This 28-Year-Old Wants to Kill Credit Card Use

Try as they may, but it does not appear that there would be any grounds to supress this enterprise since it is nothing but legal commercial activity. The only issue he faces is having transactions cross state lines, which would bring federal regulations into it, but, on the surface provided by the initial posting, I don't see a way to quash it. I've only worked in the financial sector for the last 20 years, so I'm no expert, but if I had cash to gamble with, I'd throw down with him for sure.

Absolutely. Living beyond our means, the American dream.

Do you even know what Marxism is?

Uh yup. Don't worry, I'm not insulted by your question. It's quite obvious that Obama and the the rest of the "progressive" wing of the democrat party are Neo-Marxists. We can play with titles all we want, but it really does not matter what it's called, it has the same smell.

Obama wouldn't even be on the Left in the rest of the developed world, never mind Marxist. What has Obama done, or even said, to indicate that he agrees with Marx's theory of history. How has Obama indicated to you that he believes 1) economic crisis will bring upon the immiseration of the proletariat, 2) free the proletariat of their false consciousness, 3) bring upon the overthrowing of the bourgeoisie followed by 4) a proletariat government and 5) eventually, a classless communist society.

Your opening thesis, and the subsequent tid bits you offer in support tells me that you do not believe that Obama is a closet communist, so there is no point in me standing in front of a fan to pee into it. I'm not one to waist time by explaining reality to those who do not see the light. :)

Obama a Communist? I've never seen a Communist bail out private financial institutions and require a populous to purchase products from a private for profit corporation. I HAVE seen plenty of Fascists do this though. But my guess wold be that we may be dealing in semantic differences here.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you essentially just said: "I can tell you disagree with me, so I will not discuss the subject with you." This is a very bad way to live life, sir. If you only discuss your opinions with those that agree with you, you risk holding some dangerously wrong beliefs. If your opinions cannot hold up to scrutiny, perhaps you should not be holding them.

Most certainly, you are wrong. My point was, as was clearly stated, I did not find the effort worth the expenditure to discuss with you the evidence that Obama and the rest of the "progressives" are Marxists, since you made it clear that you did not think they were. Since you did not agree with that presmise, there is no point in explaining things. As I said previously, it would be like pissing into a fan! Sometimes, there's no point to the exercise. It's like trying to talk someone out of their religious views, it 'aint gonna happen.

Well certainly, you are correct. Obama has exhibited on numerous occasions now, his deep held reverence for both Communisim and Facism! His moves to prop up "gubment moters" to pay back his pals in the UAW, his moves to pick winners (his campaign donors) in the solar energy "industry", which have all went belly up, and his health scare scam all have been obvious illusrators of his Facist inclinations, while his often-repeated class warfare rhetoric and redistribution dreams are clear illustrators of his Communist faith. All of which are clear examples of Obama being an obvious dumbass, the worst kind of dumbass as well, the arrogant kind.

being an obvious dumbass, the worst kind of dumbass as well, the arrogant kind.
Takes one to know one.

Do some basic research on Solyndra and you will discover they started receiving government money from the shrub -- please, for Goddess' sake stop spouting your obvious LIES mixed in with comments like: it is against my scruples to match wits with an unarmed person. See, my remark even sounds smarter than your: "pissing into a fan" -- who says things like that when they want to appear as if they have a modicum of intelligence? But hey, you have a very Merry Christmas; me? I'm a witch so I celebrate the Winter Solstice, whom the 'christians' STOLE and renamed 'christmas.'

Pwr 2 the 99%! Dismember the 1% and their paid vermadon (trolls)!

Yes it certainly does sweet Mistress Wolfess! I'm fully aware that the "shrub" started looking at Solyndra, but even W was smart enough to sniff out a scam, he pulled out and did not give money. On the other hand, your dear leader, feeling the need to pay back for all the campaign money, pissed right into the fan with our tax dollars given to Solyndra, and then when it was obvious they are going belly up, requested that they wait until after the election to report their problems. I realize your feelings and emotions are on your sleve, and it's so cute when you get your hot 'lil thong in a wad. :-*

Moving on, I'm fully aware of European history, and the origins of the Christmas tree in pagan havest rituals, and the efforts by the Catholic church as it spread througout western Europe during Roman occupation to "convert" the Pagans by adopting many of their traditions and rituals, including the tree.

Don't worry ma'am, I would not ever bother mathching wits with you, because it most certainly would be like the fan, and besides, I could care less and I certainly would not try to change your religion!

Certainly a hot witch at that! Great hair!

The UAW had to actually make concessions and take pay CUTS before any American auto manufacturer received bailout money. The only ones in that industry who profited from Government money were the executives. The UAW issue is a red herring and is telling as to how well you research the issues you espouse.

"Average wages and benefits currently total about $69 an hour per GM worker". (as of 2008)

This was prior to the taxpayer funded bailout of GM. Yes, I'd say pay cuts were in order.

No pay cuts for the Ford workers and that company seems to be doing great. The notion that workers wages was the reason those companies were in the red is only believed by those who don't do any research.

Quite true, Ford did not take a bail-out either! GM's problem was at the management level, and easy concessions to the UAW over the years that finally popped.