Image
attilatheblond
"...

The US Senate Armed Services Committee said its researchers had uncovered 1,800 cases in which the Pentagon had been sold electronics that may be counterfeit.

In total, the committee said it had found more than a million fake parts had made their way into warplanes such as the Boeing C-17 transport jet and the Lockheed Martin C-130J "Super Hercules".

It also found fake components in Boeing's CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter and the Theatre High-Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile defence system.

..."


Months ago, heard a discussion of the problem of computer parts from China in US weapons systems, planes, missiles. Only it wasn't so much about the Chinese as the US corporations, contracted by DOD to build such items just doing on the cheap, using Chinese computer chips. And the concerns were not just about parts that were not up to specs and subject to failure under normal military use, but of back doors and other built in hacks.

DOD is not serious about security. They are serious about funneling money to MIC. Guess there are better retirement packages for money funnelers than for the real patriots who actually want to defend the nation?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Orwellian Nightmare,   Community Spotlight
  2. tags:
    dod Military Industrial Complex Military Hardware Chinese computer chips
  3.     
    |

88 comments // US Weapons 'full of fake Chinese parts'

  • Wyley_Wombat
  • Mark701
    • 0
      Mark701  
    • Doesn't surprise me in the least. If defense contractors had their way, entire US weapons systems would have "Made in China" stamped on them.

    • 7 months ago
  • ReMarker
  • alexandrek
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • alexandrek:

      Damned good question, alexandrek! They are basically making threats and holding us hostage: give us what we want, or the workers get it. While more and more of 'the workers' are in a nation that is pretty hostile.

    • 7 months ago
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • No kidding. What a bunch of idiots. It's time to cut of the Military Industrial complex's access to the tap. Fuck the DOD for wasting our money.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • Dagum:

      Wasting the money is bad enough, but the corporations they deal with sell out the nation's security. THAT is the big problem. The corporations are setting us up to be hacked in all the defense systems.

    • 7 months ago
  • GRC54
  • letsliveinpeace
  • kayopunk
  • cmc101
  • OlBlue
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • I wonder if anyone in the DoD not sitting on their brains ever bothered
      to TEST those components before they bought them. Or perhaps they
      were too busy celebrating their big score to be bothered with that formality.
      Vladimir Lennin once said: " The Capitalists will sell us the rope we need
      to hang them with. " Wow was he ever naive. Crossing the ocean to Russia
      is also too much of a bother for those who'd only look for the nearest tree,
      & a good noose. There are more than enough sellouts on this side of the
      ocean to copy the no competitive bidding process of simply Bribing for con
      tracts. Then shortcutting quality control standards by buying cheap on the
      black market. Money has no patriotism. Greed & corruption knows no bounds.
      Looks like Total Recall 2011. The " enemy " wouldn't need to sabotage our
      defense equipment with that sort of widespread negligence. $500 hammers,
      and $1,000 toilet seats, anyone ? Those are now the good old days for the
      cynics who understand the capitalist system may be a necessary evil, but
      it's never been anything realy good. Maybe the profitters are saving their
      last 2 coins for someone to place on their eyelids. The ferryman, Charon
      won't volunteer his services taking them across the river Styx to Hades either.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • artemis6
  • attilatheblond
  • artemis6
  • alexandrek
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • artemis6:

      That was the opinion of several people on that NPR discussion too. That was about hacking into systems and the possibility of things being under the control of some other government or group.

      I figured they meant 'some other country or corporation'. Xe with all the DOD toys under their control would not make the world a better place.

    • 7 months ago
  • artemis6
  • VoyagerFilms
  • cmc101
    • +3
      cmc101  
    • Heads must roll
      this is as bad as the Rosenbergs

      This is Traitorism at the highest Levels
      Charges must be brought against our country corperations that supply the defenders with inferior military parts
      this espionage. is equal to the derivatives by money greedy anti American banksters

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • CalgarC
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • CalgarC:

      Beatchifyed & Bangin' Does she book appearances at Boy Scout
      Corn ventions ? If so, there're a few merit badges I forgot to receive.
      Heh. Nothin' says home like snow on the roof, & fire in the furnace.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • KB723
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • KB723:

      Well golly gee, saaar gent ! Ya' know I got me a system. I classify
      everything as animal, vegetable, or mineral ! Uh Huh. And tell me
      Gomer Pyle, which category do you fall into ? I dunno. I did fall into
      the creek once though ...And as they say, the rest is History.

