Community | January 04, 2012 | 127 comments

Keith Olbermann Blasts Current TV; Internal Memo Reveals Tension Over GOP Primary - The Hollywood Reporter

Image
tverdell
“I was not given a legitimate opportunity to host under acceptable conditions,” Olbermann said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter on Wednesday. “They know it and we know it. Telling half the story is wrong.”
  1. groups:
    Community,   Entertainment,   Culture,   Art and Style,   12 more
  2. tags:
    Culture c u r r e n t c u r r e n t stuff Culture?
  3.     
    |

127 comments // Keith Olbermann Blasts Current TV; Internal Memo Reveals Tension Over GOP Primary - The Hollywood Reporter

  • KimClark
    • 0
      KimClark  
    • I don't see a place to email suggestions to Current TV beyond the message boards. I highly suggest that you put an email like on your home page that does not require logging in etc. The reason I suggest this is simply, I'm very active on the web and communally. A great big hole exists on world news coverage done with real information. BBC doesn't do too bad with it but the impact on the US and from the US would be warmly welcomed. Please consider this undertaking so I never have to change the channel unless I chose to watch the deception machines. Thank you for what you do. I found Current TV and Keith Olbermann is a show my kids and I watch all week together. We miss him on days he isn't on. Please consider the world news idea.

    • 5 months ago
  • crabbyoldguy
    • -5
      crabbyoldguy  
    • By taking on the persona of Mr. Murrow has Keith inadvertently invoked the spirt of William Paley thru his nightly incantation of Murrow's tag line? It seems like the indicators are lining up, and if that's the case we all know where this ends, Keith will get a job from Obama, lobby other nations to not air stories he produced, and then fades away. Could it be that the spirt has changed the timeline, substituting Mr. Gore for a sitting president?

      Time to get out the sage and crystals.

    • 5 months ago
  • timelord999
  • remanns
  • remanns
    • -3
      remanns  
    • timelord999:

      let it be known,... publicly,..... ( I am NOT a "hit n run drive by back-stab voter" - I rather DETEST those sorts )

      I HAVE " -Vd ", your rant. Cenk is EASILY as important to " c u r r e n t " .

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • timelord999:

      p.s. - I really DO enjoy him,...........to be clear,...........he IS a tad "long in the wind",....
      BUT
      - - - -the ENTIRE "politics" thing, is NOT what is admirable about " c u r r e n t "

      -consider that "line in the sand" drawn .

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • timelord999:

      p.p.s. - - -Frank Zappa is more important to culture than Gore, Keith, Cenk,....well,....actually- " c u r r e n t " itself...........HE will be at LEAST a musical footnote ,.........100 years from now,...........ALL our "broadcast media" - all of it - will be an obscure tech subset, like the telegraph,........100 years from now.

      hmmmmmmmmmmm,.....now,......WHO WERE ,........those GREAT telegraph operators,....way back when ?!? How many "radio greats",...at all, can you name ?
      . . .and what do you know about them ?

      ( just like that )

      Handel will still have mundane folk mulling over his works,....no one will care about anything but the MOST DRAMATIC changes in political history AT ALL !

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +4
      JanforGore  
    • timelord999:

      "Mr. Gore does not seem to understand Keith Olbermann goes then say goodbye to Current Tv....the Current website"
      ~~~
      Al Gore hired Keith Olbermann so I am sure he understands plenty and it looks like you are using an old grudge for him and connecting it to this news about Keith Olbermann to express that grudge without having facts to back you up. Why would you then wish the demise of this website? You do realize that there are those here who were here contributing and supporting it long before it became poiltics 101 right? And I can tell you this; IF Keith Olbermann were to ever leave I would do my best as a contributor to support Mr.Gore and his original vision for the station and the website, because for all of the changes I have seen it has still been a place where I could express views I could not at other venues and I do appreciate that. This site is what we make of it.

