Republican Jewish Congress Bans Ron Paul From Presidential Debate

or maybe it is you pojecting as to who is stuck on stupid as you suppose ones ethnic heritage should dictate their political positions.i think that is literaly a form of the nazism you are speaking of.flag away

israel is a genocidal maniac?
you do know it is a country not a person right?
out of curiosity how does that work, when the palestinian population has only grown since israel was created?
or is their another genocide you are speaking of?
or are you not clear on the concept itself?

aipac owns congress?
man that is gunna bum out big oil, insurance industries, beef,tobacco,and corn.cuz their is no way any of those guys have more influence or anything.
cuz we all love fossil fuels, love not having free health care, love factory farms,cancer, and suger in everything.it isnt cuz they own congress or anything.that would be aipac.who in owning congress has resulted in absolutely no change in policy one way or the other.but they obviously own congress.

It is the only way to get the public know what he stands for.

I doubt he "loves" the GOP, it's just that he's more of a "conservative" libertarian (which technically I don't even see how when he's wanting to legalize marijuana and quit killing every brown skinned man on the planet), and Obama has already got the democratic nomination...

If there has to be one "republican" the people like....

You're right, my bad. I stopped voting party years ago and now I vote issues and neither party supports my issues so I have no-one to vote for, however, the clown show debates are very entertaining to say the least.

I don't think so. The Democrats didn't when Dennis Kucinich was excluded either.

isnt it amazing how for some people when it comes to jews they all think with one mind and share one voice.but dont dare call them antisemites for it cuz that would just be wrong some how

Let me guess there are only 2 "black" republicans right.... Michael Steele & Herman Cain...?

Pretty much.
To paraphrase the old joke

Klansman: "Will you be mine for 10 Million dollars?"

African American:" Most certainly."

Klansman: "How about for 50 dollars?"

African American: "What do you think I am?"

Klansman: "We've already established that, now we're haggling over the price."

Maybe they signed a pledge, too. Republitards are like that.

To disagree with zionists is not necessarily anti-semitic. Do you agree with all civil rights or OWS spokespersons? What does that make you? Lighten up.

nor is it a piece of bigotry to state the republican party believes this or the democratic party believes that.how ever it would be a piece of bigotry to make statements like by the virtue of being republican they shoot abortion doctors, or by the virtue of being a democrat they are all drug addicts, or any number of things ascribed to those who are zionists.

huge difference between political arguments, and hate speech cloaked in political discourse.the difference between attacking the ideas for being wrong, and attacking the people.

...and so what?

You should be happy that I point these things out here on this site and that I give you something to disagree with. I really enjoy reading posts on stuff that I don't agree with.

Yeah, the whole dancing jew 9/11 conspiracy that you try to promote here at times is troubling as it is.

Troubling because it happened, has been documented.....

Sounds like you're referring to Obama, and the disproportionate incarceration of minorities over a fucking plant? And his willingness to mercilessly attack Arab or "Muslim" countries, some of which are only so unstable to begin with over inequality... His (continuation of Bush era and earlier policies) sounds like some "erroneous hatred" to me.....

The only thinly veiled race war known as "prohibition" is atrocious, it's so bad it destabilized the whole country of Mexico and worked it's way into politics.... Prohibition has effectively declared war on/in Mexico...

"Yeah we'll buy all your drugs, when we're not trying to lock you up forever.... Oh and when it's so dangerous the corporations pull manufacturing out, and every other young male in Mexico wants to be a drug kingpin, that's just to damn bad...." (because that's what's seen by non-Americans, as our attitude....)

And let's just drone strike some starving militants....

i wasnt speaking about obama in particular, but anyone who feels as if they are doing anything positive by invoking racist idealogies.
just exposing that line of reasoning for the cowardice that is on the part of the spineless bigots who dont even have the courage of their convictions

"Yeah, the whole dancing jew 9/11 conspiracy that you try to promote here at times is troubling as it is."

Well I'd say that you are absolutely correct when you say that it is troubling that Israelis were caught celebrating as Americans were jumping to their deaths and being burned alive in the WTC 1,2 and 7 terror bombings.

It's amazing that anyone would be celebrating, let along citizens from a country who claim to be our allies.

id say banned and not invited are two very different things, but that is just me being obsessive over reality vs conjecture

Not allowed to attend could be considered banned, He's a legit candidate and should not have to be invited. This is BS!

and jumping could be considered flying.
but i rather utilize the full scope of concepts and enjoy the benefits nuance rather than lump everything into broad notions.
he isnt censored.he is free to say what ever he likes when ever he likes to whom ever he likes.

this even how ever is not a public forum.it is a republian forum.just like your local bar isnt a public bar but a private establishment.ya know what his libertarian ass wants everyone to have the right to do with as they please, like picking and choosing whom gets access.

he wouldnt be invited to the democratic primary debates either, and we wouldnt call that censorship would we.that would just be expected.

i dont know why if ron paul isnt a gun loving jesus preaching wacko, anyone would be surprised he wouldnt be invited.it is a fore gone conclusion

The result is the same.

so now trump is moderating the thing, and has extended an invite to ron paul, who has declined to accept.
so as this results in the same ultimate end, that a debate witll be occuring without ron paul speaking it is still censorship cuz its the same result?

that is how that works?
anytime any persons voice isnt present at any given place while others views are, censoship is an accurate evaluation of what is happening based on the results?really?

I saw a funny comment from another website: Can it still be called a debate if they all agree?

Seems like they are all just trying to out-crazy one another at this point.

Or out flip-flop each other

is not allowing the grand dragon of the klu jlux klan to speak at a naacp event censorship too?
cuz this is a republican venue.and if one doesnt meet the standards of the brand they wouldnt expect to be invited to utilize their forum.
but no one is stopping him from speaking in literaly every other venue on the planet.even in response to what ever is brought up at the debate he wasnt invited to.

alarmist much?

How is that a comforting thought? Elections and Debates aren't supposed to be like reality TV shows where producers interview and select cast members ahead of time based on the producer's "standards" and decide what "reality" they will show the American people.

If a candidate doesn't live up to someone's understanding of universal "standards" then let the American people decide by not voting for them.

never claimed it would be comforting, as nothing is with the republican party.
just stating the difference in hyperbolic concepts vs the reality at hand.wich has nothing to do with the civil rights alarmism this entire thread of propaganda is geared towards.

im sorry you feel our electoral process should or shouldnt be what ever.but the reality is as it has always been, that it is all a matter of public opinion.when the mass's couldnt read political cartoons were at their pinnicale.now that the ignorant mass's being appealed to are geared towards reality tv style crap, that is place in wich the theater of public opninion is staged, just as once cartoons served that purpose.
we the people, in this particular case the conservative people, have left them no choice.that is part of appealing to the electorate vs having it work the other way around.it sucks but no one is to blame but ourselves with each moment we tolerate rock of love and buy crap with the kardashians names on it.

this is the republican primary, not a general election.republican rules no one elses as this is their rodeo.not everyones.if it matter to ya get involved in republican politics.other wise it is their affair to do with as they please.

for fuck sake like even in your wildest imagination you ever for a seconf thought the republicans would tolerate paul?as they are looking for the most gun loving, mega church attentding, pro rich, anti progress guy possible?

Trollish much?

with an agenda, just like everyone else here.
certainly less than some who just bounce about flagging like ultimate cowards.
a new phenominon that has been occuring lately