    • 7 months ago
  • KB723
  • Des_Akkari
  • Dusty_King
  • attilatheblond
    • +6
      attilatheblond  
    • Dusty_King:

      Shoulda been a clue when troops in Iraq ended up with raw sewage in their drinking water sources thanks to Halliburton subsidiary contractors. Stuff the military used to do well for its self now outsources, up to and including food/water for the troops.

      Supporting the MIC with more and more no bid contracts for basic services and goods is NOT a good way to support the troops.

    • 7 months ago
  • DanCastro
    • +6
      DanCastro  
    • attilatheblond:

      The repugnants have show over and over that they only care about the troops when they have to as when the armor they were given was too thin or not enough protection. They certainly don't care about vets (like me! ;-) who return to no jobs and limited UIB. Where is the "patriotism" and "care for the troops" now? How many jobs bills for vet has the House or the Senate passed? Just how much do they "support the troops" when it means that they have to tax the 1%? Whose side are they on? Care to guess??? ;-)

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Lisayou
    • +5
      Lisayou  
    • DanCastro:

      Thank you for your service Dan and welcome home.
      My son has been home for almost two years and still can not find a job that would support a household. He is fortunate to have parents that are able to help support him while he goes to school. It is not fare, not every Vet has the support of a family. It really pisses me off that for the past decade we have sent our sons and daughters off to war to give the biggest sacrifice and when its time for them to come home we let them down. It makes me ashamed to be an American!

    • 7 months ago
  • cmc101
    • +1
      cmc101  
    • Lisayou:

      I am Proud to be an American and I support those that went to war for my country
      But I will not condone those warmongers that profit from my friends sacrifice
      I only have blood guts and tears to offer in their Remembrance ...

    • 7 months ago
  • cmc101
  • DanCastro
    • +1
      DanCastro  
    • Lisayou:

      I feel ashamed too! The guys I fought with who died believing in an America that greeted all with ""Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" I am sad when I think of their ultimate sacrifice and how the pols,bought and paid for by the rich, spit on them and say the country can't afford to help them find work now and if they can't find work they are lazy and wanting to live on the dole! Now that they have returned from war, they are to be "put away" at minimum expense, until they are needed for the next time!

    • 7 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • Dusty_King:

      Still a punishment too good for them. Besides, if they're as twisted
      as I believe them to be, they'd probably enjoy a beating, as much
      as, and even more, if they were the ones getting battered..

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • cmc101
  • ilikeike
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  
    • ilikeike:

      it has.. check your own submissions under the view profile tab and see if you can find it. Sometimes they disappear if you don't make a comment yourself, or send it to friends...they actually don't disappear, they just get buried under the rest of the posts.

    • 7 months ago
  • ilikeike
    • +2
      ilikeike  
    • Incredulous:

      I guess it's lost forever. Oh well, it was a good rant though. Also, sometimes it takes 5+ minutes for current to log me in even with broadband connection, doesn't happen at other sites.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Incredulous
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • Earl_Dixon
  • hombre76
    • +3
      hombre76  
    • frankly having for profit companies involved in the defence industry at all is an invetation to inferior products. their profit margin is what is most important not a superior product regardless of cost which is what they tell us we a re all paying out the noses for.

    • 7 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +3
      Incredulous  
    • hombre76:

      I'm not sure there is a workable way around for profits and defense, however, I think Bernie nailed the real problem when he said, "The numbers become increasingly shocking if you look at company affiliations."

      It is this good ol boy network of affiliations that is killing this nation...on so many levels. Yes, they are solely motivated by profit, AND, they operate under a veil of cronyism that none of them will openly acknowledge.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • attilatheblond
  • Lisayou
  • cmc101
  • Frosty46
  • squarethecircle
  • Incredulous
  • squarethecircle
    • +3
      squarethecircle  
    • Incredulous:

      understood just being a smart ass, but I wonder what they are using to build the new Oakland Bay Bridge? Irradiated metals recycled from old nuke plants? You have to wonder how they can outbid every other contractor when they have to ship the thing across the Pacific.

    • 7 months ago
  • kgMA
  • Incredulous
  • squarethecircle
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • squarethecircle
  • squarethecircle
  • kgMA
  • cmc101
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  
    • And here is the Defense Inventory report from the Government Accountability Office (May, 2010) entitled, "Defense Logistics Agency Needs to Expand on Efforts to More Effectively Manage Spare Parts" also from the website of Bernie Sanders....gets into the details of it all, not exactly what you would call pleasure reading, but interesting, nonetheless. One of the more telling introductory remarks is:

      "Since 1990, we have identified DOD supply chain management as a high- risk area due in part to ineffective and inefficient inventory management practices and procedures, problems with accurately forecasting demand for spare parts, and high levels of inventory beyond what is needed to support requirements."