    • 5 months ago
  • truthglow
  • timelord999
  • artemis6
  • artemis6
    • -1
      artemis6  
    • remanns:

      remanns , i find it astonishing that people voted you down . I voted you up . Because we were here long before and they came with perhaps ? May they find happiness where Keith takes them . I guess Plato might be right , some people need instructions as to how they should perceive and act in the world . While one such as myself hope for a spokesperson to say what i think is right , others need to be told that they should think is right , perhaps the original idea , like those that flocked to it at first are in conflict ? If Keith Olbermans voice is more important to you than your own , then GO , i say !

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • timelord999:

      . . . .and Orson Welles. I like your list. I think other media helped keep some of that name recognition alive through several generations. ( The older you are of course, them more the list has personal meaning,....RTF students excluded of course . +^d

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • +1
      remanns  
    • artemis6:

      Heh . no biggie. Keith has a cult. I think I would bow in the direction of Asimov' grave 3 times a day,......if I knew what direction that was ! To each their own !

      POST ON !

    • 5 months ago
  • TanzaniteDiamonds
  • ROSERITA
    • +3
      ROSERITA  
    • If Keith was asked to do the Iowa Caucus why would he tell his viewers he would be back Tuesday??? Current wants to continue being a third world TV station while Keith is trying to being some freaking class to it..

    • 5 months ago
  • ROSERITA
    • +6
      ROSERITA  
    • I never heard of current TV, till Keith went there.. if he goes so, will more then half of current's viewers.. Cenk is OK, BUT HE AIN'T NO KEITH!!

    • 5 months ago
  • PeteLeS33
    • +8
      PeteLeS33  
    • I think we all seen a few changes to Current in the past months since August 8, 2011. The community has been pushed into the background and I think they may be cancelling Vanguard.

      August eighth came this headline :
      Current TV Names Former CNN Executive David Bohrman as Its New President
      ( http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/08/idUS333553998820110808 )

      David Bohrman has built a reputation for interactive media. Which is why Mr, Gore and Mr. Hyatt chose him as President. He has worked for ABC, CBS, CNN, and most notably NBC AND MSNBC.

      He was very enthused about being President here at Current, stating notably

      “There has been a profound change in the media landscape in terms of what’s being covered, how it’s being covered and how audiences want to consume it,” said Mr. Bohrman. “Those of us inside the media business have a responsibility to anticipate what viewers want and need, and we must constantly reinvent the medium. Today more than ever, I think audiences demand intelligent discourse instead of shouting. They want a way to be part of the discourse instead of being passive outsiders."

      I think most of us can agree that the exact opposite is happening. (???)

      What may have happened was a complete communication breakdown, someone just forgot to inform KO. The sad part is that they (DB) instead tried to put the blame on someone else.(KO), which is unprofessional at best.

      As the memo is posted in the Atlantic Wire:
      ( http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/01/keith-olbermann-sparring-his-new...
      Jan 4, 2012 )

      To the Countdown Staff....

      I wanted to clarify tonight's programming, as I gather there may be some misunderstanding about what is on when.

      As we assumed Keith had communicated to you, Keith was asked to be the sole anchor and executive producer of our primary and caucus coverage. He declined.

      (Why else would KO decline, ( if he actually did ) if he didn't have ample time to prepare for the broadcast?)

      The memo continues:

      We then made other plans to have our 4 hours of prime time election coverage tonight hosted by Al Gore, Jennifer Granholm, and The Young Turks. We tried several times to have Keith participate in our coverage, including being the lead anchor for the 8p hour tonight, incorporated with our election group in the Los Angeles studio and produced in the LA control room. We have a special election graphic package, live remotes, caucus feeds, etc.

      There will be NO stand-alone Countdown tonight. For those of you at work who might be preparing a program, I apologize your managers did not communicate this to you. See you back on the air tomorrow night.

      Regards,
      DB

      So why would KO let his staff start working on a show that would never be aired????

      A week before the caucus the New York Times Brian Stelter accused KO of being "disgruntled" with conditions here at Current. If he wasn't before he has every right to be now, as KO tweeted to the Atlantic Wire :

      "anybody who describes my disposition towards Current as 'disgruntled' is either uninformed, working from a personal agenda, wrong -- or all of the above."

      It might very well be a combination of all three. As far as internal conflicts, very possible.

