Community | December 23, 2011 | 66 comments

Former President Bill Clinton Calls for a Return to "Big 3" News Networks?

Image
Anonmaly
Bill Clinton said it a month ago at a luncheon I attended: "There is too much information on the internet. The only way a website gets ahead is by disseminating polarizing information for its own profit. Free speech needs to be more consensus driven. We need to go back to the Big 3 networks." ... Paraphrase – Dilence Sogwood/DB feedbacker/ 12.22.2011

Dominant Social Theme: Too much information is bad for society.

Free-Market Analysis: Bill Clinton (left) wants to return to the days when three big television networks explained the Way the World Worked.

According to "Dilence Sogwood," a financial-industry DB feedbacker, Clinton spoke at a luncheon he attended and made these and other provocative points. What Clinton is revealing in these speeches he is giving around the world is that there is a historic struggle going on between free-market thinkers and those, like Clinton himself, who are attempting to maintain and justify the status quo.

We have no direct or corroborating evidence that Dilence Sogwood's statements are accurate; however, we have a history of his feedback going back nearly a year. In that time, we have never had a sense that he was anything other than a feedbacker who wished to share information about freedom, investing and elite social themes.

For purposes of this article, we will treat them as legitimate "sourced" statements. His feedback on Clinton's luncheon talk is important in our view because it provides a window into how Clinton and others who work for the Anglosphere elites are grappling with what we call the Internet Reformation.

The statement mentioned in Sogwood's feedback (above) is especially startling because in making it, Clinton reveals himself as pure utilitarian. He also reveals inadvertently the pervasiveness of the Anglosphere power elite control in the US.

The Big Three media networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) did not exist on their own but were supported by a vast corporate network that included virtually every large company and government agency germane to the 20th century. Clinton is not just calling for a renewed social compact; he is demanding a full-fledged return to the status-quo ante. More on this below.

It is the Internet that is upsetting the power elite's status quo and making it increasingly difficult for them to realize their long-held dream of total world government. This one-world order is to be run by a handful of self-selected elites.

These intergenerational, familial elites control hundreds of trillions of dollars apparently via central banks around the world. This is part of the world's current "secret government." The way the world is run (and is to be run) is via mercantilism; the great families are to continue to control government (and money) behind the scenes.

To realize this strategy is not easy. It cannot simply be done by brute force. Because government is an essential part of world control, the Anglosphere power elite needs to ensure government's expanding power as well as its credibility. If a credible argument cannot be made for government, then the elites cannot rule.

And so circulating around the globe are charismatic "helpers" like Bill Clinton, funded via book contracts, foundation donations and speaking engagements with all the resources they need. They are in perpetual motion, building up a consensus for the mercantilist system that the elites intend to fully impose. They are the paid helpers – enablers – of the world's elites.

One could argue, in fact, that Clinton has become the new David Rockefeller, when it comes to the US. Such men are valuable because they are able to muster support, cogently, for the state and the power elite that runs it behind the scenes.

Tony Blair is another one. Once they have proven their worth and skill by winning and maintaining high political office, these individuals are essentially employed by the powers-that-be to spread the elite's dominant social themes.

The points that Sogwood provides us are in line with those made in many other Clinton speeches. But they are interesting because they are provocative and perhaps "edgier" than the statements that Clinton ordinarily provides at large public forums where he is recorded and filmed. From what we can tell, this was a private luncheon and not reported (at least not extensively) by the media.

What it tells us is that Clinton and other elite associates and enablers don't have any real idea about how to turn the tide away from the enlightenment that has occurred as a result of a technology that is as fundamental as the Gutenberg Press itself.

The Internet is radically changing the context and belief structures of the time, as we have predicted many times before. How do we know the Internet is in a sense winning the day? In part because the arguments being mustered against the free-market orientation of many in the alternative media are far more convincing than the arguments of the elite's paid apologists.

It is true, of course, that the elites can try to force the planet's billions to go along with their schemes, but pure force is most likely a recipe for long-term failure. It is absolutely imperative to build a believable (moral) argument for the system that the elites want to impose.

Clinton and others like him are most important to this effort. They are in a sense the foot-soldiers of global governance. Here is a full summary of the points Clinton made, sent to us from Sogwood on Dec. 8, along with our comments:

• Too much Internet news. It divides people for profit. Must get back to the Big 3 networks.