      Really? Since 1990? Oh wait, George H. W. Bush was president in 1990. Yes, that explains it all.....NOT!

      http://sanders.senate.gov/files/d10469restricted.pdf

    • 7 months ago
  • Incredulous
  • Incredulous
    • +3
      Incredulous  
    • Incredulous:

      and in Bernie's own words for those who don't want to click the link....

      In this country, our national debt is almost $15 trillion, and we are consistently running deficits of over $1 trillion. Our Republican friends want to solve this problem by cutting programs that the most vulnerable in our society rely on, like Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. The fact of the matter, however, is that we will never get our debt under control without looking at the Department of Defense. Since 1997, our defense budget, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has tripled from $254 billion to over $700 billion.

      We've seen time and time again that much of this money is handed out to contractors that do not spend it efficiently and, in some cases, steal it. Why?
      * Part of the reason is that DOD awards more contracts than it has the capacity to oversee, and, as a result, it is unable to effectively manage its contractors.
      * The other part of the reason is that DOD is not careful about which companies it awards contracts to begin with.

      The overall number from today's report: 1.1 trillion

      As to the second point, I had DOD look at the amount of money it awards to contractors with a well-documented history of fraud. Specifically, I had DOD report on the amount it awards to companies that have been convicted, found liable of, or settled charges of fraud against DOD at some point in the last ten years.

      Since 2001, DOD has awarded almost $1.1 trillion to these companies and their affiliates. To me, this is shocking. Once a company has ripped off DOD, and been caught for it, why would DOD then go back to that company with more taxpayer money?

      Over the past ten years, DOD awarded $254,564,581 to companies that were convicted of a crime in connection with a DOD contract during that same period of time. To make matters worse, DOD awarded $33,079,743 of that to convicted companies after they had been convicted.

      Over the past ten years, DOD awarded $573,693,095,938 to companies that were found liable or settle charges of a civil wrong in connection with a DOD contract during that same period of time. To make matters worse, DOD awarded $398,081,775,397 of that to those companies after they settled the charges or were found liable. The numbers become increasingly shocking if you look at company affiliations.

      Over the past ten years, DOD awarded $1,104,423,438,564.10 to entities affiliated with companies that have a history of fraud.

    • 7 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +3
      Incredulous  
    • Incredulous:

      The numbers become increasingly shocking if you look at company affiliations.

      The numbers become increasingly shocking if you look at company affiliations.

      The numbers become increasingly shocking if you look at company affiliations.

    • 7 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  
    • Image
    • Good post, accurate assessment, especially the acknowledgment that this is less about the Chinese than it is about corporations/defense contractors like Lockheed Martin....the largest defense contractor.

      I am linking the Forbes breakdown on the CEO of Lockheed Martin, Robert J. Stevens. What's that.....he's also a Monsanto Director? No way. Yes, way.

      Read his profile at the link, check out his compensation in the graphic above (also at the link). Can we say 1%?

      http://people.forbes.com/profile/robert-j-stevens/49897

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • +4
      attilatheblond  
    • Incredulous:

      That tells the tale! The system is not about defense. The system is just a high tech feudal system, complete with self anointed kings, princes, lesser dukes, and warlords.

      Thanks for throwing that in here. It is an essential component to understanding the whole monster.

    • 7 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  
    • attilatheblond:

      What is really sad, is to contemplate the danger that defense contractors like Lockheed Martin are willing to put the sons and daughters of American taxpayers in, by cutting corners to increase their own profit. It is mind boggling to try and rationalize the greed that just keeps on giving, isn't it?

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Leen61
  • attilatheblond
    • +4
      attilatheblond  
    • Leen61:

      Seems so. But then, corporations have no national loyalties.

      What is so horrible is how they use defense as the golden calf to keep We The People from actually whittling DOD budget down to sane levels. There is no reason for us to be spending many times more than the combined budgets of the next big spending nations on defense. To do so on defense that is illusion and worse while people go hungry and homeless is indefensible.

    • 7 months ago
  • Leen61
  • Lisayou
    • +4
      Lisayou  
    • This is what our leaders have decided we can accept. If we built here we would have more control over what we are purchasing. All our leaders are corrupt we need to wash them out.

    • 7 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Lisayou
  • cmc101
  • lazloman
  • attilatheblond
  • cmc101
  • attilatheblond
    • +3
      attilatheblond  
    • And yes, it was the corporate buddy, Bill Clinton who set the stage for this sort of 'savings' to DOD by asking DOD to buy off the shelf rather than build their own.

      Of course, build their own doesn't really prevent getting bad chips.

    • 7 months ago
more from Community:

top videos