Community | November 29, 2011 | 3 comments

Fox: Student Indoctrination Is OK, But Only If The Teacher's Conservative

WakeUpPeople
Regular viewers of Fox News know that Fox is no fan of public education, which they often claim is "indoctrinating" children to liberal viewpoints. Fox & Friends, in fact, regularly runs segments about education alongside a graphic reading, "The Trouble With Schools."

Today, Fox & Friends began their show by hosting a conservative author to claim public schools "subvert American exceptionalism" and promote liberal "propaganda," then ended the show by gleefully hosting a college professor who teaches his students how the government "plunder[s] people." In other words, Fox is saying that "liberal" viewpoints being taught in the classroom is "propaganda" ... but conservative viewpoints in the classroom are important.

In the first half of the show, co-host Gretchen Carlson interviewed Kyle Olson, author of a book called Indoctrination: How "Useful Idiots" Are Using Our Schools to Subvert American Exceptionalism. Olson is also a regular contributor to Andrew Breitbart's Big Government blog and the conservative Townhall.com, although Carlson didn't mention that. Olson claimed to have found a "real agenda" to get "teachers' personal philosophy into the classroom." He and Carlson found it sinister that students would be learning about the words "strike" and "collective bargaining" in class (emphasis added):

CARLSON: Preschool teachers using words like "strike" and "collective bargaining" in vocabulary lessons? Our next guest says this is just the tip of the iceberg. He studied dozens of lessons plans [sic], and he found thousands of examples of teachers using the curriculum to promote their own liberal political agenda.

[...]

OLSON: I'm the father of a kindergartener, and so this -- looking at what was going on in schools is very important to me. And so I started looking at the curriculum, lesson plans, textbooks, videos that are being pushed in public schools, and what I found is a real agenda to get the teachers' personal philosophy into the classroom.

CARLSON: So one of the things you found was union language to preschoolers, the talk of strike and collective bargaining?

OLSON: That's right.

CARLSON: I mean, even most seniors wouldn't understand what that is.

OLSON: That's it. That's the perfect example. What happened in the city of Chicago was, there's a preschool teacher, preschooler. Again, I'm the father of a kindergartener, so I'm thinking, "Preschooler, you know, how could a preschooler relate to this?" But there's a teacher in the city of Chicago, she went up to Madison, Wisconsin to protest against Scott Walker and collective bargaining reform and everything. She took pictures there. She took them back to her classroom. She read her students a book called Click Clack Moo: Cows That Type and then she taught them the vocabulary lesson that you mentioned, "strike," "collective bargaining," and "negotiate." And you just think, you know, these are examples that high schoolers should be learning about, if at all, but yet, they're being pushed at very early ages.

What's most troubling is that both Carlson and Olson seem to suggest unions and collective bargaining, integral parts of American labor history, shouldn't be taught in classrooms at all, even in high school. The pair went on to be equally appalled by the notion that other students learn about environmental protection, incarcerations rates, and the existence of AIDS, all of which Olson views as evidence of a subversive "agenda." They were particularly troubled by the fact that Maryland high school students are required to be "environmentally literate" in order to graduate, which Fox has freaked out about before.

The following text aired during the segment, alongside the trademark "The Trouble With Schools" logo: (Image)

And this text aired later: (Image)

Watch: (VIDEO1)

Fox's stance on education here is clear: "propaganda in the schools" is bad.

Yet a few hours later, co-host Steve Doocy cheerfully hosted economics professor Jack Chambless of Valencia College, leading off the interview by saying, "It's a lesson about the American Dream, and all you parents and kids out there cannot afford to miss this segment."

During the interview, Doocy asked Chambliss about a writing assignment he gives his students on the American Dream. Both Chambless and Doocy were viscerally appalled that in their responses, "over 80 percent" of Chambless's students said the government should pay for "health care" and "tuition."

Doocy asked Chambless where he thinks his students' "sense of entitlement" comes from, and Chambliss, seemingly unaware of the irony, said that "public schools are part of it." Then Doocy asked about an "experiment" Chambless conducts in his classes, in which he pretends to be a "pickpocket" to show students it's "wrong" for "the government to plunder people":

DOOCY: Before you go, you got to tell me about the experiment you do in your class where you have -- you're essentially a pickpocket.