      President David Bohrman, as mentioned above worked for all the info-tainment networks, and built a reputation for incorporating internet and media outlets. But as WE the Community have seen here on the site there seems to be more INFO-TAINMENT and a lot less INFO-RMATION and INTERACTION.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • PeteLeS33
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -5
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • suck it up, fan boy and stfu. god what a whiny bitch.. doesnt he vaguely, at least in title, direct programming? so what he argued with himself? sorry keef but you have no cred other than a talking head of the biased variety and noone wants to hear your biased sniping. not that the primaries, or even elections, matter, as we all know. but as a member of the fake main stream media, you should know that they arent going to give a plum spot to the boob from espn, no matter how many boot licking fan boys and girls you have who dont know any better than to participate in the us vs them paradigm our corporate overlords inflict on us.

    • 5 months ago
  • dinm76
  • ROSERITA
    • +3
      ROSERITA  
    • Itsbatman_Durr:

      Keith is the only person left on TV that can't be controlled by cooperate slobs who only care about the bottom line.. As with most things in life he that takes the road less traveled is usually ostracized.. try finding one piece of news that Keith has reported that was false or distorted.. Yes! he is Partisan but he makes no bones about that..

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • Leen61
    • +4
      Leen61  
    • dinm76:

      Agreed! We get it. Itsbatman_Durr hates Keith. You know what they say, dinm76, it says more about the person that keeps repeating the same things over and over than the person they are hating on.

    • 5 months ago
  • truthglow
  • truthglow
  • Leen61
  • alexandrek
  • remanns
  • Dagum
    • +5
      Dagum  
    • Personally, I don't watch Current TV that much. But I know for better or worse Current has invested a lot or money in Keith to the point where if it doesn't work out Current.com will be done. I enjoy this site and people here (even the ones I disagree with) and I don't want to see it go under. So here are my two cents.

      Keith Olbermann has a history of being cantankerous. It's part if his personality and probably what aids him in giving some of his trademark rants. As far as employee/employer relationships, the Directors of Current TV, LLC where well aware of this ahead of time before giving Keith a contract. But it doesn't appear that they planned for when the inevitable bumps in the road appear when contracting a TV personality who is famous for being stand-offish.

      Here is how the situation looks based on the information publicly available. Keith and Countdown studio are based in New York. Keith and his staff have done a good job producing but at the same time the studio that was built for Countdown is second rate and probably very embarrassing to Keith. Countdown studio and production has been plagued with electrical failures, graphical problems, and satellite feed issues.
      Keith is Current's flagship. To have all these critical problems plague your flagship anchor due to what appears to be mainly a low budget poorly constructed studio is just plain bad business. It's unprofessional and damages the Current Brand. If you are going to pay top dollar for talent (and Current paid a substantial amount for Keith) at least give him a mediocre studio with steady satellite feed.

      This is probably what is partly driving Keith to act up. He might be upset too that on the flip side Current did put a lot of money into building The Young Turks a nice studio in California. Given the personalities it would probably create animosity between Keith and TYT. Also Keith appears to be upset about the changes in corporate leadership. Keith has been in the media business for awhile. Current should give him a seat at the boardroom table to let him vent his ideas about where he thinks the company should go.

      Both Current and Keith have a vested interest in working this thing out. Based on what I read Keith literally owns part of Current. If Current fails everyone on both sides of the feud loses. Hopefully cooler heads will prevail.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • alexandrek
  • Dagum
  • JohnA
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • nardo1224
    • +4
      nardo1224  
    • When will these network assholes understand that unlike Republican and conservative talk show people who's only existence is to please their corporate masters and will do anything and everything including LIE in order to stay on the air, KEITH OLBERMAN is a national treasury who will not be put in a canning jar and placed on a shelf to wait until he is needed to boost ratings for their network.

      Current TV's footprint was made by bringing on Keith and now that they seem to think they are established, they can shit on him and he will take it. Like so many others have stated, If Keith goes, I go. And that might not be saying much, but just like dito heads, Keith has a loyal following and we will not stand by and allow him to be treated like crap by a bloated,massive ego driven network.

      Current, you are not big enough to try and act like Fox, Msnbc, or Cnn. Accept your place and stop trying to be like the big boys because without Keith Olberman, you have nothing and that's even with Cenk, Jennifer and Al combined!

