Community | January 06, 2012 | 55 comments

IRAN War: The planned omnicide by American and European leaders

source: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/january052012/us-omnicide-as.php

Image
Vierotchka
How will nuking of Iran affect the Indian sub-continent and the world?

(NEW DELHI) - The US, NATO and Israel Defense Forces are ready to attack Iran with nuclear weapons. Covert wars had already started during Libyan attacks.

The US scientists have warned the US government

The Union of Concerned Scientists recently have warned that, should the USA use nuclear weapons in Iran, of say 1 megaton yield, it would kill 3 million people in Iran and another 35 million will die of radiation fallout in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. [The video animation is enclosed][1]

A simple representation of the computer simulation below shows how radioactive wind will blow first 48 hours. Hot, dry air, blowing from arid-plains of Iran, Afghanistan will carry radioactive dust into the Indian sub-continent, and blow right across the northern Gangetic plains.

A group of thirteen top physicists, including five Nobel laureates, in the United States had warned President George W Bush not to use nuclear weapon in Iran. [The URL of the letter given below] [2]

The warning initiated by Jorge Hirsch, a professor of physics at the University of California at San Diego, was signed by more than 1,800 physicists who categorically rejected the new U.S. nuclear weapons policy of preemptive use of the nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states, aggressor or non-aggressor, alike.

Scientists are generally a-political. They follow a philosophy that their discipline seeks welfare for the humankind and, therefore, they seldom directly get involved in politics of science or technology. What is unprecedented here is that a group had come out against Bush administration’s policy of (a) using nuclear weapons, (b) using the weapons preemptively, i.e. without any overt or covert threat of aggression, and (c) against nations that are non-nuclear, and who are defenseless against the aggression of the United States of America.

The mainstream media, globally, has been complicit in the incessant western warmongering. It has failed to warn the people of the dangers inherent in such illegal and irresponsible acts of the past and present US administration, the British administration and the French administration. Nothing unusual or unprecedented, though.

Hence the actions of the Union of Concerned Scientists and the group of physicists in taking the extraordinary step of directly communicating with the people and with the administration is not merely commendable, it is an indictment of western democratic institutions.

How will nuking of Iran affect the Indian sub-continent and the world?

Since I am an Indian, one of my main concerns since 9/11 has been the impact of US policies on the survival and sustainability of West Asia and the Indian sub-continent. The people of the sub-continent have millennia-old history of trade and commerce with West-Asia. Interaction with Europe is merely three centuries old…and that interaction has led to death, destruction, mayhem, misery, exploitation, devastation……and now utter decimation stares us in our face.

There are many ways warm air blows from West-Asian region into the sub-continent. Strong surface winds from West-Asia, picking up sand and dust, blow right across Northern India, including India’s capital New Delhi. This is normal warm air current as winter ends, spring crawls up and summer begins, but just before the Monsoon winds arrive from the South. During winter we have bone-chilling, strong surface winds in northern India coming from the West-Asian region. There are currents that blow across the dry west-Asian region and enter the Himalayas via the Karakorum Range. Particles of dust picked up by these winds are rained out or snowed and these flow through the hundreds of perennial rivers originating in the Himalayas. Worth noting is the fact air currents from this region also blows across Europe.

When Iran is nuked, these winds will suck up radioactive dust and deposit them right across Northern India, including the Himalayas.

Since the US started its unprovoked aggressions in West-Asia, post 9/11, depleted uranium nano particles carried by these winds have already contaminated vast regions of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. It is the geography, and history is never far behind; they are not coming to Asia on a humanitarian mission. They need our resources and want to eliminate each one of us.

Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq amount to two nuclear attacks on Indian people by two elected US Presidents in less than ten years. The third one is not far behind. Since Depleted Uranium particles were traced at Aldermaston, UK, by Dr Chris Busby, effectively the entire Europe has also been dosed with ionizing radiation from Iraq Wars, and hence the US and NATO forces have attacked their own civilians too. Attacks by NATO forces on European civilians amounts to treason.

