Palin: Gingrich will ‘clobber’ Obama

The 'Family Values' they Preach??? =)

Actually, she did try very hard to lose that baby, knowing full well that by flying and travelling extensively for many hours after losing the waters it had a very good chance of resulting in a stillbirth. To her great chagrin, it failed.

No, that is sheer speculation, ugly and mean-spirited. Really repulsive. She actually admitted that she did think about an abortion, but she and her husband decided against it. They decided on the side of life and God.

And Left-wingers HATE her for it.

That is particularly lame.

He sure couldn't beat him at Hoops... =)

Skeletons!!! I want more Skeletons!!! =)

Dont we all, its like watching Satan himself just fail over and over and over again. Everyone secretly wants Gingrich to win purely for entertainment purposes. As long as he doesn't get elected, now that would be embarrassing for us as a nation.

Not to mention his 'Bible Thumping Party' =)

I would call it "Bible Humping Party"...

And for Clubbing Halibuts... =)

If she wanted to be President she'd run. I think she likes being rich and has decided that is better than being President.

Palin has obviously decided that she can help more in her present capacity. In addition, she has plenty of time. She can go for the presidency in 2020, after Romney or Gingrich have completed their 8 years.

Hey Cool, Thanks for the link... =)

You're welcome, this is all interesting in small doses otherwise I think you could possibly OD on this madness.

Heh, I already have... =)

Wow, That would be Crazy.... =)

That's a New Breed I take it??? =)

LOL!!! Seems like Yesterday... =)

Now that you mention it, it does indeed... Thanks... =)

Cool, I am a bit confused, but still Cool... =)

zero was a japanese plane...used in kamakhazi attacks...when the zero show up,most of the regulars get a minus...so i feel obligated to 'plus'

Thanks budsnews for the clarification, Yes I know what a 'Zero' is... =)

She used to be.... =(

"Curses FOILED* again"

*In fiction, a foil is a character who contrasts with another character (usually the antagonist) in order to highlight particular qualities of the other character.[1][2] A foil's complementary role may be emphasized by physical characteristics. A foil usually differs drastically. For example in Cervantes' Don Quixote, the dreamy and impractical Quixote is thin in contrast to his companion, the realistic and practical Sancho Panza, who is fat. Another popular fictional character, Sherlock Holmes, is tall and lean; his right-hand man Doctor Watson, meanwhile, is often described as "middle-sized, strongly built. Sydney Carton and Charles Darnay from A Tale of Two Cities are also considered classic foils, though ironically they look exactly alike. " The "straight man" in a comedy duo is a comic foil. While the straight man portrays a reasonable and serious character, the other portrays a funny, dumb, or simply unorthodox one.

Have you considered script writing for the WWE? I think you have talent.

I started to read your post but stopped. I do not respond to "cut and pastes."

What were you trying to say?

I know you don't read cuts and pastes. I did it to "antagonize" you.

So, you did not have anything to say?

I ain't surprised.

Cognitive dissonance at its best!

Coincidence. There is something, but most people are not open-minded to understand. But it is not important.

Interesting that you went to so much trouble, however. I am flattered.

Trying to sound ed-you-kate-ed?

No, I don't need to try to sound something that I am. You, on the other hand...

Rest assured, I am bereft of both. Nice photo of you, cute!

Well, your posts attest to the opposite, of course.

They only appear to do so in inferior minds.

nope really clear

Wait wait wait... did he seriously just accuse someone else of pretention and pomposity? He is addicted to his role as the pot confronting a kettle.

Thank you so much for proving my point! LOL!

That is sicking that this dumb ass got rich due to a bunch of ignorant people. The only reason she talks good of Newt is that he said that she would be part of his adminstration if he gets elected. She was bought out by the Koch brothers and did in the original Tea Party.

So, Palin will be part of Newt's administration?

Gee. A couple of months ago, everyone was saying that Palin was simply trying to sell books.

It is amazing how you Lefties can not only read minds, but are privy to this inside information.

Please tell me about the mind-reading courses you took. I would like to sign up. Thanks.

Newt said It himself. put on you hearing aid and listen to the news and you will know what they have said.

Thanks. I did not know.

Your welcome.

Thanks again. That is very clear. It sounds like an "unofficial" role, but who knows?

I wonder about Herman Cain? As soon as I saw his endorsement, that ran through my mind. Do you know anything about that?

They will say anything to get a few more votes, I have heard nothing new about Cain. The Republicans are on a sinking ship and the more ideas they have the worst it will be for them. People just won't vote.

The abstainers will be those who would ordinarily vote for Obama. The Democrats are already desperate to get people out to vote by any means. They are now fighting the just laws requiring IDs to vote for example. The Democrats are actually planning to get buses to offer rides and "snacks" to get people - people who otherwise would not consider voting - to the polls, bribing them on the way.

The Republicans are thrashing it out, getting stronger with each state. Obama has no chance, of course, and we will take the Senate and usher in decades of Republican ascendency!

You must watch Fox News.

Sorry, but I do not get American television in my house.

I see you spout the Leftist party line. Whenever someone does not align with their ideology, they claim that the person has been influenced by Fox News.

Therefore, it is obvious that it is YOU who is parroting what you have been told. Is it MSNBC or the Huffy Post this time? Or one of those anti-capitalist Liberal comedians I see you Left-wingers quoting and praising so much?

Things will improve when Obama wins and the rich people that have been put in Congress have been voted out.

Obama will be voted out, and the Republicans will take the Senate. 2013 will usher in an era of Republican ascendency for decades. The Left-wingism is over.

If that happens there will be a war.

Thomas Sowell predicted that the Left with start rioting. But there will not be any war, of course. Americans are not like Europeans. We are a moderate people. There are Left-wingers who want, and hope for, violence in the streets and the overthrow of the civilized order, but they are a small, yet loud minority with which Americans will be repulsed if they start their "rebellion."

That's probably right. Sorry for taking so long I didn't see this e mail. Don't like the new e mail coloring, light gray, it's hard to see. A French Dictator said the the reason for religion was to keep the poor from killing the rich. These Republicans are claiming to be Christians, if they are Christians I want no part of it, others may think the same way. The World is changing, so are the people that are getting screwed every day.

Well, virtually all people in high political office claim to be church goers. All Christian. Clinton said he did. Obama used to talk about his church in Chicago and how it was a centerpiece of his adult life.

Some other quotes:

Woodrow Wilson, 1911: “America was born a Christian nation.”

FDR: “(America was) founded on the principles of Christianity.”

In 1954, Chief Justice Earl Warren: “I believe no one can read the history of our country without realizing that the Good Book and the spirit of the Savior have from the beginning been our guiding geniuses.”

Harry Truman: “This is a Christian nation.”

Jimmy Carter: “We have a responsibility to try to shape the government so that it does exemplify the will of God.

And Romney will probably will get the nomination, and look what some Christians have said about his religion: A cult.

I have no problem with his religion, The Christians have killed a lot of people in the name of their religion. You put some interesting quotes in your comments.

It is interesting to note that Americans have virtually never killed people in the name of religion, and it is the country that has the most "believers." I hope you do not refer to the witch trials and such, because they are blow completely out of proportion: It was for a short duration, and few were actually killed.

Crusades. If you weren't a Christian they killed you.

Religion (christian) was used as one of the reasons/excuses for the genocide of the native americans, part of "manifest destiny".

So Who does get to worry???

Hopefully he has to worry about the base he so deliberately screwed over.

Someone said she can even see Russia from her home... Very Mystical... But don't tell anyone..... ;)

I won't

Palin never said that, of course. You are parroting MSNBC distortions and propaganda, it seems.

She said that one can see Russia from Alaska, and that is true.

Hey, I lived there....

Very Cool cherry5000... =)

Same here... =)

Agree! Enough of this brain-dead cretin already.

I think she was reaching out to the Stoners??? =)

The rage against Sarah Palin reveals many things about the Left. They are envious and afraid of her. Palin can gather many supporters and rouse the base. Palin does not mouth morality; she lives it.

Palin is the nightmare of far-left radical females. That is because she is a strong woman, having become governor of a state. Yet, family is so important to her that she gave birth to a child, knowing full well it is retarded; she refused to end its life. And she is beautiful.

You know nothing about women or what you call the Left. The rage against Sarah Palin is in itself a misnomer. There is no rage against Palin...she is not important enough to rage against. Envy and fear is not what her critics feel, more like pity and disgust.

But let's talk about the real issue for a moment, which is the Republican agenda. Somewhere along the line, Republicans got it in their heads that they are the party that represents families, and as such, they elevate women like Sarah Palin, who, in their small minds, stand for family values. But there are lots of families out there that the Republican party refuses to acknowledge, simply because those families do not fit into the narrow definition of family the Republican party espouses, and so, the Republican solution is not only to deny those families any acknowledgment, but to go a step further and deny them person-hood....while at the same time handing the status of person-hood over to corporations.

My definition of a strong woman is not Sarah Palin. Palin is a loud, ignorant and obnoxious woman who is clueless about the privilege that has transported her to a position of power in this nation. My definition of a strong woman is the single mother, living in the ghetto, who raises her children without a husband to support her, who teaches her children right from wrong, in spite of the prevalence of wrong engulfing her world. This is my definition of a strong woman, and I feel nothing for Sarah Palin but contempt and disgust, in spite of the fact that someone else is raising her child as she shills for corporate America...and seriously, do you even understand the definition of the word retarded?

Republicans are morally and ethically bankrupt....having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof. They can win elections, and enact legislation to further privilege their position, but they cannot change the fact that families that do not fit their narrow definition of family will continue to form, flourish and prosper, with or without their blessing.

Yes, Sarah Palin is VERY important. Nation magazine, that #1 magazine of the Left, has had her on its cover many times. Threads on forums are dedicated to her. She is in the news broadcasts of Conservatives and Left-wingers. The Huffington Post writes about her.

Nobody is being denied "person-hood," except unborn babies who are declared "inconvenient."

Palin is feminine and strong. I will tell you something about men. The whacked-out men haters and feminists claim that men are "afraid" of strong women. That is absolutely not true, of course.

The TRUTH is that men are attracted to femininity and not turned off by strength, intelligence and power. If a woman can maintain femininity and really be a woman, those very factors- strength, power, and intelligence - turn ON most men.

And that is what Sarah Palin is! And the Left hates her for it.
You betcha!

Important: Of great significance or value

None of the evidence you just provided bequeaths either significance or value. She is not important.

Wrong again. Personhood is the cultural and legal recognition of the equal and unalienable rights of human beings.

I realize you may have to think about that one for a while.

Seriously....what men are or are not attracted to has no place in a debate over the merits of a political candidate....it is not a beauty pageant, which I am sure Sarah would do just fine in...again.

and the 'really be a woman'....sounds like a perfect match for your 'real American.'

But Palin is important. If she were not, the Left-wingers would not be getting so enraged and hysterical.

Mention the name of "Palin" to a Leftist and watch the fireworks fly. If you are honest, you would acknowledge the obvious. The question is: Why?

Yes, personhood should apply to babies, even before they are born and can vote.