What is a true conservative?

-
-
- dwightdouglas
- added this
By Dwight C Douglas
When I watch television, I hear all the Republicans say they are the “true” conservative. They argue that what America needs in the White House is a conservative. This word has been reshaped by those who claim they alone make sense and know how to improve America.
Dictionary.com says that conservative means disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change. But when I hear the candidates talk, they talk about changing things and “taking their country back” as if they are somehow ordained to control its destiny. And as the say, that is why they play the game, or in this case, why we have elections.
Most politicians truly believe in their heart of hearts they are doing righteous public service. They promise they have a vision to make things work better in Washington. Along the way, they discover deep-pockets of beliefs and interests they need to please to get endorsements or contributions.
We enter this election year, we slide further and further away from the “existing condition.” The idea to preserve and limit change seems rather myopic. I love when I hear the neo-cons talk about same sex marriage, choice and values. They misquote the constitution and use their misinformation to deceive the public. They somehow forget that the original document permitted slavery and set up a rich white American male powerbase – women were not allowed to vote. Without amendments, this country would be living in the dark ages of democracy. Someone must have bucked those existing conditions and institutions. Was it zealous liberals, or just smart Americans?
These wild accusations of Obama being the “great divider” and this myth that he doesn’t meet with people to compromise is just plain oxymoronic. Some of the conservative candidates have decided that a person’s religious beliefs should be the basis for different treatment by the TSA. Is this what they mean by taking back “their” country? Are we going to select and divide the citizens into groups we can control?
The true conservative is someone who has already decided what is right and what is wrong. They see things in black and white. They want to lecture me and show me the way to think about issues. A true conservative tells me that the government has gotten too big, without any seeming understanding that the government is an employer. They cut budgets and cheapen our educational efforts and turn thousands of real public servants into unemployed statistics. Do we really want fewer police, firemen and teachers? How is that limiting change?
I may be a liberal-radical Democrat, but I am into restoring traditional institutions. I would like to see more things built in America. I would like to have call centers where I talk to an American, who gets my jokes and understands my frustrations. I believe the US Postal Service needs to be preserved. What’s wrong with a real letter?
We need to understand that the rich are getting richer and the middle-class is being debt-ridden into depression. We need a strong middle-class that gets raises based on their performance. The true conservative says we need to lower debt and lower taxes. That makes no sense. That is like telling Dad, hey, make a smaller paycheck and we’ll spend less money. FACT ALERT: if you make less money you will spend less money. We need more revenue, which means more workers paying taxes. And that includes those 13+ million illegal immigrants not paying taxes now.
We need to do something about our most important “existing condition” – our ever-growing population. According to the Census Bureau, the percentage of foreign-born population has grown from 4.7% in 1970 to 12.9% in 2010 (that’s 40 million people). The country is changing and those who hold onto this notion of limiting change will be left behind. We need to change Washington, we need to change Congress and we need to change the way America handles its taxation of the general public. Again, we need revenue. We need our government to be strong, not small.
I have never met a true conservative who didn’t bother me. I ask myself, why is this? The first thing that puts me off is this aurora of knowing what is right for everyone. The next thing that generally surfaces early in the conversation is this notion that other people are not pulling their fair share. A naiveté that somehow a person working two jobs to get by is less than those who have gotten a “good” education and “pulled themselves up by their bootstraps” to beat the system. And they accuse Obama of class warfare, what?
Another thing that ruffles my feathers is this feeling that non-Christians are not the rightful owners of our country. When these politicians are slightly less true in their conservative views, they might use the phrase “Christian-Judeo nation” as if there are no other value or belief systems than those chosen two. I mean, Hollywood is full of successful people who believe that a spaceship will rescue the righteous; are they not America? And Utah is full of people who wear sacred underwear; are they not part of the great country of freedom of speech and religious belief? There are large neighborhoods in this country where people face a place in the middle-east and pray five times a day; are those citizens not worthy of our respect? There are millions of people in America who don’t want to go back to the witch hunts of Salem, Massachusetts. We like the separation of church and state. It makes sense for America today.
We need to think about the words these people use. We need to comprehend the meanings and actions behind those words. When Rick Santorum said on national TV that Muslims should be handled differently by the TSA when clearing security at our airports, I couldn’t believe the only candidate to demonstrate disbelief was Ron Paul. Rick’s opinion is not a true conservative viewpoint. This would be racial profiling and a racist attitude that would be no different than slavery, female voting restrictions and ruling that only landowners could vote. Those were the original institutions. Would a true conservative in the White House really go back to that existing condition?
We will probably find that true conservatives are just nostalgic fools, who in a sense, are out of touch with America. Professional politicians and true conservatives are keeping us from righting the ship. Even Ronald Reagan raised taxes almost every year he was in office. What would Reagan do today? A true conservative doesn’t acknowledge that good decisions and compromises move things forward. They focus on a rewritten history, the opinion of the pack and their insecure need to appear holier than thou; with the “thou” in this case being the American middle-class.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Politics, Culture, 8 more
-
- tags:
- Republicans, Ron Paul, Conservative, Newt Gingrich, 4 more
-
-
good_stuff
-
"When Rick Santorum said on national TV that Muslims should be handled differently by the TSA when clearing security at our airports, I couldn’t believe the only candidate to demonstrate disbelief was Ron Paul."
- Even if you are against this on the basis of civil rights and/or profiling, surely the fear mongerers would be against it based on the fact that the person could lie and claim they are not muslim, right?
- 5 months ago
-
good_stuff
-
-
charliesommers
-
“Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear.”
~William E. Gladstone, 19th century British Prime Minister. - 5 months ago
-
charliesommers
-
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
charliesommers:
This is nearly meaningless as it says nothing about the policy differences between liberals and conservatives, and also because it says nothing about the meaning of the terms, Liberal and Conservative, as employed by the author.
Sadly for Charlie, Gladstone was a conservative Republican using todays definitions. Whoops!
Wiki:
Gladstonian finance was the finance of the system of 'natural liberty,' laissez-faire, and free trade...the most important thing was to remove fiscal obstructions to private activity. And for this, in turn, it was necessary to keep public expenditure low. Retrenchment was the victorious slogan of the day...it means the reduction of the functions of the state to a minimum...retrenchment means rationalisation of the remaining functions of the state, which among other things implies as small a military establishment as possible. The resulting economic development would in addition, so it was believed, make social expenditures largely superfluous...Equally important was it...to raise the revenue that would still have to be raised in such a way as to deflect economic behaviour as little as possible from what it would have been in the absence of all taxation ('taxation for revenue only'). And since the profit motive and the propensity to save were considered of paramount importance for the economic progress of all classes, this meant in particular that taxation should as little as possible interfere with the net earnings of business...As regards indirect taxes, the principle of least interference was interpreted by Gladstone to mean that taxation should be concentrated on a few important articles, leaving the rest free...Last, but not least, we have the principle of the balanced budget.[30]
- 5 months ago
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
-
Andover
-