21 countries in West and South Asia affected from radiation contamination can say the something more serious: the civilians in these 21 countries have been attacked by the US and NATO forces without their respective governments being an aggressor. It is a demented extension of “the right of preemptive action” by an utterly depraved US, British and French administrations, an outright policy of genocide, or omnicide, choose your own term. But none of these people ever raised a finger against the US or any western nation; majority still believes that Americans are civilized. Does it matter now?

If you are an American, don’t ever forget that the United States of America has been directly committing war crimes since 1991. Each political leader since 1991 is directly or indirectly involved. Every military commander is involved. Every soldier is involved. Using the Nuremberg principles, a trial would result in millions of indictments for genocide.

(click on the link for the whole article and to access the in-text links)
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   World News,   Endangered Earth,   3 more
  2. tags:
    War,  Israel,  Iran,  USA,  3 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

55 comments // IRAN War: The planned omnicide by American and European leaders

  • EmperorThan
    • +2
      EmperorThan  

    • Secretary of War "Those new tomahawk missile orders arrived and now we don't have a country to drop them on Mr. President."

      Obama: "Irene, cancel my 2 o'clock with the Girl Scouts of America. Reschedule it for 3 this coin toss between Pakistan and Iran shouldn't take very long."

    • 5 months ago
  • irie_ojo
    • -1
      irie_ojo  

    • if it's true... it would be a great means of population control. war is money as is money is power. the nwo is getting everything in order in front of the blinded public. people need to wake up and realize that obama signing the ndaa is a big step towards the nwo takeover. and all those fema detention camps around the country are no joke. they will be filled by americans. its a sad day for america.

    • 5 months ago
  • jubal
    • +3
      jubal  
    • Image

    • October 5, 2007

      BILL MOYERS: Welcome to the JOURNAL.

      Talk of war with Iran has been on the lips of armchair warriors all week, many of them the same voices that four and a half years ago called for invading Iraq. From former UN Ambassador John Bolton to neo-conservative icon Norman Podheretz to RUPERT MURDOCH's pundits at FOXnews.

      In the NEW YORKER, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called launching an attack against Iran practically a done deal.

      But as the drumbeat for war against Iran grew louder this week, you had to wonder if anyone beating those drums ever stopped to ask how an American first strike on Iran would go over with the Iranians.

      I don't mean Ahmadinejad or the ayatollahs, who would use the provocation to consolidate their hold on power. I mean the man and woman in the street.

      You may remember the name Shareen Abadi. She won The Nobel Prize in 2003 for standing up for human rights in Iran, including fighting discrimination against women. For her efforts, she received death threats from her own people. Here is what this human rights activist said last year about what would happen if the United States attacks Iran. Quote. 'Iranians will unite, forgetting their differences with their government, and they will fiercely and tenaciously defend their country.'

      Even so, that doesn't seem to deter powerful forces in this country from making the case for military strikes against Iran.

      You're about to meet some of them.

      http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10052007/transcript5.html

    • 5 months ago
  • Andover
  • jubal
  • EmperorThan
  • Leen61
  • jubal
  • Leen61
    • +2
      Leen61  
    • jubal:

      Exactly what the occupation of Iraq was about, to fill the coffers of Halliburton, KBR, Blackwater and the rest. Iran won't be the same proposition and if the neocons are that stupid to think so, we're in even bigger trouble this time, jubal.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +7
      JanforGore  

    • So how can anyone read this and say they support Obama? How is he any different from the Republicans wanting this? We then can trust NONE OF THEM. So will this be covered on apologist Jennifer Granholm's spanking new little "War Room" show here? Or will she and the other Democratic partisans now have a legitimate reason why this should be done? Should this come to pass what are we going to do? Just sit here and let them do it? It simply cannot be allowed. This is why Bush should have been impeached and their preemptive BS nipped in the bud.

      If you look up Meggido (the final battle between good and evil) you will see that this is part of the Book Of Revelations-the RW wackos in this country see this playing out in a nuclear war with Iran. INSANITY.

      http://www.bibarch.com/archaeologicalsites/megiddo.htm

      "Megiddo (me·GID·o), or Tel Megiddo (TEL-me·GID·o), an ancient fortified city, is one of the most famous battlegrounds in the world. Historians believe that more battles were fought at this location than anywhere else on earth. "When Edwin Robinson stood on the imposing hill known as Tell el-Mutesellim in 1838, he jotted down in his diary the words, 'I wonder where Megiddo could have been.' Ironically, the mound on which he was standing, rising seventy feet above the surrounding plain and occupying an area of ten acres on its summit (with lower levels even larger) soon proved to be the site of Megiddo" (Pfeiffer, 1966: 375).

