The Truth About Ron Paul

One man's Truth is another's Belly Laugh.

That's nice....

I happen to be a fan of the likes of Tolstoy, Epicurus, Gandhi and a few other figures who rejected the mainstream assertion of how to live life. Totally anti-consumerist society, anti basing happiness on wealth and possessions, anti-industrialization.....

Simply put, rather think the whole world is a steaming pile of shit buried under several other steaming piles of shit, and is liable to spontaneously combust in the near future at this rate.

But there is some truth in the rhetoric about the banking institutions, there is some truth that the Rothchilds have gone as far as to offer support to Nazi Germany as a way of hedging bets. There certainly were large investments made by individuals and families as the "seed capital" for our federal reserve bank.... And the federal reserve isn't an extension of the government itself.

That is the argument, the financial sector controls and manipulates the governments around the world, and their absolute bottom line is money. They fund wars and genocides, if the policies of a government don't suit their wills, they've been historically known to create problems for whomever; nation, organization, and potentially individuals who challenge their global monetary domination (don't care to searching through to the legitimate sources for my argument, but they can be found)...

So getting rid of the federal reserve, and giving control of our financial system to a responsible government of, for, and by the people is a good thing, and only Paul supports this notion.

Is Paul a saint no, are all of his policies the best..... Arguable, but there are certain things he WILL do that nobody else will. Do you really think direct democracy or peaceful anarchism will just bloom and be accepted overnight? I don't, anyone in their right mind doesn't.

You've got to appreciate that while what you're looking for is maybe the best thing, Anarchism, people to have rights over their own selves in a responsible manner. Not be dictated to, and not have a dictatorial government is all well and good. Still we have years of tradition, and extremely wealthy interests that will fight tooth and nail from keeping that from happening.

Paul is a capitalist.... He might have some unseen financial interests in winning. But certainly the; military industrial complex, the pharmaceutical lobby, the prison industrial complex, a myriad of special interests have allot riding on him losing as well. And probably way more corruption and authoritarianism if he looses...

His policies, as of yet, will be the most effective at taking out things even many Anarchists don't like.

You can nit-pick him about the "abortion issue" which is an issues he says "the government has no place in"....

You can nit-pick him about the "civil rights act" comments... When most white people I know would gladly leave a neighbourhood or establishment, if it was suggested to them to do so simply because they weren't the area specific predominant race.

You can nit-pick him about the "gay marriage" issue another thing he said "the government has no place in"

You can nit-pick him about the him being a Christian or just on the issue of religion... But then go ahead and hold the religion issue against; Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Gandhi, The Dali Lama, or any number of odd-ball "radicals" that happen to believe in a "God" that doesn't force his will on others....

I mean whatever, if you want freedom back... It's not coming overnight, we're not magically waking up tomorrow in a free country, but Paul puts us allot closer to the stated goal of personal freedom....

That's why even Anarchist often support him, he's a step in the right direction....

And all this non-political ideology under the guise of Anarchism, is about stupid because it's chosen ignorance...

"Turn on to politics, or politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader..