Community | December 17, 2011 | 7 comments

Limbaugh Blasts Ron Paul For ‘Running To The Left Of President Obama’ On Iran

Image
ibrake4rappers13
Rush Limbaugh tore into Ron Paul ‘s statements at last night’s debate — not sanctioning Iran even if they had actionable intelligence that Iran had a nuclear weapon. “We never talk that way about the Russians, the only reason they want nuclear weapons is because we’re making them do it. It’s our fault! If you were in Iran and you had to face these evil Americans, you’d want to bomb too!” mocked the radio talk show host.

“Solid evidence!” Limbaugh exclaimed. “And yet you still would hold back US sanctions? And as a GOP nominee you’d run to the left of Obama on this issue?!”

http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/container/420/421/?layout=&content_t...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   US Politics,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Ron Paul Rush Limbaugh
  3.     
    |

7 comments // Limbaugh Blasts Ron Paul For ‘Running To The Left Of President Obama’ On Iran

  • Leen61
    • +2
      Leen61  
    • This pill popping lard ass really needs to go away. This is Mr. 5 differments we are talking about here. He has nothing to say about anything.

    • 5 months ago
  • wolfess
  • bike10
  • letsliveinpeace
  • MSII
    • +3
      MSII  
    • Hardly surprising, this is the newest war the wrong-wingers are agitating for. We just finally official conclude their last mad-war-for-profit, and they need a new one for their corporate-fascist masters. Expect to hear more and more about Iran as they continue their new advertising pr blitz for the newest war to save democracy, apple-pie, children, puppies, whatever they can use to justify more military-industrial-contractor work. -Wait!- I've just discovered the wrong-wingers excuse for a economics policy, a new war! Hmm... now how do they plan (or do they, maybe not, as history shows) to pay for this one? Are there any non-white poor babies they can take off respirators in some hospitals? How much can we divert to the military-industrial-contractors there? Hmm... There must be some poor elderly (preferably non-white of course) that we can take some life-sustaining dollars away from. Well not to worry these wars always manage to get funded one way or another!

    • 5 months ago
  • wolfess
    • +2
      wolfess  
    • MSII:

      You're right -- we've been all up in arms over the wording of the NDAA and how it meant any American could be indefinitely detained, and yet no one has said anything about the cost of this Act: $662 BILLION! Maybe that's why they decided to 'breitbart' us -- if we were all hyper about being arrested we wouldn't think twice about how much money went into keeping the MIC alive and well!

      Pwr 2 the 99%! Dismember the 1% and their political WHORES -- uh, that would be ALL the reptards in Congress and the Senate!

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
more from Community:

top videos