    • 5 months ago
  • JohnA
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • 0
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • nardo1224:

      LOL!! i hope that was intended to be a farcical post because if you are serious you need to get out more. all the MSM, including even maggots like keef, are tools of the corporate overlords. every repug, every demogogue is slave to the same master. if you want to delude yourself into thinking otherwise, you are suffering from stockholm syndrome. current tv was FAR better before keef, and will be far better without him. and you, so dont let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya on the way out!

    • 5 months ago
  • IKare1
    • +2
      IKare1  
    • nardo1224:

      Agreed. Current execs must be smart enough to realize that if Keith goes, his viewers go with him. Current will die a slow death without Keith. Cenk is OK but not enough to make me tune in without KO included.

    • 5 months ago
  • Milieu
    • +6
      Milieu  
    • Since KO built the House of ESPN and the House MSNBC, and gave gravitas to Faux Sports in between, I do believe that Current needs to be just a teeny bit careful with their Master Craftsman.

    • 5 months ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • -3
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • Milieu:

      whilst i usually agree with your opinions and respect them as well, an uncommon thing for me lol, i cant believe you typed that with a straight face. keef sucked on espn, blew on msnbc, and was a tool on fox sports. all he was ever good for was playing the leftist version of limbaugh and wanking on about how shitty his (fill in the blank) network treated him. good bye keef, and good riddance. cenk FTW. at least when he is biased, we know he believes it and isnt playing a charade for ratings

    • 5 months ago
  • coolplanet
    • +5
      coolplanet  
    • "But an internal memo from Current TV president David Bohrman obtained by THR contends that Olbermann was asked to lead primary coverage."

      This seems to be Bohrman's screw up.
      Choosing Cenk over Keith is a real stupid move!

    • 5 months ago
  • timelord999
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • dudefromtherock
  • savroD
    • +3
      savroD  
    • I agree with the sentiments below. These managers and executives are fools; and, they know it. This is why a guy like KeithO & team can deliver an entertaining mix of news and opinion with a sportcaster like delivery and the wit of an intellectual, leaving them squirming in the whirlwind cesspool of rats they are!

    • 5 months ago
  • Incredulous
    • +7
      Incredulous  
    • I'm sorry, but this just feels like more of the new and vastly improved (NOT) Current we have all been trying to acclimate ourselves to, and quite frankly, I am sick of the way this place is being run.

      talk amongst yourselves children, just don't ruffle too many feathers....and that goes double for you Keith....

    • 5 months ago
  • tverdell
  • Incredulous
  • tverdell
    • +4
      tverdell  
    • Image
    • Well, the end is near. Perhaps Keith can go to CBS or something.
      Is this also the end for Current? Without Keith, I think the network is over.
      Stick a fork in it. Current did a last gamble and it didn't work out.
      ====================================================

      The lead attorney for Keith Olbermann tells The Hollywood Reporter that the disgruntled Current newsman is negotiating his next moves with his employer in the wake of a falling out over his participation in coverage of the Republican primaries.

      http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/keith-olbermann-quits-current-tv-lawyer...

    • 5 months ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • artemis6
  • tverdell
    • +4
      tverdell  
    • According to this NYT article, Keith may have not been happy with the production quality of Countdown and Politically Direct.

      Again, that is just their guess as to why he is not happy.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/business/media/olbermann-in-a-clash-at-new-job...

      When asked if Mr. Olbermann would be on Current next Tuesday, the night of the New Hampshire primary, the channel’s spokeswoman — who has been on the job for just two days — said a special report was scheduled, and added, “We hope that Keith will play a lead role in that coverage.”

    • 5 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +4
      letsliveinpeace  
    • It seems that there is much to do about nothing, just media types trying to stir up controversy where there is none. And get some more union electricians to straighten out Keith's studio ASAP.

    • 5 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
  • tverdell
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • dinm76
  • unimatrix0
    • +7
      unimatrix0  
    • I love Olbermann, especially when he goes on a rant. However, anyone familiar with his past knows the guy is notorious for not getting along with his superiors. The guy has a problem with authority, which makes him a great pundit, but a lousy employee.