CHAMBLESS: Well, yes. When I went back to class the next time to meet with them, I told them I read over their essays and I read some of the comments they had made. And then I sat them on a table, and I asked everybody to pull out their wallets and their purses. And I picked one student in each class, and when their wallet was in their hand, I grabbed their wallet out forcefully, and in one case, I grabbed a girl's purse, and I rifled through her purse, pulled out her wallet, pulled out all of her cash. And I said that part of my American Dream was to have a cabin in northern Minnesota someday so I could have a nice retirement, and that this money was now going to help fund that American Dream. And of course, that set in motion explanation [sic] on why using the government to plunder people to support our American Dream is fundamentally, morally wrong, constitutionally wrong, and leads to a lot of economic -- economically bad events if we let that idea gain ground.

Unlike a simple discussion of unions and collective bargaining, this is a pretty clear example of a teacher pushing his "own politics."

Yet Doocy laughed throughout his interview with Chambliss and concluded, "Jack, you better go back to class, because you've got lots of heads to fill."

Watch: (VIDEO2)
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   US Politics,   7 more
  2. tags:
  3. recommended by:
    WakeUpPeople
  4.     
    |

3 comments // Fox: Student Indoctrination Is OK, But Only If The Teacher's Conservative // Video

  • windmarkbob
    • 0
      windmarkbob  
    • Image
    • Monday, December 05, 2011 9:32 AM
      You forwarded this message on 12/5/2011 11:40 AM.
      Professor Chambless,

      I recently saw a clip of you on Fox & Friends where you were interviewed about your students' thoughts on the role of government in relation to "The American Dream" and not only are the public school systems failing to engage students with thinkers like Locke, Smith, and Hayek, as you rightly pointed out, they are also not taught how to apply critical thinking to problems, nor are they taught how to articulate their thoughts well.

      I agree that you have identified a "part" of the problem correctly, regarding education, although I'd add Rousseau and Montesquieu to the mix, perhaps with a sprinkling of Hobbes for good measure.

      I'd like to restate what I believe one of the students meant when he/she said...

      “As human beings, we can’t really control our own actions, so we need the government to control those who don’t care about others.”

      In a society where the majority of people, or the majority of people with social, economic, and political power, always put their immediate personal interests ahead of the common good, and where those with power are able to influence the legislators, the executive, and the judiciary in ways that serve their interests at the expense of others, the net effect being a two tier society, of masters at the top and wage-slaves at the bottom, there are two courses of action. One course is violent revolution, the other course is for government to be restructured so that the inequities of power are limited and its harmful effects mitigated.

      From Rousseau: Nothing is more dangerous than the influence of private interests on public affairs; and the abuse of laws by the government is a lesser evil than the corruption of the legislator, which is the INEVITABLE consequence of private considerations.

      I also think it would be just as telling if we could see how the typical working-class American would have responded to the assignment. After filtering out the ones that are almost completely incomprehensible, I would guess there would be two primary themes that are antithetical to each other. One group would come across as extremely socialistic, and the other side would come across as extremely anarchic.

      In short, while the papers may have been telling, I don't think they are any more damning than what we would see if the rest of society were charged to write a similar paper: including most libertarians, who I think would generally come across as economic and social Darwinists who would prefer a Hobbesian state of nature over anything that strikes them as being even remotely socialistic, or communitarian in nature.

      Sincerely,

      Bob Huddleston
      Sophomore
      The University of Memphis

      Professor Chambless replied...

      Jack Chambless [jchambless@valenciacollege.edu]
      [Reply] [Reply All] [Forward]
      Actions
      In response to the message from Bobby Gene Huddleston Jr (bghddlst), 9:32 AM
      To:
      Bobby Gene Huddleston Jr (bghddlst)
      Monday, December 05, 2011 11:51 AM
      Thank you very much for taking the time to email me. I do apologize for the brief response. I am in the middle of final exam preparations at Valencia and other endeavors. Please – if you are inclined to – take a look at my website www.jackchambless.com where you can find my blog, information about my courses and my books.
      In liberty,
      Jack A. Chambless

    • 6 months ago
  • Milieu
    • 0
      Milieu  
    • Image
    • "Yet Doocy laughed throughout his interview with Chambliss and concluded, 'Jack, you better go back to class, because you've got lots of heads to fill.' "

      Yep, with loads of dead fish.

    • 6 months ago
  • WakeUpPeople
more from Community:

top videos