-
What is a true conservative?
This guy right here.
- 5 months ago
-
Andover
-
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
The first Republican conservative was Jefferson. He founded the country and the Republican Party in1791 to be about freedom from big liberal government. Modern Republican conservatives share that identical belief. The true conservative then is the one for the smallest government and so the most freedom.
- 5 months ago
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
-
bike10
-
Sold themselves out to Religious Right.
- 5 months ago
-
bike10
-
-
MSII
-
True conservatives are pre holy-saint-reagan (the mad). His "revolution" destroyed the earlier true conservatives. These people just co-opted that old name. The real old conservatives didn't believe in these endless military-adventures that the new ones are all so endlessly hawkish about for instance.
- 5 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
MSII:
So who are the real old conservatives then?
- 5 months ago
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
-
MSII
-
TedBaiamonte_700:
They're all long gone, are you kidding, they were "purged" over the last decades by karl rove and his followers. They pushed anyone out who were at all reasonable, or "moderate". McCain used to be what would be called a moderate, but he's been forced to go further and further right to appease the party as it's become further and further lunatic-fringe-right.
- 5 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
MSII:
Here's the basics for you. Jefferson, the first Republican, founded the country to be about freedom from big liberal government. Modern Republicans have the same identical philosophy, Ron Paul in particular. Why do you say our Founders were a lunatic fringe???
- 5 months ago
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
-
MSII
-
TedBaiamonte_700:
You've got those wrong-winger-republithug Faux Noise channel talking points/buzz words all down pat, congrats to you, the cock brothers err. I mean koch brothers are pleased their holy-dollars are getting them value.
- 5 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
MSII:
If that was ever on Fox News I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or admit you lied flat out!!
- 5 months ago
-
TedBaiamonte_700
-
-
Wetdog
-
Very good article you've written Douglas. Congratulations. You need to post this in other places as well----it is worthy of being seen as widely as possible. Thanks for posting.
- 5 months ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Incredulous
-

-
oh wait....this one is pretty good too.
- 5 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
dwightdouglas
-
Incredulous:
Incredulous, over the weekend, I have been watching the first season of MAD MEN and seeing that viewpoint of 1960 and the conservatives back then, I sense they were drinking and smoking and screwing their way through life. Were they normal back then?
- 5 months ago
-
dwightdouglas
-
-
Incredulous
-
dwightdouglas:
HA! Nobody concerned themselves with what was normal when men were mad....
- 5 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
Incredulous
-

-
says it for me....
- 5 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
remanns
-
[ The true conservative is someone who has already decided what is right and what is wrong. They see things in black and white. ]
yepper.
- 5 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
remanns
-
a penis, with a fat billford who actually wears a condom when he bends you over.
. . . .and he may even take the time to "say grace" first. - 5 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
dwightdouglas
-
-
remanns:
Very funny remanns, as you may know, I put the edgy comedy on the site www.whackotv.com, you made me laugh
- 5 months ago
-
dwightdouglas
-
-
remanns
-
dwightdouglas:
metaphor, is a terrible thing to face ! +^d
- 5 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
remanns
-
dwightdouglas:
. . .was funny !
- 5 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
dwightdouglas
-
Well said PressCore - some people only remember what they want and when that doesn't work for them, they make things up.
- 5 months ago
-
dwightdouglas
-
-
PressCore
-
Out of all those faces, I see only one whom with his Senator son wants
to protect our 2nd Amendment Constitutional rights. Bachman does too
but her views and comments are incongruent with a stable personality.
Incidently, the conservatives in the 1980s didn't regard that evil clown
Reagan as a conservative. He was once an advocate of FDR but did
a 180 degree about face when he saw what the color of Big Money
looked like, and how $3 Million speaking engagements after the
White House could buy him his Rancho Cielo. Imho, I don't call that
being conservative. I call it being compromised. - 5 months ago
-
PressCore