This is an astonishing sentiment and one that is immensely revealing. It reveals a perspective regarding news and information that is profoundly patrician. What Clinton seems to believe is that the purpose of information and education is not to enlighten but to contribute to social harmony.

The trouble is that someone must still DEFINE the constitution of such harmony. If people don't have the requisite information, then how are they supposed to do so? The unspoken conclusion is that "people" won't have to worry about it. Bill Clinton and others will do the job for them.

Which leads to another reasonable question: Where are Clinton and the rest of his elite circle getting THEIR information and their view of the world? Somebody, somewhere, must define what an "undivided" society is and to what views it will subscribe. Clinton's idea apparently is that he will, and you won't.

(more @ link)


http://www.thedailybell.com/3401/Former-President-Bill-Clinton-Calls-for-a-Retur...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Culture,   3 more
  2. tags:
    Media Bill Clinton Censorship Via Omission
  3.     
    |

66 comments // Former President Bill Clinton Calls for a Return to "Big 3" News Networks?

  • mrtraffic
  • Ratisbon
    • +2
      Ratisbon  
    • No longer own a TV. Too much noise. I watch DemocracyNow and read a handful of sites. I find I'm better informed than my friends who watch TV.

    • 5 months ago
  • gump
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • Ratisbon:

      Can I relate to what you just said. "Showbiz" is all TV news has become. It is absolutely good for no one. Maybe it never was. Maybe no news network/journalists ever offered solid, consistent, and objective rebuttal on the same program. The ideal of "just the facts please" was replaced by "what are the ratings or demographics watching us and which anchor hosted opinions/attitude will maintain this market share."

    • 5 months ago
  • Ratisbon
    • 0
      Ratisbon  
    • WisconsinNorm:

      I believe the main media has become complicit with the powers that be. Here's a quote from trends forecaster Gerard Calente on what he calls the "media morons":

      And the bigger they got, the more untouchable they became. TV Money Honeys, fast-talking finance finaglers, Nightly News anchors, Sunday Morning Beltway Blowhards, and Talk Show Tough Guys genuflected, scraped, kissed up and bowed down before those magnificent men in their money machines.

    • 5 months ago
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • Ratisbon:

      My son is a news producer for CNN International working in Atlanta. TV is always a hot holiday topic. He moved up the TV ranks quickly after graduating from U of Minnesota with a degree in broadcast journalism. ABC, NBC, Fox...It didn't matter-moving up did. I visited his workplace CNNI recently. Hundreds of people looking at computer screens all day long. They make pretty fair money, yet It doesn't seem pleasant. Information, information, information...Fresh air and sunlight is more important to me. He comes home a zombie.

    • 5 months ago
  • LivingPong
  • acarvajal
    • 0
      acarvajal  
    • Here goes again, Billy, the lover boy, pawn of the rich and powerful, spreading the fascist idea of more control to the few over the many. They can not stand to see the Internet free and open to all. We have neo- cons and neoliberalism determined to create a fascist world government, and Billy lover boy is one its tools..pathetic individual!

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +2
      PressCore  
    • acarvajal:

      Amen to that. From your keypad to God's ears ! I voted for Jimmy Carter,
      Bill-I swear I didn't have sex with that woman-Clinton, and Musolini Nobama.
      At least I got it right on the first try. 1 out of 3 is still a reflection of America
      on the decline though. The OWS protest movement knows why. Clinton
      came to the Syracuse airport in 2010 to support our Democratic H.R.Rep.
      who wasn't a bad fellow. I kind of wish I'd voted for him in 2008 instead of
      voting for Nobama. The Congressman voted to audit the Fed. I genuinely
      liked him, and I hope he runs again. I do truely belive the man has integrity
      and we need more of that sort on both sides of the isle. But somehow he
      made friends with H.R.Rep Rangel, who sits on the Trilateral Comisssion.
      I'd like to think that someone steered him wrong to corrupt or at least
      conflict him. The House tried to expel Rangel for multiple ethics charges,
      but because Rangel cleverly dug into the Banksters' camp, Organized
      Crime saved the day for Rangel. But his day is coming...Clinton figured
      the same-to dig into the Banksters' enemy camp by cozying up to Goldman
      Sachs. An exec for that infamous Bank is Clinton's inlaw now, after marrying
      into his family. That's how political alliances were arranged from before
      feudal times.