      Anciently Megiddo's gates and walls witnessed the armed struggles of Assyrians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Greeks, Israelites, Persians, Philistines, and Romans. Although Megiddo was not a fortress in the days of World War I, note that the critical battle enabling the British Field Marshal Edmund Allenby to wrest control of the Holy Land from the Turks occurred at Megiddo where he began his offensive against them on September 18, 1918.

      Armageddon

      Armageddon (AR-ma·GED·don), the mount of Megiddo, according to the New Testament book of Revelation, is once again to host one of the world's major armies in a immense conflict between East and West (Revelation 16:16). The idea of Megiddo being the venue of humanity's apocalyptic finale, the "final" battle in this war called the "Battle of Armageddon", is a misnomer. The actual battle is to occur at Jerusalem and called "the war of the great day of God, the Almighty" (Revelation 16:14 NASB) or the "Battle of That Great Day of God Almighty" (KJV).

      SCRIPTURE SUMMARY

      Joshua killed the king of Megiddo during the Conquest (Joshua 12:7, 12:21).
      The city of Megiddo was allotted to the tribe of Manasseh (Joshua 17:11; I Chronicles 7:29). Deborah and Barak led the Israelites to victory over the Canaanite armies of Sisera by "the waters of Megiddo" (Judges 5:19-20). Solomon made Megiddo one of his district capitals as well as one of his three main fortress cities (I Kings 4:12; 9:15). King Josiah of Judah died in battle near Megiddo when he tried to thwart pharaoh Necho's attempt to succor the Assyrians at the Battle of Carchemish (II Kings 23:29-30; II Chronicles 35:20-24).

      Western military forces gather in the Valley of Megiddo, at Armageddon, and proceed to Jerusalem to engage eastern forces advancing in that direction, and at the height of battle encounter the unforeseen intervention of the Messiah (Revelation 16:16). At the end of the age, in biblical prophecy, the valley of Megiddo, now known as the valley of Jezreel, will serve as the gathering place for an immense army which will engage the returning messiah, Jesus Christ, and his supernatural army in the Day of the Lord (Revelation 1:10; 16:12-16; 19:19; I Thessalonians 5:2; Joel 1:15; 2:11, 2:31).

      Engaged in an all-out struggle for global dominion the armies of a Christian united Europe and its allies ready themselves for battle against a union of armies, probably Islamic nations and their Eurasian allies, from the East (Revelation 16:12). The setting is a time of warfare wherein nuclear exchanges between West and East had already occurred. In the aftermath of a surprise nuclear first strike by the West (Revelation 9:1-11), and a retaliatory nuclear response by the East (Revelation 9:13-21), both sides move major military forces into the Middle East.

      Revelation states that it is Satan's demons, through influencing key political and military leaders, who are responsible for inciting this concentration of forces (Revelation 16:13-16). Absent the intervention of God, in the clash between these two great protagonists, the destruction of all living things would occur, presumably, in a final nuclear holocaust and its aftermath (Matthew 24:22).

      Western leaders concentrate their combined forces at Armageddon apparently planning to engage eastern forces by a land invasion. The immediate objective appears to be the taking of the rich petroleum fields to the east. The Europeans, moving several armies into the Levant through the Haifa harbor and docks, marshal their forces in the Valley of Megiddo. Armageddon comes from the Greek rendering of the Hebrew name of the place Har Megiddo (the Hebrew prefix Har means hill or mountain). The valley is a large flat plain ideal for the assembling of military equipment and personnel.

      Armageddon thereby serves as the gathering place, a natural staging area about 15 miles from the Mediterranean port and industrial area of Haifa, for their military force. From this staging area western forces advance southward toward Jerusalem which they control where a horrendous battle will take place. Rather than proceeding east against Islamic forces the leaders of the western forces had to turn to the south to bolster their forces at Jerusalem, about 55 miles away, and to engage advancing eastern forces. The armies ultimately clash at Jerusalem."
      ~~~~
      There are those who actually believe and wish to see this carried out.