    • 5 months ago
  • remanns
    • +6
      remanns  
    • unimatrix0:

      It IS best to try to avoid being a employee,...if you can manage it. ( and EAT, and all that . . . . independent contractor isn't really all that great,.....owning copyrights or patents or trademarks,..........or "secret formulas" is where it is at ! )

      Being a blacksmith wouldn't be all that bad,....but demand has diminished.

    • 5 months ago
  • letsliveinpeace
  • truthglow
    • +6
      truthglow  
    • letsliveinpeace:

      I'm sure he wishes that were true, but he doesn't own the network, & he has a contract. I also wish that were true. Then, we would be certain that Keith would be secure in his job, & we'd see him every night.

    • 5 months ago
  • truthglow
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • letsliveinpeace
  • letsliveinpeace
  • unimatrix0
  • Leen61
    • +8
      Leen61  
    • Very curious indeed why Al Gore would put Jennifer Granholm ahead of KO with the GOP primary coverage while showcasing the new kids on the block The Young Turks. I tried to watch for awhile last night and could take only a few minutes of it before having to turn it off. I have heard Granholm described as "interesting as watching paint dry". I prefer the latter, because paint does it quietly. I thought the banter was amateurish and personally, embarassing. Mr. Gore needs to do some patching up quick, because if KO leaves, he takes a lot of us with him including me.

    • 5 months ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +7
      Varex_Sythe  
    • Leen61:

      Would that even be something that Gore is in charge of? I know he was one of the big forces behind starting this website, but did he maintain as much control as people might think?

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +5
      Leen61  
    • Varex_Sythe:

      I can simply speak to the point that Al himself has chosen to interject himself into the primary coverage, so I tend to think he has got some programming clout. Al himself did the hiring of KO in the first place.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +11
      JanforGore  
    • Leen61:

      I agree and I only saw her speak on the snippets posted here. Hell, some of us here could do a better job of it. I dont know what Mr. Gore is thinking, but this is really the first time in a while I find myself at odds with a decision he had made if this was entirely his decision, which it may not really have been. That being said, do you not think that Keith Olbermann can also be difficult at times? I don't know, just asking... still doesn't change my view about "I love DOW Chemical" Granholm and it actually disappoints and angers me because Current could have had a great lineup the way it was with Keith Olbermann, Vanguard, maybe Cenk Uyger ( or a show with Pods on it with viewer participation) and an environmental/Earth show. As I stated once before, once the election is over what will there be?

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +12
      Leen61  
    • JanforGore:

      Keith has always been very opinionated and strong-willed about his role wherever he has worked, from ESPN to CNN to MSNBC to Current, but like you, it doesn't change the crux of the issue for me as well, that your "go to guy" should be in the lineup if he wants to be. Keith wants to make clear he wasn't involved in the decision making process regarding the GOP primary coverage so it had to come from the top. Keith himself, namely in his Rolling Stone interview last June, called Vanguard "the best show that hardly anyone knows about". I think if it had been left up to Keith, Vanguard would've remained and been helped in its viewership now that people like me have been drawn to the network. Keith also has this side of him that is caring and helpful as his free clinic support and spotlighting others who have been slighted by the powers that be shows. He was one of the first in the media to shine a negative light on Scott Walker, even before his election, making his "Worst Person's List" more than once during the campaign. I sure hope that any differences currently existing at Current are resolved soon to keep Keith on board and happy here. I think Keith has a greater vision for the network beyond the elections especially given his addition of Mark Ruffalo as environmental contributor, Matt Taibbi who always looks out for the Wall Street criminals robbing our futures and John Dean reporting the trashing of our justice system. Current has the potential and hopefully we are simply seeing its growing pains right now, Jan.

    • 5 months ago
  • tverdell
    • +7
      tverdell  
    • Leen61:

      Actually, David Bohrman is quoted as saying he will twist Al Gores arm in order to get him involved in programming.