      The Clintons were lawyers with political ambitions from the get go. They ex
      emplify why Wall St=NWO. Hence my comment of Clinton's pose in the photo.
      If silent pictures could talk that says, subliminaly, Hmmm, I wonder how I can
      get the world, my basketball, past the opposition's guards to make net in their
      court. Pathetic. Goldman Sachs told the Government of Greece how they could
      conceal their true debt to get them to join the European Union knowing they'd
      be puppeteered to be the first domino to collapse the E.U. economicly, then
      have the USA bail them out, in the same way Goldman Sachs criminal pig
      Paulson puppeteered the bank bailout of the 2008 meltdown after lying to
      Congress, then turning around and saying the opposite to Bankers. Many
      people are still under the impression that .75 Trillion $ bailout was all of it.
      HA ! That was the tip of the iceberg. It turned out to be $16 Trillion which had
      the Rothschild's Fed printing presses overheating to flood the world with.
      That left a money shortage here in the USA, hence the event horizon of the
      Depression we've been in since Dec. 2007. The idiots think starting a WW3
      with Iran will pull the USA out of it. They never caught on that the Rothschilds
      manipulated WW1, and WW2 behind the scenes by funding the beligerents.
      The OWS protest movement isn't merely a crusade for reform, it's also a
      crusade for the world Peace the Popes have been advocating for 2,000
      years now. Merry Christmas. Lets hope they deliver their message of Peace
      in D.C. circa Martin Luther King Memorial Day to avert the one that will finish
      us all. There are nutcases who think they can take refuge in Cheyene Mountain
      to wait for the smoke to clear. Goes to show how they value We the People.
      The Swiss Govt. has provisions for all their people, not simply their big shots.

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • +3
      remanns  
    • I either LOVE that idea,....or I HATE it,....but I don't seem to be able to channel any sort of neutral consensus about it. Go figure.

      p.s -fuck social harmony -you want harmony live in a cave. a remote cave. ( really doesn't sound bad to me, but I DO want the internet. )

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • Image
    • remanns:

      The Internet is destiny for all of us social community members here on
      Current.com, Remanns. I've found my niche here as a writer, citizen,
      Journalist. My background in psychology, law, education is solid but
      too stiff & formal. Like you, I favor art, music, expression. My mom
      was a switchboard operator for AT & T most of her life. She was
      already experienced, on duty on Dec.7, 1941, connecting people
      after Pearl Harbor, Hawaii became news. I'd like to think I follow in
      my mom's footsteps by connecting people here on Current. She
      is a very strong woman. And though she's on the other side of the
      river Styx now in the Elesian Fields, love is all that remains of any
      of us. Let's hope that this last year of the previous 26,000 year
      Mayan Calendar in 2012 proves to be the turning point for Liberty
      and Justice for all. I've got a house to buy, and the Netherlands &
      Switzerland to emigrate to when I can fully retire finaly in 2013
      sometime after all my legal affairs are commenced here in New York.
      Merry Christmas, bro..

    • 5 months ago
  • Ambill94
    • +1
      Ambill94  
    • There are things I like about ole Bill...but he has definitely been too long at the bong for this one...good luck on that one Bubba...

    • 5 months ago
  • DanCastro
    • +2
      DanCastro  
    • I see potential information overload as when TV started there were too many choices! Now, maybe we can start competing sources of information & goods that allows for real global competition of goods & ideas! We claim to be free & inventive, the net is our NOW frontier! :-)

    • 5 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • +5
      EdJoyProductions  
    • Even current got rid of Vanguard, so the spirit in which current was created is dead. Bottom line is that we can not trust any corporate structure to deliver news. Even NPR is bowing to pressure.

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
  • dinm76
  • Paratus
    • +1
      Paratus  
    • dinm76:

      Great article. Oh Bill is far from senile. This is the mindset that infects government, control of the people. The internet, and many other non internet news sites, cannot be controlled, hence the efforts and calls for such controls either by SOPA or the so-called Fairness Doctrine. This is why we must lead and participate in, movement toward more individual freedom and limited government.