    • 5 months ago
  • jubal
  • artemis6
    • +2
      artemis6  
    • JanforGore:

      This is what i have for decades secretly feared . They DO long for oblivion . And they would take us with them . I don't feel like going , though . We need to occupy their sources of power . NOW .

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
  • MikeBallantine2012
    • +2
      MikeBallantine2012  
    • jubal:

      These people believe the Jews are the chosen people, chosen to die so Jesus can return. They are just as dangerous as Al Qaeda because they sponsor financially the continued imprisonment of the Palestinian people on their own land.

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • jubal:

      100% correct! Glad you posted this, many more people need to be aware of this! Unfortunately the US military has also been deeply infiltrated up to the highest levels by the lunatic-fundie type christians, makes for a very dangerous situation.

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • artemis6:

      And they will never admit that their mindset is no different than a suicide bomber. These dominionist theocrats are just as extreme, just as hateful and just as brainwashed as any extremist. So yes, they need to not only be occupied but ousted.

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • JanforGore:

      Frankly , zealots are the scariest thing on this Earth , for there is nothing they will not stoop to , then sleep well that night . I wish to god there was a way to #1 clearly identify them #2 Heal what ever is wrong with their brains ....

    • 5 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • Incredulous
  • lopinjop
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
  • overide
  • Vierotchka
    • +2
      Vierotchka  
    • overide:

      I seem to remember that the plan is to use bunker-buster bombs on Iran's nuclear plants, so the result would be just as lethal and radioactive as dropping nuclear bombs.

    • 5 months ago
  • Dagum
  • MSII
    • +5
      MSII  
    • Dagum:

      ...and a very good general illustration why that military needs CUTS! Military bases all over the planet... any wonder the word imperial comes up so often in discussions about the "somebody" in question. Can't manage to take care of the massively failing infrastructure, and manage to cut heating oil from the elderly, but god forbid anything but -increases- to the precious military-industrial-contractors. Nothing short of disgraceful, and outright obscene.

    • 5 months ago
  • jubal
  • jubal
  • peterochocinco
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • Dagum:

      North Korea has Nuclear weapons , they have FLAUNTED them , yet are UNATTACKED . I do not blame Pakistan how having then either ( and they as UNSTABLE as hell . BUT i bet they feel safer from US . We are creating this politically TOXIC climate . And we could STOP it .

    • 5 months ago
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  
    • artemis6:

      Exactly. From the map You could see why Iran would want a Nuclear weapon. As a deterrent from U.S. invasion which is massing forces on all sides of Iran's borders.

    • 5 months ago
  • csmonut
    • +3
      csmonut  

    • One does not need much history to see what this man says is so true....

      " Interaction with Europe is merely three centuries old…and that interaction has led to death, destruction, mayhem, misery, exploitation, devastation……and now utter decimation stares us in our face."

      Western imperialism will not stop until we are "fighting with sticks and stones".

    • 5 months ago
  • freecrack
  • MSII
    • +2
      MSII  
    • freecrack:

      where exactly are these nuclear weapons, cuz I gotta tell you I've heard the bs about "weapons of mass destruction" before, you know that old adage "fool me once..."?

      Not saying that I know they are or aren't trying to get them, but I want real serious, solid proof, from actual non-partisan international sources not affiliated with the pentagon and it's military-industrial-contractors for instance.

    • 5 months ago
  • maasanova
  • freecrack
    • -1
      freecrack  
    • MSII:

      im sorry, were the 9 nulcear facilities that are all around one another as opposed to dispersed through out the countries population not the perverbial x marks the spot?
      what do you want, street signs leading to the warheads, and daily tours complete with gift shop to buy your commemerative iranian nuclear warhead t-shirt?

      where are our nukes?dont mean we aint got just cuz we get to play slots in vegas as they sit right next door.

      their is an independant source, which is the combined intel from all afencies across the planet including irans.unless you can offer the other needs for the weapons grade materials iran openly and proudly is stocking up on.

      nobody wants war but this isnt a grey area like bush's wmd bullshit.

