Community | December 09, 2011 | 15 comments

FBI's new definition of rape ensnares TSA agents as serial rapists

source: http://www.theagitator.com/2011/09/...

Image
Anonmaly
The definition of "rape" was expanded this week by the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Criminal Justice Advisory Policy Board, following a barrage of emails from feminist activists who demanded change. The old definition was too narrow, many women argued, and needed to be updated. For one thing, it didn't cover rape by women against women, or men against men, and we've all seen just how much of that goes on these days thanks to organizations like Penn State and the Catholic Church.

So in October, the FBI's UCR subcommittee Advisory Policy Board voted to recommend the definition be expanded. The new definition of rape, which looks set to be "officially" adopted by the FBI in 2012, is as follows:

"Rape" is: ...penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."

FBI's definition ensnares TSA agents as serial rapists
Here's the kicker in all this: According to this definition of rape, the federal government's TSA agents are serial rapists.

That's because, in the course of carrying out their lewd, improper and entirely illegal strip-searches and "enhanced pat-downs," they are engaged in precisely the acts covered in the FBI's definition of rape. Namely, entering the vagina and anus with their fingers without consent of the victim.

This means the next time you are fingered by a TSA agent in an airport you should seriously call the FBI and report a sex crime. In fact, it is illegal for you to not report a sex offender committing a crime of which you are directly aware. Failure to do so could make you an accomplice in that person's next sex crime, legally speaking.

Is the TSA really committing these sex crimes in America today? Yes, absolutely. Gov. Jesse Ventura's lawsuit against the TSA goes into great detail about precisely these kinds of violation. Here's another story about a woman who was sexually molested by the TSA: http://www.theagitator.com/2011/09/...

Former Miss USA was also technically molested by the TSA: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/...

And now three elderly women have stepped forward and claimed they were forced to remove their underwear and strip-searched by TSA agents at JFK (http://www.naturalnews.com/034323_N...). Countless women are being raped every single day by the TSA, and most are too shamed by the incident (or intimidated by TSA thugs) to step forward.

What we're looking at here is government-sanctioned sex offenders who are feeling up our children, teenage daughters, wives, mothers and grandmothers, routinely raping them, and then getting away with it day after day! And, astonishingly, there are only a handful of alternative media people who seem to care about this, with myself being one of the most outspoken. What I have learned in all this is that feminist groups don't care if their women get raped by government agents because they don't say a word against it.

Where are women's' organizations in taking a stand against serial rapists working at the airport?
In recent protests about expanding the definition of rape, one woman held up a sign that read, "TAKE RAPE SERIOUSLY."

Except, not if the government is raping people, apparently. Because when the government rapes women in plain daylight, women's groups remain eerily silent and don't take it seriously at all.

In a recent article, I called out the National Organization for Women (NOW) for its total silence on the issue of government TSA agents molesting and physically abusing women at airports (http://www.naturalnews.com/034323_N...). Why is rape wrong in the workplace, but rape is totally acceptable at the airport as long as it's carried out by a government agent?

One of the activist groups behind the FBI's recent expansion of rape is the Feminist Majority Foundation. They have a campaign called "RAPE IS RAPE" and their protesters march the streets holding up signs that say things like "STOP VIOLENCE!" See photos at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...

But where is the Feminist Majority Foundation on the issue of the TSA raping women all across America? Dead silence...

So I guess rape isn't rape then, is it? Not if you're working for the TSA, it isn't, apparently. And "STOP VIOLENCE" actually means "...except if the government is committing that violence against women," in which case all these feminist groups seem to be perfectly okay with it.


(good bit more @ link)



http://www.naturalnews.com/034354_FBI_rape_definition.html
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Culture,   5 more
  2. tags:
    search and seizure,  TSA Rapists
  3.     
    |

15 comments // FBI's new definition of rape ensnares TSA agents as serial rapists

  • WagonMaster
  • Not_A_Troll
    • 0
      Not_A_Troll  
    • Image

    • I'm sure at the top of the TSA food chain there is a pervert who gets off on domination and molesting, and beats off to the body scan archives.

    • 6 months ago
  • RevKen
    • 0
      RevKen  

    • This is imagination going a little too far. The people might not like what the TSA does but they willingly stand in the line and allow it to happen. If they do not like this they have an option to not fly.

      Having said that, I do believe the TSA exams are excessive and useless.

    • 6 months ago
  • eden49
    • +1
      eden49  

    • ...question: if passengers are required to be X-rayed before flying, and considering the detail these X-rays reveal, why in the hell does digital examination need to be exercised...that said, help me here, and I'm assuming not all airports are equipped with these machines, because of the expense, hence, the next step being, physical exam...does this appy to everyone (digital probe) or just to passengers at random...but I digress for background info here...if they tried this bollocks down under, there would be many blunt objects probing skulls...if an examination is deemed to be required (down 'ere), said POI, is transported to a hospital to be examined by a physician, and even that can be argued...

