Community | January 13, 2012 | 78 comments

Renewables Now Surpass Nuclear Power in the U.S.

Image
attilatheblond
About time. Think how much better renewables would be doing, and the jobs created, if we gave the technologies the same support we have poured into oil, gas, coal....
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    Renewable Energy
  3.     
    |

78 comments // Renewables Now Surpass Nuclear Power in the U.S.

  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • Thanks for all the responses. Had internet problems over weekend and was not able to get online. Will enjoy reading everything you all posted. And probably snicker over any predictable pro-nuke/anti green comments this kind of news usually garners.

    • 4 months ago
  • ecoalex
    • +2
      ecoalex  
    • Earl Butz said organic farming could not equal conventional farming yields, but now that is not true.When the monied interests battle new technologies ,they show they would rather poison and kill than transition to new cleaner safer technology.Fairfield Ca's Budweiser brewery sports a large wind power turbine showing it took the new Belgian owner to utilize Fairfield's more than ample wind to halp power it's brewery.

    • 4 months ago
  • Not_A_Troll
  • Not_A_Troll
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • Ambill94
  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  
    • Image
    • "A Russian tanker has muscled its way through hundreds of miles of Bering Sea ice several feet thick to deliver fuel to Nome. Now comes the tricky part: getting more than a million gallons of diesel and gasoline to shore through a mile-long hose without a spill."

      http://www.npr.org/2012/01/14/145211681/tricky-transfer-ahead-for-tanker-inching...

      Well, if only they had got themselves a few wind-turbines and solar panels there would have been no need for Russian tankers bringing diesel and gasoline!!! As if!

      Like it or not, there are some things 'renewables' won't be replacing anytime soon.

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
    • -3
      rerushg  
    • IceKat:

      You make a good point, IceKat. Thanks.
      There's no doubt that if you fight Mother Nature, you're in for a struggle. In defense of Nome though, it appears that they do schedule their deliveries to avoid ice but got screwed by storms in November. Must have been extreme weather due to global warming, eh? (just kidding, dude!)
      No one argues that renewables meet all needs but we've got to get seriously going down that road. At the same time we've got to re-evaluate our needs.

    • 4 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • rerushg:

      And just how long should that reevaluation take since the IEA which is usually conservative in their views has stated we only have five years before a drastic tipping point occurs? And how nice is it to sit and talk to people who have done nothing but push the very status quo that has delayed action until we reached this point and who still state we will simply just have to live with fossil fuels even at this point as if their propaganda is credible. They actually now want to drill up in the Arctic where they can't even more oil in extreme conditions. Imagine a spill? I say, BS. We are running out of time before our pushing the envelope combined with peak oil and our addiction to it pushes it to the breaking point and should that occur it won't be pretty... only in the world of the CO2 loving rose colored glass wearers who are so repulsed by vision and progress. It's time for them to go.

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  
    • rerushg:

      "No one argues that renewables meet all needs but we've got to get seriously going down that road. "

      And I totally agree, much to the surprise of some people. I'm all for as much renewable or alternative energy as possible, but only when it becomes viable, truly sustainable and affordable without needing massive government subsidies.

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
    • -1
      rerushg  
    • IceKat:

      I'm glad we agree. It's a start. :)

      The government is us. Subsidies are our money. Massive subsidies to existing major energy players are already in place in the form of outright subsidies, accounting practices favorable to their interests, direct consumer taxation, and public absorption of enormous externalities essential to their operation, including outight war (Iraq), diplomatic efforts to grease-the-skids for them or clean up their economic or human-rights messes afterwards, military protection for their operations, clean-up of their domestic messes or economic losses resulting from their failures, and massive bureaucracies necessary to oversee industries that have no intention of being environmentally or humanly responsible. The list goes on. Subsidies to promote renewables would likely force the reduction in some or all of these existing subsidies. Works for me.
      As for becoming viable. It's been viable since at least the 70's. Only will, and public education is necessary. The wrongheadedness that allows you to suggest they are not viable is our insistence that renewable resources must be harvested by conventional, massively capitalized operations. Renewables in one form or another are available virtually everywhere. We centralize when common sense dictates decentralization. We sacrifice inalienable rights ostensibly because of the need to protect centralized infrastructure when decentralization inherently solves the problem. No brainer.
      In 1942 we initiated the manhattan Project with little more than an mathematical equation. In 1945 we wiped out two Japanese cities with the A-bomb. Only three years. Ahhh, but that was a weapon.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • IceKat:

      The same tanker could have hauled renewable technologies and not faced the same logistical nightmare and, perhaps, eliminated the need for future similarly difficult trips.