    • 5 months ago
  • snoskier
    • +1
      snoskier  
    • As with all forms of freedom, once unleashed, good luck reigning it in. The next 5 years or so will be very interesting. The evolution away from traditional "media" like newspapers, magazines, and the old big 3 news organizations, will lead in unpredictable directions, IMHO. How we get news and information may be much different than now, as today is much different than 5 years ago.

      The real concern is how news / information may be manipulated, and importantly, how it is moving to the extremes.

    • 5 months ago
  • PetEr_Alan_ColE
  • Conniepae
    • +4
      Conniepae  
    • Just say NO! The big three networks have shown their character, or lack there of.

      Honesty is not a requirement. There may be a forth branch of government, but they have proven, it should not be the media it is today. It's corporate media today. They are more into the spin of the day. They pick and choose what 'we the people' hear. Jon Stewart even shows us their spin, complete with video to back it up.

      American's should not find out the spin, through a comedy show. The 'court jester' is one of the few willing to stand up and challenge the spin by MSM.

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • Conniepae:

      I'd prefer to watch the Russians' Tass, Pravda, or Isvestia TV networks
      than I would NBC, CBS, or ABC, which has to be the THE worst of all of
      those turkey brains. The Russians have allways known what Government
      run TV was all about. They have one word for " truth ", another for " news "
      when they formed Tass, and Pravda. Hence the Russian saying: " There is
      no truth in the " news " you hear, any more than there's anything new in
      the so called truth you hear " Why ? HA ! As if anyone need ask. Because
      there's no Tass in Pravda, and no Pravda in Tass. That's why.
      Paul McCartney explained it as " back in the U.S., back in the U.S., back in
      the U.S.S.R. " We get the bull's ass end of any info after the C.I.A. have
      " sanitized " it. Honest news is too germy for the sheeple to maintain their
      health after being read to like kiddies. I seriously call to question how anyone
      can consider themselves a mature adult yet watch those who call themselves
      mature adults read to them like children read a bedtime story fairy tale to
      the sheeple who " can't be bleat. " As if. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.
      Humbug. Merry Christmas, Connipae.

    • 5 months ago
  • Conniepae
    • +1
      Conniepae  
    • PressCore:

      Sadly, they move the masses along like sheep, moved along to the wrongs. Everything judged in the 'court of public opinion', then everyone just moves along to the wrongs. People left the Bush administration and wrote books about wrongs. They got a few news cycles, then we just moved along, as though the 'facts' they were telling, were not even worthy of discovery. On a couple of occassions, they even blatantly said, 'it's time to move along', because the story wasn't just going away. Sadest fact is, we did.

      Merry Christmas to you as well. No humbug! It ain't over! We just gotta stop moving along to the wrongs. Honesty should be a requirement of our politicians and our media. People should be held accountable. They say the stuff 'out loud', because they know there is no accountability.

    • 5 months ago
  • RonPaulSucksBigtime
  • rerushg
  • EmperorThan
  • LivingPong
    • -1
      LivingPong  
    • RonPaulSucksBigtime:

      Watch me copy this meal with my binary magic. Watch me turn that High Definition cinema format into to complete crap quality and beam it to a country where they don't like free and open discussion of current events and would be lucky to see it ten years from now.

      Ignore me while I build a massive monopoly, get my workers doing 16 hour shifts, pay them peanuts, fire them, then make a cool $1 Billion while they have their homes taken from them. I'm laughing to the bank, they are crying out the front holding a hat with a sign around their neck. Now watch me screw a few artists and promote gangsta rap and skanky bitches instead of thought provoking talented musicians. Listen to me rape your ear drums and stupefy your mind until you believe my bullshit arguments. Pretty soon I will control all information dissemination and with it your pathetic minds.

    • 5 months ago
  • UrbanErudite
    • +1
      UrbanErudite  
    • This just may be, the dumbest argument I have ever heard for internet censorship. You sir Mr Clinton, fail. You just lost all your credibility for shilling out to corporate news stations.

      There is no benefit from limiting are information sources so drastically. None. NADA.

    • 5 months ago
  • FLeggplant
    • +2
      FLeggplant  
    • Good idea, Bill.
      Let's all live in a 'Fox Republican Propaganda' like Country.
      I am longing to believe the One news source in the Country.
      I cannot wait to be brainwashed and told how and what to think.
      Woot!

    • 5 months ago
  • CitizenHill
  • rerushg
    • 0
      rerushg  
    • @Anomaly
      It just dawned on me. Clinton's comments like these often contain more than just what meets the ear. You are right in all that you say but I think we may be overlooking the SOPA angle here.
      Bill has long-time ties to Hollywood Big Money. With SOPA now an issue on the table and his old buddy, Chris Dodd*, now having bailed out of the Senate and off running the Motion Picture Association of America, maybe Bill's tilling the soil a bit for Chris?
      Recall that Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced SOPA (HR 3261) to the house back in October and got way more push-back than he expected. MPAA knows there are serious people loaded-for-bear on this one.
      I won't get into SOPA here. For those who don't know about it, find out and understand. (I mean REALLY understand. Things are not what they seem.)

      * Chris Dodd (ex Senator - D - CT) Chose not to run for re-election in 2010. Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs from 01/04/2007 to 01/03/2011. Anybody wanna take a wild guess why he bailed out of the Senate?

    • 5 months ago
  • 2hellnwait
    • 0
      2hellnwait  
    • rerushg:

      You said it all when you stated "Things are not what they seem". . . damn straight, invariably there are "vested" interests. . . and Blarney Prank is jumping ship as well. . .
      The Rats are fleeing!

    • 5 months ago
  • CalgarC
  • ThirdSection
  • EdJoyProductions
  • 2hellnwait
  • ecoalex
    • +1
      ecoalex  
    • Independent information is the their enemy.The network news shows are just that,not journalistic news,for that you have to go to Democracy now! RT tv DW tv,or of course CURRENT.

      The greatest loss was the Clear Channel's coup ;the domination of America's radio with right wing propaganda.

      Reagan's termination of the fairness doctrine started the slide of America into the porcelain fixture.We're fully in the bowl now.

    • 5 months ago
  • nikonwilly
    • +2
      nikonwilly  
    • Control the news and you have complete control over the population!
      Clinton is one of the elite that wants you under his heel!
      Of course they are afraid of the internet...the ability to receive honest information was very hard to come by until now...they do not want us knowing how corrupt and one sided they have rig this once free system...Hell, without the internet you would still believe 45 story skyscrapers fall down from a match. We are uncovering so many deceptive ,fraudulent schemes now and it scares the hell out of them. They should be frightened...it's only a matter of time until their scams back fire...their financial fraud has put us into poverty...their agricultural scams are making us sick...their energy scams are killing the planet...everything they put their money grubbing mitts on turns to poison.
      If they get control of the internet we are certainly doomed...and they will try with all their power...it's their only chance of keeping the status quo

    • 5 months ago
  • EmperorThan
    • +2
      EmperorThan  
    • Television is a dying breed altogether. Internet will eat it alive before it even realizes what's happening. They need to start making more online news channels like Current does. Young people today know where they get their news. "The Daily Show" jk I mean online. Stuff like Huffington Post didn't even exist a few years ago now it's one of the biggest.

      In the future people aren't going to say "look at my 42 inch TV" they're going to say "look at my new 42 inch monitor."

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • EmperorThan:

      It's not that far off. The very best large scale, flat screen TV's I've seen,
      which are the easiest on the eyes, are the Smart TVs I think Samsung
      makes. They're made so that people can connect FIOS to them. People
      can surf the net to find whatever movie they want to record on their DVR.
      With internet capable TV, it won't be long before they make H.D. computer
      monitors conventional or the larger scale as TVs are. The crossover is
      inevitable with Blue Ray DVD units built into computer towers to record
      & playback H.D.feed displayable over H.D.monitors, conveyed by wide
      band internet signal.

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
  • rerushg
    • +2
      rerushg  
    • Bill just longs for the glorious days of the 90's when he could make 10 campaign stops in a day, spin a different brand of BS at each one, and it would never catch up with him.
      Don't worry about it, Bill. We got this. Remember Haiti? You were gonna take care of all that? Do we need to ask Sean Penn to get back down there?