    • 6 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • eden49:

      I take it you're an Aussie? If so, please, just look away. We are a society currently in disrepair; not fit for observation by civilized peoples. Please check back later.
      If at some point we become more than you can tolerate, foreclose and evict us. We will totally understand. Save the planet. :)

    • 6 months ago
  • eden49
    • +1
      eden49  
    • rerushg:

      ...well, we all have the stupid brigade, wherever you go, even down here, we have a ruling body spending like drunken sailors on shore leave...but, I'll stick to subject...I just fail big time to get my head around such invasive behaviour, by non-medical personnel, and I've hosed my rhetoric down on that..

    • 6 months ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • +2
      MotherForTruth  

    • So many false rape claims have ruined lives. Clams of rape appears to be a silver bullet and the new definition of "rape" will be even more devastating.
      As a woman I am discussed with radical feminist activists.

    • 6 months ago
  • Dusty_King
    • +1
      Dusty_King  
    • MotherForTruth:

      As a women and a person that was forced to have sex against her will, NO does mean NO, people have to be held accountable for their actions. When it happened to me it was still the day of "What were you wearing?" and I was dating him, so it must have been my fault. So I knew that reporting it would do nothing.

      That is my burden to bear, why should the rest of our society carry a weight like that for 35+ years??????

    • 6 months ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • +1
      MotherForTruth  
    • Dusty_King:

      You have a pain of your experience and assume that no woman would ever lie about rape. Unfortunately the number of false rape claims is growing fast. There are cases where angry x-wife wants the sole custody of couple's children, or a woman needed an excuse to miss her day at work, or to ruin someone's reputation, or make the boyfriend jealous, cover-up infidelity, and even "did not like the sex". All these and more reasons women make false claims of rape. It got to a point that a male college student is easily charged with rape even when a female never said no. How? Both where under influence and the next day she does not recall what happen except she woke up next to him. He is charged because she was under influence. The rape laws do not empower women in fact quite opposite the real victims of rape are not taken seriously.

    • 6 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  

    • We are a nation of laws.
      Ok..... tried that..... ain't working. Can we go back to being a nation or rights and common sense now?

      Sooooo..... are we opening up a new opportunity for the "in-terminal gynecologist"? Ladies? Might as well get a full checkup while you're getting certified that your privates are "non-threatening".

    • 6 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  

    • http://rapists.ar

      Rape is defined in the common law as physical Assault intended to
      effect physical sexual contact by means of Coercion. Rape is realy
      2 combined crimes against persons, which makes it especialy one
      of the heinous & infamous crimes, which the 5th Amendment requires
      Indictment by Grand Jury to criminaly prosecute, because Murder
      sometimes follows. Important to understand the transmigration of
      the common law comes from Greece to Italy to England to America.
      In ancient Roman times, their soldiers had to violate virgins before
      they could Murder them. It was their tradition, gastly as it sounds to
      modern civilized people. The States define the precise language to
      direct how the Government criminaly prosecutes Offenders. In the
      State's Statutes, the element of mens rea (evil intention to commit
      to accomplishing crime as a goal) & mens actus ( facts evidencing
      a crime has been committed ) both have to be simultaneous for a
      crime to realy be a crime. No one can accidentaly comit any crime.

      According the 14th Amendment, Americans are citizens of the States
      in which they reside. So it's up to the U.S. to back the State's authority
      to prosecute any rapists. I hope I live to see the day when it happens
      that the U.S. facilitates the States' ability to prosecute these TSA rapists.
      As they've enabled the TSA to do whatever it wants in the name of
      accomplishing their mission. Since crime in the name of the law-
      under the color of authority-is prevalent with the TSA, as it is with
      their Flunkie Bureau of Insects partners in crime, it's obvious how
      heavily conflicted they are. Conflict of interest results in corruption.
      Lawyers are disbarred for that Offense. The DOJ is such a corrupt
      organization they won't reign in the TSA.. I don't envy people who
      opt to fly out of the USA, or back into it, when they're forced to be
      subjected to these intrusive pat downs. They add insult to injury.
      Frequent fliers soak up so many X rays, it has to have some type
      of cancerous effect unless counterbalanced by something radical.

    • 6 months ago
  • remanns
  • remanns
    • +2
      remanns  

    • I think you have put your fingers on a touchy subject.

      p.s. - I think this may also be a case of illegal search and seizure.

    • 6 months ago
  • good_stuff
    • +1
      good_stuff  

    • Your also protected against unreasonable search and siezure, but if an officer has reason to beleive you are drunk driving and you refuse a breathalyzer they can forcibly withdraw your blood. Couldn't have people getting away with a dui because they weren't visibly intoxicated...

    • 6 months ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • +3
      Itsbatman_Durr  

    • the definitions for assault and battery with intent to do physical harm are on the books too, and 'authorities' are allowed to commit that against us as well. so i am guessing they are exempt from such 'trivialities' as the law when doing 'their job'

    • 6 months ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos