What Gingrich’s Open Marriage Debate Hissy Fit Says About GOP Family Values
source: http://tinyurl.com/89o6qoj
-
-
- LOrion
- added this
One can argue that a politician’s private life is and should be private. Normally, I would agree with that sentiment. The problem is this particular politician asserts that the constitution should define marriage as between a man and a woman. Not a man, his mistress and a woman. Moreover, he’s a serial adulterer. It’s as if for all his talk about marriage, Newt’s the kind of guy who recites his vows while having his fingers crossed behind his back. That’s a character issue. If someone has a questionable ability to commit to marriage vows, what does that say about his ability to commit to things like upholding the constitution?
http://tinyurl.com/89o6qoj
http://tinyurl.com/89o6qoj
-
-
Milieu
-
I can see it now:
I do solemnly swear
[ how about that one, Calista?"]
............. that I will faithfully execute the Office of ["That one on the right Calista with the Gabanna Long Sleeve Wool Coat with Shawl...."]
President of the United States, and will[ You like that one behind her better?"]
to the best of my ability, preserve, protect
[ "I'll have the SS check out whether or not we can issue her a White House pass."]
and defend the Constitution of the United States.
- 4 months ago
-
Milieu
-
-
MSII
-
He doesn't really care about the constitution.
- 4 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
LOrion
-
SORRY blank above Image EMBEDDER not working.
- 4 months ago
-
LOrion