      David Bohrman is the CEO and decision maker, he is the one who sent the message to the Countdown staff that their show was not on last night.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • JanforGore
    • +7
      JanforGore  
    • Leen61:

      Thanks for your reply. I guess we really don't know the whole story. I too hope all works out well for all in this and now based on other comments and knowing the space Mr. Gore gave him, I am thinking this was not his decision entirely. Hopefully he will be covering other debates and primaries as it goes along.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +6
      JanforGore  
    • tverdell:

      So you're saying he took Keith Olbermann off to put Mr. Gore there? Personally, I don't think it was wise of him to give up so much control of his tv station.Thanks for clarifying that.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +8
      Leen61  
    • JanforGore:

      I watched Keith tonight. I'm glad he is back on the air! He seemed his usual self. He kinda scared me half way through his show when he said he "was going to do a career update announcement." But I think I misunderstood. It wasn't about his. He signed off in his usual fashion. So that's a good sign. Per tverdell's post, it sounds like the new CEO Bohrman called the shot. So hopefully they came to an understanding afterward.

    • 5 months ago
  • SFirman
  • tverdell
    • +6
      tverdell  
    • JanforGore:

      Actually, Bohrman waited Olbermann to anchor last night, he just wants Gore as an analyst. This is from a internal Current TV memo which is in the article.

      It seems that Olbermann didn't like the terms of him being the anchor, perhaps not enough control, that is my speculation.

      But we know for a fact that Bohrman has been asking Keith to anchor politically direct, but Keith was somehow unhappy with the offer.

      I hope the details come out soon.

    • 5 months ago
  • SFirman
    • +5
      SFirman  
    • Leen61:

      I thought Keith did good tonight. He did not appear stressed. Then I remember the night he said that was his last show on MSNBC. I think I went in shock.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • tverdell
  • Leen61
    • +8
      Leen61  
    • tverdell:

      "But we know for a fact that Bohrman has been asking Keith to anchor politically direct, but Keith was somehow unhappy with the offer."

      Aren't they in 2 different cities, tverdell? Keith in NY and everyone else in CA? Maybe it's a logistics thing.

      "I hope the details come out soon."
      Me too.

    • 5 months ago
  • tverdell
    • +7
      tverdell  
    • Leen61:

      No, I don't think so because they want to preempt countdown so they could fly Olbermann to LA. Now that you mention that, perhaps Olbermann wanted to anchor in NY.

      Good point.

      Olbermann probably wants to work with his own people in NY, good theory.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • cmc101
  • truthglow
    • +4
      truthglow  
    • Leen61:

      I agree with you 100%. I watched the MSNBC coverage last night, because I cannot tolerate the loud, grating Cenk for more than a few minutes, the boring Gore, or the establishment Democrat Granholm. I will only watch Current if Keith is on the program with them. PERIOD!!! END OF STORY!!!

    • 5 months ago
  • truthglow
  • JanforGore
  • tverdell
    • +4
      tverdell  
    • truthglow:

      Which is what's confusing. If you have an equity stake in the company, as a rule, you want the company to succeed.

      If Keith leaves, the company fails and he doesn't reap his investment.

    • 5 months ago
  • tverdell
  • truthglow
  • SFirman
  • truthglow
  • truthglow
  • tverdell
    • +4
      tverdell  
    • SFirman:

      Olbermann just lawyered up.
      That means this is the end of the line people.

      I guess he might go to CBS or ABC.

      He just tweeted that he doesn't want to do online programming.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ambill94
    • +4
      Ambill94  
    • Leen61:

      Absolutely...when KO interviewed her last fall I thought maybe she would add some new power to the lineup, but so far she has been a huge disappointment...I agree that VP Al is going to be in a world of hurt if Keith leaves...TYT are too much Cenk while the talented others on the show get only a word here and a phrase there...wasted talent it seems, and I don't think Cenk can carry it for long...

      I really hope all this is much ado about nothing and that things settle down starting next week...because as you said: "...he takes a lot of us with him including me."

    • 5 months ago
  • truthglow
  • JanforGore
    • +7
      JanforGore  
    • truthglow:

      Yes and as much as I criticize, I really do support this station which is why I wouldn't want to see this all fall apart. But I think they relied too much on a political lineup alone and it may come back to hurt them.

    • 5 months ago
1 - 100 of 127
more from Community:

top videos