years?...maybe these numbers aren't so out of the norm...and drawing huge generalizations from sketchy data doesn't help the argument.

      "Men that are between 25 and 34 should be in their prime working years. Instead, almost one out of every five of them is living with mommy and daddy." And then: "This is a major problem. Rather than working hard, taking responsibility and building their own lives..."

      The conclusion that young men are essentially a bunch of losers who sit around watching TV and generally vegging comes from the data above? That is about as non-sequitur as it can be.

      "Should be in their prime working years...Instead...living with mommy and daddy"? And what's with the mommy and daddy language? Sounds like a young woman grinding an axe.

      This reads like a poorly conceived rant based on superficial evidence by someone who knows little about the dynamics of the world in which both young men and young women are struggling today.

      What "should" be the case may have applied in the day, but there are many more factors that determine why the data reads as it does than this article would lead a reader to believe.

      BTW: Whether young men go to college or graduate if they do, is not a benchmark to measure someone's ambition or ability, that is also a logical fallacy.

      OWS is in the streets for a multitude of just causes, many of which have a direct influence on the phenomenon that this author is trying to analyze by looking at a only couple of sets of data.

      I'm not sure this makes sense, but its the best I can do right now...

    • 7 months ago
  • ninthstate
  • Debra_
    • -5
      Debra_  
    • A very wise woman once said "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

      And this proves it. Women can handle society.

      In response to the poster below, there is no defined role for men because men are no longer needed. They can go out and get drunk with their man-child friends, play pinball and collect unemployment. That's all they're good at.

    • 7 months ago
  • 667
    • -1
      667  
    • Debra_:

      i think we dislike people who dislike us. want men to treat you differently? you know with respect and compassion? how about you reciprocate? I think you are a troll, but maybe you have been treated badly... I change my position, I feel sorry for you, even if you are a troll, it can't possibly be satisfying.

    • 7 months ago
  • jpvt
    • -1
      jpvt  
    • There's a crisis of masculinity going on this country right now. I don't think many boys really know what it's like to be a man. There are several reasons for this, but the first and most obvious thing to point out is we live in a society where, for generations now, around half of the boys growing up either have no father figure, or only see their dad once in a while. I'm not saying this is anyone's fault, and I'm not criticizing divorce or children born out of wedlock, just stating a pretty obvious fact. This fact also explains why young women are so independent, because they see mom doing it all on her own.

      I also think the problem gets doubled-down because a lot of mothers feel especially bad for their fatherless sons, so they go easier on them. Thus they are more likely to pick up their sons' slack and make excuses for them. And they continue to wipe their metaphorical asses well into college (if they go).

      I also think there is no longer a strong definition of what a "real" man is anymore. There's the pro wrestler definition of being all muscular and ready to fight to solve any problems. But guys who are like that in real life are assholes. The whole "head of the family" thing is now considered to be awfully chauvinistic. The fat, lazy, stupid guy married to the overly tolerant and way too attractive wife that seems so popular on sitcoms (and cartoons) is a gross distortion of reality.

      It seems like the expectations for women are many and are placed in clearly defined roles. Mother, sex expert in the bedroom, career woman, cook, maid, etc. (I'm not saying this is right or fair). But the current role of a man isn't so well defined. He should be responsible and provide for his family, and he should do a lot of the other things that are now expected of women, but a lot of the traditional male roles have largely been antiquated leaving generations of men to figure out their roles on their own.

    • 7 months ago
  • Leen61
    • -2
      Leen61  
    • My husband and I see this so often not only at our fave bar, but in today's culture across the board. The bar we go to seems to be a microcosm of today's gender roles. You see 90% of the guys who walk into the bar dressed in some form of sports uniform (whether it's in season or not), poorly groomed and are basically social misfits. 90% of the women are clearly the dominant gender. They spend most of their time entertaining EACH OTHER than interacting with the males present. The males are spectators to the spectacle, which includes more flirtatious activity amongst the women themselves than with the opposite sex. It always looks like the males are wondering "why are we here?" There has been a collective emasculation of the male population. Movies and TV do show the male characters as under-achievers who need a woman to survive. I don't know the last time I saw a strong male character on TV or the big screen. There is a book out now called "Manning Up" about this very subject. But also a book from 2000 by Susan Faludi called "Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man" that also covers the reasons behind the downfall of masculinity.

    • 7 months ago
  • Konkey__Dong
    • -1
      Konkey__Dong  
    • "Today, young adult men are nearly twice as likely to live with their parents as young adult women are, and young adult men are much less likely to go to college than young adult women are."

      I very much resemble this. Only I went college and dropped out halfway through my third year. Wasn't learning anything useful.

      I did perfect the art of making a gravity bong though.

      Also screw living with B***hes. Females are wacky as hell these days. Love boning them but never would want to live with a chick. And if you've seen how females are these days it's really their problem.

    • 7 months ago
  • Vic_Romano
    • +4
      Vic_Romano  
    • Man, we've raised more than a generation of people who no longer are capable of independent and critical thought. We are truly a nation of sheep begetting a government of wolves. Perhaps it's time for the whole system to collapse, so folks are reminded of what it takes to maintain a town, city, county, state and nation.

    • 7 months ago
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • 0
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • Vic_Romano:

      You have it right. We are dragging ourselves down to collapse. We are being pushed by the media with what is loosely called entertainment, when in actuality it is closer to mental programming. The article makes valid points regarding the down side of young men but the malady is present in young woman too. Like men they have to have the latest wireless products, but with men it is how many technical features the device has as opposed to women who regard mobile phones in the same aspect as jewelery. Women tend to use "shopping" as a recreational activity, parroting the women they see on television. Do they need 25 pairs of shoes and of course, matching handbags? We have a nation of Imelda Marcos types. Both women and men think nothing of running up credit card debt in order to have all the stuff that they are told they desperately need. We are, as you say, a nation of sheep, just waiting to be eaten by the wolves who, in turn, will starve once they have killed all us sheep.

    • 7 months ago
  • JohnA
  • Leen61
  • floydyboy
    • +1
      floydyboy  
    • Wyley_Wombat:

      I read your comment in the voice of Tyler Durden. Great comment. You're right. The people who think like that do not own their possessions, their possessions end up owning them & running their lives.

    • 7 months ago
  • Wyley_Wombat
  • Wyley_Wombat
  • Leen61
more from Community:

top videos