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +2
      PressCore  
    • That's a Dumb & Dumberer loony idea. A sane one would be to outlaw
      all commercial TV networks. If you chart a graph from the inception of
      commercial TV in the late 1940s through 2011, and simultaneously
      with the lowering of good taste in pop music, you'll start to grasp there's
      a 1 to 1 correlation between both. Commerical Corporate TV is one of
      the essential problems leading to the dis integration of society. They
      can't eliminate the cause of the problem per se by simply condensing
      it to a more primitive stage of it's History. From the earliest days of the
      big 3 TV there were game show scandles involving payola & corruption.
      It's simply entrenched itself into most areas of modern life. I think it was
      when the televangelists got hold of it that the phrase: " A fool and their
      money are soon parted " that using commercial TV to subliminaly mind
      control entire populations through mass hypnosis became so widespread
      they began to control elections too. Mr.Sax there has them to thank, no ?
      Gotta love those feigning gestures with the hands too. Gingrich does it
      also. No, Bill, the world is not a basketball you NWO can play hoop with
      while you're planning how to get it past the other team's guard into their
      court. 1 photo does speak 1.000 words. Every picture tells a story, don't it ?
      Damn ! That's a song too !

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +5
      artemis6  
    • PressCore:

      Here's an idea . They are public airwaves , let the public have them . stop them out to real people who are from THIS country , for the common good only . Teachers could teach classes on TV . Lectures could be given . Safety procedures disseminated . You know like "americas most wanted catches criminals ? If there were NO advertising on it , i predict people would , like myself , want to watch it . It wouldn't happen , until they abandon it altogether ....

    • 5 months ago
  • mybologna
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • artemis6:

      Right on. Did you know TV was originaly envisioned as a way to teach
      kids schooling who couldn't get to classes in the city or village ? Verdad.
      Kids who were snowed in, and would have trouble making the school bus
      were thought of in that altruistic vision of what TV should be as far back
      as 1939, when the first TV camera filmed an American baseball game live.
      But it never happened. In the same way the military seizes on new inventions
      for destructive purposes, the big money interests seized on TV as a way
      to make obscene profits with their destructiveness. The ABC network is the
      biggest offender of all the commercial Corporate TV networks. They cornered
      the market in greasing G people to sell them what belongs to us, never was
      theirs to sell once the first digital frequencies came out after digital TV was
      made the new thing. ABC's assholes sat John McCain down to tell him which
      end was up from the time he announced his candidacy before the 2008
      election. The entire ABC network is one big Racketeer Influenced Corrupt
      Organization. I would never view their Piracy for all the money in the world.
      I'm looking forward to civily prosecuting the ABC TV network in my Enterprise
      Corruption case against their RICO affiliates WSYR & their holding company
      Ackerly Communications based in the Town of Dewitt, in Onondaga county
      New York since they merged with the Syracuse FBI in 1980 to attack me.

      As Thomas Jefferson said: " Whenever any Government seeks to own what
      is stricly the property of citizens, it seeks to control their will thereby. " What
      more effective way than through mass hypnosis by means of subliminal mind
      control. I graduated as a Psychology major enough to know. I have well written
      books on hypnosis. Corporate TV networks were the first weapon of infowar
      the C.I.A. seized control over in 1947 when the C.I.A. was begun. By the 1970s
      CIA Director Helms told the public brazenly " the CIA owns every TV news
      personality of any prominence ". Digital TV was only a means of implementing
      radio freqency I.D. chips in citizens homes without the FBI's 1st degree Felony
      Armed criminal Trespass. So what it was planned to be in 1939 before WW2
      became opposite that by 1949 when George Orwell's scenario of 1984 was
      written. So today we have the classic war without end TV surveilance culture
      Orwell envisioned. Instead of the altruistic vision of American values taught to
      young people, we now witness the UnAmerican vision of totalitarianism taught
      to hoodwink young people inbto misbelieving what they do is lawful. I'm also a
      graduate of a law school. I know what they do has all the m.o. of Organized
      Crime outlawed by the State of New York & the U.S. despite the dogshit who
      watch ABC. I understand where you're coming from Artemis 6. I sympathize.
      The C.I.A. uses Facebook as their database via the Internet now that Utube has
      made TV the obsolete shit that it realy always was. As one of the last of the baby boomers born in 1949, I've studied the decay of commercial Corporate TV all my
      life. What was born dead can only continuously rot, and stink.