    • 4 months ago
  • Swisher
  • Vierotchka
  • rerushg
    • 0
      rerushg  
    • Swisher:

      Thanks for the post, swisher. Very valid. Thanks.
      Thorium tech is something most folks have never even heard of. We tech types who were active in the no-nukes movement of the 70's were aware of it but our position was to avoid nuclear altogether. I think history bears out the appropriateness of that position. In a perfect world Thorium may have been pursued anyway but that world was consumed with nuclear weapons production for the Cold War. Uranium based tech is way more appropriate for that.
      It's interesting that this isn't an issue that comes up with the Iran controversy. Iran could, of course, proceed with Thorium technology and arguably avoid Panetta's "red line....nuclear capability". But the issue is not raised. Perhaps because he wants the confrontation. Perhaps because if we made that point we'd have to publicly discuss why WE didn't go there 40 years ago.

    • 4 months ago
  • Swisher
    • 0
      Swisher  
    • Vierotchka:

      Just trying to keep it real. Look at a country like Japan. They've just decided that Nuclear plants will be closed after 40 years of use. That's a good thing, I believe, but what then? You could argue that an intensive solar/wind program could be implemented, but the problem with those renewables is that they require back-up power of nearly equal magnitude (life doesn't stop when the wind stops). The alternative? Oil and/or gas, which they're turning to now at great expense, or they could look at a safer nuclear alternative. I'm all for wind/solar, but they alone will not solve our energy needs, at least for the foreseeable future.

    • 4 months ago
  • Swisher
  • rerushg
    • 0
      rerushg  
    • Swisher:

      Well, you know, we've never had a problem with creativity. Our problem has always been intelligently managing what we create.
      And, like maybe Iran and any number of other issues, becoming politically trapped in our own BS.

    • 4 months ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Swisher:

      A combination of geothermal (heat pumps where it is safe and individual heat pumps for houses), hydroelectric, wind, solar, and for countries which have a coastline by a sea or ocean there is waves, currents and tides that can be exploited for energy. Basically, individual homes and residential buildings can be largely self-sufficient using this combination. What is lacking is the political will.

    • 4 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • Swisher:

      Zero emissions? Ah, no, just not emissions every day. When there ARE emissions (and there have been many in many places) they are doozies and tend to be rather dangerous to life.

      Nuke is not what it was promised to be. And it has been heavily subsidized for my whole lifetime. Imagine how much safer and further along toward better off we would be if that $$ had gone to R&D for really safe and renewable.

      The status quo has to go.

    • 4 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • Vierotchka:

      Each household could be self sufficient. But the giant corporations do not want that to ever happen, whether we are talking power or foods. The global corps. want us all to remain junkies so the guys at the top of the global corps can continue to rule the world.

      There will be no real freedom until we have some reasonable levels of self sufficiency, both as a nation re energy, and as a people re individuals. It is no surprise that corporate lobbyists are putting more and more pressure on lawmakers to put more and more pressure on independent food producers.

    • 4 months ago
  • Swisher
  • CarlosBobthe3rd
    • +1
      CarlosBobthe3rd  
    • This is good but we are still way behind other countries. I just read an article the other day that said Germany installed more Solar in the 4th quarter of 2011 than the U.S. did for the entire year.

    • 4 months ago
  • oldbanjo
  • JanforGore
    • +8
      JanforGore  
    • Now if we could only get the renewable market out of the hands of the DOWS and BPS that control everything that is killing us... Personally, I think this is being done to keep fossil fuels in the mix. The same companies polluting and toxifying our planet Greenwash this to take over the market to prevent it from really taking off as it must now and to hoard the profits. It is good that renewables have taken over nuclear, but nuclear was mostly in the dustbin here already. I hope to see parity with fossil fuels and even surpassing them within the next couple years. Just wonder though how long that will really take now with these same companies controlling renewables and demonizing companies that are independent of the status quo to control it all. This needs to be a real peoples' movement, not the same 1% polluters we need to break away from controlling it all because they are hindering us from going to where we need to be quickly.

    • 4 months ago
  • ampersand
    • +6
      ampersand  
    • JanforGore:

      Right to core of truth, Jan. Yesterday I was checking on the cost of adding a simple solar water collector to heat a stand-alone 200 gal. tub. I got a quote of $12,000.
      (And this as from a very helpful fellow in the nearest city to me.)
      This is the same type and size of collector I used to build in college for less than $200.
      Ahem. Something is very wrong with this picture.

    • 4 months ago
  • oldbanjo
  • rerushg
  • rerushg
  • ampersand
    • +1
      ampersand  
    • oldbanjo:

      Heating a spa tub to 104 degrees shouldn't be expensive at all, that's exactly my point.
      Even given a a couple of mark-ups from factory to sales to consumer with some transportation costs it's hard for me to see how a generic solar hot water heater should cost more than $1000.
      They were making bread-box solar collectors (in a local utility even) in San Diego in the 1930's that would be perfectly sufficient for this.
      I've never been a tourist to Israel but I understand this type of simple collector is on every domestic roof there.
      Perhaps we in the US have fallen so far from hands-on production we've become penned geese in a cage, suitable only for use as incubators for our prized diseased livers.
      In any case, I'll find the time to build my own or run a copper line from on on-line gas heater instead.