    • 5 months ago
  • freecrack
    • -2
      freecrack  
    • maasanova:

      you can parse it all you want, and look at what iran is doing as you mark of a check list.but the rules also require concensus which iran has just like north korea ignored.making it not the right of iran to have nukes, but the exact opposite according to all the standards.not just the ones they pick and choose to value

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
    • +2
      MSII  
    • freecrack:

      Where's the sources for this? I don't hear any of this said by any legitimate news agency. Show me links to something from Reuters, or BBC, CNN, etc. I won't be taken in by the same types got us into the whole mad war with Iraq.

    • 5 months ago
  • freecrack
    • -2
      freecrack  
    • MSII:

      you dont recall iran stating what it was doing?
      you dont recall us,the french,and the brits calling out iran after exposing thier other 6 facilities they claimed previously didnt exist?
      the bbc has reported on this extensively and as a result npr has been talking about how much yellow cake iran has been aquiring for a while now.

      i dont need to provide you with links.anything i provide you would still be me telling you.look for yourself if you want to know.

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
  • freecrack
    • -1
      freecrack  
    • MSII:

      i am as right wing as chuck norris is liberal.
      by all means slectively ignore valid info based on an assumption rather than following through on your own.
      wait till the huffington post (which isnt biased at all) or what ever palatable source for you reports on irans nukes.probably after they have used them to some horrific detriment, cuz it wouldnt be like left wing media would ignore an enemy of israel getting nukes, just as right wing media over hypes it.

      dont look for the rational center.just wait till the propaganda you like states this for ya.

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • freecrack:

      I have no interest in seeing another war dredged up to appease Israel's right-winger fanatics and their supporters. All legitimate sources i see say Iran is years from a weapon at best. I see no reason to drum up yet another mad war to make some fanatics happy and make yet more money for the military-indusrial-contractor merchants-of-death. You're a waste of time.

    • 5 months ago
  • freecrack
    • -1
      freecrack  
    • MSII:

      you are right, lets just do nothing.
      i mean what could go wrong when a regime lacks the ability to create nukes safely?
      im sure iran wont export nuclear weapons as it does all its other weapons to terrorist groups.
      no problems could possibly arise from a regime on the verge of being ousted creating nuclear weapons that once ousted could end up in anyones hands.
      nothing like the fun of another arms race in the middle east.

      lets just ignore all these realities as to not seem like we are serving israel's interest when israel;s interests are the sane as the rest of the world.

      better to have nuclear proliferation that to start an actual war.cuz random terrorist killings are so much better than a defined war.

      not to mention it isnt even a matter of war.just as it wasnt when israel took out iraqs nukes, and syrias nukes.

    • 5 months ago
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • freecrack:

      You don't seem to be preaching about Pakistan who -HAS- nukes NOW and is HIGHLY "unstable", wheres your preaching about a far more imminent danger in that region? Wait are you one of those Israelis college kids who's getting paid by the regime for pushing the agenda? Maybe that's it! That would explain things...

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
  • freecrack
    • -1
      freecrack  
    • MSII:

      the differences between the two are massive, but if nothing else pakistan is the cuationary tale showing us exactly what happens if iran gets nukes.

      yes, im part of a grand conspiracy cuz i dont think like you as anyone who doesnt think like you must be, as your assumptions are one in the same as facts.

    • 5 months ago
  • freecrack
    • -1
      freecrack  
    • artemis6:

      i dont understand this whole invading thing.this is not a matter of invading.surgical military strikes is not invading.and we should have attacked north korea, and didnt.we should have prevented pakistan from having nukes, but instead are on the hook for billions to keep them in safe hands.

      when we should move we dont, and when we shouldnt we do.

    • 5 months ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Incredulous
  • jubal
    • +2
      jubal  
    • Vierotchka:

      The US has been spending tons of money on Israel to keep them from nuking Iran. It will be Israel who drags the US kicking and screaming into nuclear holocaust.

    • 5 months ago
  • artemis6
  • KB723
more from Community:
from the community

top videos