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
  • artemis6
  • PressCore
  • SIBob
    • +1
      SIBob  
    • Image
    • I admit it, I voted for Clinton. But to me, he was practically a Republican, (but the other choices were worse). NAFTA, which he helped to implement, was a disaster for our manufacturing sector, (as was Obama's recent three country "free trade" deal). Clinton likes to go around pretending to be the voice of reason. He sees himself as some kind of inter-racial insider. He is neither of these things. The name pinned on him by right-wing attack dogs, "Slick Willie", unfortunately, sticks. It may come to pass that the political class will make a move on our internet freedom. Just as "The Masses", (the Greenwich Village periodical), was closed down via the Espionage Act in 1918, another law will be in the making, (probably soon), to attempt to silence us. There will be a few test cases, (like Bradley Manning), to keep the rest of us in fear. The totally free exchange of ideas is always a danger to the controllers who seek to keep us down, next stop fascism. (Or, maybe we can come up with a wireless pirate web, what do you think?) http://sibob.org/wordpress/

    • 5 months ago
  • NEVERSCARED
  • tverdell
  • outofbounds
    • +2
      outofbounds  
    • You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. But the moneyed elite can try! Clinton's opinion that there's too much information on the Internet so it should be controlled is telling indeed. Bill Clinton is shown to be working for the 1%. And I heard that Hillary Clinton may run in 2017. She would work for the rights of the people?

    • 5 months ago
  • infiniteblackbox
    • 0
      infiniteblackbox  
    • Internet journalism has no integrity.
      Example.
      A blog some months back posted the story of Jennifer Fox. She was the teen who was supposedly pregnant and supposedly pepper sprayed. The net and this site in particular exploded with anger and demanded reprisal for the incident. As it turns out the girl was mentally ill and lied about the incident so the blog posted a retraction. Which received virtually no publicity. At least not as much as the original sensational story. I even tried posting a story about it here but it was ignored.
      Where the bogus story received over 100 comments of rage the true story i posted received less than 10 comments.
      What does that tell you? People on the whole are stupid and closed minded and will only consume info that will meet their agenda and stimulate their tiny little brains.
      Exactly like Fox viewers.
      A LEGITIMATE reporter reports ONLY the facts.
      This community only wants to read about Julian Assange in the positive and bad cops.
      They do not want to hear anything otherwise even if it is the truth.

    • 5 months ago
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • artemis6
  • infiniteblackbox
  • Vic_Romano
    • +3
      Vic_Romano  
    • While I agree that Fox Newz has no business being in journalism, I really don't think much of any of the other networks either. Sure, they have a few great reporters. However, the idea of concentrating the media in the hands of three corporations sounds even more dangerous.

      Support internet journalism. Stop SOPA!!!

    • 5 months ago
  • outofbounds
  • Dagum
    • +3
      Dagum  
    • I remember there was a post here on Current about a year or so ago (I wish I could find it) that showed through shell companies and subsidiaries all the major newsmedia outside the internet is owned by about three corporations. Talk about being able to control the message and manipulate the masses. The elites like Clinton et. al. would love to regress backwards to that control by taking over the internet.

      (BTW If anyone remembers that post please put up the link.)

    • 5 months ago
  • Vic_Romano
  • artemis6
  • cmc101
  • Agent_Alpha
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • +4
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • Agent_Alpha:

      I agree. Would you trust mega corporations not to lie and distort the facts?

      "It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free.
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be".
      W. Zevon

    • 5 months ago
  • Anonmaly
    • +3
      Anonmaly  
    • Hmmmm, well if you control the news, decrease the number of outlets... You could virtually control thought, wouldn't that be cute?

    • 5 months ago
  • PressCore
    • +2
      PressCore  
    • Anonmaly:

      Never in a million years would anyone intelligent call the mindless fools
      who vegetate in front of their boob tubes thinkers, bro. And they'd have
      to be thinkers to have thoughts in their head that anyone could control.
      I'd like to consider them as Alec Baldwin did in his HULU adverts some
      while back. Getting what's left of their pathetic brains sucked out and
      being left with a vacuum in which they accept hypnotic commands w/o
      knowing or caring. Watching TV is their way to get mellow 'cause their
      heads are full of jello. Yeah that's right, J E L L O. TV watchers are so
      repugnant to thinking, intelligent people that I seriously doubt any of
      us who are intelligent would piss on TV audiences if they were on fire.

    • 5 months ago
more from Community:

top videos