    • 4 months ago
  • ampersand
    • +1
      ampersand  
    • rerushg:

      Just another hippie in a local company selling stuff from the new major marketeers of solar that Jan mentioned.
      There is an opportunity here if one had the energy and tenacity to tackle it.
      I myself, (like many of us I expect) am far too comfortable to spend my precious time trying to right the wrongs of the market and provide energy solutions for my fellow man.
      I can and will do it for myself and my family but it does irk one to see such distortions.

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • ampersand:

      I understand completely.
      It sounds like a good home project if you have the determination for it. There's lots of stuff online about that sort of thing built from purchased components, converted standard stuff, or scrounged stuff. The key is to spend time on the front end understanding exactly what you're trying to do and what is possible in your location. Then work backwards.

    • 4 months ago
  • oldbanjo
    • 0
      oldbanjo  
    • ampersand:

      I'm trying to get some info for you, when I get a call I'll let you know where to get the solar water heater cheap. I was asked to build one for someone and then they found a company that is reasonable. They are in use in many Countries and should be available at a reasonable price. All houses in Israel must have solar water heaters.

    • 4 months ago
  • oldbanjo
  • oldbanjo
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • oldbanjo:

      Thanks, Oldbanjo. I've been reading through the firstsolarproducts website and will sort through more of it. It looks promising. One ironic aside I ran into was that firstsolar is by Marshall Pan--a Chinese American in Missouri who has links to China where they actually do produce affordable solar panels. He noted there was nothing being done here in the US about that on an affordable level (just Jan's point earlier) and felt he could put something together.
      Interesting, eh?
      Ah well, let's hear it for the doers.

    • 4 months ago
  • oldbanjo
  • Naumadd
    • +1
      Naumadd  
    • ampersand:

      I'm willing to bet that, if you're unable or unwilling to build it yourself, you can likely hire an enterprising young engineer or a knowledgeable handyman to do it for a fraction of the cost. I find interesting plans for such things online all the time. Most are built by repurposing used materials or with new materials very cheaply. Again, if you can get materials cheaply but need someone to build it, you ought to be able to find help much more cheaply than to have so-called professionals install a prefab system.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • +1
      Naumadd  
    • ampersand:

      I like your solve-my-own problem approach. I quite agree, sometimes seems not enough of that these days. Then again, the internet seems to tell a different story - i.e., Instructables, Maker Faire, etc.

    • 4 months ago
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • Naumadd:

      You know, the search for competent tradesman has been the constant biggest problem I've had in the past ten years.
      I've built or supervised every system we've put in so far on my fully sustainable off-grid home. I am a sustainable architect and am familiar with all of these systems.
      I live several hours away from any urban center. In my experience, finding a reliable professional or skilled worker in any field here is the rarest of finds. In a decade I've found maybe two or three.
      It's not really a matter of cost, but availability. My most reliable, competent, and honest workers have been one family of Mexicans who drive a fair distance to work here and do the work admirably and well. (Naturalized, not illegal immigrants, please note.)
      In my area of California the local product has demonstrated over and over again with painfully and costly consistency to be stoned, ignorant of the basic principles of their purported trade, lazy, and comically dishonest.
      I can well get how our culture breeds despair and a self-destructive selfishness.
      Maybe this is what happens when irresponsibility and half-assed capitalism collide.
      In any case, I will of course also construct this system as I've done the others.
      It just adds to the sadness of the situation that with huge and critical need for this type of development in America almost no Americans have the will or the skill to tackle it.
      At best there are a few who sit in idly in a store and market a packaged product produced by BP and actually know nothing about the actual functions of the system or how it goes together.
      You can talk to anyone in the last two generations and they can demonstrated amazing knowledge of movies and film stars but can't actually do much of anything.
      I'm not blameless in this. I accepted being shunted into Latin class rather than shop class in high school, being inculcated with the same silly prejudice that deprecated hands-on work in favor of manipulating symbols and language.
      I've had to learn everything else since.
      When someone talks about the fall of empires understand that it begins in every household.
      If we've produced two generations of consumers and mandarins there isn't going to be much to build with in the third generation.

    • 4 months ago
  • ampersand
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • thedirtman
    • +7
      thedirtman  
    • The fastest way to get the economy back on its feet, secure global assets, and secure environmental interests is through the development of sustainable clean energy. Nothing is more fundamentally important to a robust economy than plentiful energy on both short-term and the long-term.

    • 4 months ago
  • circlesquared
    • +4
      circlesquared  
    • a step in the right direction, but these massive wind and solar farms are still controlled and owned by the few. There is no decentralization or greater freedom for humanity...we have a long way to go and a change in perception that must persist. Occupy the power companies

    • 4 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • circlesquared:

      In Montana, there was a push (and help) from the state for local groups, companies, communities to put up more wind energy producing machines. I live along a state highway, and am happy to report there is a steady stream of the parts to put up the towers during the good weather time of the year.

      We have several colonies of Hutterites in MT. They always run great farms, well maintained, productive. Guess what? Yep some of them have put up LOTS of windmills for producing energy on their lands. I was lucky enough to be traveling down a highway by one such colony when they were just getting the first few towers running, producing energy to heat new hen houses. There were several more towers being constructed.

      The farm/colony is near a river, a rare bit of luck for MT food producers, as most farming is dry land around here, totally reliant on rain and what tiny help pumping ground water might give in some places. This particular colony owns water rights to the nearby river, but their lands are some distance, and elevation, from the river. The wind power they were generating was providing a lot of power for more water pumping. IOW, they now had the power to get and use the water they had rights to! Being remote, the construction of power lines to the colony farms is really expensive. With energy they produce with the help of wind, they do not have to get those expensive transmission lines put in, unless they want to sell their excess power back to the local power companies!

      The day I was lucky enough to be driving by, the young men putting up the towers were giving a tour to the colony elders. It was great to see the enthusiasm of the men, and the smiling and nodding of the elders as they admired the new hen houses that had been added (best damned eggs ever!) and the new fields that could now be irrigated and put into production.

      It takes help and a bit of push from the top. It takes financial incentives, but look at the help the extraction and fossil fuel industries have had for over a hundred years. Look at the taxes they DON'T PAY! Look at the costs the nation has racked up re foreign wars and constant defense/support of regimes which are completely vile to their own people.

      It pisses me off mightily when proponents of the status quo whine that renewable energy is too costly and won't work! Such people are self serving, or they think I can't do math and see out of my own eyes.

      If renewables work in the hinter lands of Montana, with our extreme climate and difficult distances, geology (lots of heat pumps here too, and lots of solar) it will work just about anywhere!

      Did some research on simple to make solar ovens for a project with some kids here. Along with that project, me and the kids found great stuff on solar stills to distill water in places where there is no safe drinking water. Wow! Amazing what can be done with a little odd material and the willingness to just try!

    • 4 months ago
  • Johnny_Los_Angeles
  • kennymotown
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • Truthitswhatsfordinner:

      Thanks for posting that link! It is great, and proves the nay-sayers wrong yet again.

      TIWFD, did you see about the advancements in solar collectors, up to and including a new form of paint that will act as a solar collector technology! So many things, which can, and will, be used together to add up to more energy from the sun, wind, water.

    • 4 months ago
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • sugarmountian
  • oldbanjo
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • sugarmountian:

      Yep. Were it not for the corporate sponsored nay-sayers, and ownership of so many pols, America would be cleaner, better powered and full of people who have had careers making renewable energy the primary source. We would have a second generation of people with jobs doing more and better things.

      The old robber barons' scions are the ones who thwarted progress. The same gang that wants real low taxes for themselves and the burden carried by the masses they have been holding down for their own profits for generations.

    • 4 months ago
  • artemis6
  • CalgarC
  • Anonmaly
    • +6
      Anonmaly  
    • That's good news....

      But um... the war on HEMP still needs to end.... We can get fuel, fiber, plastics..... (the list literally goes for days)... all that from it, but it's still (essentially) illegal.....

    • 4 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Leen61
  • attilatheblond
    • +1
      attilatheblond  
    • Leen61:

      Ain't my story, leen! It's the story of the REAL America, and proof that we can make things better. But thanks. Sorry I was offline and missed the big bump. LOL Just glad there are SOME news facts that give us good news. We sure need them!

    • 4 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • attilatheblond:

      "It's the story of the REAL America, and proof that we can make things better." I know, attila. I was just happy YOU posted it and it got the attention it deserved. :) "Just glad there are SOME news facts that give us good news. We sure need them!" I totally agree!

    • 4 months ago
  • attilatheblond
  • Leen61
  • Leen61
    • +14
      Leen61  
    • Well, this is some good news to start off the year. Seeing that the renewables surpass nuclear power, we should really start investing in them and creating jobs. It would also be great for the environment. A win win situation.

    • 4 months ago
  • KB723
  • Leen61
  • KB723
  • Leen61
  • KB723
  • CalgarC
  • bailey78
  • FreeSpiritMuse
  • Leen61
  • Leen61
  • Leen61
  • CalgarC
  • Leen61
  • bailey78
more from Community:

top videos